Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

McGlynn benched and other roster moves [Merge]


Dustin

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd rather seen Satele benched and McGlynn to center. Oh well, at least their trying something different. As long as Satele is playing, not sure it will improve though.

 

McGlynn has a cast on his hand doesnt he? I dont think he can play center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Too bad it took their boss to call them out publicly for them to actually do anything. But yes, I'm excited about this game. Maybe some of the play calling will change a bit as well

Yeah, I think the plays will change too. Pep is in serious trouble. The Colts chances are on the line, along with his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TeamLoloJones

Reed is gone, Rogers is active, McGlynn is benched, and Brown is starting.  I feel like I'm in the twighlight zone.  And I like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reed is gone, Rogers is active, McGlynn is benched, and Brown is starting.  I feel like I'm in the twighlight zone.  And I like it.

regardless if this all works out (I think we get mixed results.....I dont expect nothing great but of course Im hoping Im wrong) Im glad that staff is trying something different because watching Mcglynn on tape you could make a video of what an O Lineman is not supposed to do

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now THIS is what I like to see. Not just this but, benching richardson, playing rogers, changing up playcalling. I finally feel the sense of urgency coming from this coaching staff, which is fantastic. Up until this point, it was all talk of, " we need to execute better". Now the staff has finally realized what we need to do to win. Don't be surprised if satele is pulled next week, or maybe even during today's game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be the shot in the arm we need. I like that we aren't settling. Make it known to anyone that suits up, if you don't produce, you're replaceable.

Accountability has been missing from this team all year. These moves put everyone on notice that you are no longer rewarded a job without the production to justify it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Btw, Rogers reminds me of a young Lance Stevenson. He needs some good mentors and needs to be coached up. As in giving it all every play and not pouting, sulking when a play goes wrong or they go 3 and out

Speaking of Lance, he is playing phenomenal this year.  Pacers up by 10 @ LA, PG and West are doing very well.   Gotta get this win to start out the western conf road trip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of Lance, he is playing phenomenal this year. Pacers up by 10 @ LA, PG and West are doing very well. Gotta get this win to start out the western conf road trip.

Oh snap! Good looking out didn't think game was in till later. Yeah Lance has been a beast. He gets to cute like last game but his pretty damn good. 15-1! Make me feel better about the Colts play but football>basketball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion and Havlicek or Sam Jones would go for 30 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
    • Caitlin Clark 1 Angel Reese 0. Fever beat Sky 71-70. You lose Angel Reese. 
    • I'm all for doubling down and going EDGE in the 1st again. Just got to make sure we get the right one. Depending on where we draft, I'm okay with trading up a couple of picks to snatch the better pass rusher of the bunch. Since there will be a good amount of rushers, I hear, let's go get the better one. I can also see the draft being the opposite as this years. Most teams will go defense now in this draft, and very good offensive players fall. I think we are perfect on offense, that's why I'm okay with trading up to get the guy we need on defense.
    • IMHO , its all about perspective   If you treat Pierce as WR1, you will be disappointed   If you treat Pierce as a solid contributor, you will be pleased   - The man can block, maybe the best blocking WR on this team - The man has speed - The man can rotate in with our other WRs   I do believe that AD Mitchell will take over as a starting outside WR   The reality is, 17 games is a LONG season,    Pittman and AD Mitchell will be "fresher" for the end of the game as they are rotated in and out   The odds say that there will be injuries, and we could see Pierce be a starter on either side   I for one, WANT to keep Pierce thru his rookie deal (We will see after that)      
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...