Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

New WR... per JMV all signs point to DHB


John Dee

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In all honesty, whenever I've seen him play, he reminds me a LOT of Pierre Garçon. There are obvious pros and cons here but this makes logical sense to me.

Even when management changes, teams still will often try and plug players in and re-capitalize on previous successes. Avery last season was a Marvin Harrison 0.5. DHB could be a flash clone of Garçon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that. But you dont let Avery go and pickup Darius Heyward Bey. Its a lateral move at best from what we've seen of the guy so far.

 

 

I get that. But you dont let Avery go and pickup Darius Heyward Bey. Its a lateral move at best from what we've seen of the guy so far.

 

 A big reason our Smurfs Hilton & Avery lead the League in % of catchable balls dropped was, IMO, the little guys developed SHORT ARMS in heavy traffic.

 They both got hammered hard anyway, and I don`t know about you, but I was wondering many times if they were gonna get up.

I will be Super Impressed if Avery plays in 16 games. Its ruff out there. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that was a made up number though lol.

Just was curious if that was real because it would be an impressive statistic to know,

 

 Ya, sorry about that. The 16+ number was from PFF.

I should have used an adjective rather than a number. People complained about the drops every week, and I complained about Andrews accuracy.

IMO it is a much different game having a high percentage of balls thrown to you out in front like Rogers, Brees, and others, rather than Constantly reaching back.

Andrew was interviewed at the Pro-Bowl i recall and said he needed to work on his accuracy. Amen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not exactly a ringing endorsement for signing him IMO.

I'm just saying if he is cheap, it would be a low rish high reward situation. And if his big problem is dropped passes, it wouldn't be much different than a lot of the other receiver around here. It seemed like every receiver on the roster last year was in the top 15 for dropped passes. If its a cheap contract, if he does good then great if he does poorly then cut him in the pre season.

In other words I think the situation depends on the cap number of the contract. But personally I'm looking forward to seeing what Jeremy Kelley can do. It would be awesome to send him and fleener and Allen to the end zone for a jump ball. Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what all the argument about this guy is when we don't even know what we're offering him.  At the right price, almost any player can be a good pickup, much less a former top 10 pick that is tall, has sub 4.3 speed, is still young and from what I understand is a pretty decent person.  Let him get coached up in a stable enviornment.  What's there to lose (again if the price is right)?  You can still draft a WR as well. 

 

Seems like a no brainer to me to at least take a look at him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a real statistic about Luck, or one of those "89% of all statistics are made up on the spot" statistic?

 

I agree with him that Luck threw many of his passes behind receivers or short on the long passes.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm all for it. Sign the guy to a short, cheap contract, draft a WR anyways, and we'll actually have some competition there in training camp and hopefully some depth come the regular season. If he can't cut it, we cut him. If another team wants to pay him like a #2 long term, let them have him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with him that Luck threw many of his passes behind receivers or short on the long passes.....

Well yeah. I'm not arguing he never threw behind or above his receivers. I was just wondering if that statistic was compiled from actual data.

Which OP has clarified it was just a number he was using based on what he saw. Not the product of running numbers. Which there is nothing wrong with I might add.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Again….   McGinn didn’t do the damage to Mitchell.  The scouts did.     And there are columnists like McGinn at every major paper.  Their job is to gather info and report it, whether it’s popular or not.    Let me turn this around.  Hypothetically, a few years from now if Mitchell doesn’t pan out and he’s moody and difficult to deal with and he’s a bust, then the scouts will have been proven correct.  And people here will say McGinn’s column was spot on.   Another person who should’ve handled his business better is Mitchell himself.  He’s been living with this since he was roughly 16.   And scouts said he interviewed badly with them.   Even Mitchell admits it.     I don’t think this is as black and white as it seems to you.      To be clear…. I love Mitchell.  Glad we drafted him.  I’ve said several times that Ballard defending him draft night was smart and scored points with the kid.  Now he comes out and says that exact thing.  He appreciates that Ballard defended him so hard and he wants to pay the Colts and Ballard back by being the best player he can be.   
    • I’d say those teams that lost had worse defenses compared to the winners. That’s not to say that their defenses were bad, they just weren’t as clutch in the big moment.    To me, defense matters a whole lot when you need a stop or a momentum change.    Look at all of the star studded power offense teams of the last decade who were incapable of winning it all. 
    • Oops that’s my mistake. Yeah I completely missed that. My apologies.   But yeah he’s one I would keep an eye on for us next year. Him and Will Johnson. It’s a little early to be talking about what the Colts would do in the draft, but I would put money on this being the year Ballard takes a DB high. I could also see him go D-Line again. I love college football and watch as much of it as I can, but I’ll be paying attention to a lot of the guys you listed at those positions. Last season I watched a lot of the teams that had the elite receivers (Washington, Texas, LSU, FSU, etc…).   I’m also getting ready to fire my draft podcasts I listen to back up and look at summer scouting. I’ll come back for some discussions as I get info as I always enjoy talking prospects with you.
    • The issue some may have is the kind of journalism where Bob McGinn created an article that affected a young man's career based solely upon anonymous sources.   I'm confident you will reply back referring to your experience as a journalist with some version of 'without anonymous sources, there would be no journalism'. I value reading your insight about how sports are covered and I don't disagree that anonymous sources can be important. Its fair for anonymous sources to give background about things they are not comfortable saying out loud.   However, I'll add that perhaps its also fair for Bob McGinn to use his anonymous sources to help him find the story and craft the story, but if nobody will put their name on it then Bob McGinn needs to dig deeper before he launches infotainment into the world. He can't take back the damage he did to AD Mitchell.    
    • So damn classy as always. I still rewatch their pandemic golf game from 2020. They just have awesome chemistry together. Hopefully they can get Tom on the Manningcast again for more hilarity.  
  • Members

    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,518

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,068

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ProblChld32

      ProblChld32 704

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,671

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 274

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,511

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...