Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Heat Increasing for Answers


Coltsfan1284

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 324
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

14 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I'm not even counting on that.  I'm really indifferent as to whether any of these guys stay or go.  I just think it's silly (a) expecting change when Irsay said already he expects no chagne (b) to conflagrate an issue that, for the time being should be a non-issue until further notice and (c) make child-like demands for a response to said conflagrated issue when Irsay has no obligation to discuss anything about it in the first place.  

 

It's no wonder Irsay has said nothing on the topic, because if anyone's paid attention ot the Colts media and these forums over the past month and a half, it doesn't matter hwat Irsay says, there's a loud and obnoxious group of people that won't take him at his word anyway.  So why the hell would he say anything at all?

You know what would've made all of this stop before it started. Irsay saying "Pagano and Grigson WILL be back for the 2017 season, and their jobs are absolutely safe." Don't use a sequence of words that give you an out if you are certain. He created this mess, it's no ones fault but his own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So my take on the things, and the current silence, is that Irsay is at a crossroads with Manning right now. IF I am to believe the reports (and sadly I do believe them because I am optimistic and REALLY want a change), I think that the Gruden deal is basically a done deal and that nothing about that is holding up any announcement. 

 

What I think is causing the extended silence (and more silence today if nothing gets announced) is a conversation that Irsay is probably having with Manning right now about coming on board as team president with Gruden. Like before, there is some definite lack of agreement in that situation because apparently Manning wants a piece of the franchise (no matter how small it is, it will still be worth millions) and essentially a permanent fixture with the franchise while Irsay probably wants Manning around for a few years in a salary basis before committing to something so permanent. 

 

All in all, I believe that we are going hear one of 2 things either today or tommorow: Gruden gets hired and assumes all personnel control as well (leading to Grigson being fired or severely demoted to scouting only or something) OR Gruden and Manning are both hired in a huge press conference which will stay the headlines for weeks on end. The second, by basic nature, is bound to take MUCH longer to negotiate than the former. As of right now, I think that change is more likely than everything remaining the same and Pagano and Grigson coming back at their current roles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lets look at this whole thing from another angle...

 

We know the rumors involve currently 3 people not counting Pagano and Grigson,

 

Gruden

Manning

Irsay..

 

Irsay has been silent, unusually so but that's been pointed out to death

 

Gruden- I'm surprised no one has reached out to Gruden's agent for comment and if they have, obviously they declined to comment, that alone says something as it would put the Gruden rumor to rest if his agent denied reports of any discussions with the Colts

 

Manning- Same as above.  Manning has in the past denied rumors about him and as of now, not a single thing from him(or his agent) denying these reports either. At least none that i've seen.

 

just food for thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, corgi said:

You know what would've made all of this stop before it started. Irsay saying "Pagano and Grigson WILL be back for the 2017 season, and their jobs are absolutely safe." Don't use a sequence of words that give you an out if you are certain. He created this mess, it's no ones fault but his own.

That's the thing.  It's not a mess.  There is no mess.  It's a bunch of people on the outside saying something and about the people on the inside and those people on the inside turning a deaf ear to it.  It's like when you're in high school or at work and people are talking "rumors this and rumors that about Offensively PC."  I can't control (nor do I even care) what other people say about me.  I'm going to do what I want to do and if I want to share anything with anyone, I will.  But their saying anything about me doesn't influence what I do or say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

That's the thing.  It's not a mess.  There is no mess.  It's us on the outside saying something and the people on the inside turning a deaf ear to it.  It's like when you're in high school or at work and people are talking "rumors this and rumors that about Offensively PC."  I can't control (nor do I even care) what other people say about me.  I'm going to do what I want to do and if I want to share anything with anyone, I will.  But their saying anything about me doesn't influence what I do or say.

You're right but at the same time it takes no effort to say "We're all cool and the gang over here." Im okay with the rumors and silence, it's like trying to figure or if the girl you're crushing on "likes you" or is "in like with you". I haven't been in high school for 14 years, I don't remember the proper wording for that situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

I'm not even counting on that.  I'm really indifferent as to whether any of these guys stay or go.  I just think it's silly (a) expecting change when Irsay said already he expects no chagne (b) to conflagrate an issue that, for the time being should be a non-issue until further notice and (c) make child-like demands for a response to said conflagrated issue when Irsay has no obligation to discuss anything about it in the first place.  

