Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

With the 13th pick in 2020 NFL Draft (merge)


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, runthepost said:

That’s like saying Barkley wasn’t going to be good. A few posters were saying that 

I'm confused when you throw Barkley in. I didn't say Lamb would not be good, I was questioning your assertion that  because the guys you mentioned were doing well that Lamb would do well. Just because a guy is good in college does not guarantee he will be good in the oros.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PeterBowman said:

There is a very good chance a top tier receiver or top tier D lineman will be available at 13. 

Drafting for need for the sake of drafting a qb will hurt the team even more 

Exactly.  Very good post.

 

I think this forum understands the concept and value of BPA, but there seems to be an atmosphere of comments that suggest an elite Qb can be picks at #13 because its pick #13.  That he will be elite simply because he's picked at 13.

 

There may not be a first round quality QB left by pick 13, and the Qb sitting there at pick 34 might not be elite.  In fact, he probably wont be.

 

So all of the JB haters who just want him fired may be disappointed.  Firing someone is easy.  Its finding a player who is better than who you just fired is the hard part. Those players aren't just floating out there waiting to be signed by someone and the teams that have those players often don't want to give them up. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DougDew said:

Exactly.  Very good post.

 

I think this forum understands the concept and value of BPA, but there seems to be an atmosphere of comments that suggest an elite Qb can be picks at #13 because its pick #13.  That he will be elite simply because he's picked at 13.

 

There may not be a first round quality QB left by pick 13, and the Qb sitting there at pick 34 might not be elite.  In fact, he probably wont be.

 

So all of the JB haters who just want him fired may be disappointed.  Firing someone is easy.  Its finding a player who is better than who you just fired is the hard part. Those players aren't just floating out there waiting to be signed by someone and the teams that have those players often don't want to give them up. 

If Brissett is fired should be easy finding someone that’s better than him. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, boo2202 said:

If Brissett is fired should be easy finding someone that’s better than him. 

Case Keenum? 

 

Ryan Fitzpatick might be available.  

 

Both of those Qbs seem to always be available.

 

Andy Dalton?  Certainly the Bengals would move on from Dalton if they drafted Burrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DougDew said:

CIN will take one.  After WASH, DET, and NYG,   Then comes MIA, LAC, and CAR in a row.  MIA will probably take one. Three teams for sure.  Maybe 4.

 

I could see the JAGS roll with Minshew and build a team around him.  What guarantee is there that any college QB will be better than Minshew?  And they have Foles.

 

We pick at 13, and that's a long ways up to picks 2 through 4, outbidding other teams that may move up a couple of slots to be sure to get the QB they want.

 

Burrow, Herbert, and Eason are probably the top 3 QBs and will be after the combine. 

 

Is Love, Tua, or Fromm worth pick 13?  

I could see the Chargers taking Tau and re-signing Rivers or another QB to a short deal.  I wouldn’t rule out Miami taking Tau either.  That’s assuming he turns pro.  If he doesn’t right now I think only Burrow and Herbert are worth that high of a pick and the Colts would be better off to try to get another player to help them getting a QB in round two. 

 

Miami is a wild card because they could take another position at number four and take a QB later in the first.  

 

The Chargers clearly have to make a choice with Rivers as do the Panthers with Newton.  Once we get those answers we will have a better idea what’s going to happen.  It’s also possible one of them could sign Rivers or Brady as well as could the Colts if they think they are an elite QB away.  

 

I don’t think Eason goes in round one.  If he does I think it would be late in the first round.  I’d think one of Eason, Love, and, Fromm would be there at 34 assuming the Colts go QB.  

 

I agree I think the Jags taking a QB is unlikely for the reasons you said but I just don’t think you can 100% rule it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, IndyEric07 said:

Just for s&g’s, what would the Colts have to give up to get Jeaux Beaureaux?

I doubt the Bengals have any interest in trading that pick for several reasons. He’s the best QB in this draft being one of them plus the fact he’s from Ohio gives the Bengals a face of their franchise that will appeal to fans.  That’s something they haven’t had in a long time.  So baring a significant injury or him just being a disaster in combines I don’t see a way the Bengals trade that pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

I could see the Chargers taking Tau and re-signing Rivers or another QB to a short deal.  I wouldn’t rule out Miami taking Tau either.  That’s assuming he turns pro.  If he doesn’t right now I think only Burrow and Herbert are worth that high of a pick and the Colts would be better off to try to get another player to help them getting a QB in round two. 

 

Miami is a wild card because they could take another position at number four and take a QB later in the first.  

