Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

So, is the Jeff Saturday experiment over yet?


John Hammonds

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

Woods is my least favorite of those guys.  Clunky is a good description, but excessively tall guys can be that way, RAS score aside.  I think there were better all around TEs in the draft but Woods had the best RAS profile and was Ballard's target it sounds like.  Ballard was going to pick him a round higher but opted for Pierce.  I think Pierce can be a good X,,,more physical than Pitt.

yes Pierce is the only keeper so far and Woods is showing that he has a place on this team. Taylor, Pittman and Campbell can and/or cannot be signed as that is fine with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply
28 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Woods is my least favorite of those guys.  Clunky is a good description, but excessively tall guys can be that way, RAS score aside.  I think there were better all around TEs in the draft but Woods had the best RAS profile and was Ballard's target it sounds like.  Ballard was going to pick him a round higher but opted for Pierce.  I think Pierce can be a good X,,,more physical than Pitt.

Kinda what I was thinking with Pierce and a reason why I think we should deal Pittman and save the cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Nickster said:

Kinda what I was thinking with Pierce and a reason why I think we should deal Pittman and save the cap space.

I just dont think Pittman is a #1 receiver. I like him but i wouldnt pay him #1 money. 

Im hoping Saturday is not the coach

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John Hammonds said:

No no no you don’t understand. I have it on good authority this was just an evaluation period. That’s all. Jeff was never trying to win games. The only way he could properly evaluate players is by keeping the same losing scheme and players in place and change nothing (sarcasm fyi).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

Hey Irsay...if Saturday is the Colts coach next season, I'm done...I quit...I'm moving on. So what's it going to be Jim ..Saturday or me? It's up to you. The balls in your court.:rock:

Do we have a door number  3? Say swim suit model? Just asking cause  I think I will take the model over u. Sorry bud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If Irsay had given him a clean slate and hired him after the season he might of had their respect. He could of hired his own coordinators ect. But Irsay made a big blunder.

Think of it this way. If u worked in a business and a promotion came up and that owner 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

If Irsay had given him a clean slate and hired him after the season he might of had their respect. He could of hired his own coordinators ect. But Irsay made a big blunder.

That’s been my biggest complaint. We gained absolutely nothing by firing frank mid season. He needed to go for sure but at the end of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

That’s been my biggest complaint. We gained absolutely nothing by firing frank mid season. He needed to go for sure but at the end of the season.

We actually did gain something as hard as it may seem. We probably get a few more wins which means we miss out on a QB again. So even though we got worse in the end it might work out for the better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

We actually did gain something as hard as it may seem. We probably get a few more wins which means we miss out on a QB again. So even though we got worse in the end it might work out for the better.

It only will if we succeed in getting a good pick and good HC to go with it. Given Irsay’s history as well as Ballard, I’m not terribly confident either will succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

It only will if we succeed in getting a good pick and good HC to go with it. Given Irsay’s history as well as Ballard, I’m not terribly confident either will succeed.

Yeah Irsay's history only has Polian, Dungy, Manning and Luck in it. He also had a long running history of winning a whole bunch of games. 

Your narrative is dead wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

What would you guys think about Jim Caldwell. He might be able to reset the culture in the locker room. 

I like him.  My son actually had a try out with the Detroit Lions and said he was a very good man. Oh but right . He's not a yeller and screamer cause that's what we need lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moosejawcolt said:

I like him.  My son actually had a try out with the Detroit Lions and said he was a very good man. Oh but right . He's not a yeller and screamer cause that's what we need lol.

Now that I think about it he is a little old. He is 67.

 

I want someone like Dan Campbell. Players would run through a brick wall for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Now that I think about it he is a little old. He is 67.

 

I want someone like Dan Campbell. Players would run through a brick wall for him.

Well that's  nice but can get coach?  For some one that talks  about toughness  . That D is an absolute embarrassment 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

Yeah Irsay's history only has Polian, Dungy, Manning and Luck in it. He also had a long running history of winning a whole bunch of games. 

Your narrative is dead wrong. 

Polian was responsible for Manning. Grigson was responsible for Luck. I’ll concede Dungy though that too may have been Polian.

 

Irsay cut Manning when he had two good years left. Irsay hired Grigson, who outside of the aforementioned Luck was terrible. Since parting ways with the Polians, we’ve not had the levels of success we’ve enjoyed previously.
 

And if you wanna give Irsay credit for Dungy, then you have to give him fault for Pagano, Caldwell, Mora, and Frank.

 

And that’s just from the Manning era forward. Shall we look at his football success/failure rate prior to that? Or have I made the point clearly enough?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bluebombers87 said:

Polian was responsible for Manning. Grigson was responsible for Luck. I’ll concede Dungy though that too may have been Polian.

 

Irsay cut Manning when he had two good years left. Irsay hired Grigson, who outside of the aforementioned Luck was terrible. Since parting ways with the Polians, we’ve not had the levels of success we’ve enjoyed previously.
 

And if you wanna give Irsay credit for Dungy, then you have to give him fault for Pagano, Caldwell, Mora, and Frank.

