Jump to content
CR91

Antonio Brown is officially on the trade block

Recommended Posts

I'm really tired to people demonizing AB, because prior to Week 17 he was never labeled as a bad teammate or guy in general, and now all of the sudden he's the most cancerous thing on Earth lol...gtfoh, quit buying into the recency-bias fueled mainstream media propaganda. AB works as hard as, if not harder, than any player in the league, and has never been considered a bad teammate until now. You can't just look at it in black and white, because this isn't some mathematical equation where there's just 2+2=4...there are so many variables at play. Ben played a part (imo the biggest part), Tomlin played a part, the organizational hierarchy played a part...basically, it's not all AB. There were extenuating circumstances, and I honestly don't think AB's actions within those circumstances were indicative of who he is, or who he will be with his new team. 

 

On another note, if the price keeps dropping, I think the Colts would be crazy not to send their latter 2nd (or even the earlier one) for AB. It would basically alleviate the need for a WR for the next season or two, allowing that draft capital, or FA resources, to go to more prudent needs. All things out in the open, there's no denying that the Indianapolis Colts offense would be exponentially greater next season with AB lining up opposite his good friend TY Hilton. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

I'm really tired to people demonizing AB, because prior to Week 17 he was never labeled as a bad teammate or guy in general, and now all of the sudden he's the most cancerous thing on Earth lol...gtfoh, quit buying into the recency-bias fueled mainstream media propaganda. AB works as hard as, if not harder, than any player in the league, and has never been considered a bad teammate until now. You can't just look at it in black and white, because this isn't some mathematical equation where there's just 2+2=4...there are so many variables at play. Ben played a part (imo the biggest part), Tomlin played a part, the organizational hierarchy played a part...basically, it's not all AB. There were extenuating circumstances, and I honestly don't think AB's actions within those circumstances were indicative of who he is, or who he will be with his new team. 

 

On another note, if the price keeps dropping, I think the Colts would be crazy not to send their latter 2nd (or even the earlier one) for AB. It would basically alleviate the need for a WR for the next season or two, allowing that draft capital, or FA resources, to go to more prudent needs. All things out in the open, there's no denying that the Indianapolis Colts offense would be exponentially greater next season with AB lining up opposite his good friend TY Hilton. 

I think maybe you should do a little research on ABs team problems before week 17.

If you can't see why people think he is a selfish player who only thinks of himself all you have to do is listen to him talk.

It's self explanatory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

I'm really tired to people demonizing AB, because prior to Week 17 he was never labeled as a bad teammate or guy in general, and now all of the sudden he's the most cancerous thing on Earth lol...gtfoh, quit buying into the recency-bias fueled mainstream media propaganda.

 

Probably because all of ABs antics since he got paid were swept under the rug as long as he produced on the field.

 

Now that he isn't producing on the field for Pittsburgh anymore, I'd expect even more dirty laundry dating back to his big payday to be aired in the near future.

 

If we learned anything from what happened with Bell, it's that Steelers players don't mind putting a teammate on blast when they put themselves above the team.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, CR91 said:

Raiders are the front runners

 

Maybe if it's anything but a 1st-round pick.

 

If they end up giving up one of their 1st round picks for AB, especially if it's the 1st they got from Dallas, that would make no sense to me.

 

They give up 24-yr-old Cooper for a 1st, then turn around and use it on 30-yr-old AB?

 

:scratch:

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Maybe if it's anything but a 1st-round pick.

 

If they end up giving up one of their 1st round picks for AB, especially if it's the 1st they got from Dallas, that would make no sense to me.

 

They give up 24-yr-old Cooper for a 1st, then turn around and use it on 30-yr-old AB?

 

:scratch:

 

At this point, I don't think any team will give up a first.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Lucky Colts Fan said:

 

Probably because all of ABs antics since he got paid were swept under the rug as long as he produced on the field.

 

Now that he isn't producing on the field for Pittsburgh anymore, I'd expect even more dirty laundry dating back to his big payday to be aired in the near future.

