Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Trade Luck for Sanchez so HE can hand the ball off...


bluephantom87

Recommended Posts

Pep and the conservative Chuck are buying too much into this ground and pound. The Colts came out after the opening fg like they had a 20pt lead and were trying to ice the game. This is not Stanford and this forced run game is hit or miss. Our passing game is starting to suffer with drops etc. and looks out of sync. Bad call to bring Pep in as oc and I'm sticking with that until he can prove he's able to attack a team's weakness on a weekly basis instead of the ground and pound approach no matter what. This offense lacks imagination and is starting to make Luck look like Kyle Orton. Where's the no huddle? If Sean Payton had this offense it would be a nightmare! Oh well the Pep experiment continues... :facepalm:  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

We only handed the ball off 13 times this game and 30 pass attempts ( 4 rush by luck)

I'd say the short intermediate passes hurt more than the hand offs

How many of those passes were in those last two or three drives though?

Can't just pass when desperate exclusively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do agree somewhat, but the Chargers did a good job disguising their D (sound familiar?) and forcing Luck into bad throws. But we still don't have an answer for the blitzes! They came all night and Luck couldn't make them pay, I know he is still young, but some of that is on the OC. When it's working, everyone loves Pep. When it isn't, it's fire Pep....I am in the middle. Both are young and will get better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was poor execution more than anything. 6 drops to kill any chance of a sustained drive. That is the story of the night.

Despite how bad the defense played, we had a chance to win it in the 4th quarter and came up short.

I don't put this on Pep and the play calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was poor execution more than anything. 6 drops to kill any chance of a sustained drive. That is the story of the night.

Despite how bad the defense played, we had a chance to win it in the 4th quarter and came up short.

I don't put this on Pep and the play calling.

 

Right, it wasn't pep's fault that he deliberately ran play after play designed for high completion short yardage situations, to get us to 3rd and 3 or 3rd and 4. We had lots of key drops, but why wait until 3rd down to dial up a play where the ball is thrown past the 1st down marker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hes becoming a toned down alex smith, and thats the %aki that i don't like

All coaches have egos and this conservative staff is making a point to play a certain style but don't have enough pieces on the defensive or o-line to do it on a consistant basis. Luck is STILL the best option on offense. Peps play calling tonight put the Chargers into a comfort zone with the short passing game NOBODY respected and the drops didn't help either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All coaches have egos and this conservative staff is making a point to play a certain style but don't have enough pieces on the defensive or o-line to do it on a consistant basis. Luck is STILL the best option on offense. Peps play calling tonight put the Chargers into a comfort zone with the short passing game NOBODY respected and the drops didn't help either.

"Luck is still the best option on offense." Are you seriously questioning that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, it wasn't pep's fault that he deliberately ran play after play designed for high completion short yardage situations, to get us to 3rd and 3 or 3rd and 4. We had lots of key drops, but why wait until 3rd down to dial up a play where the ball is thrown past the 1st down marker.

we're all upset right now. I'm sure if you go back and watch the game a second time ( not sure why anyone would want to) you'd see there were deeper options but Luck opted for shorter passes. Bottom line, if they made those catches the game would have been entirely different.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

we're all upset right now. I'm sure if you go back and watch the game a second time ( not sure why anyone would want to) you'd see there were deeper options but Luck opted for shorter passes. Bottom line, if they made those catches the game would have been entirely different.

 

Only because he is told to take his 1st option if open.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When it all comes down to it the Defense, although letting up long time consuming drives, held when it mattered. Yes, they let some drives continue because of penalties, but you have to realize as well that when your defense is constantly out there because your offense can't sustain a drive, the D is going to get tired. It's a team game. Both sides of the ball have to be working or one gets left looking like crap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only because he is told to take his 1st option if open.

Really, you sit in at the QB meetings to know what he's told?

My guess is that he has options and makes reads based on the defense and the pressure. We did not provide much protection and that explains Luck opting for shorter and quicker throws.

Again, the 6 drops cost us the game. The drop by Fleener was a pass over 20 yards by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't pin this loss on Andrew Luck!! This game was horrible all around. Andrew was probably the top performer for the Colts next to Reggie Wayne minus his drop passes. Horrible Defense and horrible executions on offense, mostly due to dropped passes and lack of holes for the running game. Andrew Luck needed support from his guys on Offense and much needed on Defense, both failed to show up tonight. Trade Luck... Your out of your mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Luck is still the best option on offense." Are you seriously questioning that?

