Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

What Changes in the NFL would you like to make?


FanFromtheWasteland

Recommended Posts

Since this is such a dead time in the football season and everyone including me are looking for something constructive to discuss, I thought it would be interesting to see what all of you would like to adapt or change in the NFL. My change would be a creation of a discipline council made up of owners, players, x players and a reprisentative from the PA and the commisioners office. All disciplinary actions go through them and what they say goes. End of story

Mods feel free to move to nfl general if this is where it should go

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1.I'd like see coaches be able to have as many padded practices during TC as they want to have provided medical staff(Not th teams med staff either) on hand deem a player is healthy to go

 

2.The minimum number of enshrines into the NFL HoF each year is 4 (Max 8)....Which I would keep it at 4 while also selecting 4 from the 1970's on back....A lot of the newer breed has gotten in so fast compared to guys that while don't have the numbers some built the foundation of the sport and have earned getting in

 

To be continued

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah...I would change by reverting back. Deflategate, Bountygate, what crap we've been handed the last few years.

I would revert back to less triggerhappy refs. The rules we complain about have actually been in place for decades. The refs just lost their judgement call duties somewhere in the middle. If a Slot WR's hip is grazed, if a DL's wrist hits a QB's facemask on accident, if they hear a louder than usual pad collision...all things that are automatic flags in spite of better judgement that everybody watching has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*I would like the ball actually have to be in the end zone before a play is a TD.

I don't think its fair to simply touch the pylon or wave the ball over the pylon.

*I would like overtime to be a complete 15-minute non-sudden death period.

If no one scores, game ends in a tie, complicating the playoff race (a good thing)

*I would like the end zone extended five yards to passing patterns could be effectively run near the goal line.

*I would like field goals of less than 30 yards to be only 2 points and field goals over 50 yards to be four points.

Put some game into that game.

*I would like a offensive player stiff arming a defender in the face mask to be a face mask penalty.

Right now, that rule is among the most unfair in all of sports. Offensive players can palm or slap the face mask of defenders..defensive players cannot do the exact same thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*I would like the ball actually have to be in the end zone before a play is a TD.

I don't think its fair to simply touch the pylon or wave the ball over the pylon.

*I would like overtime to be a complete 15-minute non-sudden death period.

If no one scores, game ends in a tie, complicating the playoff race (a good thing)

*I would like the end zone extended five yards to passing patterns could be effectively run near the goal line.

*I would like field goals of less than 30 yards to be only 2 points and field goals over 50 yards to be four points.

Put some game into that game.

*I would like a offensive player stiff arming a defender in the face mask to be a face mask penalty.

Right now, that rule is among the most unfair in all of sports. Offensive players can palm or slap the face mask of defenders..defensive players cannot do the exact same thing

Don't know if I agree with the 2 point version of the field goal but I do agree with the 4 point version

Link to comment
Share on other sites

something could be done about kick offs and punt returns.  it seems like a waste of time watching most of pats kickoffs go out the back of the end zone.  maybe they could move kickoffs back a little bit.

 

as for punts, if feels like a flag is imminent about 50% of the time if there is no fair catch.  i dont have any great ideas to fix this one other than maybe ease up a little bit about  holding and block in the back calls on returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate how pass interference/holding is called nowadays. The defensive player should be able to get physical passed 5 yards. As far as the pass interference downfield, maybe coaches should be able to challenge PI calls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make any pass thrown to a receiver that is behind the line of scrimmage a "live" ball.

Have quarterbacks call the plays

Power to challenge illegal hits

Force the Patriots to retire those hideous uniforms

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give both teams a possession in overtime.

Expand active rosters and game day rosters.

Loosen up the practice squad policies so players can be moved up and down more easily.

Loosen up the IR rules so short term IR can be used more effectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*I would like the ball actually have to be in the end zone before a play is a TD.

I don't think its fair to simply touch the pylon or wave the ball over the pylon.

*I would like overtime to be a complete 15-minute non-sudden death period.

If no one scores, game ends in a tie, complicating the playoff race (a good thing)

*I would like the end zone extended five yards to passing patterns could be effectively run near the goal line.

*I would like field goals of less than 30 yards to be only 2 points and field goals over 50 yards to be four points.

Put some game into that game.

*I would like a offensive player stiff arming a defender in the face mask to be a face mask penalty.

Right now, that rule is among the most unfair in all of sports. Offensive players can palm or slap the face mask of defenders..defensive players cannot do the exact same thing

The pylon is in the end zone so if the ball touches it. it is a TD. Wave over is a judgment call. Over 50 yd FGs maybe should be 4 points but never under 3, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give both teams a possession in overtime.

Expand active rosters and game day rosters.

Loosen up the practice squad policies so players can be moved up and down more easily.

Loosen up the IR rules so short term IR can be used more effectively.

I think they should do away with the IR all together. Just let the team deal with the player limit no matter. The players get paid while on IR so really what difference does it make? Maybe I am overlooking something? I do agree with both teams getting the ball in OT. Both teams played even through the regular game so both teams deserves the chance to tie in OT. With the rules swaying to the offense I think it would make for a better game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see a change in the playing surfaces, engineered to slow down foot speed by, say, 10%.

