Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Andrew-Peyton funny post-game cartoon


NWGirl227

Recommended Posts

Guest TeamLoloJones

That picture is inaccurate, Luck doesn't gloat, and Peyton is in the film room right now not feeling sorry for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

My sentiments exactly ruksak. A dunce cap on Peyton Manning is so disrespectful. The student schooled the master? Please...Indy only won by 6 points not 25 okay. Let's not get carried away here. Thank you. 

Yep. It was about as finny as a rubber critch.

Link to comment

insulting

 

That picture is inaccurate, Luck doesn't gloat, and Peyton is in the film room right now not feeling sorry for himself.

 

My sentiments exactly ruksak. A dunce cap on Peyton Manning is so disrespectful. The student schooled the master? Please...Indy only won by 6 points not 25 okay. Let's not get carried away here. Thank you. 

She's a Stanford student. Perhaps not all that concerned with what's insulting to Peyton. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

or spelling,i didn't find it that finny.

At 1st, I thought that since Andrew Luck spend his formative in Germany, it might have been an official translation, but no witzig means funny in German. 

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

You mean ribber

Dangit......I'm slipping. 

 

Good catch. Back to humor school with me. ......I mean himor school, sorry. Himor school. With an "I" where the "U" should be. 

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

*spent 

 

if you're gonna be a grammar/spelling nazi, at least spell check your stupid posts..

A Seinfeld Book Nazi reference how quaint...Or should I say Soup Nazi reference is that accurate enough for you? 

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

*spent 

 

if you're gonna be a grammar/spelling nazi, at least spell check your stupid posts..

Actually he wasn't doing anything of the kind, he was just trying to be funny. You on the other hand are being personally insulting.

 

Frankly the comments here are far more amusing than the cartoon. What are you getting your back up about?

 

As someone once said..............

 

jeez, lighten up people..

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

Dangit......I'm slipping. 

 

Good catch. Back to humor school with me. ......I mean himor school, sorry. Himor school. With an "I" where the "U" should be. 

Well if you were going to keep the word rubber as in "Yep. It was about as finny as a rubber critch."  --ruksak

 

You could use an umlaunt or a 2 dots ( ¨ ) used over a vowel, typically written in either German or Hungarian languages, to indicate a different vowel quality. I don't know how to do that on my computer screen text though.

 

Similar to this image below: [Just trying to make Andrew feel reconnected with his European, childhood roots I guess. Just Kidding!] 

 

koestritzer-blech.jpg

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

*spent 

 

if you're gonna be a grammar/spelling nazi, at least spell check your stupid posts..

The last person to question SW1's spelling hasn't been seen for months. He is a silent assassin, often slipping into your home unnoticed and masquerading as a common house cat. Meow. 

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

Actually he wasn't doing anything of the kind, he was just trying to be funny. You on the other hand are being personally insulting.

 

Frankly the comments here are far more amusing than the cartoon. What are you getting your back up about?

 

As someone once said..............

 

i was getting my back up about others getting their backs up about how "insulting", "inaccurate", "disrespectful" this cartoon was.. therefore the "lighten up" comment 

 

but making fun of op's obvious typo (funny - finny), a real pinnacle of amusement..

 

now that i've explained my overreaction, i excuse myself for personal attack on sw1, as he likes to call himself.. 

 

sorry..

Link to comment
Posted · Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument
Hidden by Nadine, October 22, 2013 - spelling argument

To be fair, spelling and grammar do count in Netiquette, and it is advised is to proof read or spell check.  OTOH, smartphones and twitter are eroding some netiquette core values.  I guess that is why it appears that spelling errors where the correct letter is right next to it on the keyboard should get a pass; as this one does (in my book). Any fat fingered folks like me that have tried typing on their virtual keyboard on a tiny phone screen gets this. :)

 

It used to be you wouldn't condemn someone for spell/grammar because the misspelling(s) or word application (IE: the use of you're and your) would already reflect on  the credibility of the poster and not need any additional illumination.  Once again, the limitations of twitter are allowing some to believe that no longer holds, but it does.  But the final thing that is sometimes tough to remember, we're all human and make mistakes and we need to lean toward the forgiveness side.  In the end, it should be the points and ideas being discussed, and not how they were presented. :)

 

 /rant off

Link to comment

My sentiments exactly ruksak. A dunce cap on Peyton Manning is so disrespectful. The student schooled the master? Please...Indy only won by 6 points not 25 okay. Let's not get carried away here. Thank you. 

