Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Update: Tracking Colts releases at cutdown


CR91

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, CR91 said:

 

How well did that work for the cowboys vs the 49ers last year 😂

I didn’t say it’d work haha said they’d try it

13 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

Imagine around this time Nadine had the ability to cut a poster

 

"It's always tough losing a great poster but I decided today to cut @2006Coltsbestever because he posts Simpson Gifs constantly

 

Simpsons Apocalypse GIF

Pretty sure I’d been first on that list haha

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Yoshinator said:

I think it's more of Flaccos refusal to help young QBs. He didn't help Zach Wilson in NY when he was on the Jets, and when he was on Denver he didn't help someone either (I believe it was Drew Lock). I wouldn't be surprised if he is refusing to help Richardson, and he was forced to ask Sam for help instead of Flacco.

That is nonsense.   

 

https://www.nfl.com/news/jets-qb-joe-flacco-embracing-role-as-mentor-to-zach-wilson-but-believes-he-still

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/news/joe-flacco-colts-anthony-richardson-backup-quarterback

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Yoshinator said:

I think it's more of Flaccos refusal to help young QBs. He didn't help Zach Wilson in NY when he was on the Jets, and when he was on Denver he didn't help someone either (I believe it was Drew Lock). I wouldn't be surprised if he is refusing to help Richardson, and he was forced to ask Sam for help instead of Flacco.

Wrong GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jvan1973 said:

The Zach Wilson is old news. He didn't help Wilson at all. Also read the quote in the Richardson link. “I really don’t believe that’s the job of a backup quarterback,” Flacco said when asked about mentoring Richardson. “I think that happens naturally as you become part of the team and like I said, you’re in that room and you are going to obviously do that. I’ve proven to be, I think as far as I’m concerned, a good teammate and I think that’s the most important. Those kind of things happen naturally.”

 

He has never helped any QB become good. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, csmopar said:

Wrong GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy

Don't think so. He's a very good backup QB for us, but he doesn't like to mentor young QBs. Just because he's on the Colts doesn't mean that'll change or the facts change. There's a reason Richardson asked Sam for help and the pattern is obvious since Flacco became a backup QB.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yoshinator said:

Don't think so. He's a very good backup QB for us, but he doesn't like to mentor young QBs. Just because he's on the Colts doesn't mean that'll change or the facts change. There's a reason Richardson asked Sam for help and the pattern is obvious since Flacco became a backup QB.

What evidence do you have to support this theory? 
 

because everyone from AR to Shane has said that Flacco has been great for mentoring him thus far. I get some of it is coach speech but if there was a problem, the body language would be totally different 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, csmopar said:

What evidence do you have to support this theory? 
 

because everyone from AR to Shane has said that Flacco has been great for mentoring him thus far. I get some of it is coach speech but if there was a problem, the body language would be totally different 

This is a quote from Flacco in 2019 while in Denver. While in Denver in 2019, Flacco made it clear that mentorship was not his job. On then-rookie quarterback Drew Lock, Flacco said, “I hope he does develop. But I don’t look at that as my job. My job is to win football games for this football team.”

 

He's done this with Zach Wilson and Drew Lock. I can't prove he's doing it with Richardson (that's a guess by me), but he has a history of not doing it. I'm going with the history here. Steichen and AR aren't going to call him out on it and cause turmoil on the team right before the season starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Yoshinator said:

This is a quote from Flacco in 2019 while in Denver. While in Denver in 2019, Flacco made it clear that mentorship was not his job. On then-rookie quarterback Drew Lock, Flacco said, “I hope he does develop. But I don’t look at that as my job. My job is to win football games for this football team.”

 

He's done this with Zach Wilson and Drew Lock. I can't prove he's doing it with Richardson (that's a guess by me), but he has a history of not doing it. I'm going with the history here. Steichen and AR aren't going to call him out on it and cause turmoil on the team right before the season starts.

There's a big difference from 2019 Flacco that still considered himself a starter and was competing to be one vrs 2024 Flacco that knows his role is a backup.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 He has really good blocking in front of him.

What should be a very good run game.

 A very good receiving group.

A really good play caller.

Steichen ran hurry up in his first game as a rookie. 

So, he knows the offense very well by now.

I see a quick release.

 I believe they trust that he got the memo about protecting himself.

So is he just some injury prone athlete? I don't think they bet on that.

 I'm hoping Bean has a deal with us for the PS. If he rides with us for a season he looks to have a great shot to be our #2 next season. 

 

Sounds like you're optimistic for Richardson as well. I don't really think it's debatable, though, that he's not reliable. Not yet. That's what I think the standard should be for whether we keep two QBs or three. The Colts might have a different standard...

