Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

PEPS NO COAST OFFENSE


OLD FAN MAN

Recommended Posts

From what I can tell through the first nine games (admittedly I did not see the game yesterday as it wasn't being aired in South Bend...stupid Bears), it isn't so much the scheme that isn't working so much as it is the playcalling. The playcalling is in general far too conservative and predictable. I saw that Luck flung it almost 50 times yesterday, but I am guessing this had more to do with the Colts being down by so many points than it did a change in philosophy.  

 

I think this team would benefit by adopting an aggressive mindset on both sides of the ball, but especially offense. Passing to open up the run would be beneficial rather than vice versa. I do agree with you though that a bigger emphasis on quicker/shorter routes would probably help Luck and the OL considerably.                                                          

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we had Duane Allen, I would like the west coast.  There is no way that Fleener alone would allow that offense to prosper.  The reason being that we would need Allen's blocking (edge protect, etc.) to allow two dangerous weapons at TE to counter-act the defense that would be setup to attack the West Coast.  Strong side attack w/weak-side blocking or TE threat.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about guys execute better. Pep didn't cause Castonzo to get whipped on the first drive causing a fumble, he didn't cause Luck to have the accuracy David Woodley, he didn't cause Hugh Thorton to go the wrong direction on 3rd and 1 , etc etc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it is clear the no coast offense isn't working, should pep try the west coast short pass offense?

 

Yup, that's exactly what we should do. I'm amazed that we haven't made any coaching changes after our 6-3 start

actually wouldn't be such a bad idea, because we tend to do better and luck does better on those short passes. plus its a clock killer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Offensively, I think we look best while running the no huddle. We should hide the scoreboard from Andrew Luck, tell him everytime we get the ball that it's the 4th quarter with 2 minutes to go and we are down by four. I figure he'd catch on quickly, but hey, it's worth a shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How about guys execute better. Pep didn't cause Castonzo to get whipped on the first drive causing a fumble, he didn't cause Luck to have the accuracy David Woodley, he didn't cause Hugh Thorton to go the wrong direction on 3rd and 1 , etc etc

 

Hey practice makes perfect right? I decided that even though I'm a good right handed bowler with multiple 300 games, I'm gonna switch to throwing left handed this year and see if I can make it work, even though all of the other guys on my team are relying on my high scores, it doesn't matter because the coaches said this was going to be our best chance to win, but under your mantra I should just execute.

 

My point being....it's not that simple. This is the NFL, if your players cannot execute something the way it's supposed to be executed after 9 games, then you change, you don't say "This is how we are going to do it" and refuse to adapt hoping that the players will come aorund. Most of the games this year have been try to make this Power Run offense work for the first half, and if not unleash Luck in the 2nd. I think most teams are on to us.

 

When we are missing key pieces to our offense we need to make changes to adapt, not just say "Hey DHB, your the new X Receiver" It's not going to work, he's not that good. We need to play to the strengths of the players that we have instead of trying to make a square peg fit in a round hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey practice makes perfect right? I decided that even though I'm a good right handed bowler with multiple 300 games, I'm gonna switch to throwing left handed this year and see if I can make it work, even though all of the other guys on my team are relying on my high scores, it doesn't matter because the coaches said this was going to be our best chance to win, but under your mantra I should just execute.

 

My point being....it's not that simple. This is the NFL, if your players cannot execute something the way it's supposed to be executed after 9 games, then you change, you don't say "This is how we are going to do it" and refuse to adapt hoping that the players will come aorund. Most of the games this year have been try to make this Power Run offense work for the first half, and if not unleash Luck in the 2nd. I think most teams are on to us.

 

When we are missing key pieces to our offense we need to make changes to adapt, not just say "Hey DHB, your the new X Receiver" It's not going to work, he's not that good. We need to play to the strengths of the players that we have instead of trying to make a square peg fit in a round hole.

Except what I pointed out had nothing to do with the power running game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We run just about every run scheme, it's just his go to run play is the power play which 90% of the time blows up in our face

A whole lot of blowup in Richardson's face compliments of the 'butts' of Thornton, Satele and McGlynn.......and add Castonzo and Cherilus to the big butts club yesterday.....abysmal...absolutely abysmal.

 

I want to say I caught Jack Doyle making a couple of nice blocks yesterday.  He sealed his man well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The downside of BTM is the absolute dogma the coaches have preached about stop the run and run the ball (and I would suggest it been strongly preaced from the beginng of this year run the ball from power formations). There is no chance we will look at the playbook and more frequently use the plays that have been effective. The old Celtics played 1 way and they molded the players to the system if you couldn't fastbreak they replaced you, they never adapted the system to the players strengths. That is the philosophy staked out by this coaching staff..... the only way to win is to be a team that can first stop the run and run the ball at will. It's not true but you won't convince this staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Words to describe yesterday's loss:

Sad
Depressing

Embarrassing
Sickening

Amateurish
High School (perhaps not even that good)

No Heart
No Desire
No Fire
No Direction

 

 . . . and the worst word . . . .

PREDICTABLE!!!!!!

 

What did we learn as fans when Peyton was here about the run versus pass, and what to do when neither is working well. Quick outs, quick hitters, etc., etc., etc. It opens up the run, period.

Much too often I hear the "so called" experts say "you have to establish the run to open up the passing game!" Peyton proved that wrong using the above.

 

How long is it going to take the coaches to realize this???? This coaching staff has only been here for 1-1/2 seasons so they can be burned out, but they have to do more than punch the clock!!!!

 

I like Chuck Pagano a lot, but I don't believe he's NFL head coach material. That's no being harsh, it being factual. There's not enough fire, no sense of urgency, zero imagination and creativity, and he fails to motivate.

How about Bruce Arians? Remember him? I know it wouldn't have been right to give him the head coaching job, but in retrospect we'd be better off.

 

Would someone in this organization please step back and take a close look at what's happening? In any other organization or business, heads would be rolling now!
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not saying he is about to be a sack machine but you can see some of his potential as a one gap penetrator with that frame.    
    • Davis came from Alabama. My point of interest as the writer highlighted is he is moving from being a 2 gapper into now only being responsible for a single gap with a lot more penetration from him versus read and react. With his length and power at 6ft 7 300 plus the expectation for him in our scheme is he will be more disruptive. A much more reliable option for us if Grover goes down in addition to whatever else maybe we can do with him.
    • Thank you. You guys are too kind, but I truly appreciate the support.    Perhaps I am being too hard on myself… But my point still stands that anyone who makes it to the NFL, whether practice squad or starter, has achieved something prestigious that only a rare few ever achieve.    Over a million high schoolers play. Of those only 7.8 percent move on to play in college.    Over 80,000 people play in college. Only 0.4 percent make it to opening day in the NFL.    Only 2,016 players make it to NFL rosters. 
    • Davis had a very good rookie season after being drafted in the 2nd round out of Ohio State (I believe).   Graded in the 70’s against both the run and pass.      But his last three years have been disappointing, as he’s graded in the mid-50’s.   The reason I’m so interested in this signing, is (A) I’m sure it was heavily influenced by the new DL coach, Partridge.   And (B) we’re paying him 2/14.  I don’t recall that kind of money ever being given to a basic backup before.   Don’t think Davis is here to push Stewart, the Colts just signed him to 3/39.  That tells me the Colts defensive staff sees him differently.   I don’t know what the plan the staff has come up with for Davis, but I’m looking forward to watching it play out. 
  • Members

    • Stoney

      Stoney 122

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,887

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...