Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Conference Championship Games, Jan. 29, 2023, Discussion thread


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

All the Eagles have to do now is basically just run the clock out and make no mistakes. Even if they punt for the rest of the game it should be in the bag. 

 

What's the score. I went out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I agree with this. I think they should be able to dress a third QB, punter, kicker without it counting against the 46 guys that can dress.  But those 3 spots can’t play unless there is injury.
 

 

Thanks for that. It should be there. The NFL would be better. Just a better onfield product.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FuedinHatfield said:

Should have been incidental contact.

To me if your back or side is to the kicker after being contested by a blocker, that’s incidental. Hips facing towards the kicker, aiming low, things like that should be reserved for roughing the kicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bluebombers87 said:

To me if your back or side is to the kicker after being contested by a blocker, that’s incidental. Hips facing towards the kicker, aiming low, things like that should be reserved for roughing the kicker.

So you're saying force is one directional?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, teganslaw said:

SF is unraveling. People will blame the referees, but not buying that excuse. Some are just upset that their favored team isn't doing well. 

SF is causing a lot of their problems but to deny that refs haven’t been generous to Philly is a bit naive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, teganslaw said:

SF is unraveling. People will blame the referees, but not buying that excuse. Some are just upset that their favored team isn't doing well. 

I remember the 1995 NFC Championship Game went exactly like this. The Packers were ahead of Dallas 27-24. Dallas dominated us in the 4th quarter and won 38-27. We unraveled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Will colts go to eagles to interview Steichen or you think he comes here?

I don’t know if I want him.  He almost cost them the season when he ran Hurts 20 times and got him injured late in the season. And he hasn’t looked impressive today. Though 49ers defense is legit. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

How did you get that from what I said?

Your saying the blockers body position or intent has nothing  to do with outside force. Regardless of body position I can influence you. Regardless of my hip position I as a defender can influence where you end up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FuedinHatfield said:

Your saying the blockers body position or intent has anything to do with force. Regardless of body position I can influence you. Regardless of my hip position I as a defender can influence where you end up.

You must be fun at parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Shive unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So we ended up with 3 more shots, that may provide value if they get on the field and perform well. Yeah! Old news.
    • Back to the original post about this, seems like they got something backwards with their Johnson/Hill numbers. Johnson has decimals, Hill has whole numbers. But chart shows Hill will decimals and Johnson with whole numbers.    Johnson - 19 Hill - 6.03     Jimmy Johnson has early 6th round value   + 16.4pts - pick 183-184 range   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Rich Hill has late 5th round value #35 - 170pts   #44 - 135pts #110 - 30pts #158 - 10pts #211 - 3pts   +8pts - pick 167-172   https://www.drafttek.com/NFL-Trade-Value-Chart-Rich-Hill.asp?RequestTeam=Ind   Inconsequential, but a little flaw in that data entry.   Only thing I don't like about Rich Hill's is the value he places on those top 3 picks, where I think Jimmy Johnson's has the advantage in my eyes.   Although I like the value gained on Rich Hill's better. Lol.
    • In essense we got Julius Brents, Adetomiwa Adebawore, Daniel Scott and Titus Leo for #35... I really believe that you have to have a great reason not to trade back when that's the value you are getting. To a huge degree the draft is a crapshoot and the difference in expected value between 35 and 44 is probably negligible. And for the price you get 3 more shots at players, some of them with really high upside too.    Of course, there might be some exceptions to the rule(QBs as always break that rule... maybe some exceptional talent at another high value position), but in general if you can get that type of a deal, you should almost always do the trade back. And I think this is one area where Ballard has actually been great as a GM. 
    • I will say, me personally though, I find more value than an early 6th(compilation of trades).   We got 4 players for the 1 pick(#35), once the dust settled, and got the guy we would of probably taken at #35 in the first place.   So adding (3) guys for "free" essentially, is a big win.   So I would say I lean a little more towards value charts than trade charts for that reason. Maybe somewhere in the middle, late 3rd early 4th "value", and that's mainly because I think we would of took Brents at #35 either way.   Seems teams are closer to the trade chart when making deals, but claim the value charts after deal, if it shows a big win.    
    • I see it now. When I first read it, thought you were saying 1st trade down got 6th round value and 2nd trade got 2nd round value.     Then was blinded by just waking up and already looking for a flaw.   Clearly teams aren't using the value charts as you stated in post above.     Thanks for helping me read out the chart. Should just read the picks we kept and sent out. No need to have them cancel each other out.     EDIT: ahh who am I to tell the guy how to do his charts(have to account for the picks). It was my reading comprehension that caused the problem.
  • Members

    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 196

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nickster

      Nickster 3,860

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SaturdayAllDay

      SaturdayAllDay 258

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 7,602

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsfan1965

      coltsfan1965 78

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • J@son

      J@son 1,971

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 50

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pelt

      Pelt 1,016

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • throwing BBZ

      throwing BBZ 3,244

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Mitch Connors

      Mitch Connors 634

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...