 

If we learned anything from what happened with Bell, it's that Steelers players don't mind putting a teammate on blast when they put themselves above the team.

 

21 minutes ago, crazycolt1 said:

I think maybe you should do a little research on ABs team problems before week 17.

If you can't see why people think he is a selfish player who only thinks of himself all you have to do is listen to him talk.

It's self explanatory.

 

Sorry guys, all I hear from everyone not named Ryan Clark is that AB works his as+ off and is normally the hardest working guy on the field, and was never a bad teammate. Ben can't continuously throw the dude under the bus, or the organization allow Ben to get away with murder (or rape), and AB not eventually take action. He's the best player on the team, and therefore the largest personality, and his endorsements reflect that. Just because someone is outspoken, and has a big personality, doesn't make them a diva. I'm almost certain if you remove AB from that ultra cancerous environment, with his work ethic, and put him in a healthy environment, he would benefit the locker room, not take away from it. Either way, you guys are sold that he's the devil, and there's no chance of you changing that perception, so we're gonna have to agree to disagree.  Funny how someone sitting at home on their couch can know so intrinsically that another person, whom they've never met, is a bad dude. You're just basing it off of what the talking heads are feeding you...keep in mind that those people's jobs are lost/made on ratings, so they have a tendency to stir the pot and elaborate. I listen to NFL players, and the overwhelming majority tend to think teams are crazy for not trading for AB.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

I dont think he is the locker room presence Ballard is looking for

  

No doubt is a big issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

Funny how someone sitting at home on their couch can know so intrinsically that another person, whom they've never met, is a bad dude.

 

Kinda like how someone else sitting at home on their couch can intrinsically know a person they've never met is a good dude and just assumes they would be a good teammate for the Colts?

 

1 hour ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

gtfoh

 

...    you don't know anymore than anyone else, so your opinion has as much (or as little) value as anyone elses' on here.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@SouthernIndianaNDFan  Just curious, did you watch the AB interview with Jeff Darlington?

 

 

If Andrew Luck said half the stuff AB said in this interview, how would you feel about our QB?

 

(Paraphrasing)

"I don't need football"

"They're gonna play by my rules"

"I've already got my money, my mansion is paid for"

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While the drama may be exaggerated a bit, there is cause for concern that he may not be the locker room guy the Colts want on their team.   Maybe it is low risk/high reward though.   No doubt the passing game would be better.   The initial issue is that he has expressed that he wants a big extension from the team that brings him in.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

 

 

Sorry guys, all I hear from everyone not named Ryan Clark

 

So a former teammate can't reveal facts on the matter?

 

30 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

is that AB works his as+ off and is normally the hardest working guy on the field, and was never a bad teammate. Ben can't continuously throw the dude under the bus, or the organization allow Ben to get away with murder (or rape), and AB not eventually take action. He's the best player on the team, and therefore the largest personality, and his endorsements reflect that. Just because someone is outspoken, and has a big personality, doesn't make them a diva.

 

No. But not controlling oneself in response to other team (Players, coaching staff, marketing, front office) members (sometimes less than appealing) comments (private and public) might...

 

30 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:


 

I'm almost certain if you remove AB from that ultra cancerous environment, with his work ethic, and put him in a healthy environment, he would benefit the locker room, not take away from it.

 

I don;t agree. I just feel that the dude will get mad again at somebody, somehow, someway, somewhere, someday and wreck their team too.  Tony Dungy says if you can't play for Tomlin (or Andy Reid), you can't play for him either, and likely most other coaches.

 

30 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

Either way, you guys are sold that he's the devil, and there's no chance of you changing that perception, so we're gonna have to agree to disagree.  Funny how someone sitting at home on their couch can know so intrinsically that another person, whom they've never met, is a bad dude. You're just basing it off of what the talking heads are feeding you

 

Feed me the feel good story then...

 

30 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

...keep in mind that those people's jobs are lost/made on ratings, so they have a tendency to stir the pot and elaborate. I listen to NFL players, and the overwhelming majority tend to think teams are crazy for not trading for AB.

