Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts offseason discussion / Ballard Grievances (merge)


Recommended Posts

Just now, Yoshinator said:

I believe they like him because he's a veteran and our best blocking TE. I think he's overpaid, but I guess we're keeping him.


it is true- he’s our only veteran blocking tight end. The others are raw and Granson is better utilized off the line, imo. I think the bowers talk is smoke and mirrors… One, that I don’t see him at 15, nor will we trade up for him over a receiver… and two, I think they really want to see what Woods (and the others) can do with #5… so hanging on to him isn’t such a bad idea to me. Although I agree he’s overpaid… 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ColtStrong2013 said:


it is true- he’s our only veteran blocking tight end. The others are raw and Granson is better utilized off the line, imo. I think the bowers talk is smoke and mirrors… One, that I don’t see him at 15, nor will we trade up for him over a receiver… and two, I think they really want to see what Woods (and the others) can do with #5… so hanging on to him isn’t such a bad idea to me. Although I agree he’s overpaid… 

He is just fair at blocking, and makes like one catch per game

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, KB said:

I think bringing Snead in would give us an upgrade at the position and someone that would help with the development of Brents and Jones with his experience. Snead, Brents, and Moore as starting CBs with Flowers and Jones backing them up is a pretty good room IMO.

Snead excelled in a man based defense, he wouldn’t be the same here. He isn’t a Ramsey or Sherman who could play man or zone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 1959Colts said:

Right, which would mean, one of the others would have to get cut, and if they did draft a TE it would be two cuts.

Then Cox would be an unrestricted FA next year. Seems foolish to move forward with MAC to me

I believe Granson’s contract is also up at the end of the year so you are really in the same boat with him.  Someone is going to end up the odd man out.  Cox and Granson seem like the most likely candidates to me but the Colts also seem to like them the most so I dont know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


@w87r is keeping tabs in 

 

 

 

56 minutes ago, Yoshinator said:

Thank you. I'll check it out. :thmup:

I have us estimated at:

 

2024 Cap Space:

Spotrac -  **estimate $29.8m

OtC - **estimate $26.2m

 

 

Have us with about $10m coming off the cap on 2024 with Sanchez and Moore, and (2) guys dropping off of top 52 at $915 each.

 

 

Will update numbers over there as available.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

They like him.  I know fans don’t but they clearly do.  For the record I am not saying I am agreeing with them on liking him just answering why they are keeping him.

I think they release him soon. He just isn’t worth the $. They’ll wait to see if their FA hunting is successful or not. A pass rushing DE and a FS are likely targets, and if/when they sign, I expect Mo is gone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, w87r said:

 

I have us estimated at:

 

2024 Cap Space:

Spotrac -  **estimate $29.8m

OtC - **estimate $26.2m

 

 

Have us with a out $10m coming off the cap on 2024 with Sanchez and Moore, and (2) guys dropping off of top 52 at $915 each.

 

 

Will update numbers over there as available.

Thanks, I appreciate the update! :thmup: Still room to sign a few FAs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, w87r said:

 

I have us estimated at:

 

2024 Cap Space:

Spotrac -  **estimate $29.8m

OtC - **estimate $26.2m

 

 

Have us with a out $10m coming off the cap on 2024 with Sanchez and Moore, and (2) guys dropping off of top 52 at $915 each.

 

 

Will update numbers over there as available.


 

Bowing Down Waynes World GIF
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yoshinator said:

Thanks, I appreciate the update! :thmup: Still room to sign a few FAs.

We have plenty of space and plenty of ways to create more, rather easily, and future pain free.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hoose said:

I think they release him soon. He just isn’t worth the $. They’ll wait to see if their FA hunting is successful or not. A pass rushing DE and a FS are likely targets, and if/when they sign, I expect Mo is gone. 

We’ll see I heard all last off-season people expected him gone too yet he’s still here.  Not ruling it out just saying I don’t think it’s a lock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • w87r changed the title to Colts FA news (MERGE)
19 minutes ago, ColtStrong2013 said:


I’m not sure a lot of people understand the top 51 rule of the cap. I didnt before this year, and still don’t pay enough attention to the rules to fully understand. 
 

https://www.thefalcoholic.com/2020/6/2/21278326/nfl-top-51-rule-explained-how-much-cap-space-will-it-really-cost-to-sign-the-falcons-draft-class

 

this is from 2020, so it may be a bit outdated depending on what changes may have been made, but it does a good job breaking down how the rookies for the falcons that year counted toward the cap. 

It’s been stated on here multiple times every year over the years but people ignore it for some reason.  I’m sure we will have to state it again next year. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

Only advantage is for MAC to get the best team fit in FA he can get and the most money he can get, to do good by him.

Kinda what I was thinking.  He’s really not the kinda player that goes in the first few days.  Maybe we’ll still release him in the next week or two…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

We’ll see I heard all last off-season people expected him gone too yet he’s still here.  Not ruling it out just saying I don’t think it’s a lock.