 

The Chargers clearly have to make a choice with Rivers as do the Panthers with Newton.  Once we get those answers we will have a better idea what’s going to happen.  It’s also possible one of them could sign Rivers or Brady as well as could the Colts if they think they are an elite QB away.  

 

I don’t think Eason goes in round one.  If he does I think it would be late in the first round.  I’d think one of Eason, Love, and, Fromm would be there at 34 assuming the Colts go QB.  

 

I agree I think the Jags taking a QB is unlikely for the reasons you said but I just don’t think you can 100% rule it out.

I could be wrong, but I don't recall a QB that is thought to have elite potential ever fall to 13.  I know Lamar did, but he fell because no other team thought he was elite.  Same with Mahomes.  

 

For us to get an elite QB at 13, Ballard would have to see something other GMs do not.  I like him as a GM, but I don't think he's that smart to see something that another GM won't take ahead of him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DougDew said:

I could be wrong, but I don't recall a QB that is thought to have elite potential ever fall to 13.  I know Lamar did, but he fell because no other team thought he was elite.  Same with Mahomes.  

 

For us to get an elite QB at 13, Ballard would have to see something other GMs do not.  I like him as a GM, but I don't think he's that smart to see something that another GM won't take ahead of him.

I am just comment on how it stands right now.  

 

Honestly, I am not sure if any of these guys outside of maybe Burrow or Tau (who has injury concerns) is going to be thought of as elite.  The rest have holes that could very well make them fall.  

 

Realistically the Colts would probably have to pay a huge price to go up to number four which I don’t think they will do or hope someone slips and try to go up and get a guy if they are a sold on a guy.  

 

Honestly, I am starting to think most likely they will take another position at 13 and grab one of the second tear QBs at 34 if they want one.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

I am just comment on how it stands right now.  

 

Honestly, I am not sure if any of these guys outside of maybe Burrow or Tau (who has injury concerns) is going to be thought of as elite.  The rest have holes that could very well make them fall.  

 

Realistically the Colts would probably have to pay a huge price to go up to number four which I don’t think they will do or hope someone slips and try to go up and get a guy if they are a sold on a guy.  

 

Honestly, I am starting to think most likely they will take another position at 13 and grab one of the second tear QBs at 34 if they want one.

I am looking forward to watching the Oregon game. And the draft board always changes with combine, pro days and individual workouts. It's still early to judge exactly how this years college QB class will grade out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 1959Colts said:

I am looking forward to watching the Oregon game. And the draft board always changes with combine, pro days and individual workouts. It's still early to judge exactly how this years college QB class will grade out.

Yes it is but seeing as I can’t see the future I am just commenting on how things as they stand now.  It can clearly and will change drastically between now and the draft.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you guys think of getting a Derrick Brown or Javon Kinlaw, assuming one of them is available at No.13 first??

 

Then, what would you think if we packaged both our 2nd rounders to move back into the second half of the first round to get Jordan Love or Justin Herbert at QB and gain an extra 3rd??

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chad72 said:

What do you guys think of getting a Derrick Brown or Javon Kinlaw, assuming one of them is available at No.13 first??

 

Then, what would you think if we packaged both our 2nd rounders to move back into the second half of the first round to get Jordan Love or Justin Herbert at QB and gain an extra 3rd??

I would love to get Brown and Love with this scenario. We'd probably get an extra 4th instead of a 3rd though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I would love to get Brown and Love with this scenario. We'd probably get an extra 4th instead of a 3rd though.

 

The Redskins pick No.34 is a powerful one. Trading both our 2nd rounders nets us at No.14 or 15 and if we pick again close to No.18-20, could easily net us a 3rd rounder if done with the right team.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, chad72 said:

What do you guys think of getting a Derrick Brown or Javon Kinlaw, assuming one of them is available at No.13 first??

 

Then, what would you think if we packaged both our 2nd rounders to move back into the second half of the first round to get Jordan Love or Justin Herbert at QB and gain an extra 3rd??

I am not so sure you won’t be able to get Love at 34.  

 

I doubt Herbert makes it to 13 let alone later, especially if Tau goes back to school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chad72 said:

 

The Redskins pick No.34 is a powerful one. Trading both our 2nd rounders nets us at No.14 or 15 and if we pick close to No.18-20, could easily net us a 3rd rounder if done with the right team.

That'd work. Love to do that with a team like the Broncos who pick 15 or the Raiders with multiple 1sts in the teens. Both teams have multiple 3rds I believe as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

I am not so sure you won’t be able to get Love at 34.  

 

I doubt Herbert makes it to 13 let alone later, especially if Tau goes back to school.

