Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

If this draft is comparable to the 2013 draft, the price for trading up to the middle of the 1st is....


Recommended Posts

Our 1st (29) and 3rd (93) round picks. That's what San Francisco gave to Dallas to move up (from 31 to 18) and select Eric Reid. It's also what New Orleans gave up to Arizona to move up to 20 in 2014. Not ground-breaking info. 

 

Would you be opposed to move up the middle of the 1st for a player like Malcom Brown, Marcus Peters, Danny Shelton, Bud Dupree, La'El Collins, ect...if the cost is just a 1st and a 3rd?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 1st (29) and 3rd (93) round picks. That's what San Francisco gave to Dallas to move up (from 31 to 18) and select Eric Reid. It's also what New Orleans gave up to Arizona to move up to 20 in 2014. Not ground-breaking info. 

 

Would you be opposed to move up the middle of the 1st for a player like Malcom Brown, Marcus Peters, Danny Shelton, Bud Dupree, La'El Collins, ect...if the cost is just a 1st and a 3rd?

would i do that trade to get Alvin Dupree? Heck yeah! get it done Grigs!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 1st (29) and 3rd (93) round picks. That's what San Francisco gave to Dallas to move up (from 31 to 18) and select Eric Reid. It's also what New Orleans gave up to Arizona to move up to 20 in 2014. Not ground-breaking info. 

 

Would you be opposed to move up the middle of the 1st for a player like Malcom Brown, Marcus Peters, Danny Shelton, Bud Dupree, La'El Collins, ect...if the cost is just a 1st and a 3rd?

 

I bet one of those 5 will be available at 29.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like anyone in the first round enough to do that deal. I'm probably being stubborn, but I don't think there's much difference between Brown/Shelton and Phillips/Davis. I like Peters, but I don't think there's much difference between him and PJ Williams. Not much difference between Collins and Clemmings, and Collins might have long term health issues with his knee. I don't like Dupree's tape, and probably wouldn't even want him at #29, although his athleticism is very intriguing. 

 

Maybe I'm overvaluing a late third rounder. But to me, it's about the difference in quality between the guys who will be there around #12-18 and the guys who will be there at #29. 

 

If I thought we should go after a first round receiver and we could get up to Kevin White, then I'd be all about it. He's probably the only top 20 guy that I'd want enough to move up. Or maybe Brandon Scherff. But they're both probably top 10 and out of range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, that's weird because I think PJ Williams is completely awful .

 

Nah, I disagree. He needs some refinement, but I like the way he covers. I could be wrong, of course.

 

To the point, though, Peters is better. I don't think I'd want to move up for him, though. And after what Grigson said about being burned by young knuckleheads, I don't think Peters is on his board. Maybe if he falls down to #61... Same for Paul Dawson.

 

Edit: Use Darby or Johnson instead of Williams. Same point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like anyone in the first round enough to do that deal. I'm probably being stubborn, but I don't think there's much difference between Brown/Shelton and Phillips/Davis. I like Peters, but I don't think there's much difference between him and PJ Williams. Not much difference between Collins and Clemmings, and Collins might have long term health issues with his knee. I don't like Dupree's tape, and probably wouldn't even want him at #29, although his athleticism is very intriguing. 

 

Maybe I'm overvaluing a late third rounder. But to me, it's about the difference in quality between the guys who will be there around #12-18 and the guys who will be there at #29. 

 

If I thought we should go after a first round receiver and we could get up to Kevin White, then I'd be all about it. He's probably the only top 20 guy that I'd want enough to move up. Or maybe Brandon Scherff. But they're both probably top 10 and out of range.

 

Collins?    Knee?

 

La'el Collins,  LSU?

 

A long-term knee issue is the first I've heard of this..... 

 

Can you elaborate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Collins?    Knee?

 

La'el Collins,  LSU?

 

A long-term knee issue is the first I've heard of this..... 

 

Can you elaborate?

 

It's the first time you've heard of it because I made it up. 

 

I was thinking of Ereck Flowers. He had a meniscectomy done in October. Recovered well, and quickly, and that's great and all. But that usually has long term implications, because they've removed part of the fibro-cartilage in his knee. He's an offensive lineman; that's a lot of strain on the knee, and not a lot of cushioning.

 

So yeah, Flowers, not Collins. My bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our 1st (29) and 3rd (93) round picks. That's what San Francisco gave to Dallas to move up (from 31 to 18) and select Eric Reid. It's also what New Orleans gave up to Arizona to move up to 20 in 2014. Not ground-breaking info. 

 

Would you be opposed to move up the middle of the 1st for a player like Malcom Brown, Marcus Peters, Danny Shelton, Bud Dupree, La'El Collins, ect...if the cost is just a 1st and a 3rd?