 

On Bean, let's say a couple other teams have their eye on him. Richardson starts the season looking pretty good, the Colts are looking solid, and they're paying Flacco $4.5m guaranteed, so he's not going anywhere. Another team's starter goes down in Week 3, that team is now on the lookout for a new QB2/3. They offer Bean a spot on the roster. The Colts offer to match, and now Bean has decide whether to stick around with the Colts as QB3 all season, or go to another team where he has a legit shot at being QB2. 

 

My thinking is, if you like Bean enough to think he can be QB2 next year, he's worth the roster spot this year. Then you eliminate the possibility of him getting signed off the practice squad. Maybe that costs you a fifth safety, or a 10th OL... Those are spots that you can supplement with the practice squad, though. I think, for a team with an unproven starter and a 40 year old backup, QB3 is more important.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

There's a big difference from 2019 Flacco that still considered himself a starter and was competing to be one vrs 2024 Flacco that knows his role is a backup.

 

Flacco's comments were completely justified, and I hope he still views himself that way. It's NOT his job to mentor the starter, it's his job to be ready to play if/when he's called on to do so. (By the way, Flacco has done a reasonably good job of being ready as the backup, which is no doubt why the Colts signed him.) And if Richardson wants to pick up good habits from Flacco on the practice field, in the meeting rooms, etc., then that's on Richardson to learn from Flacco's example. 

 

I'm sure that Flacco is ready and willing to answer questions and help solve problems. Acting like he's going to shun his teammates is silly.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ADnum1 said:

Looks like Sam, Treadmill and Pinter cut

 

Got a link? Not that I don't believe you, but this is the same thread in which someone claimed that year-old news was current... 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Superman changed the title to Update: Tracking Colts releases at cutdown
5 minutes ago, Superman said:

 

Got a link? Not that I don't believe you, but this is the same thread in which someone claimed that year-old news was current... 

It was the link posted earlier in this thread 

 

Thirty-seven players were cut by the Indianapolis Colts on Tuesday as the team set its 53-man roster -- at least temporarily -- for the 2024 season. Here is a list of the players (* -- already released or waived):

Austin Ajiake

Liam Anderson

Genard Avery

Jason Bean

Levi Bell

Taven Bryan

*Tyrie Cleveland

Marcel Dabo

Sam Ehlinger

Demetric Felton

*Clay Fields III

Arlington Hambright

*Ronnie Harrison Jr.

Eric Johnson

Chris Lammons

Jonah Laulu

Titus Leo

Cameron McGrone

D.J. Montgomery

Jordan Murray

Mike Panasiuk

Danny Pinter

*Derek Rivers

Zavier Scott

*Spencer Shrader

Jaylin Simpson

*Kedan Slovis

*Derek Slywka

*Mike Smith Jr.

Eric Tomlinson

Laquon Treadwell

Michael Tutsie

*Greg Ward

Juwann Winfree

Jake Witt

Craig Young

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ADnum1 said:

It was the link posted earlier in this thread 

 

Thirty-seven players were cut by the Indianapolis Colts on Tuesday as the team set its 53-man roster -- at least temporarily -- for the 2024 season. Here is a list of the players (* -- already released or waived):

Austin Ajiake

Liam Anderson

Genard Avery

Jason Bean

Levi Bell

Taven Bryan

*Tyrie Cleveland

Marcel Dabo

Sam Ehlinger

Demetric Felton

*Clay Fields III

Arlington Hambright

*Ronnie Harrison Jr.

Eric Johnson

Chris Lammons

Jonah Laulu

Titus Leo

Cameron McGrone

D.J. Montgomery

Jordan Murray

Mike Panasiuk

Danny Pinter

*Derek Rivers

Zavier Scott

*Spencer Shrader

Jaylin Simpson

*Kedan Slovis

*Derek Slywka

*Mike Smith Jr.

Eric Tomlinson

Laquon Treadwell

Michael Tutsie

*Greg Ward

Juwann Winfree

Jake Witt

Craig Young

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2024/08/26/colts-will-cut-36-players-to-get-to-53-heres-the-projected-list/74911073007/

 

That's IndyStar's projection, not what's actually happened, right? The ones with a * by their name are the players who have actually been released so far.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matabix said:

Kent Sterling said something interesting this morning. When AR was struggling in the Bengals game he went to Sam not Joe. I've heard alot of reports of how smart Sam is. Man I think Bean has gobs more potential. 

We need to save this post

And 7 years from now when Sam has a podcast All 22 on our QB People will say he wasn’t any good how can he explain these play concepts Why isn’t he a QB coach ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/nfl/colts/2024/08/26/colts-will-cut-36-players-to-get-to-53-heres-the-projected-list/74911073007/

 

That's IndyStar's projection, not what's actually happened, right? The ones with a * by their name are the players who have actually been released so far.