 

a) If you are sold on the QB you are getting after doing your due diligence, pundit and analyst ratings will not matter. See Daniel Jones that got picked up at No.6, it happens all the time.

 

b) 5th year option for a QB is an invaluable tool you will have access to for the rookie contract if you get back into the 1st round

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

a) If you are sold on the QB you are getting after doing your due diligence, pundit and analyst ratings will not matter. See Daniel Jones that got picked up at No.6, it happens all the time.

 

b) 5th year option for a QB is an invaluable tool you will have access to for the rookie contract if you get back into the 1st round

Yep, I wish we had a 5th year option for Darius Leonard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

a) If you are sold on the QB you are getting after doing your due diligence, pundit and analyst ratings will not matter. See Daniel Jones that got picked up at No.6, it happens all the time.

 

b) 5th year option for a QB is an invaluable tool you will have access to for the rookie contract if you get back into the 1st round

Part of the reason the Giants took Jones where they did was they were stuck there and unable to move back.  

 

The fifth year option would be nice but not worth overdrafting a guy for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Part of the reason the Giants took Jones where they did was they were stuck there and unable to move back.  

 

The fifth year option would be nice but not worth overdrafting a guy for.

 

It ultimately depends on their valuation. QBs are slightly and typically overvalued, and if we don't move up, we can stick to our principles and watch some other team move up and get the QB we want. Both Chiefs and Texans moved up for Mahomes (from 27th to 10th) and Watson, the Ravens moved back into last pick of Round 1 for Lamar Jackson. Just because we now have the benefit of hindsight, even if any of those QBs did not work out nearly as well, they'd still have been market value moves for QBs. 

 

Like I said, your evaluation of Jordan Love nor mine matter, if the decision makers feel he is worth No.19 (for example), they will move up if necessary back into Round 1 because it is a premium position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoColts8818 said:

Me too but not if it meant they had to give up Smith or Turey to get it which they would have had to do.

I believe we drafted Leonard at 36, so it would probably cost a 3rd to move up. That would of been Tyquan Lewis before the trade up. He might bust, but I'd rather have Lewis just in case. We'll pay Leonard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I believe we drafted Leonard at 36, so it would probably cost a 3rd to move up. That would of been Tyquan Lewis before the trade up. He might bust, but I'd rather have Lewis just in case. We'll pay Leonard.

I know you know a lot about college players. What do you think about that WR from Liberty, Gandy-Golden? He looks like Moss, not as fast but still 4.5 speed and 6'4 so he has size. I like him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

It ultimately depends on their valuation. QBs are slightly and typically overvalued, and if we don't move up, we can stick to our principles and watch some other team move up and get the QB we want. Both Chiefs and Texans moved up for Mahomes (from 27th to 10th) and Watson, the Ravens moved back into last pick of Round 1 for Lamar Jackson. Just because we now have the benefit of hindsight, even if any of those QBs did not work out nearly as well, they'd still have been market value moves for QBs. 

 

Like I said, your evaluation of Jordan Love nor mine matter, if the decision makers feel he is worth No.19 (for example), they will move up if necessary. 

I am sure they would.  I am just saying I don’t know if he will be valued that high.  Some mocks I’ve seen see the Colts getting Love with their second second pick.  If he’s valued there they could easily get him at 34.  

 

Part of the draft is playing poker and resisting the urge to over draft.  If you think a guys value is in the 30s you don’t give up a lot to go get him in the teens.  Now if you think his value is in the teens then sure you move up and go get him.

 

Like you said though, a big part of that is the value the team puts on a guy and that’s something we will never know unless they draft him.

4 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

I believe we drafted Leonard at 36, so it would probably cost a 3rd to move up. That would of been Tyquan Lewis before the trade up. He might bust, but I'd rather have Lewis just in case. We'll pay Leonard.

Lewis we traded back in the second round to get.  So I don’t think a third a lone would have gotten us back into the first to get him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I know you know a lot about college players. What do you think about that WR from Liberty, Gandy-Golden? He looks like Moss, not as fast but still 4.5 speed and 6'4 so he has size. I like him.

One of my best-friends loves him and he is his super sleeper at WR in the draft. This is the same guy who was telling me about Leonard after round 1 in 2018 and has a friend who knows him from South Carolina. So take that for what it's worth! :thmup:

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

I am sure they would.  I am just saying I don’t know if he will be valued that high.  Some mocks I’ve seen see the Colts getting Love with their second second pick.  If he’s valued there they could easily get him at 34.  

 

Part of the draft is playing poker and resisting the urge to over draft.  If you think a guys value is in the 30s you don’t give up a lot to go get him in the teens.  Now if you think his value is in the teens then sure you move up and go get him.

