Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Reports: Colts eye CB, not Maurice Jones-Drew, in trade


stonehart1234

Recommended Posts

Okay... all the talk is what we could get... but what will we have to give up?

Can we really lose anymore of our beloved Colts.... I am having enough trouble putting the numbers with the names.

from what i have read it involves a high draft pick, but like everyone else i dont know if its us giving up the high draft pick or someone else giving up a high draft pick. there has been talk about possibly freeney being traded so who knows

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dwight Freeney aint going anywhere.

I wouldnt necesarilly say that. freeney is due 14 million this year, if the colts could get something decent for him like a 3rd round pick then they prob will trade him away.its better to trade him and get something for him then not trade him and lose him in FA. IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be ok with a 2nd or 3rd given up for Vontae he would greatly improve the play of the secondary. He can cover and is the type of corner you'd want in run support. he would be better than any corner we could pick up in the draft next yr with a 2nd or 3rd pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WELL FROM WHAT I SAW IT SAID MIKE WALLACE OR MJD OR DAVIS, I LIKE ALL OF THEM BUT I WOULD LOVE FOR US TO GET WALLACE OR MJD

Why would they EVER take on either of those contracts?....We have very servicable backs. Give D Brown a chance (he's earned it), and from what I've seen so far Ballard has A LOT of potential. As for WRs....we are already going to be cutting some pretty good WRs as it is. Why take on that monster contract when we haven't even seen what Avery can do as well as the fact that we can get a speedster in the draft next year for next to nothing. And this doesn't even take into consideration what we would have to give up to get either of these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they EVER take on either of those contracts?....We have very servicable backs. Give D Brown a chance (he's earned it), and from what I've seen so far Ballard has A LOT of potential. As for WRs....we are already going to be cutting some pretty good WRs as it is. Why take on that monster contract when we haven't even seen what Avery can do as well as the fact that we can get a speedster in the draft next year for next to nothing. And this doesn't even take into consideration what we would have to give up to get either of these guys.

Or to the point, why give up a high pick now when we can just sign the guy outright next year for nothing since he's a free agent and the Steelers aren't going to give both him and Brown a big contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's 24 or 25.....

...This would be a trade for the present AND the future....and, afre thuis season...we have cap space to pay him, right/

Just cash and a anything byut a No. 1) draft choice....?? Really? Do it.

..... it would certainly increase our chances of making the playoffs THIS SEASON...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CRHughes,

I have liked your post, but really... we need a CB... they tried to draft 2 this year and was beat out... we know it is our big deficiency... we have tried alot of trials with CB's .. they are not impressed.. even with multiple trades.. I was looking forward to seeing Chism, but he hasn't performed... we have a CB head coach and if he believes we do not have what we need then go get it... I would personally prefer nothing more than a 3rd pick. ... BUT I am 100 % behind the NEW FO & Coaches

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is not what I meant to convey. I rephrased it to clarify what I meant to say
    • The WNBA is loaded with talented deep teams. Literally have played 2 of the best teams in the league(one, twice), in the first 4 games(so 3 out of 4). Not sure about the first team, but she picked up 2nd foul on a pretty bad call early in the game to out her on the bench. * refs, how do you call such a weak call on the main draw in their first game, I'm sure the league gave the refs a little push back afterwards.   It will take time for her to adjust and this team to compete with the top teams, who have built super teams and/ or been together for longer. I think I heard something like the fever had only been together for like 30 days or something?   The WNBA is loaded with talent, definitely one of the hardest leagues to make. 12 teams x 12 players - 144 players        There has been a lot of hate out there, this tweet below sums it up pretty well.     To hear all these current WNBA players trash talking her is crazy.   She has literally energized the market and games are selling out or close to. All that is going to do, is put more money in everyone's pocket. They need to be protecting her out there rather than trying to break her in half with a "who can screen her the hardest challenge".     She needs to cut down on the turnovers, but the Fever looked a lot better last night in the second matchup against that team. Probably should've won it, but they will improve as the season moves along and will take a year or two before they can compete with NY/LV type of teams.
    • He is a pass first QB but they are going to run the RPO and he's going to run ,so brace yourself. 
    • You and I agree. I rephrased my earlier comment to clarify what I was trying to to say. I meant that those supporting Butker are defending his right to freely speak but are not defending the same rights of those that disagree with Butker.
    • Sorry Doug.  I think you lost this argument in a landslide.      Perhaps you’re unaware that the nuns who run the school put out a statement saying they are not happy with what Butker said.  That they expected a speech celebrating these women graduating and going into the world to make it better anyway they want.   So the nuns think you’re wrong.    As for your standard media bashing…. I’ll put it simply.   A dog biting a man is NOT news.   A man biting a dog IS news.  
  • Members

    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cjwhiskers

      cjwhiskers 866

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,492

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsleafs

      coltsleafs 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Gigc

      Gigc 575

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyColtsFan411

      IndyColtsFan411 101

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,387

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 1,374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • bellevuecolt

      bellevuecolt 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...