Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Eagles Release Jason Babin


krunk

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not if we put in a claim on him. We're ahead of the Patriots in waiver priority.

That would be good, but I have a feeling Grigs is going to pass on this one for some reason. My gut is telling me Babin just needs a change of environment. We do need some help getting to the q.b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is only good in the Wide 9 and is a locker room cancer according to most of those "experts" who have inside knowledge. There is a reason the Eagles just cut him and have little reason too, because they still will have to pay him if no one claims him .

The only place I've seen him called a cancer is on message boards like this one.

He's played and been productive in several different schemes, with several different coordinators and sets of teammates.

The Eagles won't owe him anything else after this release, whether he's claimed or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only place I've seen him called a cancer is on message boards like this one.

He's played and been productive in several different schemes, with several different coordinators and sets of teammates.

The Eagles won't owe him anything else after this release, whether he's claimed or not.

Eagles will owe remaining balance of $5.6M salary, $1.64M, if he is not claimed on waivers.

Jason Babin was a nobody before he met Washburn, who followed him to Philly. So he never was in a different scheme when he was having success. It was always the wide 9.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only place I've seen him called a cancer is on message boards like this one.

He's played and been productive in several different schemes, with several different coordinators and sets of teammates.

The Eagles won't owe him anything else after this release, whether he's claimed or not.

I'd like it twice if I could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not really that knowledgeable about this stuff, but why wouldn't we just play a base 4-3 and move Freeney and Mathis back to their natural position at this point. It's not like losing a yard or so on average in run D would be the make or break for this D right now. The linebacker core is the only place left that there's depth, they'd adjust. Angry would get more snaps, and he can tackle. I'm waiting for 10 responses about how wrong I am. I can handle it! :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eagles will owe remaining balance of $5.6M salary, $1.64M, if he is not claimed on waivers.

I misunderstood your point earlier. I thought you were saying they'd have cap obligations in future years. My mistake. Either way, I don't think they're hopping up and down over the potential of saving $1.64m on the cap over the next five weeks. They don't have plans on using that money elsewhere.

The monetary considerations with respect to Babin's contract are completely related to 2013 and 2014. The Eagles currently have close to $140m committed to the cap in 2013. The salary cap is expected to stay somewhat flat; I think it will come in at less than $125m, and that's probably being ambitious. The Eagles releasing Babin is just them getting a head start on shedding payroll for next season. So the idea of potential savings against the cap for the remainder of 2012 probably wasn't very high on their list in making this decision.

Jason Babin was a nobody before he met Washburn, who followed him to Philly. So he never was in a different scheme when he was having success. It was always the wide 9.

Define "nobody."

He was a productive player for the Texans, where he was both a pass rushing OLB and a 4-3 end. Not a Pro Bowler, not a defensive leader, but a productive player. As a rotational pass rusher, he had 124 tackles, 13 sacks and two forced fumbles in 43 games through his first three seasons. He took off when he got with Washburn in Tennessee, but that's not the first time he contributed.

Besides that, we play Freeney and Mathis in plenty of wide nine alignments over the past few weeks.

I'm not campaigning for Babin. I just don't think the resistance to adding him is logical. He's a talented player who would come with little cost and less risk, and we need all the talent we can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would be good, but I have a feeling Grigs is going to pass on this one for some reason. My gut is telling me Babin just needs a change of environment. We do need some help getting to the q.b.

No one gets his free pass out by quitting on his teammates and not suffer repercussions from the guys on other teams. How long before he decides to quit on you too? All these ex Eagles coming out and railing on him now. I knew there was a steaming pile under the underbrush.

I hope Grigson stays away... far away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the last 3 seasons 2 players have more sacks than Babin. Jared Allen and Demarcus Ware.

He's cheap and has talent. I'm with Supe on this one. I'm not going to start a rally to bring him here. But he could help this team, and his signing wouldn't hurt us in the slightest.

He could even be a stop gap for the Dwight-less years ahead, preventing us from having to use a pick on a DE, OLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Over the last 3 seasons 2 players have more sacks than Babin. Jared Allen and Demarcus Ware.

