Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Conference Championship Games, Jan. 29, 2023, Discussion thread


NFLfan

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, FuedinHatfield said:

I can guarantee he's better than what they have in at this moment.

You can why?  Johnson probably hasn’t taken any 1st team reps since he’s been on the team.  Of course he’s gonna struggle seeing his 1st action in the NFC championship game.  As for Purdy, I think he just rode a wave of good fortune. If he balls out next year, then we’ll know he’s legit.
 

When you deep dive his stats, he didn’t carry the 49ers in any game.  Scheme had guys running wide open.  Running game was dominant. Defense was dominant. He at the most made 2 big time plays a game.  Maybe he plays in the 2nd half to lead the comeback and it’ll be “guaranteed” he’s the man?  We’ll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

I see we have a lot of 49ers fans in the chat. Lol.  Have we forgotten about the punt hitting the wire?  Regardless, we need the Eagles to win so we can interview Ryans tomorrow and get our HC hired sooner rather than later.  

As a Bengals fan I can’t root for San Fran but in a way I’d love to settle the score and beat them for once in a Super Bowl. Eagles fans are just… trash…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

You can why?  Johnson probably hasn’t taken any 1st team reps since he’s been on the team.  Of course he’s gonna struggle seeing his 1st action in the NFC championship game.  As for Purdy, I think he just rode a wave of good fortune. If he balls out next year, then we’ll know he’s legit.
 

When you deep dive his stats, he didn’t carry the 49ers in any game.  Scheme had guys running wide open.  Running game was dominant. Defense was dominant. He at the most made 2 big time plays a game.  Maybe he plays in the 2nd half to lead the comeback and it’ll be “guaranteed” he’s the man?  We’ll see. 

Well two immediate delay of games to start.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Smoke317 said:

You can why?  Johnson probably hasn’t taken any 1st team reps since he’s been on the team.  Of course he’s gonna struggle seeing his 1st action in the NFC championship game.  As for Purdy, I think he just rode a wave of good fortune. If he balls out next year, then we’ll know he’s legit.
 

When you deep dive his stats, he didn’t carry the 49ers in any game.  Scheme had guys running wide open.  Running game was dominant. Defense was dominant. He at the most made 2 big time plays a game.  Maybe he plays in the 2nd half to lead the comeback and it’ll be “guaranteed” he’s the man?  We’ll see. 

Or that play with Kittle wide open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

As a Bengals fan I can’t root for San Fran but in a way I’d love to settle the score and beat them for once in a Super Bowl. Eagles fans are just… trash…

Yeah. You guys do owe them some payback for two of them.  I too hate Eagles fans.  I just like Hurts & Smith. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

Yeah. You guys do owe them some payback for two of them.  I too hate Eagles fans.  I just like Hurts & Smith. 

If the Eagles win, I would be happy for Jalen for sure. He’s such an awesome kid.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RollerColt said:

If the Eagles win, I would be happy for Jalen for sure. He’s such an awesome kid.

He’s really the only reason I’m cheering for them. I also dislike 49ers for passing on Fields. This Shanahan scheme would’ve accelerated his growth and they’d be beating the Eagles today.  Still can’t fathom why they took Lance.  Could’ve stayed pat and took Mac. They’ll rue that draft for a long time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Oh my gosh. 

 

6 minutes ago, bluebombers87 said:

Well this is a plot twist

 

6 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I feel so bad for SF. Eagles are getting a gift.

 

What's going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, FuedinHatfield said:

He made one play. Purdy has been consistent for a good while Jesus. 

 

I guess we’ll have to wait until next year or maybe he’ll work some of that Purdy magic this half?  Regardless, I’m just not sold on Purdy like you are is all.  He has yet to have to put the 49ers on his back and carry the team since he’s been forced into action. Now’s his chance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smoke317 said:

I guess we’ll have to wait until next year or maybe he’ll work some of that Purdy magic this half?  Regardless, I’m just not sold on Purdy like you are is all.  He has yet to have to put the 49ers on his back and carry the team since he’s been forced into action. Now’s his chance. 

I'm not either but he won a playoff game and did what he need to. Not going to crap on the kid. Andrew only made one AFC championship game.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Purdy back in.

Josh Johnson now being evaluated for a concussion. Purdy back in but cmc may have to play QB.

 

Okay, they are in a lot of trouble. They cannot blame the defense for this. The offense has to do its part too. It is a complementary game. All parts have to do its job. The offense has been bad and has given up the ball. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Shive unpinned this topic

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In essense we got Julius Brents, Adetomiwa Adebawore, Daniel Scott and Titus Leo for #35... I really believe that you have to have a great reason not to trade back when that's the value you are getting. To a huge degree the draft is a crapshoot and the difference in expected value between 35 and 44 is probably negligible. And for the price you get 3 more shots at players, some of them with really high upside too.    Of course, there might be some exceptions to the rule(QBs as always break that rule... maybe some exceptional talent at another high value position), but in general if you can get that type of a deal, you should almost always do the trade back. And I think this is one area where Ballard has actually been great as a GM. 
    • I will say, me personally though, I find more value than an early 6th(compilation of trades).   We got 4 players for the 1 pick(#35), once the dust settled, and got the guy we would of probably taken at #35 in the first place.   So adding (3) guys for "free" essentially, is a big win.   So I would say I lean a little more towards value charts than trade charts for that reason. Maybe somewhere in the middle, late 3rd early 4th "value", and that's mainly because I think we would of took Brents at #35 either way.   Seems teams are closer to the trade chart when making deals, but claim the value charts after deal, if it shows a big win.    
    • I see it now. When I first read it, thought you were saying 1st trade down got 6th round value and 2nd trade got 2nd round value.     Then was blinded by just waking up and already looking for a flaw.   Clearly teams aren't using the value charts as you stated in post above.     Thanks for helping me read out the chart. Should just read the picks we kept and sent out. No need to have them cancel each other out.     EDIT: ahh who am I to tell the guy how to do his charts(have to account for the picks). It was my reading comprehension that caused the problem.
    • It is incoming value from one trade... and then it's outgoing value in the next trade. You are not claiming the value of those picks... they cancel out when you put them in the outgoing picks.    35 for 38+141  then 38 for 44+ 110 then 141 for 158 + 211 ...   when you draw the line you get 35 for 44+110+158+211   Using Johnson: 35(550) for 44(460) + 110(74) + 158(28) + 211(7)... or 550 points for 569 points. Net gain of 19 points, which by Johnson's chart is equivalent of late 5th, early 6th round pick...    Using OTC: 35(1128) for 44(1007) + 110(525) + 158(334) + 211(182) or 1128 points for 2048 points. Net gain of 920 points which is by OTC chart is equivalent to the 60th pick... or thereabout(i.e late second... )
    • It is, but it's not.     They are outgoing, you can't claim the value if you don't use  the pick. It got traded again, it is not incoming value   #38 and #141 are not incoming value, because we didn't use the picks.   You can't claim both sets of picks as incoming/outgoing value. Just can't       
  • Members

    • Crush22

      Crush22 465

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 16,146

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsva

      coltsva 2,243

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 14,687

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,231

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 7,602

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 3,338

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,758

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 3,873

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 7,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...