Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Heat Increasing for Answers


Coltsfan1284

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 324
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Irsay's December answer to potential change was 6 minutes long. He praised Grigson and Pagano's record and talked about caution and continuity. He left open the possibility of "change" in the context of "You are always looking to make your team better no matter how successful you are"......and he said,

 

"I don't have any anticipation of change. There is no plan of that."

 

This was right after the second loss to Houston and the Colts were 6-7. 

 

Of course, he left open the slight possibility, but I don't see how he owes anybody any further explanation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

What's the point in getting Twitter followers? Especially when you're full of it?

In the current age of Internet news, it's not about being right, it's about being first.   Respectable reports with an actual reputation aren't going to put their reputation on the line just to be the first one.  But an unknown guy with no credible would gladly take the risk, if he could potentially be right and the first one to report it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, egg said:

Irsay's December answer to potential change was 6 minutes long. He praised Grigson and Pagano's record and talked about caution and continuity. He left open the possibility of "change" in the context of "You are always looking to make your team better no matter how successful you are"......and he said,

 

"I don't have any anticipation of change. There is no plan of that."

 

This was right after the second loss to Houston and the Colts were 6-7. 

 

Of course, he left open the slight possibility, but I don't see how he owes anybody any further explanation.

If he did, indeed, plan on making changes, do you think he would come out say that he was?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:

If he did, indeed, plan on making changes, do you think he would come out say that he was?

 

I personally think he was honest in the interview about everything he said, including the remote possibility that he would make a change. So, it could happen, but probably won't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PeterBowman said:

guess this is the go to thread for the Gruden related topics....the others got locked.

That is the one thing I hate about this site...Who wants to have to go through a thread that is 100 pages long...Just let the threads die on there own..If people aren't interested they will...Some threads cover a certain aspect of the situation, if it bothers people they don't have to click or comment on them...This is the only forum that does this, and I personally think it is unnecessary. .I dont want to have to look through multiple pages to find new content or refresh myself on previous content...It is called a FAN FORUM, how about letting the fans decide what they choose to talk about and not a few people in control who think they know best..It's the offseason what are people supposed to talk about.?.Lets just merge everything into 1 stupid thread then to keep the site organized...smh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

I think locking the other threads has a lot to do with saving people from having the same discussion in several different threads.

That and it devolved into me talking about Brad Dourif and the Chikd's Play series. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jshipp23 said:

That is the one thing I hate about this site...Who wants to have to go through a thread that is 100 pages long...Just let the threads die on there own..If people aren't interested they will...Some threads cover a certain aspect of the situation, if it bothers people they don't have to click or comment on them...This is the only forum that does this, and I personally think it is unnecessary. .I dont want to have to look through multiple pages to find new content or refresh myself on previous content...It is called a FAN FORUM, how about letting the fans decide what they choose to talk about and not a few people in control who think they know best..It's the offseason what are people supposed to talk about.?.Lets just merge everything into 1 stupid thread then to keep the site organized...smh

 

If I had to guess it's more due to the fact that there were some people that had jumped into that thread yesterday and were kinda late to the party, and they were embedding content that had already been submitted by other members. We don't need a thread that has just pages and pages of duplicate content. I saw some tweets get embedded last night that had already been added 2 days prior. Once that starts to happen, it makes sense to lock the thread and start fresh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nadine said:

There is still a gruden thread:  http://forums.colts.com/topic/49846-grudens-first-moves-merge/

 

This thread is general speculation.  people were complaining about too many threads

I know, but it was only a few people..I just think a thread will die naturally...Once they become mega threads i don't even bother to look anymore too much to look thru..When there are multiple threads going in different aspects or directions it just makes it easier in my opinion..Onece they are merged it becomes a jumbled mess..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Steamboat_Shaun said:

 

If I had to guess it's more due to the fact that there were some people that had jumped into that thread yesterday and were kinda late to the party, and they were embedding content that had already been submitted by other members. We don't need a thread that has just pages and pages of duplicate content. I saw some tweets get embedded last night that had already been added 2 days prior. Once that starts to happen, it makes sense to lock the thread and start fresh.

That and people were complaining about all the threads with the same topics 

The thread titles were no longer accurate to what was going on in the threads so, I just opted to keep the most recent one (fewer pages for people to wade through)

 

You can please some of the people........etc.....etc.....etc

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jshipp23 said:

I know, but it was only a few people..I just think a thread will die naturally...Once they become mega threads i don't even bother to look anymore too much to look thru..When there are multiple threads going in different aspects or directions it just makes it easier in my opinion..Onece they are merged it becomes a jumbled mess..

I just merged the gruden plans topic because the topics were similar.  What coaches?, what fee agents?

 

This one is just general speculation

 

This thread wasn't merged, I linked the other threads to it so, it's not a mega merge.  Just 3 pages right now :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tsarquise said:
 
33sOkay, I think they are full of it now. Lmao!
 