 

Here's why.  Injuries would drop, significantly.  Particularly, head injuries.  Aside from the humanitarian aspect, fans like to see their favorite players actually play, with fewer on the IR.  Fan appeal = good for business.  I'm guessing many pros would appreciate a better chance to really enjoy their retirement, too, with maybe fewer painkillers needed.

 

No loss of all the things that make the NFL great...tackling, receiving, running, blocking.  The NFL of the 50s and 60s was still good football, even though the game has sped up since.

 

One way to do this is a softer surface.  Fewer shoulder separations, then, also.

 

I watch track events when I want to see foot speed.

 

Thanks for asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

make 80+ yard TD passes worth 28 points

It's 80 yards, dude........should be 80 points. 28 points for an 80 yard pass isn't even 5 points per ten yards. 

 

If you're not going to take this thread seriously, you should leave. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Power to challenge illegal hits

 

I love this idea considering how defensive players get the penalty flag for anything remotely close to roughing the passer. I was so furious when HOF RB Marshall Faulk complained when the rules committee toyed with the notion that backs might get called for using their helmets as a weapon prior to a collision & then it got dropped completely. What a crybaby. Boo Hoo. 

*I would like the ball actually have to be in the end zone before a play is a TD.

I don't think its fair to simply touch the pylon or wave the ball over the pylon.

*I would like a offensive player stiff arming a defender in the face mask to be a face mask penalty.

Right now, that rule is among the most unfair in all of sports. Offensive players can palm or slap the face mask of defenders..defensive players cannot do the exact same thing

I like the idea of physically having to enter the end zone as a WR, TE, RB, or QB. Touching the pylon is a cop out. Well said OUM. 

 

No, I like the stiff arm. That stays & is no penalty what so ever because football is all about speed, balance, angles & the ability to tackle 1 on 1. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love this idea considering how defensive players get the penalty flag for anything remotely close to roughing the passer. I was so furious when HOF RB Marshall Faulk complained when the rules committee toyed with the notion that backs might get called for using their helmets as a weapon prior to a collision & then it got dropped completely. What a crybaby. Boo Hoo. 

I like the idea of physically having to enter the end zone as a WR, TE, RB, or QB. Touching the pylon is a cop out. Well said OUM. 

 

No, I like the stiff arm. That stays & is no penalty what so ever because football is all about speed, balance, angles & the ability to tackle 1 on 1.

Would you then allow defenders to strike offensive players in the face mask?

To be fair?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see a change in the playing surfaces, engineered to slow down foot speed by, say, 10%.

 

Here's why.  Injuries would drop, significantly.  Particularly, head injuries.  Aside from the humanitarian aspect, fans like to see their favorite players actually play, with fewer on the IR.  Fan appeal = good for business.  I'm guessing many pros would appreciate a better chance to really enjoy their retirement, too, with maybe fewer painkillers needed.

 

No loss of all the things that make the NFL great...tackling, receiving, running, blocking.  The NFL of the 50s and 60s was still good football, even though the game has sped up since.

 

One way to do this is a softer surface.  Fewer shoulder separations, then, also.

 

I watch track events when I want to see foot speed.

 

Thanks for asking.

I can appreciate wanting to restrict injures. A noble endeavor ILV. I'm all for natural grass as opposed to artificial turf, but I really don't wanna see the speed of the game restricted at all. In track, no one is trying to bring you down hard on every play much less swarm a QB like a pack of bloodthirsty wolves so I disagree respectfully with your comparison there. Okay, I get what you mean. Pass rushers & LBs can't compete with quick footed WRs. That's true they can't but that's where quality CB secondary execution comes into play as well as a good rotation of fresh legs at the DE position matters. 

 

Your reasoning is admirable IVL, but it will never come to pass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you then allow defenders to strike offensive players in the face mask?

To be fair?

About 80% of the time a stiff arm is all about creating separation & not falling down basically ending the play where ever the RB or WR falls so I don't usually see this act as something meant to harm a defensive player tying to bring a guy down. 

 

In my book, defensive players either win at the line of scrimmage slowing down the timing of routes & if they can't do that to begin with, a stiff arm won't really matter anyway. I'm more inclined to give a defender more leave way on a horse collar tackle because if the dude could catch up to the athlete with the ball & simply did his best to bring a back down that's impressive to me even though I know it's illegal by todays rules. Naturally, I don't wanna see any player sustain a career ending injury of course.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would play 18 regular season games and two pre-season games. 16 and 4 cheats the fans and bores the players

You're not wrong OUM. I don't always watch complete preseason games myself either, but if an athlete is the the roster bubble, those extra 2 games can be the difference between getting cut or making the squad. 

 

Not only that head coaches & their coordinators barely have enough time to evaluate all positions as it is, especially with the limited number of CBA practices in full pads.

