Smonroe

Pagano - 11th Best Coach in the NFL

204 posts in this topic

I can see it. As much as the fan base seems to hate him for only going 8-8 last season, he is one of those coaches who you just want to play for due to his character.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah,  I can see it as well.  Back to back 8-8 seasons and with all the circumstances surrounding those seasons  is pretty remarkable really.  The players really play hard for him, no question.  Hopefully CB finds him better players to work with and he's off to a great start IMO. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, lollygagger8 said:

Sorry.....

 

Image result for hysterical gif

I know right!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahalmaolmaolmaolmao

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

6 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I know right!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahalmaolmaolmaolmao

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

That's the trick now isn't it?  Too many Indy fans suffer from "the grass is always greener" syndrome.  The problem not only is finding a better coach, but if you do replace him, will the next "sure fire" candidate actually be better?

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

I'm not doing this again. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I'm not doing this again. 

Why ?  Because there isn't 11 coaches with a better winning percentage?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, ColtsBlitz said:

Next year, I want the Pagano haters to find me a better, available coach... just to see the results we get. If anyone says Marvin Lewis.... I'm just done.

 

Sean Payton, of course.  He has experience working with an elite QB, a great offense and porous defenses.

 

Pay no attention to his 7-9 record the last three years.  We'll think of better excuses.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

What coaches have a better winning percentage over the last 5 years?

Ron Meeks winning percentage as a DC was really good too. Just saying..

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you know he's not a BAD coach per se, he's just not  great coach. But he's also somewhat inexperienced compared to the others listed above him. Not saying he'll ever be on their level, but there's much worse out there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Ron Meeks winning percentage as a DC was really good too. Just saying..

Dc isn't head coach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, PeterBowman said:

you know he's not a BAD coach per se, he's just not  great coach. But he's also somewhat inexperienced compared to the others listed above him. Not saying he'll ever be on their level, but there's much worse out there.

Not to mention that he lacked a full compliment of quality players

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Dc isn't head coach

Often DCs and OCs are better qualified

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pagano that high isn't too out there, I'd put him at around 15 or so though.

This post reminded me. I really, really thought we were going to fire Pagano and hire Gase last offseason. I thought it made too much sense. Dolphins got a potentially great coach.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

 

2 minutes ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Often DCs and OCs are often better qualified

 Yep, one is in Arizona now.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

Why ?  Because there isn't 11 coaches with a better winning percentage?

I've already told you Andrew Luck and our worthless division at the time skew Chucks winning percentage.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Pagano that high isn't too out there, I'd put him at around 15 or so though.

This post reminded me. I really, really thought we were going to fire Pagano and hire Gase last offseason. I thought it made too much sense. Dolphins got a potentially great coach.

We should have luck would be winning MVPs 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I've already told you Andrew Luck and our worthless division at the time skew Chucks winning percentage.

 

Didn't have Luck much in 15, and the lack of talent should balance out that argument.

 

I often wonder how any of those other coaches would have fared with our roster.

 

This season is going to be the decision point.  Every team in the division has improved (well, maybe not the Texans but they were already good).  I don't think Chuck gets in on Ballard's honeymoon period.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, MPStack said:

 

 

 

 Yep, one is in Arizona now.

And they have done what?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

Didn't have Luck much in 15, and the lack of talent should balance out that argument.

 

I often wonder how any of those other coaches would have fared with our roster.

 

This season is going to be the decision point.  Every team in the division has improved (well, maybe not the Texans but they were already good).  I don't think Chuck gets in on Ballard's honeymoon period.

I just hate the black and white argument that is winning percentage. When your division is a cakewalk for your first 4 years yeah you will have a higher percentage then say someone in the AFC North 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

And they have done what?

Represented the NFC in the 2015 SB. Next question?

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

I just hate the black and white argument that is winning percentage. When your division is a cakewalk for your first 4 years yeah you will have a higher percentage then say someone in the AFC North 

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, MPStack said:

Represented the NFC in the 2015 SB. Next question?

 

BTW, Chuck's team represented the AFC in the championship game (only one game away from the SB) the year before and did so with a far inferior roster.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, PrincetonTiger said:

Not to mention that he lacked a full compliment of quality players

Why do all the pagano supporters give him a pass on his own player aquisition and development. He is not a bad coach but many say he was not giving quality players. As if, any head coaches in the NFL do not have tons of roster control. He is mediocre. IMO his 3-4 is bland and predictable. He also has made poor scheme decisions for the talent he aquired. Grigson has become his scapegoat. I hope he succeeds as a colts fan. If anything Luck will just "will" this team to wins easier with this improved roster.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, life long said:

Why do all the pagano supporters give him a pass on his own player aquisition and development. He is not a bad coach but many say he was not giving quality players. As if, any head coaches in the NFL do not have tons of roster control. He is mediocre. IMO his 3-4 is bland and predictable. He also has made poor scheme decisions for the talent he aquired. Grigson has become his scapegoat. I hope he succeeds as a colts fan. If anything Luck will just "will" this team to wins easier with this improved roster.

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

That's the thing we would beat teams like San Fran, Denver, and Seattle one week then we would turn around and be blown out by teams like the Rams, Bills, and Jets the following week. I don't think he is the worst coach in the NFL but he can certainly coach dumb and be predictable to many times, especially after a big win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

I always felt that with RG/CP that our roster was the bottom of the league, especially on D and with our O-line. We would be playing with rotational guys or second/third string players as starters at the start of the season versus waiting for injuries for these players making an appearance, with the last two seasons being the worst. With the turnover of midlevel FA idk if this is gonna change this season but I think the quality of the players acquired is far better then what RG ever put on the table for CP, and I defiantly think that the D will be huge overall improvement which should hopefully increase the number of games we win next season and make it to the playoffs again.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The national media has a lot of respect for Pagano.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

Because player acquisition wasn't part of his job.  It was Grigson's job.  Sure, Pagano had input as all coaches do, but we have no idea specifically which players pagano wanted and which ones Grigson said "too bad, I'm taking this guy".