What? I said he's the best option so why would I question the statement? Apparently Pep thinks his power I Stanford run game is setting the nfl on fire and Luck just needs to manage the game because his numbers suggest that's the case now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't pin this loss on Andrew Luck!! This game was horrible all around. Andrew was probably the top performer for the Colts next to Reggie Wayne minus his drop passes. Horrible Defense and horrible executions on offense, mostly due to dropped passes and lack of holes for the running game. Andrew Luck needed support from his guys on Offense and much needed on Defense, both failed to show up tonight. Trade Luck... Your out of your mind.

Did you read the FULL title of the topic? I'm a BIG Luck fan!!! It's a dig at Pep because I feel he's taking a franchise qb and turning him into a game manager. My point was anybody can hand the ball off. Sanchez or Painter would excel in this BASIC early 60's offense. The receivers are blocking so much they forgot how to catch. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts passed it plenty this game. They had 34 designed pass plays (30 attempts, 4 Luck rushes), and only 13 rushes.

 

The Colts weren't on the field for long for any of their drives so they couldn't really develop much.

 

Relax with this conservative sucks mentality...

 

The Colts went to San Fran, used the VERY SAME mentality against the 49ers and they beat them by 20. The mentality has worked in the past. Should they be more aggressive at times, yes, but we can't start nit picking every little thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts passed it plenty this game. They had 34 designed pass plays (30 attempts, 4 Luck rushes), and only 13 rushes.

 

The Colts weren't on the field for long for any of their drives so they couldn't really develop much.

 

Relax with this conservative sucks mentality...

 

The Colts went to San Fran, used the VERY SAME mentality against the 49ers and they beat them by 20. The mentality has worked in the past. Should they be more aggressive at times, yes, but we can't start nit picking every little thing.

 

We faced 2 pocket passers and lost both games. Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pep and the conservative Chuck are buying too much into this ground and pound. The Colts came out after the opening fg like they had a 20pt lead and were trying to ice the game. This is not Stanford and this forced run game is hit or miss. Our passing game is starting to suffer with drops etc. and looks out of sync. Bad call to bring Pep in as oc and I'm sticking with that until he can prove he's able to attack a team's weakness on a weekly basis instead of the ground and pound approach no matter what. This offense lacks imagination and is starting to make Luck look like Kyle Orton. Where's the no huddle? If Sean Payton had this offense it would be a nightmare! Oh well the Pep experiment continues... :facepalm:  

I agree with everything, but the bold part. Payton has been unusually conservative this year. It cost him the Pats game on Sunday and allowed inferior teams to keep the games closer than they should have been

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What we learned Monday: Colts must place offense in Luck’s hands

 

    By Chris Wesseling

    Around the League Writer

    Published: Oct. 15, 2013 at 12:40 a.m.

 

The Indianapolis Colts got what they deserved in a 19-9 loss to the San Diego Chargers Monday night.

For just the third time in 23 career starts, Andrew Luck was kept out of the end zone. If he was the type to assign blame, he could start with the five players who dropped easily catchable passes at crucial points in the game.

Darrius Heyward-Bey mistimed a potential long touchdown, Reggie Wayne couldn’t reel in a key third-down pass and Coby Fleener’s slippery mitts made an appearance in a similar situation — followed by a T.Y. Hilton muff on the next play.

When Trent Richardson lost a screen pass to sabotage a late fourth-quarter drive, overly conservative coach Chuck Pagano opted to punt back to the Chargers down seven points with less than two yards to go for a first down.

Needless to say, the Colts’ chances of picking up the first down were greater than their odds of stopping the Chargers and keeping enough time on the clock to go the length of the field for a touchdown.

For all of those physical and mental errors, though, it is coordinator Pep Hamilton’s insistence on clinging to a dysfunctional, old-school power running attack that is preventing Luck from reaching his potential.

There’s a method to Hamilton’s madness. He wants to create high-percentage passing opportunities against boxes loaded up to stop the run.

This is not an offense that abides game-changing mistakes.

It works best when blockers blow their men off the ball, allowing the power back to sustain drives, move the chains and punish tacklers. It doesn’t work when the offensive line lacks the talent to open holes for an indecisive back.

The Colts personnel falls into the latter category, which has the effect of playing keep-away from the best young no-huddle passer inNFL history.