He's cheap and has talent. I'm with Supe on this one. I'm not going to start a rally to bring him here. But he could help this team, and his signing wouldn't hurt us in the slightest.

He could even be a stop gap for the Dwight-less years ahead, preventing us from having to use a pick on a DE, OLB.

Simply put, he'd be value added to our D. As far as that locker room stuff, I think ours can handle it. He was on Sirius yesterday and would not say a bad word about anyone. He also said he expects his contract to be reworked next year by whoever picks him up.

I doubt we'll get him, but I don't see a downside if we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one gets his free pass out by quitting on his teammates and not suffer repercussions from the guys on other teams. How long before he decides to quit on you too? All these ex Eagles coming out and railing on him now. I knew there was a steaming pile under the underbrush.

I hope Grigson stays away... far away.

Where are you getting this quitting on his team mates thing from? Did you get that from his team mates? Show me an article or an interview please. Some kind of proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a one trick pony that can't even do his one trick in a system designed for him to do so, and a locker room problem.

At 4:00 pm today he will clear waivers and try to strike a huge dollar multiyear deal with someone. I hope dearly it is not us.

Actually both seasons he started every game he had over 10 sacks and 18 last year, Starting helps a player get into the game much easier and faster then being subbed in and out and not getting any rhythm or feel for the game
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 sacks in 43 games is not that good. I wouldn't be opposed to bringing him in, but it would have to be next to nothing. He brings nothing to the table unless we use him in pass rushing only situations. We also have no clue how he will fit into the 3-4 D.

He was a rotational player. Jerry Hughes has 5 sacks in 35 games, four of them in his last 11. Not that Jerry Hughes is the measuring stick, but my point is simply that for a rotational pass rusher, that's a decent level of production. And that also answers how he would likely fit into our defense, since the Texans were using him as pass rushing linebacker for his first two seasons.

There's nothing wrong with using him in pass rushing only situations. I don't understand why we'd try to use him for anything else.

The price tag is also pretty cheap, at $1.64m for the remainder of the season. We can easily absorb that. And there's no risk. If we waive him in two weeks and no one claims him, we'd have to swallow the remaining $1m or so. If we release him after the season or anytime before Week 1 of 2013, there's no commitment moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're in a 4-3, or at least a hybrid version, more than we're in a 3-4. A great pass rusher fits any system.

he has been released from every team (or didnt sign a new contract) for a reason.I think i read he is 3rd in sacks for the last 6 years yet he is either released or not resigned.

he is a situational pas rusher, who sucks vs the run, we already have freeney on that role :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup! I think Freeman makes what, $375k this year??

Enough said.

The talk of money is just plain silly IMHO. if the Colts can afford him without jeopardizing the future and he helps the team, how can that possibly be bad? How his salary compares to anyone else's is irrelevant. He's not a quitter, he's a lights out player in practice and on games. He's also opinionated, and if you've ever been around Philly fans you probably agree with his tweets the got him in trouble.

As far as him being a one trick pony, so what? It's a trick every team can use. I doubt we'll get him after just filling our roster but I don't understand why anyone would complain about improving the team. As the Giants have shown, you can't have too many pass rushers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eagles will owe remaining balance of $5.6M salary, $1.64M, if he is not claimed on waivers.

Jason Babin was a nobody before he met Washburn, who followed him to Philly. So he never was in a different scheme when he was having success. It was always the wide 9.

I misunderstood your point earlier. I thought you were saying they'd have cap obligations in future years. My mistake. Either way, I don't think they're hopping up and down over the potential of saving $1.64m on the cap over the next five weeks. They don't have plans on using that money elsewhere.

By the way, I think the Eagles are free and clear on Babin either way. According to Ross Tucker, Babin has already claimed termination pay once in his career, which means he doesn't get anything from the Eagles if he clears waivers. I don't know how or if that affects their cap for 2012, but they evidently won't be paying him the $1.64m.

https://twitter.com/...526849458540544

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The talk of money is just plain silly IMHO. if the Colts can afford him without jeopardizing the future and he helps the team, how can that possibly be bad? How his salary compares to anyone else's is irrelevant. He's not a quitter, he's a lights out player in practice and on games. He's also opinionated, and if you've ever been around Philly fans you probably agree with his tweets the got him in trouble.

