Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Frank Reich's Offense is Sweet for Andrew Luck


RollerColt

Recommended Posts

Just finished reading Doyel's IndyStar. article, and... 

 

It's positive for once! 

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/columnists/gregg-doyel/2018/09/10/frank-reichs-offense-sweet-qb-andrew-luck-indianapolis-colts/1251636002/

 

I agree with Gregg on this one, it was awesome to see Reich's true playbook in action. 

 

Mismatches? Check.

Misdirection? Check.

Confused defenders? Check. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely eye candy, definitely an offense we had been clamoring for. I just hope Luck finally gets some continuity of a few years with the same OC, at least 3 for starters. Luck is smart, he can absorb all that the new OC can dish out. So, bring it and give a few play makers and OL around him to get this O to the next level.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I'm shocked people were somewhat disappointed from Sundays game.

 

That was night and day from the last couple of years of hand off, hand off, 3rd and 6 and Doyle tackled after a 5 yd gain, 4th and 1, punt.

 

Loved the shifting alignments, no huddle, traditional alignments, up tempo, normal tempo.

 

This was all in game freaking one. They'll win games, even if they have to outscore teams once #12 has played a little and everyone gets on the same page.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, chad72 said:

Definitely eye candy, definitely an offense we had been clamoring for. I just hope Luck finally gets some continuity of a few years with the same OC, at least 3 for starters. Luck is smart, he can absorb all that the new OC can dish out. So, bring it and give a few play makers and OL around him to get this O to the next level.

 

I'm actually not all that worried about it.  This is Reich's offense..not Sirianni's so like Philly, even if Sirianni winds up getting a HC offer, a new OC will be brought in but the scheme will remain mostly the same. :)

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here’s a pretty good breakdown:

 

check out the pocket. Oline did  okay. 

    Getting Castonzo, Mack, Turbin and (hopefully) Good back can only improve the run.

    I understand Good May get replaced by Heag or Clark but either way, having continuity on the Oline will be HUGH! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Defjamz26 said:

If Castonzo was out there, you probably have him taking less sacks as well. Ball got out of his hand quick.

Yeah like that sack Braden Smith gave up. Probably doesn't happen with Costanzo.

And that looked like it was going to be a big play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the running game is going to improve with the return of Mack, Turbin, and Costanzo.  I really love the Nyeheim Hines element in the passing game.  And when Mack gets back that's another guy who can stress linebackers in the passing game.  So with the way we use our backs in the passing game we really have more than one speedy guy out there other than TY.   We've got tight ends who are mismatches, plus backs who are mismatches to go along with possession guys as well.  We've got more than people think we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2018 at 1:19 PM, Savage21 said:

Andrew Luck was made to play in this style of offense. Give the guy some blocking, a consistent and respectable running game, and a few more playmakers and I'll be happy.

 

In the NFL Top 100 a few years ago, Richard Sherman said something along these lines...."No shots at his current O-Line but give Andrew Luck some proper protection, a few more weapons, and that guy is a very very very dangerous man". This was said when Sherman was probably the best CB in the league, dude had seen it firsthand at Stanford.

 

Luck turned 29 today. It's time for him to become the best QB in this league. The Colts defense is crappy, the weapons outside Hilton are questionable, but I am positive that it doesn't matter and it's time for Reich and Luck to burn this league to shreds. He can absolutely do it. Rodgers has been carrying a crappy coach and roster for years, Luck has done same. I've seen enough to know Reich and Sirianni are smart men, Luck will erupt...just needs to stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/09/12/andrew-luck-shoulder-injury-indianapolis-colts-passing-game

Quote

 

How Did the Colts Adjust the Passing Game for Andrew Luck?

 

By ANDY BENOIT 

September 12, 2018

 

In his first two seasons in the NFL, Andrew Luck put up passer ratings of 76.5 and 87.0 while leading mediocre Colts teams to 11-5 records both years—enough to be labeled a good, but not great, quarterback by many.

 

But inside the NFL, Luck was already being billed as perhaps the game’s best quarterback. It was only a matter of time before his stats would catch up to his extraordinary film. (Indeed, they did in Year Three, when Luck threw for 4,761 yards and led the league with 40 touchdown passes.)

 

Football people were gaga over Luck’s preternatural ability to extend the action. While many high-level quarterbacks extended plays by breaking them down and conjuring magic, Luck extended them through sheer protraction. Plays that were designed to attack in three or four seconds would be carried out by Luck for five or six seconds—without abandoning the play’s design! Late in the down, Luck would still be in the pocket, eyes downfield, working through his deepest progressions. No defense could hold up long enough.

 

But some worried that Luck couldn’t hold up either. A byproduct of extending plays, especially within structure, is that the quarterback absorbs more hits—Impactful hits, for that matter. Luck might make a brilliant throw with a defender bearing down, but he’d take a thundering body blow in the process. Most alarming was how often his arm and shoulder would be exposed on this contact.

As you know Luck eventually suffered a 20-month shoulder injury, leading many to question whether the quarterback could ever play again. Football people were asking a different question: if he does play again, will he play with the same style?

 

This topic was at the forefront of Indianapolis’s head coaching search—after Josh McDaniels’s spurning, the Colts eventually landed on Eagles offensive coordinator Frank Reich. At training camp, I posed the question to Reich, as well as to Luck himself.

 

“Andrew absolutely can continue to extend plays,” Reich said. “His career is just getting started. I know he’s already accomplished a lot, but Tom Brady, Drew Brees, these guys are playing until they’re 40 years old. Andrew’s got a long way to go yet. He has elite athleticism for the position, so his ability to extend within the pocket, that’s still a big part of it.”