 

Tony Dungy has no need to stir any pots.  Teams are waiting it out to get a lower price.  If anyone thought he was no issue, at least 2nd round pick would have been swapped by now.

 

Here's things that stick in my mind--

 

In 2112, the Steelers gave Brown a long term contract extension (to a non-quarterback who had two years remaining on his existing contract!)  The Steelers never do this. Brown and the Steelers agreed on a five-year, $42.5 million contract that ran through the 2017 season.

 

Brown then expressed dissatisfaction with that deal as soon as 2015 and the Steelers, once again, went off their normal protocol to give him cleverly-disguised raises before the 2015 and 2016 seasons until the sides agreed to a new five-year, $72.7 million contract in February 2017.

 

Recenlty he said it was about guaranteed money.  Then he says no, he has money.  There is no doubt this is beyond money.  And I don't want it near the Colts new Culture. A former team employee tells the media Brown's success is tied heavily to the talents of Big Ben and maybe not quite get those #'s with some other (bottom half of the NFL?) QB's and AB goes off like the loose cannon he is-

 

"Trade me let's find out," Brown tweeted in response. Then missed a meeting/film study to boot. Tomlin disciplines him.

 

He then often misses meetings, or is late when he shows.  He told Ryan Clark and Dick LeBeau at a practice after he got paid 'not to touch him, he's the franchise'.

He goes off on Roethlisburger after Ben blames an interception on a botched route by AB. (Bad on Ben going public here).

 

I'll pass.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, ColtsBlueFL said:

 

So a former teammate can't reveal facts on the matter?

 

 

No. But not controlling oneself in response to other team (Players, coaching staff, marketing, front office) members (sometimes less than appealing) comments (private and public) might...

 

 

I don;t agree. I just feel that the dude will get mad again at somebody, somehow, someway, somewhere, someday and wreck their team too.  Tony Dungy says if you can't play for Tomlin (or Andy Reid), you can't play for him either, and likely most other coaches.

 

 

Feed me the feel good story then...

 

 

Tony Dungy has no need to stir any pots.  Teams are waiting it out to get a lower price.  If anyone thought he was no issue, at least 2nd round pick would have been swapped by now.

 

Here's things that stick in my mind--

 

In 2112, the Steelers gave Brown a long term contract extension (to a non-quarterback who had two years remaining on his existing contract!)  The Steelers never do this. Brown and the Steelers agreed on a five-year, $42.5 million contract that ran through the 2017 season.

 

Brown then expressed dissatisfaction with that deal as soon as 2015 and the Steelers, once again, went off their normal protocol to give him cleverly-disguised raises before the 2015 and 2016 seasons until the sides agreed to a new five-year, $72.7 million contract in February 2017.

 

Recenlty he said it was about guaranteed money.  Then he says no, he has money.  There is no doubt this is beyond money.  And I don't want it near the Colts new Culture. A former team employee tells the media Brown's success is tied heavily to the talents of Big Ben and maybe not quite get those #'s with some other (bottom half of the NFL?) QB's and AB goes off like the loose cannon he is-

 

"Trade me let's find out," Brown tweeted in response. Then missed a meeting/film study to boot. Tomlin disciplines him.

 

He then often misses meetings, or is late when he shows.  He told Ryan Clark and Dick LeBeau at a practice after he got paid 'not to touch him, he's the franchise'.

He goes off on Roethlisburger after Ben blames an interception on a botched route by AB. (Bad on Ben going public here).

 

I'll pass.

