Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Is the NFL raising the cap this year?


COLTS449

Recommended Posts

Im just curious on how Seattle is going to be able to retain ALL of their free agents in these next couple of years. Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Bruce Irvin, Kam Chancelor, Bobby Williams, Marshawn Lynch, Russell Wilson, Percy Harvin, Golden Tate, I mean that is a lot of star power who will want a lot of money for their roles in making Seattle a better team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im just curious on how Seattle is going to be able to retain ALL of their free agents in these next couple of years. Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Bruce Irvin, Kam Chancelor, Bobby Williams, Marshawn Lynch, Russell Wilson, Percy Harvin, Golden Tate, I mean that is a lot of star power who will want a lot of money for their roles in making Seattle a better team.

They won't be able to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope not! This will help other teams retain their star players and affect our ability to steal players away. Without a first rounder this year, we need some good FA acquisitions. Let's wait until Andrew's contract is due before the salary cap is increased!

The salary cap going up a few million dollars isn't going to affect the Colts one way or the other on who they can or can't sign. Yes it will rise some this yr. and I think it takes a huge jump next yr.. The salary cap going up is always s good thing IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im just curious on how Seattle is going to be able to retain ALL of their free agents in these next couple of years. Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, Bruce Irvin, Kam Chancelor, Bobby Williams, Marshawn Lynch, Russell Wilson, Percy Harvin, Golden Tate, I mean that is a lot of star power who will want a lot of money for their roles in making Seattle a better team.

Very true. It'll be interesting to watch....and the phrase "hometown discount" gets thrown around a lot, but I'll believe it when I see it.

 

There's a big difference between Tom Brady doing that well into his NFL career...and a team filled with celebrated mid-round guys who've won a Super Bowl but who've yet to really cash in.

 

Seattle deserves credit for drafting very well and winning it all....but there will be a downside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The salary cap going up a few million dollars isn't going to affect the Colts one way or the other on who they can or can't sign. 

I don't agree with that.  I remember the Colts were able to keep Jeff Saturday a few years back specifically because the salary cap was increased, thus allowing Polian the flexibility to retain him. What if another team had wanted Jeff Saturday's services?  Then the cap increase would not have been such a good thing for them.

Now, imagine if, say, Cleveland is allowed to give Alex Mack a few more million then they would have had the salary cap not been increased.  Then, at least this Colts fan, will be singing the blues...

Who knows if something like this would play out, though. Just sayin'....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with that. I remember the Colts were able to keep Jeff Saturday a few years back specifically because the salary cap was increased, thus allowing Polian the flexibility to retain him. What if another team had wanted Jeff Saturday's services? Then the cap increase would not have been such a good thing for them.

Now, imagine if, say, Cleveland is allowed to give Alex Mack a few more million then they would have had the salary cap not been increased. Then, at least this Colts fan, will be singing the blues...

Who knows if something like this would play out, though. Just sayin'....

If it allows teams to sign one of their own players then we'll just sign somebody else. Its not a big deal and IMO the chances of the Colts signing Mack is slim to none anyway. I don't even want them to sign him for the money he'll get. Centers should not be paid that much and it would be smarter to sign one of the top centers available but will be much cheaper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Umm, the salary cap goes up every year (except in 2010 when they had the uncapped year and then the new CBA created a cap that was initially lower than the 2009 cap) and it's determined by the TV revenue.  It was around 120 million in 2011, 121 million in 2012 and 123 million in 2013.  Now reports are saying it will jump to 130 million in 2014.  The salary floor is now also set at 90% of the cap (in 2013 it was 88% of the cap).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't agree with that.  I remember the Colts were able to keep Jeff Saturday a few years back specifically because the salary cap was increased, thus allowing Polian the flexibility to retain him. What if another team had wanted Jeff Saturday's services?  Then the cap increase would not have been such a good thing for them.

Now, imagine if, say, Cleveland is allowed to give Alex Mack a few more million then they would have had the salary cap not been increased.  Then, at least this Colts fan, will be singing the blues...

Who knows if something like this would play out, though. Just sayin'....

The salary cap is not a real number, meaning teams can do things to manipulate how the money shows up regarding the cap, and no team has ever NOT signed a player because of the salary cap.  They may use that as an excuse sometimes but that is all it is, it's a just a way of saying that the team did not think the player was worth what he was asking.

 

Remember a few years ago when Corey Simon became available, many Colts fans said the Colts could not sign him because they did not have the cap room (I think the Colts were about 2.5 million under at the time) and yet the Colts signed him.  The bill will come due one day but the cap itself is not a deterrent to signing a player that the team covets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In one of the interviews I listened to with Scott and a Tenn Titans reporter a few months back he was asked what's one of the things that separates you? He said probably what is between my ears. High football IQ, understanding of the game and instincts.
    • Agree with you on the draft takes.   For AR's season, I think mediocrity is what we should hope for( compared to other QBs). We should not forget,that this is basically his rookie season and he's still only 22. So if that would get us to 10-7.....HOORAY !
    • Less than 2 months away when the greatest crushes this Jake Paul guy. Tyson in 3. Tyson is getting in great shape, he looks fast and strong as of now.    When I list boxers where they rank all-time, I go by peak. You have to when it comes to boxing because most fighters Don't last long. Mike Tyson from 1985-1995 only lost once in 10 years. His record in that time frame was 43-1 37 KO's. Buster Douglas KO'd him in the 10th round in a fight where Mike didn't even train for and Mike actually KO'd him in the 8th, Douglas got a 13 count.    Notable wins in that 10 year frame.   Berbick Holmes but he was old, still it was Holmes. Tucker  Spinks Bruno Ruddock (twice)      
    • I'm excited about our future. I think Ballard put together 2 very nice drafts in a row. Never thought we would get Latu, thought we had a better chance at Bowers. Still holding out hope for Cross, he flashes greatness than dissappears, hope he's consistent. Hope Woods takes lead in TE room. I keep writing off Granson, but he keeps impressing. Even if Richardson has a mediocre season I think the team around him could get us to 10-7. 
    • I think you understood his words in a "positive" way, but that's not what he said.   He DID NOT say that "most of you would choose to get married..."   That's your implication. Of course, only women can bring children in this world and most of the women will choose to be married and have children, but that's not exactly what he said.   He said, "doing so - while some others will go on to lead successful career in the world - will take you closer to God's Will"    Here's what he said from the transcript:    He could've said, "even if you go on to have a very successful career, and get the greatest accolades of the world, I think the most important title of a woman is :  Homemaker. And, that would take you closer to God's Will"    But, he didn't say so because he wanted to say exactly what he believes women should do and brought God into that by saying that's His Will.    I think he made a mistake of implying that women are generally excited about marriage and having kids and being a homemaker, when that's only part of a woman's life - even though that could be the most cherished and blessed part of the life.   He only looked at how that made his wife's life - his words, not his wife's words by the way - and projected that to all the women. 
  • Members

    • twfish

      twfish 1,941

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • compuls1v3

      compuls1v3 1,989

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,368

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Coltsfan1953

      Coltsfan1953 201

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,429

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • lincolndefan

      lincolndefan 92

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,028

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NoVA Colts Fan

      NoVA Colts Fan 5

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Pigskin

      Pigskin 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...