Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

First half vs second half, what changed on O-line? Yep, Shipley


chad72

Recommended Posts

Our O-line protection calls got better, and execution got better with A.Q.Shipley at center.

I almost felt like "yay, Satele is hurt" in a twisted way because I had a gut feeling our execution was going to improve in the second half. It did, much more solid thus putting up 13 offensive points and the D getting a pick six put us over the hump.

Maybe it wasn't just Olsen getting beat, it could be that the combo of Satele and Olsen was the issue because they had to communicate well on double teams and other things as well. I dont think it was just a co-incidence, we have seen it in several games. Satele might be a better run blocking center but this team goes as Luck goes, and a pass blocking center with able run blocking is what Shipley brings to the table.

I feel we need to start the playoffs with Shipley as center.

Thoughts???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think there's a few on here who would agree with you and I'm becoming one of them. It does seem to help us when he he comes in for Samson, though some of the snaps can get wayward. I don't think he or Satele are the long term answer though. If we are going to draft any Oline I'd like it to be a C if there is a suitable one available.

Shipley/Satele at G might be worth a look at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shipley is absolutley huge, i saw him and was thinking, man is there a nine-foot subway on the sidelines that he has been hitting on because i thought his stomach was going to come out of his shirt. WE NEED MORE GUYS LIKE THIS, beef it up, beef it UP!!!!!! If they don't want to feed them, I WILL , just come on down to the river by my van and i'll have a buffet waiting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It could also be that we are better in the second half in general. Look back at most of our games and you'll see that we make halftime adjustments and flat out play better in the second half, especially in the fourth quarter. It could be that Shipley made a huge difference, but it also could be coincidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Linkenbach also come in for Justice or McGlynn?

We talked Shipley when he was initiallly picked up........I remember saying....all he needs is a "Saturday chance."

I said yesterday Link should have been at LG and Justice was starting on the RT....Shipley makes the players to the left and right better.....simple as that. Olsen was not AS bad in the second half. Let us not discuss the first. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm convinced Arians and/or Grigson is playing favorites. Satele is awful and Olsen shouldn't even be on the roster right now, let alone get the start over Shipley or Linkenbach. Heck, our starter had to wait 2 weeks until Linkenbach got hurt before he got his job back. Yet, this scrub, Olsen, comes right in (off IR, mind you) and gets the nod over Shipley and Link, no questions asked?

Something ain't right here

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I told Tammy when Satelle went down,look out Ships coming in and Ballard will be a beast in the second half,it just makes the whole line better with him in there at center IMO

YEP....AND YOU AND i DISCUSS IT EVERY WEEK! oooops....... accidentally all capped it....:) I need to read the :rulez: :flag: Darn....I get flagged for everything....:)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our O-line protection calls got better, and execution got better with A.Q.Shipley at center.

I almost felt like "yay, Satele is hurt" in a twisted way because I had a gut feeling our execution was going to improve in the second half. It did, much more solid thus putting up 13 offensive points and the D getting a pick six put us over the hump.

Maybe it wasn't just Olsen getting beat, it could be that the combo of Satele and Olsen was the issue because they had to communicate well on double teams and other things as well. I dont think it was just a co-incidence, we have seen it in several games. Satele might be a better run blocking center but this team goes as Luck goes, and a pass blocking center with able run blocking is what Shipley brings to the table.

I feel we need to start the playoffs with Shipley as center.

Thoughts???

I didnt notice our protection getting better in the second half...Luck was being chased like he stole something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My exact sentiments. I was sitting at Bdubs with my girlfriend when he went down and I was like "Yes!". My girlfriend said "what?!"

I did the same thing.

I don't think Satele is even close to healthy though and that could be a contributing factor to his lousy play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was the biggest shock to me, I thought Link would get flattened by Morgan, who dominated Justice, but he didn't get near Luck in the 2nd half.

Not a shocker to me. Linkenbach was a left tackle at Cincinnati. The prevalent feeling here is that Linkenbach, when he goes against quality D-lines, will definitely be above average on the tackle front than the guard front (though he has surprised me on the guard front probably because he must have put on some bulk). So, to me, him doing fine at right tackle is not a shocker at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not a shocker to me. Linkenbach was a left tackle at Cincinnati. The prevalent feeling here is that Linkenbach, when he goes against quality D-lines, will definitely be above average on the tackle front than the guard front (though he has surprised me on the guard front probably because he must have put on some bulk). So, to me, him doing fine at right tackle is not a shocker at all.

Well it is a shocker to me because he played bad last year when he was RT.

It might be the better O line coach, or he is playing with passion for a starting job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome back.   After taking a month off, you’ve returned.   I’m not sure where to start, so let’s try the night the Colts drafted Mitchell.  Late that night, you and another high profile Ballard-Hater had this conversation:  That you didn’t like CBs defense of Mitchell.  His big speech.  Why?  Because you guys agreed that “Ballard didn’t know enough about Mitchell to know if he was a good guy or not.”   Your words.     When my chin came off the floor and my eyes back in my head I thought this:   Why would you OR the fans of any team ever think that what a GM shares on draft night is all he knows?   Because it isn’t.  A GM is sharing all that he wants to share, nothing more.  But what he doesn’t share is much, much more than what he does share.  Think an iceberg;  10 percent above water,  90 percent below.   A GM knows far more than he ever shares.    And now you make this argument….   If Mitchell doesn’t work out, Ballard has left himself open to criticism.   Two words:  who cares?   A GM can’t do his job well if he’s afraid of criticism.  Do you think the Steelers care that George Pickens is totally crazy?   No.  They care he makes big plays for Pittsburgh and catches first downs and touchdowns.  Mike Tomlin deals with the crazy part in private.   A GM has to have thick skin.  Ballard clearly does.   And he doesn’t care what others think of him.  Nor should he.     So far Mitchell seems to enjoy Indy.   I think the odds are good Ballard and Steichen can handle whatever baggage the kid brings.    
    • Unbelievable.  Tell me, what’s the criteria for being a spoiled brat?     Because all the other rookie WR’s have clauses in their contracts too.   The Colts do a great job of signing players.  This signing doesn’t seem to bother the Colts, yet it bothers you enough to call Mitchell a spoiled brat.  Over nothing much out of the ordinary.  Thats why players have agents.  It’s why the Colts have Mike Bluem.     You remain your own worst enemy.     Goodness gracious.         
    • When the Colts drafted Goncalves they said they think he could play 4 positions at the NFL level.   All but Left Tackle.  So he is not a replacement for Raimann.   odds are Goncalves will play RG and some RT.    I’m a Cosell fan.  He’s forgotten more about football than anyone here knows.  But his opinion on Raimann is beyond head scratching.    Raimann scored in the low to mid 70’s his rookie year.  Then scored in the low 80’s last year.   I don’t know what he thinks of PFF scores,  but there is more to this opinion than meets the eye.  Something doesn’t add up at all.  
    • I think his professional career is very slim. Not sure if you remember Vick Ballard but he had similar injuries and he was pretty much done with football after. Not to say that Scott can’t come back it’s completely possible but to rehab and have to get over the mental aspect of things it’s gonna be hard.
    • Not a big deal at this time, but I hope AR is 100% by the time he takes contact in a real game. Don't want this to be a regular occurrence, especially when you combine his reckless playing style with the injury. I hope he can play all year. Last thing we need is him getting nagging injuries every game. 
  • Members

    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,254

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,464

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Powerslave

      Powerslave 61

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kirie89

      Kirie89 6

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...