 

The score doesn't tell the story.

 

If Davis doesn't go out for 1 play DT never scores. If Butler didn;t go out for a while Welker never gets those key big plays.

 

The Broncos were extremely lucky to lose by only 6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The score doesn't tell the story.

If Davis doesn't go out for 1 play DT never scores. If Butler didn;t go out for a while Welker never gets those key big plays.

The Broncos were extremely lucky to lose by only 6.

True.. and if luck threw a better pass, indy scores, game over, reggie doesn't get hurt :( i just can't get that unfortunate play out of my mind...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The Broncos were extremely lucky to lose by only 6.

We were lucky Hillman fumbled. What was I thinking just before that fumble? "I've seen this movie before."

 

Peyton was going to snap our necks. You know it. I know it. Everyone in that stadium knew it. Fox goofed by putting in a known butterfingered back during a classic Peyton led maelstrom. 

 

We stood tall against a known Super Bowl contender. ....again. But we're lucky that things were taken out of Peyton's hands. We may not be so lucky if we meet them again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't go so far as to say its' disrespectful, especially since, as I understand it, she's a Luck fan, and not a Colts fan (or at least as long as Peyton had been a Colt).  So while you don't have to find it funny, understand, not everyone feels the same way about Peyton as the rest of us.  And besides, it's not like we don't criticize our own players any less than the OPs comic did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We were lucky Hillman fumbled. What was I thinking just before that fumble? "I've seen this movie before."

 

Peyton was going to snap our necks. You know it. I know it. Everyone in that stadium knew it. Fox goofed by putting in a known butterfingered back during a classic Peyton led maelstrom. 

 

We stood tall against a known Super Bowl contender. ....again. But we're lucky that things were taken out of Peyton's hands. We may not be so lucky if we meet them again. 

I had heard that Peyton audibled to the Hillman run.

 

The cartoon was great satire and not disrespectful in the least. I think it pretty much sums up the night in which everyone on the planet thought Manning would school the Colts/Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's very easy to understand why some find this cartoon insulting.

 

First, Luck didn't school Peyton and I think he would be the first to say that.

 

It was a team win.  The Colts beat the Broncos.

 

I'll never understand why some can reduce what I view as the ultimate team sport down to two players who are never on the field at the same time. 

 

And, yes, no one would be offended if this were a depiction of Brady and Manning except for, perhaps, Patriot fans.

 

However, Brady never wore a Colt's uniform. 

 

And, I sure never cried tears of joy when Brady hoisted that Lombardi. 

 

So, for those who loved Peyton and lived through the ups and downs of his career as a Colt; it's very easy to understand those who take offense. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True.. and if luck threw a better pass, indy scores, game over, reggie doesn't get hurt :( i just can't get that unfortunate play out of my mind...

Luck was trying to avoid a sack, can't blame him for the bad throw. He had dlinemen in his face within about 2 seconds of the snap

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peyton has been in the NFL many years and has thus earned great respect. Peyton was Andrew's hero and I am sure he would find that cartoon more than a bit offending.