 

We are getting a few messages about Harbaugh. We wanted to clear that up with what we know.1st, Irsay and Harbaugh have a good relationship.

I would personally drive to Ann Arbor and pack Jim Harbaughs bags for him if it helped one iota bringing him here as our coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jaric said:

I would personally drive to Ann Arbor and pack Jim Harbaughs bags for him if it helped one iota bringing him here as our coach.

So, now it's Harbaugh instead of Gruen, or is it Harbaugh for Pres/GM and Gruden for coach?

I'm now more completely confused.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

So, now it's Harbaugh instead of Gruen, or is it Harbaugh for Pres/GM and Gruden for coach?

I'm now more completely confused.

If I get to pick it's Harbaugh for coach and maybe also GM depending on what he wants.

 

I'm not really all that excited about Gruden for coach other than him not being Chuck Pagano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

So, now it's Harbaugh instead of Gruen, or is it Harbaugh for Pres/GM and Gruden for coach?

I'm now more completely confused.

niether, that tweet was a response to another account asking if they'd heard any colts/harbaugh rumors recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, jshipp23 said:

That is the one thing I hate about this site...Who wants to have to go through a thread that is 100 pages long...Just let the threads die on there own..If people aren't interested they will...Some threads cover a certain aspect of the situation, if it bothers people they don't have to click or comment on them...This is the only forum that does this, and I personally think it is unnecessary. .I dont want to have to look through multiple pages to find new content or refresh myself on previous content...It is called a FAN FORUM, how about letting the fans decide what they choose to talk about and not a few people in control who think they know best..It's the offseason what are people supposed to talk about.?.Lets just merge everything into 1 stupid thread then to keep the site organized...smh

Count me in!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

^ That same twitter account just said Harbaugh has no interest.

They are being really random now though, talking about John as a possible candidate down the road. Sounds like they're already backtracking on Gruden.

They were responding to people asking them about Harbaugh and they were saying he isn't a candidate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Tsarquise said:
 
33sOkay, I think they are full of it now. Lmao!
 
 

We are getting a few messages about Harbaugh. We wanted to clear that up with what we know.1st, Irsay and Harbaugh have a good relationship.

 

Nevermind, they were responding to people asking about Harbaugh.

 

How can an unverified sports betting account with under 500 followers be considered a reputable source? 

 

Don't believe everything you read on the Internet (or Twitter for that matter). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:


I know. Just seems odd that they'd even mention Harbaugh has a chance at our HC job when they've all but stated Gruden is our new HC.

Exactly. They said he wont be a candidate this year but may be a name to remember in the future.

Why say that if you just said chuck is gone.and Gruden is in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MTC said:

I'm not listening to any of the speculation until Irsay announces he fired Pagano (which in my mind, isn't happening this season).

 

 


Then there are guys like me who are staying skeptical but also probably wading too deep in the rumor waters. It's a fine line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To follow this up before a certain poster tells me the NBA disagrees with me about Tatum because he made 1st team All-NBA, I would just reply and say no way is he better than Edwards. I would take Edwards over him all day and twice on Sunday. Edwards got jipped  making 2nd team. Without Edwards, the Wolves wouldn't even make the playoffs in the West. 
    • Bo Jackson is the greatest athlete of all-time, if anyone thinks otherwise, I want what they are drinking . He was a great NFL football player/RB, good Pro baseball player. Could bench press 450 pounds down to chest and up once and run a 40 in 4.1.
    • He is and he is overrated. He is a great player but I could even argue his teammate Brown is better. Let me say this, I know I come off as a Tatum hater, I really am not. He just never performs in the playoffs like a #1 option. Brown won the MVP for example. Take Brown off that team and the Mavs would have definitely beat them then. Tatum is on a loaded team, they have Brown, Porzingis, White, Holiday, and Horford.    Off the top of my head, players that are better than Tatum are: Joker, Luka, Giannis, Embiid, Edwards, SGA, and even Brown - so he isn't top 7. I would even take Brunson and Haliburton over him - they have more responsibility playing PG and are young as well. I have Tatum top 10 - he is slightly better than Butler and Mitchell, Tatum is great but shaky at times, he cracks my top 10 because LeBron, Curry, and Durant are old and Leonard is always injured. Without Haliburton, the Pacers would be a .500 team. Without Brunson so would the Knicks. Without Tatum, Boston would still win 55 games with Brown/Porzingis/Holiday/White/Horford, they could have won around 70 this past season but quit playing the last 2 weeks.
    • Fever are now in 7th, 8 teams make the playoffs. I think they will get in. Clark is great already, I figured she would be. Screw her critics! 
    • The whole division stinks except for the Brewers and Cards. Cubs have played like doo doo and are only 1 game out of 3rd place  .
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...