 

It's no wonder Irsay has said nothing on the topic, because if anyone's paid attention ot the Colts media and these forums over the past month and a half, it doesn't matter hwat Irsay says, there's a loud and obnoxious group of people that won't take him at his word anyway.  So why the hell would he say anything at all?

Here's the thing....he didn't exactly say there wouldn't be any changes, this is from the interview he gave before we were trounced from playoff contention.....

 

"“Right now, I’m not anticipating making any changes,’’ he told USA Today. “That can always change. It always can when we’re sitting down at the end of the year and evaluate things."

 

https://www.google.com/amp/fox59.com/2016/12/14/colts-jim-irsay-not-anticipating-changes-says-that-can-change/amp/?client=safari

 

 

 

So going by his statement changes could happen, especially since we didn't make playoffs again. I would love to see some changes but whatever happens I won't sleep over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, corgi said:

You're right but at the same time it takes no effort to say "We're all cool and the gang over here." Im okay with the rumors and silence, it's like trying to figure or if the girl you're crushing on "likes you" or is "in like with you". I haven't been in high school for 14 years, I don't remember the proper wording for that situation.

If so would she be your Bae? Your Boo? So confusing, whatever happened to the English language? lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, \m/COLTS\m/ said:

Here's the thing....he didn't exactly say there wouldn't be any changes, this is from the interview he gave before we were trounced from playoff contention.....

 

"“Right now, I’m not anticipating making any changes,’’ he told USA Today. “That can always change. It always can when we’re sitting down at the end of the year and evaluate things."

 

https://www.google.com/amp/fox59.com/2016/12/14/colts-jim-irsay-not-anticipating-changes-says-that-can-change/amp/?client=safari

 

 

 

So going by his statement changes could happen, especially since we didn't make playoffs again. I would love to see some changes but whatever happens I won't sleep over it.

There's a reason the song was titled "I will always love you" and not "I will most likely always love you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, \m/COLTS\m/ said:

Here's the thing....he didn't exactly say there wouldn't be any changes, this is from the interview he gave before we were trounced from playoff contention.....

 

"“Right now, I’m not anticipating making any changes,’’ he told USA Today. “That can always change. It always can when we’re sitting down at the end of the year and evaluate things."

 

https://www.google.com/amp/fox59.com/2016/12/14/colts-jim-irsay-not-anticipating-changes-says-that-can-change/amp/?client=safari

 

 

 

So going by his statement changes could happen, especially since we didn't make playoffs again. I would love to see some changes but whatever happens I won't sleep over it.

That is the thing. While I agree with those saying that he doesn't need to squash every rumor, leaving an out for yourself right before the division slips through our fingers does leave a lot of room for speculation. At this point, I agree with Kravitz who said that Irsay is most likely kicking tires and that this isn't a great look at the end of the day. Perception in the city will be that we were looking to move on, which can't be great for Chuck to hear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Gruden- I'm surprised no one has reached out to Gruden's agent for comment and if they have, obviously they declined to comment, that alone says something as it would put the Gruden rumor to rest if his agent denied reports of any discussions with the Colts

This is my issue with the entire discussion.  Gruden is on Mike and Mike every week, including this week, and not a peep.  Now in their defense, they asked him after the season ended, as they have every year he's been a guest, if he had an interest in returning to coaching and he said no.  But the point remains, it isn't like Gruden is in hiding.  He's a weekly guest on Mike an Mike, and said nothing this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, \m/COLTS\m/ said:

If so would she be your Bae? Your Boo? So confusing, whatever happened to the English language? lol

I just nod and throw up the devil horns when anyone more than 5 years younger than me talks to me:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dirty Mudflaps said:

This is my issue with the entire discussion.  Gruden is on Mike and Mike every week, including this week, and not a peep.  Now in their defense, they asked him after the season ended, as they have every year he's been a guest, if he had an interest in returning to coaching and he said no.  But the point remains, it isn't like Gruden is in hiding.  He's a weekly guest on Mike an Mike, and said nothing this week.

My thoughts exactly, now why he's said nothing..... well that's up for speculation, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

That's the thing.  It's not a mess.  There is no mess. 