If that's the case I hope Andrew never ventures out into the real world. There are actually offensive things out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is why I don't care for "all time lists" in any sport.  The players and games have evolved, with rule changes as well.  I prefer to judge a player's "rank" with regard to their time period.  And you are correct, Wilt was completely dominant. 
    • Breaking News per ESPN:   Ravens at Chiefs is the opener on Thursday night (September 5th)
    • In Young's case, he profiled as a Safety when he enrolled at Ohio State and then switched to Linebacker much like the draftee Jaylon Carlies enrolling as a CB then switched to the SS/LB role at Missouri.   Youngs two years as a starter at KU (Compares favorably to Carlies): 25 Games, 101 Tackles, 10.5 for loss, 6 sacks, 2 Ints, 6 PD, 1 FF - converted from S to LB at KU Key Measurables: 6'3" w/33" Arms, 4.56 40-yard dash   Carlies 3 years as a starter as a hybrid SS/LB at Missouri: 38 games, 212 Tackles, 11.5 for loss, 3 sacks, 9 Ints, 9 PD, 3 FF, 1 FR - converted from CB to hybrid SS/LB Key Measurables: 6'3" w/34.25" Arms, 4.50 40-yard dash   Key Measurables in the past for successful Colts Linebackers: Leonard: 6'2" w/34.375 Arms, 40-yard dash skewed due to injury but still ran a 4.70 (we know it was likely closer to 4.5) Okereke: 6'1" w/34.5" Arms, 4.58 40-yard dash Speed: 6'4" w/33.25 Arms, 4.60 40-yard dash   In comparison to LB's we let walk or cut due to low production: Anthony Walker: 6'1" w/30.375" Arms, 4.65 40-yard dash (decent stats) Matthew Adams: 6'0" w/31.25" Arms, 4.63 40-yard dash - pretty much drafted as a Special teamer only Jordan Glasgow: 6'0" w/30.625" Arms, Only drafted for special teams play   The one true outlier (as he said at the 2024 NFL Draft - he shouldn't be standing up there): Zaire Franklin: 6'0" w/31.75" Arms, 4.62 40-yard dash - All heart and soul   The Current crop of Back-up and/or PS linebackers on the roster from 2023: McGrone: 6'1" w/32.125" Arms, Injured so no 40-yard dash time (active roster in 23) Stuard: 6'0" w/30.25 Arms, Injured so no 40-yard dash time (only traded for to play special teams) Ajiake: 6'1" w/31.625 Arms, 4.60 40-yard dash time (PS player in 23) Anderson: 6'3" w/29.25" Arms, 4.53 40-yard dash time (PS player in 23 with 1-2 games as a ST's) Harrison: 6'2" w/33.375" Arms, 4.63 40-yard dash (50/50 player last year as he transitioned to LB on the PS) Olubi: 6'0" w/31.75" Arms, 4.45 40-yard dash (active roster in 23 with a couple starts)   Olubi (good speed) and Harrison (length) are likely keepers which gives Young a clear opportunity to take the 3rd back-up role as a core special teamer and possibly work his way into a 3rd and Passing Distance coverage backer like I envision Carlies being as well. So Speed and Franklin play the running downs and those two come in to play coverage.    Also makes me wonder if MAYBE they give Harrison run at SS/Box Safety and move Blackmon back to FS?    Not forgetting Pennix.........he is a BIG BOY at 6'2" & 234lbs who has lined up at RB, FB, HB, and TE in College and was productive that ran a 4.59 forty - only faster TE we have is Mallory and there is no RB bigger than him, but he is faster than Sermon though and they have eerily similar RAS score measurables except Pennix is WAY bigger, just sayin'. I'm going to say it was his versatility that caused him to go undrafted because he didn't do enough at any one position so evaluators had a hard time determining how he could be used!??! But a creative offensive mind like SS can certainly figure out how to use him all over the offense - short yardage back, fullback, HB/TE leaking out into the zones, in-line blocker as a TE. I am interested in seeing what they do with him in open practices and minicamp. Ultimately, he could take one of the back-up roles behind JT and maybe even make someone like Granson expendable (probably not but stranger things have happened)   ****Disclaimer, yes, I know I only focused on the measurements of the player and not what they have done in practice or pre-season games. Given this teams propensity to like certain measurements for certain positions I don't feel like this is a "bad take".......      
    • Has anyone who has been paying attention to Latu or to Gus Bradley learned if Latu will play the LEFT defensive end or the LEO, the RIGHT defensive end?      Has that been confirmed by anyone?!?      Asking for a few thousand friends here…..   Thanks in advance….  
    • Chad Kelly’s only real impact for the Colts was the pre-season, something Sam has been better at since he’s been here.  Even then we saw how over whelmed Sam looked playing in a real game.  The logically conclusion is Kelly would have too.  Don’t fall for the pre-season trap.  The jump from back up to third string pre-season QB to NFL starter in a regular season game is the size of the Grand Canyon.  Let’s not forget Curtis Painter once looked good enough in the pre-season that some fans actually thought he could be developed into Peyton’s replacement and we all saw how that played out.     Rather anyone likes Kelly or not is irrelevant to the fact he’s had a tone of tape out there for NFL teams to see.  We know NFL teams will give just about anyone they think can be a franchise QB a chance to at least look at him.  The fact no NFL teams have come calling for even a tryout since the Colts released him tells you what teams think of him.     Fans can like him all they want that and $20 will get you a “value meal” at McDonalds.  He’s not some superstar who never got his chance, he’s a pre-season darling who isn’t good enough for regular season football.  Those are a dime a dozen in the NFL.  It’s not that people don’t like or aren’t a fan, in fact I’d argue he’d be a major underdog that most people would cheer for, it’s they have seen this before and recognize it for what it is.  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...