Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts Interested in Jarvis Landry?


Smonroe

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Coming off an injury plagued year, may be cheap.  If healthy, he’s a good veteran addition.  Sorely needed in that WR room.  
 

 


If Steichen wants him — then fine.   But otherwise, I hope we pass.   He’s one of my least favorite receivers of the last 6-8 years.   I think he’s hugely overrated and, for a number of years, badly overpaid. 
 

So I hope this report doesn’t pan out.   But if the Colts sign him, I’ll support the move.
 

In Steichen I trust.  

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stitches said:

Note that this is NOT a sourced info. This is something a "former NFL executive" thought might be within Colts' interests...

 

"Former NFL executive" knows nothing about Ballard... 

 

Maybe.    But you don’t know who the former exec is and don’t know what he may know about Ballard. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I seriously doubt that Colts would even "kick the tires" on Jarvis Landry.  He is a free agent for a reason.  If he still had "the juice" - he would have been signed in the first week of free agency - and - we're nearing the end of the second week.

 

Additionally - we just signed Isaiah McKenzie - who I feel has better upside than Jarvis Landry - at this point in his career - or lack thereof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Rolltide_gocolts said:

I think there’s  2 maybe 4 weapons I would trade from 35 to the 1st rd for….. TEs from Georgia and Notre Dame, J Gibbs, zay flowers and tank Dell 

Colts have 4 TE's, Flowers and Dell might( at least one of them) will be available in the 2nd round.  Would like to see Schmidt, Avila, Mauch OL/C players, or a CB at 35.  JMO on this, and add trading up from #80 using Moore and a pick will still be possible for a good WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pierce

Pittman

Landry

 

That would be a legit top three.  Not gonna lie the injuries with Landry concern me but he is productive.  Colts would be free to not sweat WR unless one they love falls to them.

 

If they get their QB at the top that is a group that gives him quality options.  So I could see it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t expect another move at WR unless a superstar just falls in their lap which I don’t see happening.  I think they will continue to develop Pittman and Alec as 1 and 2 and let McKenzie and Dulin fighting it out for the number three/slot role.  Ballard likes the Colts receiver group and I think views the biggest issue with their lack of production being the QB position and them being young and needing to learn. The later doesn’t apply as much to Pittman but he was also the most successful of the receivers last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The FA WR market is pretty thin.  A lot of guys heading into their 30s, no impact players besides OBJ.  And he’s a big question mark.  Maybe Golladay or Robbie Anderson are the best available?
 

I wonder if K’neal Harry could revive his career.  He’s still young and had a lot of potential.   Probably be cheap too.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly, as long as we are healthy going into opening day then that is all that matters.    By the way, that is one of the best and funniest posts I have seen all year in here, I have to give it a Homer laugh 
    • Era's are so different, it would seem LeBron could play in any era and be dominant but in the 80's and 90's the game was way more physical. How would LeBron do against a team like the 1989 Pistons for example? We don't know?, if they allowed the Pistons play by the rules they played with back then.    Regarding the Pacers their 1998 team was the best IMO. We had the Bulls beat in Game 7, I still believe we got screwed by the REFS. Whether or not we would have beat Utah is a different subject but that would have been a hell of a series. Utah would have had HCA.
    • Yeah I try not to let my Colts bias get in the way when I do lists, it is tough sometime. I can understand why anyone would say Randy should be ranked higher. Randy was a freak and was so tall, a QB could just throw a long one to him and on 50/50 balls, he would catch it.    I have gone back and forth over the years regarding Peyton and Tom. My Colts bias says Peyton is the GOAT, he is also my favorite player of all-time so I hate, let me repeat I hate putting Tom #1. I just factor in everything but saying Peyton is #3 isn't a dis , that is practically saying he is damn near the GOAT. I have Montana 2nd because I felt like during the 80's which had all kinds of great teams, he won 4 SB's and was flawless in those SB's. You don't get anymore clutch than him.   I get the Emmitt Smith hate on this board, most here hate the Cowboys but once again when ranking players people should put that aside IMO. Otherwise the list becomes who somebody loves and hates.
    • California still has salad bars
    • There was on twitter and reddit, more than just usual trolling and trash talk    
  • Members

    • stitches

      stitches 16,199

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • erock

      erock 1

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 2006Coltsbestever

      2006Coltsbestever 34,773

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 11,743

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 172

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 7,645

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Indyfan4life

      Indyfan4life 3,342

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Down under wonder

      Down under wonder 9

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Narcosys

      Narcosys 613

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 1,083

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...