 

 

I can respect that, you actually have reasoning and fact to support your stance. For every Dungy tho there are several ex-players and coaches that completely endorse AB, so it's really just whichever side you buy, or bought initially and ran with. I just don't like Luke the way Ben handles anything, and a QB should never publicly throw "his guy" under the bus seemingly every week on his radio show, and Tomlin shouldn't have allowed it to get to this, or shouldn't have created a culture where anything even resembling this is okay. What you allow will continue. I'm apparently way in the minority, but for a 2nd rounder, and a contract we could easily frontload the crap out of of, I think it's a steal. To each their own, though. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

 

I can respect that, you actually have reasoning and fact to support your stance. For every Dungy tho there are several ex-players and coaches that completely endorse AB, so it's really just whichever side you buy, or bought initially and ran with. I just don't like Luke the way Ben handles anything, and a QB should never publicly throw "his guy" under the bus seemingly every week on his radio show, and Tomlin shouldn't have allowed it to get to this, or shouldn't have created a culture where anything even resembling this is okay. What you allow will continue. I'm apparently way in the minority, but for a 2nd rounder, and a contract we could easily frontload the crap out of of, I think it's a steal. To each their own, though. 

Think about why there hasn't been any GMs make an offer? They don't want to mess with a diva receiver who is 30 years old. Especially when he said he was tearing his contract up and is expecting a new one. The Steelers have redone how many contracts to make him happy?

Calling yourself the franchise shows he puts himself above the team.

Instead of letting things work out after he told the Steelers he wanted trade he has now talked himself out of wanting a GM to want him for anything higher than a song and dance.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, crazycolt1 said:

Think about why there hasn't been any GMs make an offer? They don't want to mess with a diva receiver who is 30 years old. Especially when he said he was tearing his contract up and is expecting a new one. The Steelers have redone how many contracts to make him happy?

Calling yourself the franchise shows he puts himself above the team.

Instead of letting things work out after he told the Steelers he wanted trade he has now talked himself out of wanting a GM to want him for anything higher than a song and dance.

 

 

That's the problem with 90% of the guys on here, they just keep driving and driving THEIR OPINIONS, attempting to make them everyone else's, and I'm an independent as far as this topic goes. I understand where you guys are coming from, I just disagree. Putting it 8 different ways isn't gonna help me to comprehend your point any more clearly, because it isn't a problem of comprehension or recognition, but rather plain ol' disagreement. I think AB would take the offense to another level, he's ridiculously talented, and the Colts would be able to structure the deal where by the time he wasn't AB anymore they could simply part ways with minimal damage. I'm also of the opinion that in another (drastically less toxic) situation, that he would be a perfectly cohesive addition to the locker room. Again, we're gonna have to agree to disagree. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, SouthernIndianaNDFan said:

 

That's the problem with 90% of the guys on here, they just keep driving and driving THEIR OPINIONS, attempting to make them everyone else's, and I'm an independent as far as this topic goes. I understand where you guys are coming from, I just disagree. Putting it 8 different ways isn't gonna help me to comprehend your point any more clearly, because it isn't a problem of comprehension or recognition, but rather plain ol' disagreement. I think AB would take the offense to another level, he's ridiculously talented, and the Colts would be able to structure the deal where by the time he wasn't AB anymore they could simply part ways with minimal damage. I'm also of the opinion that in another (drastically less toxic) situation, that he would be a perfectly cohesive addition to the locker room. Again, we're gonna have to agree to disagree. 

Of course you’re entitled to your own opinion...    but the point is this....

 

There’s only one opinion that matters.   And it’s not mine or yours or anyone else’s.

 

The only opinion that matters is Ballard’s.   And apparently he disagrees with you.   Because if he actually agreed with you he’d be introducing Brown as the newest member of the Colts today.  

 

And that hasn’t happened.   So it is what it is. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

Of course you’re entitled to your own opinion...    but the point is this....

 

There’s only one opinion that matters.   And it’s not mine or yours or anyone else’s.

 

The only opinion that matters is Ballard’s.   And apparently he disagrees with you.   Because if he actually agreed with you he’d be introducing Brown as the newest member of the Colts today.  

 

And that hasn’t happened.   So it is what it is. 