It’s time for Hamilton to go back to the drawing board, devising a fresh plan to put the offense in Luck’s capable hands.

 

Sums it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Colts passed it plenty this game. They had 34 designed pass plays (30 attempts, 4 Luck rushes), and only 13 rushes.

The Colts weren't on the field for long for any of their drives so they couldn't really develop much.

Relax with this conservative sucks mentality...

The Colts went to San Fran, used the VERY SAME mentality against the 49ers and they beat them by 20. The mentality has worked in the past. Should they be more aggressive at times, yes, but we can't start nit picking every little thing.

What was the ratio before the Colts were forced to pass though I wonder. Because I know it was a pretty even spoilt early on. Before the game started to get away from us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the ratio before the Colts were forced to pass though I wonder. Because I know it was a pretty even spoilt early on. Before the game started to get away from us.

 

Still pretty pass happy although yes it was even early on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 WR sets? Really? Frankly, we do not have 3 WRs to move the chains consistently. It’s not THAT difficult to cover Wayne. It’s THAT difficult for Heyward-Bey to catch a football. It’s not THAT difficult to jam Hilton at the line with a DB, then to wall him with a LB and double cover with a S (that frontshoulder touchdown catch by 5-9, 173 Hilton against 6-4, 221 Browner was a miracle).

Put your best CB on Wayne. Put your worst OLman on Heyward-Bey. Press Hilton hard at the LOS. Play 1-high robber (to spy Andrew also). Blitz inside against Satele and McGlynn (to stop the power run also). You win.

After Miami game: “This team lacks talent…”. After San Diego game: “With all that talent on this team…” Funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm starting to see the national media give Luck the nod as the best of the young qbs but I'm also seeing some who don't like the Colts offense because it's starting to make Luck look very average. Gruden even commented on the power I and thought Luck looks better in a more up tempo type of offense. The more the Colts are on national tv the more Pep will be analyzed on his use or non use of Luck. The slow starts are a direct reflection of the conservative play calling. Too much time is focused on establishing the run to a fault with many early wasted downs. The numbers lean toward the midrange passing game because once down Pep seems to call more passes. The receivers looked out of sync against a team who can't stop anyone's passing game. Would be nice to see Luck stand in a clean pocket like Rivers who had ALL DAY just as Tanny did in the Miami lose. That's two games given away to teams (who now own tie breakers against the Colts in the afc) in which our gameplan made it easy to defend the slow I'm starting the first couple of qtrs like I'm icing the game with a lead. Every week receivers have drops in this league but it's magnified on the Colts because they choose to play a grind it out close to the vest type of game with no room for error.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the talent we have, would should be able to start fast, get at least 10 points up on the opponent  and then use our running game to pound out the clock.....what am I missing here? 

 

Instead, we start like molasses, and ground and pound for most of the first half, only to have to come back in the second half to win.....yesterday proved that technique is not going to pass muster.  I hope the Colts coaching faculty goes to the mountain top this week and has a 'come to Jesus' meeting, because if we run this same game plan against Denver, we are going to get smoked.  We need to score 30-40 points to have a chance next week, and run the ball first mentality is not going to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I almost wish they had thrown it less.  Specifically on the third and 3 that Wayne dropped.  A handoff up the gut to DB or TR might've extended the drive.  The running game was actually working yesterday.  The reason we didn't sustain drives was due to failings in the passing game.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only because he is told to take his 1st option if open.

 

wow so now you're in the meeting room with the coaches and players?  I look forward to more "behind the scenes" info from you as the season progresses.  

 

I'm also not seeing what the problem is with throwing to an open receiver?!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow so now you're in the meeting room with the coaches and players?  I look forward to more "behind the scenes" info from you as the season progresses.  

 

I'm also not seeing what the problem is with throwing to an open receiver?!?

 

You gotta go with what works, not what you blindly think will work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pep and the conservative Chuck are buying too much into this ground and pound. The Colts came out after the opening fg like they had a 20pt lead and were trying to ice the game. This is not Stanford and this forced run game is hit or miss. Our passing game is starting to suffer with drops etc. and looks out of sync. Bad call to bring Pep in as oc and I'm sticking with that until he can prove he's able to attack a team's weakness on a weekly basis instead of the ground and pound approach no matter what. This offense lacks imagination and is starting to make Luck look like Kyle Orton. Where's the no huddle? If Sean Payton had this offense it would be a nightmare! Oh well the Pep experiment continues... :facepalm:  

I have to agree. Plus, it's just not as fun to watch. And as long as Pep Hamilton is OC Luck will never have the stats to be considered a great QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree. Plus, it's just not as fun to watch. And as long as Pep Hamilton is OC Luck will never have the stats to be considered a great QB.