My mistake thanks for the correction. 

 

The list does seem pretty accurate though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Matabix said:

Kent Sterling said something interesting this morning. When AR was struggling in the Bengals game he went to Sam not Joe. I've heard alot of reports of how smart Sam is. Man I think Bean has gobs more potential. 

Sam may have a future in coaching.

 

I don't think he has the physical tools to be a qb in the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JediXMan said:


Why did they veto it?

 

IDK, I didn't even know they could.

 

If I had to guess, they don't want teams calling up a third QB without paying him an active roster salary. They might also feel like QBs are being given a special exemption that undermines other players. It might all be part of a strategy to get fully expanded rosters, rather than just a limited expansion for one position, in special circumstances.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 He has really good blocking in front of him.

What should be a very good run game.

 A very good receiving group.

A really good play caller.

Steichen ran hurry up in his first game as a rookie. 

So, he knows the offense very well by now.

I see a quick release.

 I believe they trust that he got the memo about protecting himself.

So is he just some injury prone athlete? I don't think they bet on that.

 I'm hoping Bean has a deal with us for the PS. If he rides with us for a season he looks to have a great shot to be our #2 next season. 

 

 



This is a good post.   The only point I’d disagree with is the concept of a young QB like Bean being ready to be QB2 next year for Richardson. 
 

I think we are many years away from that.
I think AR in his early years is going to require a veteran QB to offer wisdom and set an example for Richardson to follow.  I don’t think Bean or someone like him will be in position to offer those views for many years.  

 

I think AR’s severe lack of experience requires a veteran backup.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Yoshinator said:

I think it's more of Flaccos refusal to help young QBs. He didn't help Zach Wilson in NY when he was on the Jets, and when he was on Denver he didn't help someone either (I believe it was Drew Lock). I wouldn't be surprised if he is refusing to help Richardson, and he was forced to ask Sam for help instead of Flacco.

I think this is you telling yourself what you wish to be true more than it is what’s really true to be honest.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, BlackTiger said:

He's here because he had a good off season and outplayed the guys trying to take his spot.  I'm not a huge fan of Chris Ballard anymore either, could take him or leave him.

 

He had a rough season last year but won the battle in camp this year.

yeah, which is kinda the point, how much better did he get? probably not a good look at the room if he has a spot still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, AKB said:

yeah, which is kinda the point, how much better did he get? probably not a good look at the room if he has a spot still. 

He looked good, it wasn't just everyone was bad.  Baker had a legitimately good off season.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Superman said:

 

Sounds like you're optimistic for Richardson as well. I don't really think it's debatable, though, that he's not reliable. Not yet. That's what I think the standard should be for whether we keep two QBs or three. The Colts might have a different standard...

 

On Bean, let's say a couple other teams have their eye on him. Richardson starts the season looking pretty good, the Colts are looking solid, and they're paying Flacco $4.5m guaranteed, so he's not going anywhere. Another team's starter goes down in Week 3, that team is now on the lookout for a new QB2/3. They offer Bean a spot on the roster. The Colts offer to match, and now Bean has decide whether to stick around with the Colts as QB3 all season, or go to another team where he has a legit shot at being QB2. 

 

My thinking is, if you like Bean enough to think he can be QB2 next year, he's worth the roster spot this year. Then you eliminate the possibility of him getting signed off the practice squad. Maybe that costs you a fifth safety, or a 10th OL... Those are spots that you can supplement with the practice squad, though. I think, for a team with an unproven starter and a 40 year old backup, QB3 is more important.

 

 Absolutely right. This would hold true even with great trust in AR's reliability. Drum roll...

 If Sam is also a hot prospect let's get a draft pick for him. 

 I watched and rewatched our o-line play. If I was told Pinter was to be our starting center this year i would be fine with it. He looked that solid. And Rucker looks like a solid prospect to be a future starter.  In that scenario we sure could use that 10th spot. 

 Freeland is coming along a little as a RT.

 Goncalves was really crashing it down at LT with his run blocking. I like him as a 6th in short yardage. But he is a not good out there with his pass blocking. Praying for Raimanns good health. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Absolutely right. This would hold true even with great trust in AR's reliability. Drum roll...

 If Sam is also a hot prospect let's get a draft pick for him. 

 I watched and rewatched our o-line play. If I was told Pinter was to be our starting center this year i would be fine with it. He looked that solid. And Rucker looks like a solid prospect to be a future starter.  In that scenario we sure could use that 10th spot. 

 Freeland is coming along a little as a RT.

