Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Why Not Add Revis


MFT5

Recommended Posts

I know we don't have much to give up as far as draft picks are concerned but why not give up any combination of our picks from a 2nd on back.

It's pretty well known that with some restructuring of his contract, Revis' 16m cap hit can go down to 5 and some change.

A player with his impact on defense is important in this day and age not to mention Vontae arguably the better athlete of the two would be learning from Revis and that can only spell Shutdown.

I've seen time and time again draft picks being treated like gold and they great to an extent but never are you gonna find someone the calibur of Revis where we plan on picking if this monster gets built ... What's really to much ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you haven't heard, we re-signed Vonte Davis.     $9.75 Mill per year.

 

And with the signing bonus Revis would want,  even a low salary would still be a big cap hit.    These days you can't afford too much money into your two corners...   or three corners....   or four corners...

 

So,  Revis is now pretty much priced out of our market.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we don't have much to give up as far as draft picks are concerned but why not give up any combination of our picks from a 2nd on back.

It's pretty well known that with some restructuring of his contract, Revis' 16m cap hit can go down to 5 and some change.

A player with his impact on defense is important in this day and age not to mention Vontae arguably the better athlete of the two would be learning from Revis and that can only spell Shutdown.

I've seen time and time again draft picks being treated like gold and they great to an extent but never are you gonna find someone the calibur of Revis where we plan on picking if this monster gets built ... What's really to much ???

he is getting ready to be cut, why trade for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if y'all know but it's to my understanding if you deal for him you can restructure his current contract and the cap hip becomes roughly 5m ... That's my reasoning for wanting to trade for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we hadn't re-signed Vontae it COULD have been something we looked at...but there are teams with more money that would be appealing to him. I still think Cleveland will be where he ends up because of his Jet connections and they have money they seem willing to burn. Now that Vontae is back....Revis isn't coming here...he will still get north of 10 million a year easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if y'all know but it's to my understanding if you deal for him you can restructure his current contract and the cap hip becomes roughly 5m ... That's my reasoning for wanting to trade for him

he won't restructure, he would rather be cut and choose his next team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if y'all know but it's to my understanding if you deal for him you can restructure his current contract and the cap hip becomes roughly 5m ... That's my reasoning for wanting to trade for him

I thought I had read something along those lines, but Revis didn't want to restructure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only does he not want to restructure, he's going to pitch a fit every time he's not the absolute highest paid cornerback in the NFL.

I can understand your disagreeing of the thought of bringing him in but to be that aggressive about it is a little weird but w/e.

You must of vacayed on Revis Island and got sun burned idk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit off the subject, but don't underestimate the effect not having a good pass rush has on our secondary.  If I had a choice between the two, I would take DaMarcus Ware over Revis.  Why?  Because Mathis and Ware and Werner would put some much heat on the QB it would make it much easier for our guys to cover.  On the flipside, you put Revis back there with our current pass rush, good luck!  He won't look good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand your disagreeing of the thought of bringing him in but to be that aggressive about it is a little weird but w/e.

You must of vacayed on Revis Island and got sun burned idk

 

Sorry if that came across as aggressive.  Wasn't meant to be.

 

But to that point, look at his history and it's pretty much true.  Every year there's a good chance he'll hold out if he's not the top paid corner in the league.  The contract he wants is bad enough, but when you take into account that fact that he's just going to demand more money every year...

 

Nah, I'll pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, trade a 2nd round pick today for a player who will be cheaper and cost no picks tomorrow

I said a combination meaning whatever it takes weather that's a 2nd and 7th or 4th and 5th and trading guarantees we get him instead of waiting for him to choose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said a combination meaning whatever it takes weather that's a 2nd and 7th or 4th and 5th and trading guarantees we get him instead of waiting for him to choose

i guess you didn't see the part where he said he isn't willing to restructure. Not only that, the Colts just lockeup Davis. Revis isn't coming to Indy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess you didn't see the part where he said he isn't willing to restructure. Not only that, the Colts just lockeup Davis. Revis isn't coming to Indy

Yeah I never really believed he'd come to Indy but I want to disprove the end all be all that draft picks are gold when good players are always dangled for them ...

... and the thought of a Revis, Davis, Toler, butler CB crew seems badass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guess you didn't see the part where he said he isn't willing to restructure. Not only that, the Colts just lockeup Davis. Revis isn't coming to Indy

 

Well, after tomorrow he won't have a choice. As none of his contract is guaranteed, he'll be a free agent with no income, and no one is going to give him a new contract for $16mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revis tends to demand you re-work his deal every year and is very quick to pull the hold out card and seems to care about how much money Revis can make Revis every year and hey more power to him because teams do it. 

 

At least with Davis you know exactly what you are getting and he already knows your system and that he's not going to come to you in a year and say hey I want to re-work my deal or I'll hold out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revis wants to play for a contender. He hasn't slowed down. Was the better part of Bucs defense, but with changes at the staff the move to cut him makes sense. Their trying to rebuild. Now if target any corner it better be a move to get Stanley Jean Baptist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
    • Do you mean meddling?  Sure, I mean its reported that Arthur Blank screwed his GM by wanting Penix.  Tough break for the new GM, and it makes it harder for Blanc to evaluate him I'd think.  I hope the new guy doesn't get blamed for stuff that was out of his control.
  • Members

    • Breeze

      Breeze 326

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 4,258

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CheezyColt

      CheezyColt 897

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,260

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,760

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Believe blue1306

      Believe blue1306 90

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • teganslaw

      teganslaw 1,125

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DougDew

      DougDew 9,033

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • wig

      wig 259

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 1,374

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...