 

The only people that care about stats or Luck's recognition are his little fanboys and girls.  Irsay, Grigson, Pagano, Hamilton etc are not building a team to make sure that Luck goes down as one of the best QB's of all time.  They're building a team to win championships. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Wilt dominated Bill Russell when they played, what Boston fans don't comprehend for some reason is, the Celtics had all the best players on their team other than players like West, Baylor, and Robertson. Outside of that the league had a bunch of MEH players back then except on Boston. Boston had Cousy, Havlicek, Sam Jones, Tom Heinsohn, and KC Jones besides Russell. Russell could get away with playing a bad game on occasion because Havlicek or Sam Jones or even Heinsohn could go for 25 and they would still win. Cousy wasn't a great shooter but was a great Assist guy and would just run that team like a great QB does.   Bill Simmons has Bill Russell as the 2nd greatest player ever, that is what ruins his list and I agree with a lot of his rankings. Loved his book and love his knowledge on ranking players but his Russell ranking is simply because he is from Boston. No way in hell is Bill Russell the 2nd greatest player of all-time. He had too many offensive deficiencies to be that. To me Larry Bird was the better player compared to Bill Russell.    Simmons top 10 updated: 1. Michael Jordan 2. Bill Russell 3. LeBron James 4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 5. Magic Johnson 6. Larry Bird 7. Wilt Chamberlain  8. Tim Duncan 9. Kobe Bryant  10. Jerry West   Mine is: 1. Michael Jordan (we agree)   2. Magic Johnson   3. LeBron James (we agree)   4. Kareem Abdul-Jabbar (we agree)   5. Kobe Bryant   6. Larry Bird (we agree)   7. Wilt Chamberlain (we agree)   8. Steph Curry - Bill has Curry 15th.   9. Shaq O'Neal - Bill has Shaq 13th.   10. Bill Russell - yes, he makes my top 10, great defensive player, great rebounder, a good scorer but not a dominant scorer and a winner. His 11 championships can be viewed in a lot of different ways compared to how players won theirs in the 80's-up until now. 11 is 11 though so a top 10 list without him would not like right.   He had West and Duncan in his top 10 - I don't. I have Shaq and Curry instead. To me Shaq was more dominant at his peak than Duncan was, and Curry changed the game with his 3-point shooting. Shaq is the only player in NBA history other than Michael Jordan to win 3 straight Finals MVP's (2000-2002), he has to be top 10. I never thought I would see a better shooter than Reggie Miller, then Steph entered the building. Steph also does have 4 championships, a Finals MVP, and 2 League MVP's + he has the most 3 pointers made in NBA history.
    • Caitlin Clark 1 Angel Reese 0. Fever beat Sky 71-70. You lose Angel Reese. 
    • I'm all for doubling down and going EDGE in the 1st again. Just got to make sure we get the right one. Depending on where we draft, I'm okay with trading up a couple of picks to snatch the better pass rusher of the bunch. Since there will be a good amount of rushers, I hear, let's go get the better one. I can also see the draft being the opposite as this years. Most teams will go defense now in this draft, and very good offensive players fall. I think we are perfect on offense, that's why I'm okay with trading up to get the guy we need on defense.
    • IMHO , its all about perspective   If you treat Pierce as WR1, you will be disappointed   If you treat Pierce as a solid contributor, you will be pleased   - The man can block, maybe the best blocking WR on this team - The man has speed - The man can rotate in with our other WRs   I do believe that AD Mitchell will take over as a starting outside WR   The reality is, 17 games is a LONG season,    Pittman and AD Mitchell will be "fresher" for the end of the game as they are rotated in and out   The odds say that there will be injuries, and we could see Pierce be a starter on either side   I for one, WANT to keep Pierce thru his rookie deal (We will see after that)      
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 19,915

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,824

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,115

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 41,834

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Chucklez

      Chucklez 1,048

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • runthepost

      runthepost 2,014

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CrazyHorse

      CrazyHorse 6

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hooch

      Hooch 3

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...