 Goncalves was really crashing it down at LT with his run blocking. I like him as a 6th in short yardage. But he is a not good out there with his pass blocking. Praying for Raimanns good health. 

 

If someone wants Sam and offers a pick, I'd be all over it. That seems unlikely, though.

 

The OL has shown some promise. Goncalves definitely had some issues in protection at LT, though. He's athletic, but not quick enough, IMO. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They are due for it. But the Ravens and Texans will also be in play.   It will be those Top 4 dogs in play for the SB from the AFC when it is all said and done - Chiefs, Bills, Ravens, Texans
    • That's because those are the only years I looked at to make the list.  I'm sure I'd find plenty of Patriot trades and FA pickups in the late 90s, too.   The reason I looked only at their dynasty years is because I was responding to the suggestion that dynasties have to be built from within.  And I just don't think that's the case.   In fact, I'd go farther to say there's no such thing as an NFL team that's been built entirely through the draft and UFDAs.  It may be the case that dynasties like the Brady-era Pats were less engaged in free agency and trades than other teams.  But to say that they stayed away from FA and trades just isn't correct.   That said, I do agree that it all starts with the franchise QB.  And I'd also agree that few franchise QBs have been acquired from elsewhere (at least for their prime).  There are some notable exceptions (Steve Young, Drew Brees, and Warren Moon come to mind).  But they're mostly drafted.
    • I am in awe of the technological function called copy/paste!   Quarterbacks Passing Richardson 69.5/11th Rushing Richardson 81.8/2nd Runningbacks Rushing Taylor 58.6/54th Wide Receivers Receiving Pierce 88.4/3rd Dulin 83.1/8th Pittman 60.7/64th Mitchell 47.9/114th Tight Ends Receiving Alie-Cox 51.0/43rd Granson 39.2/57th Pass blocking Granson 74.7/5th Alie-Cox 27.4/43rd (of 46) Run blocking Alie-Cox 79.9/5th Ogletree 76.5/7th Granson 64.8/18th Tackles Pass blocking Raimann 84.2/8th Smith 65.5/44th Run blocking Smith 82.4/10th Raimann 79.3/15th Guards Pass blocking Nelson 86.7/3rd Fries 80.4/9th Run blocking Fries 91.7/1st Nelson 86.8/3rd Centers Pass blocking Kelly 82.7/4th Run blocking Kelly 68.1/12th Defensive Ends Coverage Lewis 61.8/24th Pass rushing Latu 70.8/18th Paye 65.2/35th Odeyingbo 62.0/48th Land 57.8/69th Lewis 51.9/112th (of 133) Run defense Paye 64.4/43rd Land 60.0/65th Latu 57.8/82nd Lewis 54.9/94th Odeyingbo 31.8/128th (of 131) Defensive Tackles Pass rushing Buckner 63.6/42nd Stewart 63.4/43rd Bryan 62.6/47th Adebawore 56.0/90th Run defense Buckner 78.2/4th Stewart 61.2/48th Adebawore 55.3/81st Davis 47.1/115th Bryan 38.1/138th (of 147) Linebackers Coverage Speed 88.2/3rd Franklin 76.9/13th Pass rushing Speed 63.2/21st Carlies 57.8/41st Run defense Franklin 47.4/78th Speed 45.2/81st Carlies 38.6/89th (of 98) Cornerbacks Coverage Moore 90.9/3rd Brents 50.1/105th Jones 36.5/125th (of 128) Pass rushing Moore 57.8/19th Run defense Brents 71.6/20th Jones 63.8/48th Moore 39.2/117th (of 119) Safeties Coverage Blackmon 67.7/30th Thomas 60.0/65th Cross 49.6/87th (of 99) Pass rushing Blackmon 57.4/20th Run defense Cross 74.3/11th Blackmon 51.2/81st (of 89)
    • Awuzie was another one. What I wanted to see was them save money on slot CB and bring in a proven boundary CB.   I know a lot of people say that young/unproven players have to play to develop, but there's no rule that young/unproven players have to start by default. They are on cheap, rookie deals, which gives a team a lot of flexibility.   Remember when Ballard went the young/unproven route with the DL back in 2021? Well, since then, he has brought in DL FAs and (repeatedly) retained his own proven vets. Even a guy like Latu, who had a ton of hype, only played 39% of the snaps (even with Ebukam being on IR).   I know Ballard is a trenches guy, so he is going to invest more in the DL. But the approach to each position group is wildly different. And it's not just a move like the Sneed trade...there's a lot of space between that and filling out the CB room with young/unproven players (many of which are late-round draft picks and UDFAs).    And with their only real cap investment (and proven CB) in the secondary is a 29 year-old slot CB, they were taking a pretty big risk without much of a contingency plan. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...