Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Monday Night Playoff Game?!? Cardinals @ Rams, Jan. 17, 2022


NewColtsFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

So I’m reading a story about Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford’s and it talks about the game is MONDAY NIGHT .

 

And I thought, WTH?!?  
 

When did the NFL put playoff games on Monday night?!?    Doesn’t that put the winner at a competitive disadvantage?   Won’t the winner have to face some other team on a short week, while the team they play is on longer rest?

 

I’m sure the reason is money, but what the heck?!?     Messing with the playoffs like this seems a couple of bridges too far.   What else am I not understanding?   Help me here!  
 

:giveup:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read that the reason for a Monday night playoff game is that it's very lucrative. Monday football is a way for those betting to cut losses or make even more money. The NFL has deals with online betting services who pay millions to broadcast Monday games. They want to keep their partners/sponsors happy.  So the money is the driving force. 

 

The NFL used to discourage gambling, but it's too profitable so they decided to get a piece of the action. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:

So I’m reading a story about Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford’s and it talks about the game is MONDAY NIGHT .

 

And I thought, WTH?!?  
 

When did the NFL put playoff games on Monday night?!?    Doesn’t that out the winner at a competitive disadvantage?   Won’t the winner have to face some other team on a short week, while the team they play is on longer rest?

 

I’m sure the reason is money, but what the heck?!?     Messing with the playoffs like thus seems a couple of bridges too far.   What else am I not understanding?   Help me here!  
 

:giveup:

 

I totally agree. Most likely, the MNF winner will get the last divisional round game on Sunday. Even then, it is 1 day less than what playoff teams in the past got. More ways to make money for ESPN/ABC? Typically playoffs are only on NBC, CBS and FOX, correct? Now by putting it on MNF, they get another network involved for the money? I personally do not like it, just like you.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

I totally agree. Most likely, the MNF winner will get the last divisional round game on Sunday. Even then, it is 1 day less than what playoff teams in the past got. More ways to make money for ESPN/ABC? Typically playoffs are only on NBC, CBS and FOX, correct? Now by putting it on MNF, they get another network involved for the money? I personally do not like it, just like you.

Well ESPN/ABC had a game normally Saturday early game (us last year)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PuntersArePeopleToo said:

My bad, I just remember being annoyed with the announcershaha

 

2018 was ESPN.

 

But ya, ESPN has broadcast a WC game each year and now are on rotation for Super Bowl

 

Money talks. But hey, Disney can cut back by not giving families direct rides from the airports to the hotels anymore, despite raising all their prices, right? :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:

So I’m reading a story about Rams quarterback Matthew Stafford’s and it talks about the game is MONDAY NIGHT .

 

And I thought, WTH?!?  
 

When did the NFL put playoff games on Monday night?!?    Doesn’t that put the winner at a competitive disadvantage?   Won’t the winner have to face some other team on a short week, while the team they play is on longer rest?

 

I’m sure the reason is money, but what the heck?!?     Messing with the playoffs like this seems a couple of bridges too far.   What else am I not understanding?   Help me here!  
 

:giveup:

I agree with what you think.

But for my own selfish interests, it works.   It'll be nice to have 3 days of playoff football.   

It is nice to see that no games have been pushed out due to covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, teganslaw said:

I read that the reason for a Monday night playoff game is that it's very lucrative. Monday football is a way for those betting to cut losses or make even more money. The NFL has deals with online betting services who pay millions to broadcast Monday games. They want to keep their partners/sponsors happy.  So the money is the driving force. 

 

The NFL used to discourage gambling, but it's too profitable so they decided to get a piece of the action. 

 

If it wasn't for Gambling and Fantasy, the NFL wouldn't be nearly as popular and watchable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/15/2022 at 1:24 PM, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

If it wasn't for Gambling and Fantasy, the NFL wouldn't be nearly as popular and watchable.

I was very popular before gambling and fantasy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Myles said:

I was very popular before gambling and fantasy.

The game has been deteriorating....a few years ago it was unwatchable to enough where the ratings went down to that they were thinking about doing away with Thursday night football. 

Its product has improved some the last year or two but still long and many stoppages. 