A cheaper blocking TE is certainly gettable in FA  and just makes too much sense. The Colts need to put that precious cap space to better use. I hope and expect that they will. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoose said:

A cheaper blocking TE is certainly gettable in FA  and just makes too much sense. The Colts need to put that precious cap space to better use. I hope and expect that they will. 

To you maybe.  Again, I am not against moving on from Mo I am just stating that the Colts clearly like him more than the fans do.  I heard the same stuff last off-season regarding Mo.  Yet he’s still here with Shane and Ballard going out of their way to speak highly of him in the past couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, runthepost said:

Snead excelled in a man based defense, he wouldn’t be the same here. He isn’t a Ramsey or Sherman who could play man or zone

Sneed was one of the highest rated zone corners in the NFL last year.  People have been complaining about the Colts not disguising their coverages enough. A player like Sneed allows them to do that very thing. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Archer said:

Kinda what I was thinking.  He’s really not the kinda player that goes in the first few days.  Maybe we’ll still release him in the next week or two…

 

Mike Gesicki signed with the Bengals for 1 year $3.25 million, could have had him but then he took less than the previous year (1 year $9 mil. with the Patriots) only because it was Joe Burrow and the market wasn't great for TEs, just like it is subdued for RBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hawkeyecolt said:

Sneed was one of the highest rated zone corners in the NFL last year.  People have been complaining about the Colts not disguising their coverages enough. A player like Sneed allows them to do that very thing. 

 

Yep, he was stellar in zone because McDuffie played as much man as Sneed and Sneed rarely took a bad step in zone. He is definitely a good fit and isn't just a man corner, he is versatile.

 

If he goes back to the Chiefs, they will restructure contracts and sign him, and that helps with their roster strength.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stitches said:

Ballard really likes his team and his players. Lets hope this is not one of those "do the same thing over and over again and expect different results" things... 

 

My opinion: Ballard is doing what he can to keep the defense serviceable but affordable so he can draft foundational pieces on offense. He's not focusing on defense, he just wants it to work so the team can build around Anthony Richardson this year. It makes sense to me.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Archer said:

Kinda what I was thinking.  He’s really not the kinda player that goes in the first few days.  Maybe we’ll still release him in the next week or two…

He isn't a free agent.  He isn't going anywhere unless he  is cut or traded

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

Yep, he was stellar in zone because McDuffie played as much man as Sneed and Sneed rarely took a bad step in zone. He is definitely a good fit and isn't just a man corner, he is versatile.

 

If he goes back to the Chiefs, they will restructure contracts and sign him, and that helps with their roster strength.

The Chiefs are really on the clock from my perspective. They have to be under the cap when the new league year starts tomorrow.  After Jones’s deal, getting Sneed dealt is important.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, richard pallo said:

I think we’re going for a bigger fish.  I did like him though.

my heart just broke, i wanted chinn w everything en my soul 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hawkeyecolt said:

The Chiefs are really on the clock from my perspective. They have to be under the cap when the new league year starts tomorrow.  After Jones’s deal, getting Sneed dealt is important.  

 

Yeah, that is why they re-worked Mahomes' contract terms to the fact that they can restructure it as late as May from where it was, which was March.

 

That is like a silver bullet they use, restructuring Mahomes and Joe Thuney's contracts recently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Obviously he wasn't scoring 40 tds. I'm just using it to show his potential. What did you want me to use with such a small portion size?   Again if you want to label them as top 10 or above average, go ahead. I said my piece and I'm gonna leave it at that.
    • You continue to read too much into a state based on a tiny portion of the season.  As if AR would’ve been a lock to continue at that pace.  Odds are, he wouldn’t have.     As to the OL,  you missed your own point.  You called them average.  When they’re a top-10 unit.   That goes back to my original observation.  You created this post behind a flawed concept that forced you into calling them average when they’re not.  That’s a real flaw.   Sorry. 
    • TBH, a hot take I have this season is that the TEs will actually flourish (given health).  Remember, last season it was at one point the TEs were out producing the WRs with checkdown Charlie Minshew.  Imagine what they can do when the field opens up with ARs arm and hopefully a big play WR room with Pierce and AD.  Woods is in the same boat as AR now.  Boatloads of potential and flashes but haven’t seen it because of health.  
    • I took his tds and made a season long projection. In what way am I lying? He scored 7 tds and only finished two games. ( Counting the jags game). How is that not impressive?   I actually said 20 and 21 which imo were their best years, but I think you're taking the term average too harshly. I'm not saying their bad. Like I said, I'm looking at the line as a group not just Nelson, Kelly, and Smith and my main concern was health not their ability. They have all dealt with injuries and have either played hurt or missed time. I also mentioned how the depth is inexperienced. Our depth consist of two rookies and second year player. Pinter is coming back from injury and French is ok. If you wanna call them above average, fine.
  • Members

    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,551

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 164

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,526

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Iron Colt

      Iron Colt 133

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • smittywerb

      smittywerb 1,510

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,874

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,144

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,566

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Narcosys

      Narcosys 631

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...