 

And that’s just from the Manning era forward. Shall we look at his football success/failure rate prior to that? Or have I made the point clearly enough?

You are ridiculously negative.  If you dislike him so much why be a fan of his team?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

You are ridiculously negative.  If you dislike him so much why be a fan of his team?

I dislike him when he inserts himself too heavily into football operations. That’s what GMs are for.

 

It’s because I am a fan of this team that I am critical of him. Don’t mistake blind loyalty for a virtue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

I dislike him when he inserts himself too heavily into football operations. That’s what GMs are for.

 

It’s because I am a fan of this team that I am critical of him. Don’t mistake blind loyalty for a virtue.

Virtue? You take yourself and your Fandom way too serious. The NFL is a rich man's game that you, me nor anyone else has any power or control of. Getting bent out of shape over something you have no say so in is a waste of time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

Virtue? You take yourself and your Fandom way too serious. The NFL is a rich man's game that you, me nor anyone else has any power or control of. Getting bent out of shape over something you have no say so in is a waste of time. 

You’re the one getting all heated cuz I disagree with a billionaire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to pray that Dallas makes a good run and the Chargers win a game to take them off the list for Sean Payton.  Then turn around and draft his QB of choice and let them grow.  No doubt that Payton would give that QB a direct line to Brees to pick his brain on running Sean’s offense.  That’s the dream scenario. 
 

The nightmare scenario is Irsay feeling guilty about attaching the moniker of “worst interim coach in football history” to Jeff’s legacy and brings him back so he can try to salvage both of their reputations.  Just give Jeff a front office position and get the right coach in here Mr Irsay.

 

Under the dream scenario, Irsay could quietly say Jeff was brought on to ensure the tank to make sure we got the right QB. Even if it isn’t true and he wanted Jeff to succeed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

To the OP's question. I sure hope so. I am very worried Irsay has lost it lately though and is going to do something brain dead like let Jeff coach next season.

I hope I'm not jinxing this by saying this but I doubt it. Saturday was a PR move. And really Reich had to go, he was terrible. 

 

But clue people, we are not getting Harbaugh or Payton. Time to acknowledge reality. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bluebombers87 said:

Polian was responsible for Manning. Grigson was responsible for Luck. I’ll concede Dungy though that too may have been Polian.

 

Irsay cut Manning when he had two good years left. Irsay hired Grigson, who outside of the aforementioned Luck was terrible. Since parting ways with the Polians, we’ve not had the levels of success we’ve enjoyed previously.
 

And if you wanna give Irsay credit for Dungy, then you have to give him fault for Pagano, Caldwell, Mora, and Frank.

 

And that’s just from the Manning era forward. Shall we look at his football success/failure rate prior to that? Or have I made the point clearly enough?

Spot on. There are a few on here that wear blinders when it comes to discussing Irsay, the dysfunctional owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nesjan3 said:

To the OP's question. I sure hope so. I am very worried Irsay has lost it lately though and is going to do something brain dead like let Jeff coach next season.

Exactly. He's become a loose cannon. I doubt a top notch coach or GM would want to come to Indy because of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Feel the need to clarify something.   The writer of the article, Bob McGinn, is one of the top-10 football writers there is.  (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel) McGinn does NOT have an opinion on Mitchell.  It’s the unnamed scouts who have the negative opinions.  McGinn is quoting them which is his job.  He is supposed to do that.     Ballard even acknowledged that in his own way.  He literally said “put your name on it!”   Well, McGinn’s name IS on it.  it’s his column.   But it’s the scouts who are saying things anonymously.   If there’s an issue, (if) it’s with them, not McGinn.     
    • And when/if a team signs one of those safeties they’ll be made to look like a genius while Ballard is called a fool.    I think what’s more likely is that an injury will inevitably happen and a team will bring in an available free agent. That could be training camp. That could early in the season. You just never know. 
    • But if the Colts sign someone next week or the week after then it really doesn’t matter.    I would’ve preferred we sign some two weeks ago.   Get them familiar with the DC and position coach.   But once we didn’t then it really doesn’t matter when.  It just matters that we do it before camp opens.  At least to me.    And the fact no one else is signing these top FA safeties tells me the market just isn’t there yet.   I’m preaching a healthy dose of patients.  
    • How about getting a proven commodity in the FA market? I know that assumes the player wants to be here, but money talks and the Colts have some. This D needs a solid center fielder. Simmons fits that role perfectly. If he’s gettable, here’s to Ballard pulling the trigger, even if it’s a slight overpay. The team CANNOT leave this crucial position to players who have consistently underperformed in the past (Cross and Thomas). 
    • All - this is the real question.   What do the 32 GMs in the league know that the rest of us (we're on the outside looking in) don't know?   Answer that question and you'll have what you need to analyze the choices made by the leadership of your favorite team.
  • Members

    • jskinnz

      jskinnz 2,680

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • cdgacoltsfan

      cdgacoltsfan 4,356

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,162

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,090

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,408

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,511

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 1,056

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DalTXColtsFan

      DalTXColtsFan 83

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,968

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,804

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...