 

As far as betting/Fantasy, that's a major component of sports these days, especially the NFL.  More and more states are legalizing sports betting to the delight of NFL who I think partnered up with Draft Kings. On ESPN and other networks the betting lines roll by on the crawler.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

The game has been deteriorating....a few years ago it was unwatchable to enough where the ratings went down to that they were thinking about doing away with Thursday night football. 

Its product has improved some the last year or two but still long and many stoppages. 

 

As far as betting/Fantasy, that's a major component of sports these days, especially the NFL.  More and more states are legalizing sports betting to the delight of NFL who I think partnered up with Draft Kings. On ESPN and other networks the betting lines roll by on the crawler.

 

I was looking and didn't really see the dip in ratings that you mentioned.   I may have missed it.  The NFL has always been strong even having insignificant games besting NBA playoff games in the ratings quite often.   I don't doubt the gambling and fantasy have helped them, but I don't think they were ever in trouble.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Myles said:

I was looking and didn't really see the dip in ratings that you mentioned.   I may have missed it.  The NFL has always been strong even having insignificant games besting NBA playoff games in the ratings quite often.   I don't doubt the gambling and fantasy have helped them, but I don't think they were ever in trouble.  

 

"NFL denies that Thursday Night Football could be limited or eliminated - ProFootballTalk" https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/11/28/nfl-denies-that-thursday-night-football-could-be-limited-or-eliminated/amp/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LJpalmbeacher2 said:

 

"NFL denies that Thursday Night Football could be limited or eliminated - ProFootballTalk" https://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/11/28/nfl-denies-that-thursday-night-football-could-be-limited-or-eliminated/amp/

I don't think the NFL would drop the Thursday night games.   They only care about the ratings.   Thursday Night Football has been getting over 14 million viewers the past few years.  

I agree with  Taylor above that only teams coming off a bye week should play in them.   But I don't expect the NFL to change anything.  

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/819113/nfl-thursday-night-football-viewers/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Myles said:

I don't think the NFL would drop the Thursday night games.   They only care about the ratings.   Thursday Night Football has been getting over 14 million viewers the past few years.  

I agree with  Taylor above that only teams coming off a bye week should play in them.   But I don't expect the NFL to change anything.  

 

https://www.statista.com/statistics/819113/nfl-thursday-night-football-viewers/

 

I don't expect them to drop Thursday games either, but at the time of that story the ratings were down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • NFLfan changed the title to Monday Night Playoff Game?!? Cardinals @ Rams, Jan. 17, 2022

Cardinals have fallen off a cliff since that hot start they had at the beginning of the season. I don’t know why you try a trick play on an important third down in the first quarter, but maybe that’s indicative of why they collapse every season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont mind the Monday Night Playoffs. More days with playoff games for us. Its been apparent that the only thing NFL cares about is money since they introduced Thursday Night Football. They grandstand about player safety but viewers and money is the bottom line. More regular season games...more playoff teams.

 

I wouldn't be surprised if by 2030 they move to an NHL/NBA style playoffs, 8 teams from each side. Maybe 19 or 20 games, 1 preseason. Saturday Football is probably going to be a regular thing every week soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TaylorTheStudMuffin said:

Like someone mentioned our QB play looks so bad compared to what these other teams look like.

In hind sight, we should have traded whatever it took for Stafford. Apparently he was interested in coming here. Bad miss by Ballard IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chickenMan said:

In hind sight, we should have traded whatever it took for Stafford. Apparently he was interested in coming here. Bad miss by Ballard IMO

Some of us have been screaming this since Stafford became available

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, chickenMan said:

In hind sight, we should have traded whatever it took for Stafford. Apparently he was interested in coming here. Bad miss by Ballard IMO

We don’t have half the weapons he has. Ballard is the one that didn’t want him. We also didn’t have the QB piece to add to the trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TaylorTheStudMuffin said:

We don’t have half the weapons he has. Ballard is the one that didn’t want him. We also didn’t have the QB piece to add to the trade.

Ballard did want him we just got outbid. Ballard wasn't willing to pay the price the Rams were. Ballard didn't want Wentz, let frank talk him into it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want a pass rush like the Rams.