 

Sooner or later, the NFL season will expand with a 2nd bye week added for all teams. I know this, but preseason games matter on the scouting front & reducing them will = greater injures & compromise rosters.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not wrong OUM. I don't always watch complete preseason games myself either, but if an athlete is the the roster bubble, those extra 2 games can be the difference between getting cut or making the squad. 

 

Not only that head coaches & their coordinators barely have enough time to evaluate all positions as it is, especially with the limited number of CBA practices in full pads.

 

Sooner or later, the NFL season will expand with a 2nd bye week added for all teams. I know this, but preseason games matter on the scouting front & reducing them will = greater injures & compromise rosters.

That's a good point about rookies trying to make the roster. The 2nd bye week is needed. That's exactly right.

At the very east would be to go to 16 and 3 with an extra bye/

Ive never brought he argument that 18 games and 2 pres-season games will create more injuries. At one time, there was 14 and 6 and moving to 16 and 4 didn't create more injuries, I don't beliveve.

I'm also unhappy about fans paying ticket prices for pre-season games.

In a related issue, I think rosters should go up to 48...4 by 11 plus 4 specialists (kickers and longsnappers)

I don't know where the number 45 (game day roster limit) comes from

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Force the Patriots to retire those hideous uniforms

Are we talking their throw back uniforms or their current silver ones? I kind of like the red paints & white helmets. As far as old uniforms go, Pittsburgh's are the worst. They remind me 1920's prison uniforms. 

 

"The Bees Knees" look has got to go like yesterday dadeo.  haha

 

Steelers-Throwbacks-2012.jpg

 

 

acb20792e8439a1d28a1f2cdbd7fdf1c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with several posters here :

1. Superman - each team must have a possession in OT (opening drive TD for the win in OT is garbage)

2. oldunclemark - 18 game regular season, 2 preseason games (extend TC to evaluate players)

3. southwest1 - 2 byes (will become necessary in an 18 game season)

Finally, and this has been mentioned before - Narrow the goal posts (does not have to be extreme to achieve more difficulty)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make any pass thrown to a receiver that is behind the line of scrimmage a "live" ball.

Have quarterbacks call the plays

Power to challenge illegal hits

Force the Patriots to retire those hideous uniforms

Agreed, BOTT! New England's old uniforms are even far superior to the ones worn now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

coaches should be able to challenge PI calls.

this is a good one that doesnt get enough attention.  you should be allowed to challenge a non call too.

 

i would also add personal fouls to the list of reviewable penalties

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Appreciate the response.   A few thoughts to share….   i think Irsay only steps down IF his health deteriorates.  No use in comparing him to Kraft, his health appears to be better even though he’s much older.     But if Irsay stepped aside, here’s why I don’t see the daughters blowing things up and starting over.   If they fire Ballard — fine.  But if they also fire Dodds and Brown, at that point, I think you’d see the rest of the scouting department resign (if they weren’t fired too).  They will all get good jobs elsewhere too.     At that point, Steichen is surrounded by very few who know him.  Worse for the daughters…. There would then be a clear line.   With Irsay vs with the daughters.  And if the new GM doesn’t do well and things go south, then the blame won’t go as much to the new GM as it will to the daughters who decided to blow things up.   They’ll be the focus of incredible hate if the new regime makes fans long for what looks like the good old days of the Ballard years.      The argument for not hiring Dodds or Brown seems to be little more than Ballard-hate.  Those people want nothing more to do with anyone associated with Chris Ballard.   Guilt by association, not because of ability.      Thats why I described hiring one of Dodds or Brown as the easiest, simplest, cleanest move to make.  Much less risk.  But blowing it up and starting over is the far higher risk move.  Threading a tiny needle hoping to get it right.     By the way, if you fire Ballard and company and hire a new GM, who does those interviews?   Honestly, who?   Who would you feel good about conducting the interviews of the new GM?      Firing someone is easy.  Hiring the right person is really hard.    Thanks for your patience. 
    • I just want to be on record now. If the Colts fire Ballard for whatever reason in the next few years, I have no clue what direction they will go. Just wanted to get that out there in case any of you were wondering my opinion on this. 
    • I understand there are a lot of people that don’t know the story. I for one am burnt out on it. I do find it funny they “stole” the Ravens from Cleveland but whine about the Colts leaving. Sports bring out the best homers and team spirit. 
    • Colts by 17. Going to be a rough week for you buddy.    Thats a joke. I have no idea but would probably lean towards the Packers winning if I had to choose. I do think it’s great you may have transitioned to a third franchise QB in a row. I hope Love has a great career for you guys. Always had a soft spot for the Packers and they would probably be my team if I didn’t love the Colts. I enjoy it when you guys are good. Best of luck this year!!  
    • Packers have a pretty strong and balanced team. The defense was able to hold the Chiefs to a low score last year while the offense was perhaps the only one to score over 24 points on the Chiefs defense.    But really it’s hard to say as of right now. Let’s see how everyone fares during training camp and after their season openers. Lots of things can change. 
  • Members

    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,531

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,163

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...