 

Well, I think everyone's opinion matters...Ballard is just on the conservative side, which works...really well. I'd be more aggressive, but that's why I'm not the GM and he is. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just avoid this website for about 30 seconds leading up to the pick. Not that hard to avoid this type of spoiler.
    • Fact - Dorsey put KC in a hole from a cap perspective Fact - Dorsey told Maclin via email that he was being released.  Fact - Dorsey was fired from KC Fact - KC went from ranked in the 20s offensively to the top 5 immediately after Dorsey was fired   Simply put, Dorsey didn't work out in KC. And firing someone via email is just *ic and cowardly. That is black and white.
    • You have a singularly unique viewpoint.   If only the real world was as black and white as you seem to think it is....   If only....  
    • If all are there, I take Wilkins 99% of the time and Simmons 1%. Like you've stated its unlikely though, so I'll go with Simmons (provided Dr's reports are good).  
    • I already pointed to 2 teams who got far more hosed this year than the Colts.  The Buccaneers and the Raiders.  Even the NFL came out and ADMITTED it was not a fair schedule.  So tell me, did they really care? Nope.  They had plenty of opportunity to pour over the schedules before they became public and make some adjustments.  They did not.  They have proven my point.  They do not care if schedules are unfair.   When I say to whine, just play your schedule, that refers to the difficulty this year of the teams we play and the locations of the games which are hard wired in and known to everyone the second the schedule comes out.  I am also not whining when I pointed to the schedule's order being particularly difficult with those three divisional games coming down the road.   Those are simply the teams hard wired in and the order, though not preferential, is not worth whining about.   It's a known reality you have to play all those teams in all those locations.     BUT.. and here is the massive distinction: The late night games and the nationally featured games are entirely and intentionally created all season.  Nobody denies this.   So for 10 of 13 seasons, they have INTENTIONALLY given us a horrendously unbalanced disadvantages, and they do not care.  The idea that they DO care at all about things like CTE is only because they don't want the lawsuits and they don't want the gravy train to be legislated by government to stop.  They don't want the PEOPLE to demand it.  Or for Moms to stop letting their hyper athletic kids to play football and instead guide them into other sports.  Of course soccer leads to more overall concussions per player worldwide at all levels, but the media simply doesn't care because the "world" game is off limits and the NFL is a big fat target to be taken down by a line of special interests in the USA.  It is a game that important to men and boys and often teaches them to work together for something bigger than themselves, to have discipline and focus, to stay out of trouble and put some effort into grades and it often gives kids without fathers in the home exposure to many father figures in the game, not just a head coach, but assistant positional coaches and coordinators, weight lifting/fitness coaches and team captains/leaders as well as peers who are more often doing the right things instead of the wrong things.  For whatever reason some would prefer to theorize, there are major forces out to destroy that lifeline for boys, young men and even full grown men.  But the NFL doesn't care about the health or those issues.  They only care that the supply of super freak athletes continues unabated and they don't care about fairness, equality or safety, they care about TV ratings (#1 show on every involved network) so those nearly insane rates keep growing and to keep butts in seats, gambling growing and thriving (wait til you see what is coming in that arena) and merchandise sales humming along.  If they have to screw the Colts and other teams along the way, it's no big deal to them.  If the refs just happen to screw the smaller markets at key moments of specific games to change who advances, well, that's just a happy coincidence that rings up a higher ticket on the cash machine.   And based on attitudes like "small markets like Indianapolis should be happy to just have a team" they have those people just where they want them.  Docile and willing to take any scraps they care to toss out.  That's how they con cities into terrible stadium deals (thank God Indianapolis representative are brilliant and have connected our convention business to the stadium literally to the stadium making us one of the top convention destinations in the world, but I digress).     Pointing out TRUTHS is not whining.  Pointing out and listing undeniable facts is not whining.  Whining about me doing that is whining.  Whining about me pointing out when your faux facts and belief in them as being naive is whining.   Not being able to tell the difference is also naive.  But alas. 
  • Members

    • BleedBlu8792

      BleedBlu8792 1,218

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DillyDilly

      DillyDilly 870

      Senior Members
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Irish YJ

      Irish YJ 393

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ReMeDy

      ReMeDy 2,694

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 1,882

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 107

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • HOF19

      HOF19 368

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 3,920

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crofan

      Crofan 28

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • The Peytonator

      The Peytonator 2,539

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...