2 minutes ago, Nesjan3 said:

Ballard did want him we just got outbid. Ballard wasn't willing to pay the price the Rams were. Ballard didn't want Wentz, let frank talk him into it

Levin Bowen stated there was someone in the colts big 3 that would not sign off on it. He has now come out and said it was Ballard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TaylorTheStudMuffin said:

I want a pass rush like the Rams.

Levin Bowen stated there was someone in the colts big 3 that would not sign off on it. He has now come out and said it was Ballard.

Yah because the price was to high. We were in on him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Matt Ryan is durable, but nothing goes according to plan. This is the NFL, where the unexpected happens. There's a very good chance Foles will play at some point if we sign him for a year. Asking a 37 year old QB to stay healthy for 17 games plus the playoffs is a tall task. Our O-Line is probably weaker with this starting five than before as well and that's with no injuries.    There's two issues with Foles to me. 1.) If he plays for an extended period of time, he's not good enough as is, but not bad enough to tank like Sam would for us. So it would actually hurt our chances of getting a franchise QB, and we can't keep Matt Ryan forever, he's 37 now. 2.) Foles is just the latest in another of Reichs QBs that he wants on the Colts. I'm tired of it. People say he'll do well with him as he has familarity. So does that mean anyone he doesn't have familarity with will be even worse? That's a valid question. If Reich had familarity with Wentz and he did that bad, considering their relationship, is Reich going to be just as bad or worse with Matt Ryan?   Sorry to get off subject. Just trying to show that there's really no upside to the Foles signing unless you believe he'll do what he did with the Eagles for us. 
    • I think regression is likely but don't anticipate it being significant.    The changes to the O-Line are probably for the worse rather than for the better (though this certainly isn't clear or certain), I think Hines will play more of a role overall on offense, and I don't think the loss of Doyle can be understated.    I also think the passing game should be better too though. I voted that efficiency will stay the same but I could actually see the efficiency increase even if the overall production decreases. Though it's not as if we weren't already efficient last season.
    • Yeah I don't get the hate either. He's probably one of the better back ups in the league and almost certainly better than what we had already.
    • Here we go!!! Welcome to Indy Mr. big Richard Nick Foles!!!
    • Read a few articles that have in one way or another suggested that our run efficiency at least, and possibly our rushing total or rushing average (JT 5.5, NH 4.9) take a step back.    The articles had different spins, but here most of the reasons given.   Offensive Line losses (Departure of OL starters Glow and Fisher). Glow has always been a solid run blocker, and IIRC, our efficiency and/or success rate running right has been as good or better than running left.  The front runner to replace Glow now looks to be Pinter, who while a wild card, looked to have pretty good vertical punch.  While Fisher was pretty bad in pass pro, he was pretty darn good most games run blocking.  Pryor graded better than Fisher in pass pro, but not as effective in run blocking.  WR/TE losses (departure of Pascal and Doyle) Doyle - While some were never impressed with Doyle as an offensive weapon, he was always a pretty darn good blocker Woods and Ogletree - blocking is seen as weaknesses in both their games Granson - also is suspect in the blocking space Pascal - not much of a pass catching weapon, but like Doyle, very solid blocking Pierce - didn't block much, but has great hands vs the press, and seems pretty "tough" or "physical". Doubt he's running boundary 9s all game, so this is an area to watch.  JT - is no longer going to surprise teams in 2022 Hines - perhaps becoming more of a receiver than runner. NH's efficiency actually improved last season even though his snaps went down. I could make a case that this could be a pro or a con.     Things that IMO, might offset things for the positive Ryan - Should be better in short passing game, so perhaps Frank will call a more well rounded game plan that keeps DBs from cheating up Nelson - returning to good health Kelly - getting back on track after regressing the past few seasons Addition of Lindsay, who is perhaps a better #2 RB option (rushing, not catching) than Hines
  • Members

    • Crunked

      Crunked 116

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Myles

      Myles 5,452

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 11,673

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • EastStreet

      EastStreet 18,320

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 7,335

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • craigerb

      craigerb 210

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jared Cisneros

      Jared Cisneros 5,039

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...