 

In terms of player development, what do you call getting decent starter performance out of guys like Rashaan Melvin and Edwin Jackson?  What do you call helping guys like Darius Butler and Vontae Davis turn their careers around?  Getting quality play from guys like Jack Doyle and TY McGill.  Even Kerr performed better than you typically get from an UDFA.  These are just a few examples off the top of my head. 

The same defensive players had just turned in the worst defense in colts history. You are right, he did turn their careers around. To be serious though, i like a lot of the young guys we have on D. I think we will do well this year. Oddly enough i am more optimistic than paganos supporters. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, J@son said:

 

And I (and I'm sure many others) hate the notion of completely disregarding the winning percentage due to having Luck and being in the AFC South.  the 2015 season completely invalidates the "only because of Luck" argument, and as far as the schedule, I'm sorry the scheduling committee didn't include tougher teams on the colts schedule but it is what it is.  Considering Pagano & co. beat teams like San Fran, Denver and Seattle when they were dominating at least calls into question the stated opinions that Chuck's record would be far worse in a different division.  No one knows that. 

Then turn around and get blown out by the rams he's a good coach 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Gase is way too high. First thing I'd change.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Colts_Fan12 said:

Then turn around and get blown out by the rams he's a good coach 

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Chuck, I always have.  I think the players enjoy playing for him and I think he'll continue to get better with more and more experience.  My opinion really hasn't changed to much.  I think Grigson was the problem.  If the Colts draft well and are terrible the next few years, maybe I'll change my opinion.  I really don't think there are many qualified/winning coaches available for the taking right now who would also want to come to the Colts. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

You are right most will not admit that the Colts are held back by certain people like pagano 

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

People will only turn on Pagano and figure out he's a bad coach when they are "allowed too" and he is fired or released, just like the same with Grigson. It's the same misguided loyalty where a portion of the fanbase wouldn't dare talk bad about someone as long as they are a Colt, and they throw facts out the window. There's no convincing them. The best we can hope for is Ballard improves the team enough to be contenders in 2018, because it certainly won't be this year with Pagano as Coach, unless he magically turns a 180.

Another big problem with our fan base is they fear change. They are so scared to change coaches because "we could always get worse" so unless it's a Superbowl winning head coach they would rather keep chuck and his stupid actions. 

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Pags is a great person. We can debate that he's a great coach until the cows come home. 

 

I guess at the end of this season is where the true test will be since he's finally rid of the dead weight of Griggles. I'd love to eat crow if Pags turns this team around under Ballard's watch. Maybe it was Griggles that was the problem the entire time.....maybe it wasn't. We shall see. 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    •   As long as it is not a typo, I will be prepared.
    •   I saw that too.  I can make it work, but I thought we were doing Sunday, September 3rd, in the afternoon?   No?
    • No prob. I think colt and pat fans can get along.  Did i just say that?  I threw up a lil in my mouth just thinking about it. The pats are easy to hate. (For the rest of the league)  
    •   Michael Phelps challenges whale to race  
    •   I was just pointing out when I look at stats, I will look to see what makes up the stats, how are the stats come by, are the stats effected by things like play calling (run the ball in the end zone or pass it), coaching (are you a passing team or a ball control team) etc.  Then i can get a better gauge on stat as to whether or not, and to what extent, I think that it is reflective of the intrinsic value contributed by a player.  Drew Brees throws over 5000 yards a handful of times, and so on.    With Passing yards and passing TDs, there is element where a player has an opportunity to garner these stats and not necessarily by his own skill.   If Team A (like the Pats in SB 51) are trailing (or are in shootout and need to keep scoring as its D is a sieve and keeps yielding score for score) in say 12 games, then the offense on that team will still be running and gunning till the end of the game in 12 games. And in the other 4 games they are in control and the offense and the team are trying run out the clock.  And say the team throws for an extra 80-100 yards and 1 TD on average in those 12 games they will throw an additional 1000 yards and 12 TDs.   Lets flip it around and say Team B is the exact opposite and is in a shootout for 4 games and running out the clock in 12 games and all else is the same.  Well they with throw for an additional 400 yards and 4 TDs.   And lets add that we know that each QB can do the same regardless of which team he is on.    We will have at the end of the season QB for Team A will of had an opportunity to put up 600 more passing yards and 8 passing TDs.  So if the two end up as follows:   QB Team A:  4600 yards, 38 TDs QB Team B:   4000 yards, 30 TDs   As first look it looks like QB on Team A is the "better" QB, but when we look to the above, understand that either QB could do same on the other team, the separation is not attributed to intrinsic talent of the QB but merely the fact that one more opportunities to cumulate stats.     And this is just a illustration to show my point.  it could just as easily be just 4 games versus 1 game where each thrown for 150 yards each and 1 TD and thus the overall difference would be 450 yards and 3 TDs, and so on.   So that is why i would like to be able get our hands around stats similar to the above to get a better gauges on the end yearly numbers.   My sense in reading some responses is that the colts did not have a good a defense as the pats, that they had more offensive weapons; and as such, likely might of found themselves in Team A's situation more times than Team B's.  I do not mean 12 games, but what ever it is, be nice to know it to get a more weighted value in the end.    Btw, i loved what you did with the comparisons and looked to each player against their contemporaries and that gives a better gauge then trying to compare  a player from 2014 to one in 1982.     
  • Welcome New Members

  • Members

Community Software by Invision Power Services, Inc.