 

You beat me to it.

 

I want to know why the Colts don't run a more efficient offense. It has been a mystery to me all season long.

 

Just because I don't get an answer doesn't make it a mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, corgi said:

You're right but at the same time it takes no effort to say "We're all cool and the gang over here." Im okay with the rumors and silence, it's like trying to figure or if the girl you're crushing on "likes you" or is "in like with you". I haven't been in high school for 14 years, I don't remember the proper wording for that situation.

lol @ "don't remember proper wording."

 

Maybe i'ts the lawyer in me, but whne it comes to public disclosures, if you don't have to say anything, don't and if you do, say as little as possible.  So when Irsay says nothing, I get it.  Maybe he's doing it for a couple reasons - maybe he is looking.  In which case, fine, but if he is, then he doesn't have a course of action set in stone yet, at which point, demanding for a response is futile because if hte owner doesn't know, why would we expect an answer.  Being silent can have the effect on people within in the organization, particularly Pagano and Grigson, that effect being the statement that "You're jobs are never safe, so even if you're here this yera, you may not next year.  Do a better job."  Maybe he has a certain distaste for the media creating issues and fabricating news over trivial matters.  It's no secret that Irsay doesn't just leak a story to just anybody and he's selective with who he leaks things to.  If I were ever in a position to be in high demand by the media, I'd pull stunts on them all the time like when Irsay said an announcement is coming at 5pm and then after a substantial period of time tell the media "False alarm.  Come back tomorrow....or don't"  I can't remember when he did that, but he did it earlier this year and the media was *.

 

16 minutes ago, \m/COLTS\m/ said:

Here's the thing....he didn't exactly say there wouldn't be any changes, this is from the interview he gave before we were trounced from playoff contention.....

 

"“Right now, I’m not anticipating making any changes,’’ he told USA Today. “That can always change. It always can when we’re sitting down at the end of the year and evaluate things."

 

https://www.google.com/amp/fox59.com/2016/12/14/colts-jim-irsay-not-anticipating-changes-says-that-can-change/amp/?client=safari

 

 

 

So going by his statement changes could happen, especially since we didn't make playoffs again. I would love to see some changes but whatever happens I won't sleep over it.

As I've said before, the "that can always change" is anecdotal.  It's true, regardless of whether or not it was said.  This whol media circus is not predicated on those handful of words.  It's predicated on the fact that the Colts went 8-8 and missed the playoffs a second straight year, there have been some leaked grumblings from players about Grigson and Pagano, and its fueled by the fact that other teams have publicly made known that they are moving on or staying with a certain guy on or near Black Monday.  In all of the curmundgeonly ramblings of the media, no one has really hammered that part of the quote as the basis of the story without glossing over the sentence before it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Lets look at this whole thing from another angle...

 

We know the rumors involve currently 3 people not counting Pagano and Grigson,

 

Gruden

Manning

Irsay..

 

Irsay has been silent, unusually so but that's been pointed out to death

 

Gruden- I'm surprised no one has reached out to Gruden's agent for comment and if they have, obviously they declined to comment, that alone says something as it would put the Gruden rumor to rest if his agent denied reports of any discussions with the Colts

 

Manning- Same as above.  Manning has in the past denied rumors about him and as of now, not a single thing from him(or his agent) denying these reports either. At least none that i've seen.

 

just food for thought

The only "reports" are tweets from Brad Wells though. It's not like it's on ESPN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 12to13 said:

The only "reports" are tweets from Brad Wells though. It's not like it's on ESPN.

no, Brad's not the only one.  there's been a few others.  That said, I'm not really buying any of them, but I do think Irsay has reached out to explore other options, who, what or when, I dont know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csmopar said:

no, Brad's not the only one.  there's been a few others.  That said, I'm not really buying any of them, but I do think Irsay has reached out to explore other options, who, what or when, I dont know

A few other tweets? It's been nothing but tweets so far. I'm not buying it, it's not even realistic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, OffensivelyPC said:

lol @ "don't remember proper wording."