Luck, however, sounded a touch more pragmatic.

 

“I’d like to think I can continue to do it,” he said. “But I think it’d be foolish of me to not to adjust certain things about [extending plays]. It’s a part of my game that I don’t want to lose, but it’s about applying it in a more efficient, productive way.”

 

One reason Reich got the Colts job was he’d spent the last two years coaching Carson Wentz, the closest thing to a Luck clone. Prior to tearing his ACL, Wentz in 2017 was having an MVP campaign on the strength of his late-in-the-down playmaking. But it was Philly’s offense in Wentz’s 2016 rookie season that’s a more attractive fit for Luck post-shoulder injury. To simplify things for their young quarterback, the Eagles had employed a lot of spread formations and pre-snap bells and whistles. Post-snap, Wentz would drop back three or five steps and get the ball out. There’s only enough time for one or two reads, and more importantly, there’s not enough time for the pass rush to get home.

 

The Indianapolis offense had this dink-and-dunk texture in Week 1 against Cincinnati. Luck completed 73.6% of his passes (his career completion rate coming in was 59.2), averaging 5.4 intended air yards per attempt, which NextGen Stats cited as lower than every QB except Alex Smith and Derek Carr. On average, he got the ball out in 2.49 seconds. Thirty five times the Colts lined up in some sort of spread formation, including eight snaps with an empty backfield—a formation that demands the ball get out promptly. The offense also went shotgun 61 times, which positions a QB to throw quicker.

 

The challenge is to stay committed to this new approach. The Colts started right tackle/guard Joe Haeg in place of an injured Anthony Castonzo at left tackle. It’s easier to call quick-strike throws if you’re unsure that your left tackle will maintain his pass blocks. Will Reich get more aggressive with deeper dropbacks once Castonzo returns?

 

Another concern is Indy’s wide receivers also struggled when Cincy’s talented corners applied man coverage. If wideouts can’t win one-on-one in space, spread formations and quick throws can’t work. You can help receivers through scheme, though those ploys tend to result in more designer downfield plays, where routes have longer to unfold.

 

There’s also the question of how hard the Colts should commit to getting the ball out of Luck’s hands quickly. If extending plays is what makes him special, should they really sacrifice that in the name of precaution? It’s the same debate people have long had about dynamic running quarterbacks. What’s the point of protecting a QB if you’re not going to maximize his strengths? The rebuttal, of course, is what good are the strengths if a QB isn’t available?

This doesn’t have to be a binary decision. Reich’s job is to help Luck find that delicate balance between playing responsibly and aggressively. Luck has enough elite traits—presnap awareness, field vision, precision accuracy—to make it work. How he does will determine his and the Colts’ future.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, coltsfeva said:

Here’s a pretty good breakdown:

 

check out the pocket. Oline did  okay. 

    Getting Castonzo, Mack, Turbin and (hopefully) Good back can only improve the run.

    I understand Good May get replaced by Heag or Clark but either way, having continuity on the Oline will be HUGH! 

HUGHs was terrible for our line a couple years back :funny:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I predict all of the players listed as questionable will play.  The Steelers offense is meh.
    • The problem with hiring a defensive guy and tasking him with building that offensive support system is that most of them just don’t have it, and they’re not really capable of building it. There aren’t enough Tom Moore types out there to help institute that long-term knowledgeable stability.    We got lucky with Pagano and Luck having Arians in the building, and largely being the head coach for the majority of Luck’s rookie season. But watching Pagano flail to fill an offensive staff post-Arians was painful, and most of the defensive head coaches struggle in the exact same way. It’s out of their specialty and out of their comfort zone and it just makes it harder than it needs to be on everyone involved.    The most advantageous way to hire a defensive HC is with an already established QB and system that he can just come in and not have to build from the ground up. 
    • You should double check. I just did. Womack started both games, with Jaylon Johnson on the other side, and Kenny Moore at nickel.    Against the Packers, Womack got 20 snaps, Flowers got 19. Against the Bears, Womack got 28 snaps, Flowers got 41 (and he left before the game ended, so maybe he would have gotten more). Maybe Flowers was on his way to taking Womack's spot in the lineup, but Womack was on the field as a starter in both games.
    • Game on the line, inconsistent passer at QB, and the OL is the strength of the team. Everyone in the world knew that the first priority was to stop JT. And they couldn't.    I don't know what's with this myth that there's something deficient about JT as a RB. It's nonsense.
    • I think he's probably only using 25% of his playbook so far, for various reasons. Some of that is intentional, as they work in some concepts with a young QB and a young-ish supporting cast.   Another part of it is that the Colts game script has been heavily skewed, especially in the first two games, so the gameplan had to be reduced as the game went along. The offense couldn't stay on the field, and the defense couldn't get off of it. It was better against the Bears, but their offense still ran 30 more plays than ours. Total, our offense has run 87 fewer plays than our opponents. Teams usually script their first 15 offensive plays, and I wonder if the Colts have gotten through that opening script in any of the first three games. So I think there are some things that they'd like to have run, but so far they have not been able to get to them.   I don't think it's a binary 'do we call winning plays, or do we call plays to develop the QB' consideration. I don't necessarily agree that those priorities have to compete with one another, but it does require a balance to do them both justice. I don't think it does this team any good, short term or long term, to restrict Richardson to 15 passing attempts/game, or to use him as an option QB like this is the Navy team, even if they felt like that could be a way to win some games. I also don't think they should coach him as if every game is "winner take all," and have him lay his body on the line or try to drop back 50 times a game.    And we have to blame Richardson and the WRs to a certain extent. There have been a lot of missed throws, drops, and turnovers. Those plays have stalled or ended several possessions, and that's not on the play calling.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...