-
Recently Browsing 2 members
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
Topics
-
Posts
-
By GoColts8818 · Posted
Shane may not be to blame for the late INT after all. AR checked into that play. -
This game will probably be laughable - all our worst traits will get extra-exposed. Only hope to win is timely turnovers and defense playing lights-out. Defense has been better so the second part is more likely than the first part, but still unrealistic.
-
By ProblChld32 · Posted
In all my years of playing and coaching football a passing play (screens excluded) has never been designed to go directly to one singular player. It’s all based on concepts and what you see on the field. We’ll go with a “flood” concept for example it’s a concept to stretch the defense and make them pick their poison. You usually have 3 receiving threats on one side of the field one vertical route, an out breaking route and a shallower out breaking or flat route underneath that. The play is dialed up to scheme someone open DEPENDING on what the defense is showing or giving you. In most cases that vertical route pulls the safety’s back usually making more room for the out breaking route. Once again it’s all based on what you see the defense giving you. But under no circumstances is a play called and you’re going to throw to one specific player EVERY time (if that is what you’re suggesting). As for going through progressions, AR does that very poorly. I watch the all 22 film each week and he notoriously stares receivers down, which is why he’s thrown the amount of interceptions he has so far this season. -
By GoColts8818 · Posted
That’s my feelings on it. There are lot bigger issues from today and with Richardson in general then this. If people want to blast him for it got for it but I am much more concerned with him going 2-15 in the first half, throwing the INT that decided the game and only completing 33% of his passes for the day than this. -
Richardson was put into the best position of any young player. Great O-line, elite RB, good receiver core, and an offensive minded HC. It’s a better situation than probably Williams, Daniels, Levis, Young, Stroud, Nix, and Maye. Yet all of those QBs have outplayed him except for Young and Levis, and even the gap with those two is relatively small. Thats why I’m not buying these excuses. Playcalling hasn’t been good, but would anyone really rather have Shane Waldron or Brad Idzik? Receivers? Would rather have our group than Every other group except who the Bears have. And we have the best RB out of any of the other QBs mentioned. OL had penalties but would anyone rather have the Bears or Titans O-line? We get it, he’s young and raw, but then that brings us back to the original point; he shouldn’t be playing. None of what is happening is really helping him get better. Also we have completely lowered the bar for bad rookie QB play. This isn’t normal growing pains. This is historically bad QB play.
-
-
Members
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now