-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
-
Thread of the Week
-
-
Topics
-
-
Posts
-
Brown plays a premium position and had some issues staying on the field. There was risk involved with that but that was a trade for a player that has more of an impact because the position he plays. Yes Buckner makes a huge impact on the field because he’s a good player, but there isn’t a person here who wouldn’t rather have a WR, LT, or Edge Rusher of the same or greater caliber as him. So trading for AJ Brown or Tyreek Hill is much more aggressive than trading for Buckner. Most of the playoff teams had elite receiver rooms and average DTs. -
By throwing BBZ · Posted
You and your kind keep bringing up how Miami or San Diego were willing to NOT draft THEIR Franchise QB that year. You are out in left field on this. Move on because you are WRONG. Complain about something real! -
Wentz trade had a higher risk factor because of the 1st rounder given up compared to Matt Ryan, IMO. -
By Restinpeacesweetchloe · Posted
I still can’t shake the feeling something else was going on in the locker room. I don’t think it’s far fetched it had something to do with Covid vaccines ect. Then when Covid hit the team crap hit the fan.There seemed to he something that divided the locker room from that raiders game and it carried into this year. Covid vaccines wrecked a lot of relationships. -
Trading a first for an established player and giving him a new contract absolutely qualifies as an aggressive move. We're praising Howie Roseman for doing this with AJ Brown, but diminishing it when the Colts did it for Buckner? It's not the same level of aggressiveness as moving up for a QB, nor is it as risky. It's still aggressive, and risky. Same is true for signing Rivers, and trading for Wentz.
-
-
Members
-
Recommended Posts