 

1st and 3rd hmm

 

I'd only do it for Brown/Shelton.  Everyone else I see as not a big enough talent gap to trade up for.  I might "might" add Kendricks to this list as I think he's probably the most complete so on that alone he's sort of in a class of his own on the ILB's.  Then again I wouldn't mind just taking Perryman so I dunno... Tough question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like anyone in the first round enough to do that deal. I'm probably being stubborn, but I don't think there's much difference between Brown/Shelton and Phillips/Davis. I like Peters, but I don't think there's much difference between him and PJ Williams. Not much difference between Collins and Clemmings, and Collins might have long term health issues with his knee. I don't like Dupree's tape, and probably wouldn't even want him at #29, although his athleticism is very intriguing. 

 

Maybe I'm overvaluing a late third rounder. But to me, it's about the difference in quality between the guys who will be there around #12-18 and the guys who will be there at #29. 

 

If I thought we should go after a first round receiver and we could get up to Kevin White, then I'd be all about it. He's probably the only top 20 guy that I'd want enough to move up. Or maybe Brandon Scherff. But they're both probably top 10 and out of range.

 

I see a big difference between Brown/Shelton and Phillips/Davis.  I agree though on the CB I'd say there isn't a huge gap of talent between the top corners to trade up for one so taking at #29 will be remotely the same value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a big difference between Brown/Shelton and Phillips/Davis.  I agree though on the CB I'd say there isn't a huge gap of talent between the top corners to trade up for one so taking at #29 will be remotely the same value.

 

Maybe. That's just my thinking. I'd have to feel like there's a difference between the guys that are available in that trade-up range and the guys that I hope will still be there at #29. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe. That's just my thinking. I'd have to feel like there's a difference between the guys that are available in that trade-up range and the guys that I hope will still be there at #29. 

 

Quick question though.  I'd say there is a clear separation from Kendricks to the other ILBs.  Do you see him as a value worth trading up for?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quick question though.  I'd say there is a clear separation from Kendricks to the other ILBs.  Do you see him as a value worth trading up for?  

 

He's one that I think will last to #29, so my inclination is to say no. But if it starts to look like you have to go up to #22-25 to get him, and you can do that and give up a third or a fourth, then maybe. (Think we could get a third or a fourth for Freeman?)

 

I think I'd rather just take one of the really nice prospects that is likely to still be there at #29, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's one that I think will last to #29, so my inclination is to say no. But if it starts to look like you have to go up to #22-25 to get him, and you can do that and give up a third or a fourth, then maybe. (Think we could get a third or a fourth for Freeman?)

 

I think I'd rather just take one of the really nice prospects that is likely to still be there at #29, though.

 

Interesting thought on Freeman.  Yes I do think we could get a 3rd for him (solely based on previous production) but I don't think we'd get a deal before the draft...  Unless some team really likes him.  I wouldn't mind pulling it off though.  Freeman in my eyes is at the Mckinney/Perryman level so it would a good trade off value wise.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would if Grigson thinks that a NT, ILB or S could come in and make a big improvement this year but that's it.  This team is built to win now, so it either needs to be a big and immediate upgrade, or we need to keep the pick.  I think that Kendricks would be that guy, and would like to get him, but I think we would need to get in front of SF at 15, which might be too steep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is one of my grievances with Ballard as well. Another is his tendency to (in my opinion) overvalue his own draft picks.   I get that continuity is important, but Stewart is going into his 8th season here, Moore his 8th, Franklin his 7th, Speed his 6th, Paye and Dayo their 4th. At some point the talent just is what it is and if that isn't good enough, you need to move on.  
    • I slept on Hull once.  Now he has a restraining order against me.  A bit of an overreaction imo but it is what it is.
    • Don't 4 get the TE group and JT. Don't sleep on Hull either.
    • Latu looks like an immediate contributor, especially on passing downs. I think AD will supplant Pierce by season's end. The OL depth will come in handy.   The Colts certainly improved through the draft, but so did other teams as well. I don't think they improved more than other teams. But more importantly, I am not sure the ceiling of this team (outside of AR of course) raised all that much this offseason. And that's what I was hoping to see. This has been my "grievance" with Ballard. Relying almost solely on current players and younger guys to develop (like the rookies and DBs). They aren't really accounting for other team's improving...or for the difference in schedule IMO (like HOU did with their offseason moves).   I guess it all depends on how one viewed last season...and where you think the current floor is. But I agree that they overachieved...and that opponent QBs played a big role in that. Many of the bad QBs they faced either gave away games or just weren't competitive. And that's tough to bank on happening again.   The margin for error is pretty small when you are a 9-win team looking to make the playoffs. And having a few games flip from being easy one year to more challenging the next...could be the difference between 5-6 wins and 9-10 wins.   It really is going to come down to AR. Can he stay healthy? Can he reach his upside? It's always going to come down to this anyways, but there are certainly outcomes between great and bad where a good overall roster can make the difference.
    • Browns game, I will leave it at that. Cost us a playoff spot.
  • Members

    • IndyJoe

      IndyJoe 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 41,671

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JackWV

      JackWV 40

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solon

      Solon 206

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hooch

      Hooch 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Two_pound

      Two_pound 751

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,307

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,382

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,340

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...