Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2021 Preseason Game #2: Colts at Vikings, Saturday, Aug. 21st, 8pm ET


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 674
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, PuntersArePeopleToo said:

It is, but i know for like the Colts, it isnt the radio guys who do the preseason games, just the way your guys are talking sounds like how the Colts Radio guys talk, not the the TV guys

 

They are the radio guys. I don't believe they have TV guys, as the channels with the NFL contracts have their own broadcasters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EastStreet said:

Agreed. 

Eason's 2-3. While not Elway, it was his first series.

He didn't force anything either. I'll take it. 

 

I'm not choosing sides about who our backup is going to be.  I'm just looking for some informed comments.  Not having much luck yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wentzszn said:

Receivers and QB not connecting on anything. Still wish we had seen Eason with the starters. Hopefully he looks better the second half.

You likely will next week, maybe for the first quarter or so..... It won't matter, both these guys need to get so much more experience it's not funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nelson56 said:

I'm not choosing sides about who our backup is going to be.  I'm just looking for some informed comments.  Not having much luck yet.

We're all seeing the same things. One is short and can't get the ball down field it seems, and has RedZone issues tonight.  The other came in the last three minutes and threw the ball like it was a radioactive missile..... Not many catchable flamethrowers from him to guys all of ten feet away.... Whataya want?  The D has looked great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nelson56 said:

I'm not choosing sides about who our backup is going to be.  I'm just looking for some informed comments.  Not having much luck yet.

I think both QBs are playing pretty close to what their college game was. SE lacks touch and accuracy, but has decent wheels and looks good most times in the RPO. Eason has pocket presence issues and lacks touch sometimes on short stuff. 

 

I don't think either were helped by the play calling. MN is playing tight, so all the dink and dunk stuff will be tough until we make them defend the entire field. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shafty138 said:

We're all seeing the same things. One is short and can't get the ball down field it seems, and has RedZone issues tonight.  The other came in the last three minutes and threw the ball like it was a radioactive missile..... Not many catchable flamethrowers from him to guys all of ten feet away.... Whataya want?  The D has looked great.

What do I want?  Don't really care.  It's preseason and I prefer running the ball anyway.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shafty138 said:

We're all seeing the same things. One is short and can't get the ball down field it seems, and has RedZone issues tonight.  The other came in the last three minutes and threw the ball like it was a radioactive missile..... Not many catchable flamethrowers from him to guys all of ten feet away.... Whataya want?  The D has looked great.

The ST has played well too

Just now, EastStreet said:

Yes, but didn't turn it over twice either. Neither looks good. But I'm going to pick the guy without 2 INTs almost every time lol.

Comedy Reaction GIF by Jo Koy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, holeymoley99 said:

They want to see if Dulin can do anything on offense as special teams alone doesnt get him a spot this year, hes in a deep hole

It's just the wrong use for Dulin. He needs to get more slot or even Z routes. Having him run X routes is silly IMO. Especially when we are overloaded with Bigs already. Last year they had him at X half the time, and running clearouts/picks the other half. I feel sorry for the dude lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's very telling that nobody actually came out and said that Stroud's published test score was inaccurate. Yes there was pushback about the scores, but they all were very general and non-specific. "I've seen published scores that aren't correct", "Those scores miss a lot of context", etc.    And especially when Stroud himself was asked about those scores. Do you remember what his answer was? He didn't dispute any of it. He just said he's not a test-taker, he's a football player.    I think several big time reporters/analysts reported it. I think I first heard it from Zierlein. But can't find the original. Here's Pelissero reporting on it too: https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-draft-pro-execs-scouts-coaches-rank-and-evaluate-the-qb-class           There have been some suggestions that the Panthers took Bryce Young over Stroud partially because of the S2 test, because they valued it highly.    Yeah, I don't remember if it was reported as players refusing it or their agents not allowing them to take it, but this is what one of the podcasts I listen to reported. Not 100% sure which one it is because I consume a lot of those draft podcasts.    They probably can... not sure if the players would do it. But if the teams knew it in advance they might have better idea of whether development in certain areas is even possible. 
    • I don't think I agree that it's revisionist. Last year, some scores leaked, and then Stroud's scores got aggregated and the story was sensationalized. But all along, there was pushback about the scores -- were they accurate, was there missing context, was there an incomplete leak designed to make people discount Stroud, was someone trying to gain leverage for a trade, etc. There was skepticism from reputable people, and even though it was noted that many teams value the S2 test, I don't think anyone ever expected or predicted that Stroud's draft stock was significantly affected by whatever his score was.    I don't remember reading that he took the test multiple times. That's an interesting variable, if it's true.   There can be value in the test, but like with any other piece of information, how do you apply what's learned to your evaluation process? Like you said, there's a lot of work to figure out how this testing correlates to a player's ability to perform in the NFL, same as with any other datapoint. I don't know if it should be dismissed, but I don't think any team is letting S2 scores rule over their scouting process. Not even for QBs.    I haven't heard that any QBs are refusing to take the test, but I have read that agents are recommending that they don't. I think that's alarmist; Stroud went #2, which is basically what most people expected. Is it established that the scores hurt him? I'd say they did not. But I might not want a player I represent to be subjected to the media/Internet scrutiny, especially since it's clear that players pay attention to what's being said about them, and sometimes react to it.   To the bolded, if a team wants to use S2 results for planning, why can't they draft their QB, and then ask him to take the test? Now there's no pressure, he can test under controlled circumstances, and the team can use the data to help develop their player. 
    • The most important stat is late 20's in defense. Then the eternal test. We can get a sack that puts them in long situations and they quickly pick apart our poor coverage. 
    • To me all this sounds like revisionist history. There were TONS of reports at the time about how much teams valued the S2 test, how some execs were worried about his S2 scores... how he took it MULTIPLE TIMES in attempt to get better score(very far from the assumption that he didn't give full effort).    It's OK if a test doesn't 100% predict performance. It's on those GMs and execs that they put so much weight on it. At the end of the day Stroud is just another datapoint in the dataset of 1000s players that took that test. And the discrepancy between his score and his performance might help further improve the correlation matrix. Maybe the certainty last year wasn't warranted and from now on teams and execs will read more carefully into what that test is saying and what it isn't saying and how much they should value it.    My guess is... the pendulum might swing the other way too much(into completely devaluing the test).    BTW I heard on a podcast that this year's QBs have been refusing to take the test precisely because of how Stroud was treated last year and teams are now * off because that test is not only used for evaluation purposes, but also for planning of future development. 
    • From Albert Breer/SI: https://www.si.com/nfl/2024/02/26/draft-preview-combine-cheat-sheet-questions     A lot of good info in there, but I really noticed that people are stressing how deep they think the draft is at positions that everyone wants the Colts to target. And it makes me think that there will be value on Day 2, at WR and CB especially, and OL. The positions that are probably at more of a premium in the first round will be DT/DE. DT especially lines up with a major roster need for the Colts, and aligns with Ballard's philosophy of building the trenches.   One more snippet:  
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...