Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Conference Championship Games, Jan. 29, 2023, Discussion thread


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

Just now, NFLfan said:

When Cirianni was the OC, was he well thought of by Colts fans? 

We didn’t know what to really think of him since Reich called the plays. We knew Nick at least helped with design, but we didn’t realize how good he was until he left…

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RollerColt said:

We didn’t know what to really think of him since Reich called the plays. We knew Nick at least helped with design, but we didn’t realize how good he was until he left…

 

Just now, Happy2BeHere said:

Yes and most of us wish he was the one calling the plays years and years ago. 

 

He has the look/temperament of a head coach. He has a lot of energy. I like him. He seemed focused on the whole game, not just the offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

Sirianni isn’t calling the plays this year.  Ironic he could delegate the responsibility and Frank couldn’t. 

 

Yes. I think good coaches focus on the whole game. JMO. If I were interviewing potential head coaches, I would want to know if they plan to call plays. If so, I would not want to hire them.

 

I see I have been spelling his name wrong. Thanks!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Shive unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just wanted to post it, because I think it just belongs to this thread...  (wondering nobody did it already)    Anyway.... Goal should always be to compete and at least go to the playoffs. 
    • So we ended up with 3 more shots, that may provide value if they get on the field and perform well. Yeah! Old news.
    • Back to the original post about this, seems like they got something backwards with their Johnson/Hill numbers. Johnson has decimals, Hill has whole numbers. But chart shows Hill will decimals and Johnson with whole numbers.    Johnson - 19 Hill - 6.03     Jimmy Johnson has early 6th round value   + 16.4pts - pick 183-184 range   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Rich Hill has late 5th round value #35 - 170pts   #44 - 135pts #110 - 30pts #158 - 10pts #211 - 3pts   +8pts - pick 167-172   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Inconsequential, but a little flaw in that data entry.   Only thing I don't like about Rich Hill's is the value he places on those top 3 picks, where I think Jimmy Johnson's has the advantage in my eyes.   Although I like the value gained on Rich Hill's better. Lol.
    • In essense we got Julius Brents, Adetomiwa Adebawore, Daniel Scott and Titus Leo for #35... I really believe that you have to have a great reason not to trade back when that's the value you are getting. To a huge degree the draft is a crapshoot and the difference in expected value between 35 and 44 is probably negligible. And for the price you get 3 more shots at players, some of them with really high upside too.    Of course, there might be some exceptions to the rule(QBs as always break that rule... maybe some exceptional talent at another high value position), but in general if you can get that type of a deal, you should almost always do the trade back. And I think this is one area where Ballard has actually been great as a GM. 
    • I will say, me personally though, I find more value than an early 6th(compilation of trades).   We got 4 players for the 1 pick(#35), once the dust settled, and got the guy we would of probably taken at #35 in the first place.   So adding (3) guys for "free" essentially, is a big win.   So I would say I lean a little more towards value charts than trade charts for that reason. Maybe somewhere in the middle, late 3rd early 4th "value", and that's mainly because I think we would of took Brents at #35 either way.   Seems teams are closer to the trade chart when making deals, but claim the value charts after deal, if it shows a big win.    
  • Members

    • Dr. T

      Dr. T 362

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 802

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DZS13

      DZS13 12

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,525

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 7,602

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 6,901

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsGermany

      ColtsGermany 658

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • superrep1967

      superrep1967 858

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • PureLuck

      PureLuck 269

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 89

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...