Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Super Bowl LVI Gameday discussion thread


ColtsGermany

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 337
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, GoHorse1992 said:

Bengals proving you don’t need an elite OL to go far. As long as you have a QB who gets it out fast and playmakers who can get open. 

I hope this Super Bowl is proving to Ballard that he needs to tweak his team building strategy. Maybe not as extreme but maybe that wide receivers (Bengals) and free agency/trades (Rams) are aspects that can be stocked up on and perused more aggressively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lancer1 said:

An inaccurate vet, who despite his 2 SB MVPs, finished his career with a .500 record.

 

I don't disagree but he was clutch. He won when he had to. IMO, I believe Rivers was the best of the three from that draft class but he is the only one not to win a SB. (BTW, I was a fan of Rivers since his days at NC State.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

 

I don't disagree but he was clutch. He won when he had to. IMO, I believe Rivers was the best of the three from that draft class but he is the only one not to win a SB. (BTW, I was a fan of Rivers since his days at NC State.)

Eli may have been clutch (or lucky, he did throw one right to Patriots corner Asante Samuel 2 plays before his game winning throw yo Burress on '07) in two of his postseasons, but in the other four he was 1 & done!

16417794177436721764211808000895_9161564109055.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, buccolts said:

Halftime entertainment seems to be getting worse every year.

I missed it.  I cleaned my kitchen

1 minute ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

Prince still the best halftime show of all time........

Without a doubt!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TaylorTheStudMuffin said:

So glad I am not the only one to think that. This is so lame. I like country music and not all of this crap. 

 

Lol. My sister said it was the best since Prince. I never watch halftime shows or commercials. I watch only for the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I read something that said the leaked scores were only partial. And now that I'm thinking about it more, I think they were saying the low score that was published was from his first attempt, and he might have retaken the test and done better. It's kind of fuzzy, but that might be the case.    Either way, my point was that I remember notable pushback against the leaked scores, and their importance. So if certain people are now saying that they didn't care about the S2 scores a year ago, that doesn't sound like revisionist history to me. One of those unnamed execs could be Ballard, who was very vocal about not liking how Stroud was talked about. And we know the Colts subscribe to S2...     Some suggestions... basically unsubstantiated rumors that get repeated enough that they begin to be accepted as fact. Who knows what the Panthers were doing last year, but if they let the S2 test decide which QB to draft, they deserve all the dysfunction they've experienced. I don't think even the Panthers are that lost. More likely, Bryce Young was the guy they decided on, and maybe the higher S2 was in his favor, but would have just been one of several factors that they used.      The way it's described, there's potentially value in the S2 testing. But using Stroud as the example, if you watch him play, and then look at a low S2 score, and can't figure out how to reconcile the disparity between the tape and the test score, then you don't know how to evaluate. Overall, I think way too much is being made of the S2 thing, similar to how way too much was made of Wonderlic scores. It's just one piece of info, and probably carries a small amount of importance overall.    But if a team wants to use S2 testing to prepare a development plan, especially for a QB, there's no real reason they can't have him take the test after the draft. If that's really part of the value, and the player declines the test before the draft because he doesn't want to be scrutinized over it, then ask him to take it once you've drafted him.
    • Ask Philip Rivers to give him advice on parenthood, AR should stick around in the NFL for a while then. 😉
    • Yes, I think so too.
    • It's very telling that nobody actually came out and said that Stroud's published test score was inaccurate. Yes there was pushback about the scores, but they all were very general and non-specific. "I've seen published scores that aren't correct", "Those scores miss a lot of context", etc.    And especially when Stroud himself was asked about those scores. Do you remember what his answer was? He didn't dispute any of it. He just said he's not a test-taker, he's a football player.    I think several big time reporters/analysts reported it. I think I first heard it from Zierlein. But can't find the original. Here's Pelissero reporting on it too: https://www.nfl.com/news/2023-nfl-draft-pro-execs-scouts-coaches-rank-and-evaluate-the-qb-class           There have been some suggestions that the Panthers took Bryce Young over Stroud partially because of the S2 test, because they valued it highly.    Yeah, I don't remember if it was reported as players refusing it or their agents not allowing them to take it, but this is what one of the podcasts I listen to reported. Not 100% sure which one it is because I consume a lot of those draft podcasts.    They probably can... not sure if the players would do it. But if the teams knew it in advance they might have better idea of whether development in certain areas is even possible. 
    • I don't think I agree that it's revisionist. Last year, some scores leaked, and then Stroud's scores got aggregated and the story was sensationalized. But all along, there was pushback about the scores -- were they accurate, was there missing context, was there an incomplete leak designed to make people discount Stroud, was someone trying to gain leverage for a trade, etc. There was skepticism from reputable people, and even though it was noted that many teams value the S2 test, I don't think anyone ever expected or predicted that Stroud's draft stock was significantly affected by whatever his score was.    I don't remember reading that he took the test multiple times. That's an interesting variable, if it's true.   There can be value in the test, but like with any other piece of information, how do you apply what's learned to your evaluation process? Like you said, there's a lot of work to figure out how this testing correlates to a player's ability to perform in the NFL, same as with any other datapoint. I don't know if it should be dismissed, but I don't think any team is letting S2 scores rule over their scouting process. Not even for QBs.    I haven't heard that any QBs are refusing to take the test, but I have read that agents are recommending that they don't. I think that's alarmist; Stroud went #2, which is basically what most people expected. Is it established that the scores hurt him? I'd say they did not. But I might not want a player I represent to be subjected to the media/Internet scrutiny, especially since it's clear that players pay attention to what's being said about them, and sometimes react to it.   To the bolded, if a team wants to use S2 results for planning, why can't they draft their QB, and then ask him to take the test? Now there's no pressure, he can test under controlled circumstances, and the team can use the data to help develop their player. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...