 

Maybe i'ts the lawyer in me, but whne it comes to public disclosures, if you don't have to say anything, don't and if you do, say as little as possible.  So when Irsay says nothing, I get it.  Maybe he's doing it for a couple reasons - maybe he is looking.  In which case, fine, but if he is, then he doesn't have a course of action set in stone yet, at which point, demanding for a response is futile because if hte owner doesn't know, why would we expect an answer.  Being silent can have the effect on people within in the organization, particularly Pagano and Grigson, that effect being the statement that "You're jobs are never safe, so even if you're here this yera, you may not next year.  Do a better job."  Maybe he has a certain distaste for the media creating issues and fabricating news over trivial matters.  It's no secret that Irsay doesn't just leak a story to just anybody and he's selective with who he leaks things to.  If I were ever in a position to be in high demand by the media, I'd pull stunts on them all the time like when Irsay said an announcement is coming at 5pm and then after a substantial period of time tell the media "False alarm.  Come back tomorrow."  I can't remember when he did that, but he did it earlier this year and the media was *.

 

As I've said before, the "that can always change" is anecdotal.  It's true, regardless of whether or not it was said.  This whol media circus is not predicated on those handful of words.  It's predicated on the fact that the Colts went 8-8 and missed the playoffs a second straight year, there have been some leaked grumblings from players about Grigson and Pagano, and its fueled by the fact that other teams have publicly made known that they are moving on or staying with a certain guy on or near Black Monday.  In all of the curmundgeonly ramblings of the media, no one has really hammered that part of the quote as the basis of the story without glossing over the sentence before it.

Listen bruh, I'm literally gonna get you lit with some savage bling bling no whu I'm sayin? lol

 

Anyway... When I read that statement it reeks of a person who has not made a decision on if he wants to make a change or not, if  Irsay would have simply said I will not be making any changes all the speculation would probably not exist . IMO of course!

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 12to13 said:

A few other tweets? It's been nothing but tweets so far. I'm not buying it, it's not even realistic. 

i wouldn't say its unrealistic, I'd say the likilihood something actually gets done is slim. but there is a chance

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fisticuffs111 said:

Brad's tweets seem a lot less confident.

I could definitely see some source just trolling him. Hard to imagine Brad Wells being a well liked guy among Colts inner circles.

There is another Twitter account that has been tweeting the same things. The Twitter account is named "let's knock em down". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tsarquise said:

There is another Twitter account that has been tweeting the same things. The Twitter account is named "let's knock em down". 


Just saw that twitter last night. They, or at least it seems like a group, have been tweeting a lot since the beginning.

One really interesting thing they tweeted was the night before the Texans games. They said something like "sources tell us to keep an eye on the Texans game" and while it probably wasn't what people were expecting, a lot of rumors came from that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, 12to13 said:

The only "reports" are tweets from Brad Wells though. It's not like it's on ESPN.

 

No, there has been reports from JMV on 1070 the fan too and he has proved in the past that he has solid sources. I'd believe him over anyone else honestly.  Kravitz who used to work at the Indy Star has also commented on how he has heard the same things.  Greg Doyel who now works at the star put on twitter yesterday that Pagano is like Irsay safety school but Irsay has applied at Yale and Harvard and is awaiting results.  So clearly he believes this too. Stephen Holder has indicated he does not believe this is over either.  There have been several people who have heard the same information, some are just more open in sharing that information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, indy1888 said:

 

No, there has been reports from JMV on 1070 the fan too and he has proved in the past that he has solid sources. I'd believe him over anyone else honestly.  Kravitz who used to work at the Indy Star has also commented on how he has heard the same things.  Greg Doyel who now works at the star put on twitter yesterday that Pagano is like Irsay safety school but Irsay has applied at Yale and Harvard and is awaiting results.  So clearly he believes this too. Stephen Holder has indicated he does not believe this is over either.  There have been several people who have heard the same information, some are just more open in sharing that information.

which is why it's so easy to believe something's up.....just not sure the stages of where it's at

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fisticuffs111 said:


Just saw that twitter last night. They, or at least it seems like a group, have been tweeting a lot since the beginning.

One really interesting thing they tweeted was the night before the Texans games. They said something like "sources tell us to keep an eye on the Texans game" and while it probably wasn't what people were expecting, a lot of rumors came from that day.

Yeah, I noticed that tweet. They seem kind of legit to me. They are adamant that Pagano is out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ColtsLuck1292 as we have said all along, Pagano is out. We've never changed our reporting on him.