As far as him being a one trick pony, so what? It's a trick every team can use. I doubt we'll get him after just filling our roster but I don't understand why anyone would complain about improving the team. As the Giants have shown, you can't have too many pass rushers.

We have a one trick pony now that makes too much already. Freeney.

This is all moot anyways since we've already filled our 53 spot roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this as yes, I sometimes don't adequately express my take I guess..Ha!! Happens. 🤷‍♂️ But you are correct. Cam to me as you stated was never a consistently good QB at the NFL level and that is why I was never a fan of his game. I guess it's all about how one views what an NFL QB should be or look like. I'm not a fan of Lamar either as I think he is somewhat in the mold of that type of QB. Great athlete who just happens to play QB. Outside of that Raven scheme, I'm not sold on the fact the Jackson could ever flourish. It's why over 90% of the time if Lamar is needed to bring the Ravens out of a deficit he can't do it. It's not his game, yet there are those who think Lamar is superior and he has achieved personal accomplishments. Ravens do consistently win though but it's an entire team deal as their defense is normally rock solid to compliment that run first style. We don't have that here in Indy
    • I already laid out the injuries.  You can say what you want but one was the coaches pulling him in the Rams game because they were down multiple scores with little time left, two of the others were a concussion and a shoulder injury that required surgery so that rules out toughness.  Then the Steelers game he tried to comeback and clearly wasn’t moving well and it’s reported he has injury that does cause players to miss time and there is a chance he plays Sunday which seems to be counter productive to people who want argue he’s not tough enough.  None of those involve him lacking toughness.  It’s a nonsense argument made up by fans who are tired of him being injured.     also Richardson has taken wicked hits and hopped right back up from them.  To the point people complain about the league not protecting him with roughing the passer calls.  If he had no pain tolerance he wouldn’t get up from the those hits.   yes he needs to be better at protecting himself.  Again that has nothing to do with toughness.   Also I am not comparing him to Luck if you read my post.   I am pointing out Irsay is acknowledging they are being cautious with Richardson and injuries because of what happened with Luck.  That’s not comparing the two players.
    • IMO the only reason to not play Richardson (when healthy) is if you've given up on him. Joe Flacco has a role on this team and that role is secondary or tertiary to the main goal of this team at this moment - namely developing AR and figuring out if he can be our franchise QB. The best way to do both of those is to play him and let him gain experience and playing time... And, ultimately to get enough snaps that you feel comfortable with whatever decision you come to about his long term prospects. And IMO the only reason to bench him is if you think you've gotten the answer to that primary question and it is negative.    Otherwise, we are doing the same thing we were doing the last 3 years before we drafted him and IMO that's the worst place to be as a franchise in regards with your QB... Where you not only don't have a franchise QB but you don't even have the hope of having one on the roster.   I can't believe this conversation is even being had. If he can play... He has to play.
    • The kid chose not to slide to protect himself and was in a really awkward position when he did get a good NFL wallop. It’s absolutely brainless to do that after getting knocked out of games and the season.   Maybe he needs to sit on the bench for another season. Let him play  play play, what, for another game or two until the next stupid injury?  He still has a lot to learn and it looks like to me we are rushing an inexperienced kid into something he isn't quite prepared for.   AR seems humble, maybe a bit more humility regarding a possible Superman complex would serve him and the Colts very well long term.  What AR IS in years 4 and beyond is what Wise Colts fans should be concerned about. And yes, like me, many here are getting old enough we Want It Now! It's an unreasonable expectation for a kid that can't throw an out that isn't a mile high, and hasn't the sense of when and how to protect himself. 
    • I don’t listen to games anymore because I don’t work on Sundays anymore. But man sometimes listening to the game is better than watching it. Kinda miss Matt Taylor getting all pumped..  I-N-D-Y lol 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...