 

 

Quick update: Gruden is still Irsay's main target & talks r progressing. Gruden wants to have an elite staff & make sure GM is on same page

 

 

We have heard he has concerns with Grigson and has people he'd prefer. It appears Irsay would prefer Grigson but is willing to compromise.

 

 

Right now we are hearing Irsay/Gruden are putting feelers out to various GM options. We don't know where they are in that process

 

 

Remember, some "experts" said decisions would be made today. They weren't. We have consitently said to be patient. #colts #nfl

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tsarquise said:

@ColtsLuck1292 as we have said all along, Pagano is out. We've never changed our reporting on him.

 

 

Quick update: Gruden is still Irsay's main target & talks r progressing. Gruden wants to have an elite staff & make sure GM is on same page

 

 

We have heard he has concerns with Grigson and has people he'd prefer. It appears Irsay would prefer Grigson but is willing to compromise.

 

 

Right now we are hearing Irsay/Gruden are putting feelers out to various GM options. We don't know where they are in that process

 

 

Remember, some "experts" said decisions would be made today. They weren't. We have consitently said to be patient. #colts #nfl

Just trying to get more twitter followers. I just don't believe Irsay and Gruden are together agreeing on a contract looking at a new gm..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, indy1888 said:

 

No, there has been reports from JMV on 1070 the fan too and he has proved in the past that he has solid sources. I'd believe him over anyone else honestly.  Kravitz who used to work at the Indy Star has also commented on how he has heard the same things.  Greg Doyel who now works at the star put on twitter yesterday that Pagano is like Irsay safety school but Irsay has applied at Yale and Harvard and is awaiting results.  So clearly he believes this too. Stephen Holder has indicated he does not believe this is over either.  There have been several people who have heard the same information, some are just more open in sharing that information.

The general feeling seems to be the same, it appears that changes are in the works.  But we won't see reliable sources report anything until it appears to be imminent.  Talks are just that and can easily fall apart.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Corndog said:

The general feeling seems to be the same, it appears that changes are in the works.  But we won't see reliable sources report anything until it appears to be imminent.  Talks are just that and can easily fall apart.   


If I had to bet money as to what ultimately happens, it's that a deal will fall through and Pagano will be back.

That's not to say that I could be totally wrong and there's no negotiations going on at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Matt Gay hate is a convenient outlet for Chris Ballard hate. Which explains why it's mostly unreasonable.   However, I don't understand why they're putting him out there right now. He's evidently hurt, and he needs some time to get right.
    • Speaking of Baker:   I've been skeptical that Bryce Young can overcome the marks against him, so I'm not exactly waiting for him to turn it on. But I was skeptical about Baker as well, for different reasons. He never looked as ineffective and incapable as Bryce has looked so far, but he's a good example of a player who a) was in a bad situation, and b) still had to get better at QBing. 
    • Well, I thought the Olubi kid showed some solid play making ability with good tackling so i'm surprised they pushed rookie Carlies, who missed a fair amount of time, ahead of him so quickly. So one could say the position has been addressed by drafting a LB each of the last 2 seasons with guys our people like.  Carlies did play 46 snaps Sunday. Like our other Gus led LB's he didn't seem to be where he needed to be when needed. But what the hey, that becomes much more likely when you have 2-3 seasons under your belt, With a d-line playing well in front of you.     It wouldn't surprise me at all if Williams throws for 250+ with 3 touchdowns. The little devil on my shoulder tells me it would be a good thing, just another nail in Gus's coffin. And of course that is a sad place to be. lol  
    • If the past two seasons have shown anything, it's that you can never fully write off a QB based off of limited information. The NFL journey can be a long one.    Geno Smith, Baker Mayfield, Sam Darnold... All written off as failures just a few years ago.    @Superman and I have spoken for years on how the surrounding organization plays as much of a role in the success of a QB as traits and abilities.
    • Flutie had a great career.  He was awesome in the CFL.  Maybe that's what Young should do for a year or two.
  • Members

    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,305

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,634

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,202

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colts1324

      Colts1324 1,079

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,011

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TigerColt

      TigerColt 114

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,657

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DavePSL

      DavePSL 119

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 866

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coming on strong

      coming on strong 4,391

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...