 

Like you said though, a big part of that is the value the team puts on a guy and that’s something we will never know unless they draft him.

Yep. Of course a GM's board is vastly different from draft experts (for better or worse). I'm sure that draft range for Love will be narrowed after pro days, combines, and interviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

One of my best-friends loves him and he is his super sleeper at WR in the draft. This is the same guy who was telling me about Leonard after round 1 in 2018 and has a friend who knows him from South Carolina. So take that for what it's worth! :thmup:

Yeah that is my sleeper too. He looks awesome, I think because he is playing lesser comp he is being over looked?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jared Cisneros said:

Yep. Of course a GM's board is vastly different from draft experts (for better or worse). I'm sure that draft range for Love will be narrowed after pro days, combines, and interviews.

Oh yeah right now everything is still up in the air.  Still all it takes is one team to fall in love with a guy.  Like Leonard.  He wasn’t on many if anyone’s boards to go where he did but he was on the Colts there.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, IinD said:

Any game wreckers on D that might be there at #13?. We only + about the offense, but that D is definitely thirsty for a force at DT or DE.

 

I think they'd be able to potentially find a good QB prospect with that 33/34? pick.

 

Maybe Derrick Brown (IDL - Auburn) but probably not.  More likely would be AJ Epenesa (EDGE, Iowa), Yetor Gross-Matos (EDGE, PSU), Javon Kinlaw (IDL, S. carolina), Curtis Weaver (EDGE, Boise State) or K'Lavon Chaisson (EDGE, LSU), though I think we could trade back and take them closer to pick 20.  

 

A few possible WRs are CeeDee Lamb (WR, OKLA), Tee Higgins (WR, Clemson), Jerry Jeudy (WR, Alabama), Henry Ruggs III (WR, Alabama), or Lavinska Shenault (WR, Colorado).  Kind of doubt Lamb or Jeudy will be there at 13, and think we could drop back a few slots to get most of the others.

 

A few possible DBs are Grant Delpit (S, LSU -- not sure we need a S, but the dude is a stud), Kristian Fulton (CB, LSU), CJ Henderson (CB, Florida).. again, we could maybe trade back a couple picks for any of these three.

 

Pretty solid OL talent in round 1 as well (I don't know we need a 1st rounder, but I'd really like to see us upgrade Glowinski).  

 

After Burrows, I don't see any QBs being a long-term franchise QB.  I have my doubts that any of them could beat out Jacoby.  

 

I'm somewhat expecting us to trade back in round 1 to get an additional 2nd round pick.  With the way this draft is stacked, I think we can really improve our WRs, DL and secondary with 4 picks in the first 2 rounds.  

 

7 hours ago, CR91 said:

If Tua or Herbert get within the top ten, I'd trade up. Shouldn't take a lot to move up a few spots

 

Don't think Tua's going to translate into the pros, TBH.  I don't even think he'll wind up entering the draft this year, anyway.  And I don't see Herbert as a sure fire upgrade to Brissett.   

 

I'd personally rather see us fill holes in other areas of the roster than waste a pick on a mediocre QB.  Aside from Burrow,  I don't think any QB in this draft is a sure shot franchise guy.

 

7 hours ago, Joecolt15 said:

Do you take a chance on an injury Tua?

 

 

No.

 

7 hours ago, GoColts8818 said:

The best QB on the board because Brissett is NOT the answer.

 

We're in far worse position if we take a mediocre QB in the draft and avoid filling holes at other glaring needs than we are if we keep the mediocre Brissett and build around him for a year before either signing a top end FA or trying to get a franchise guy (we're unlikely to have the #1 pick next year, but aside from Burrow this year the only other franchise QB I'm seeing in college is T. Lawerence from Clemson and he's not going to be eligible 'til next year).  Maybe a guy like Fromm will fall to the 34th or 44th pick, but I don't see anyone after Burrows (going #1) being worthy of a first round pick at QB in this draft.

 

4 hours ago, Mr.Debonair said:


18 for 127 and 1 TD, tells me he wasn’t a factor even when he did play 

 

He showed his flashes.  He didn't play much.  He definitely seemed to be improving but he couldn't stay healthy.  

 

He was drafted as a project pick anyway.  His major issue is going to be staying healthy next year, but I think Reich will figure out a way to make him a threat in the offense (maybe not just as a WR but as a multi-faceted threat who lines up all over the place).

 

4 hours ago, DougDew said:

CIN will take one.  After WASH, DET, and NYG,   Then comes MIA, LAC, and CAR in a row.  MIA will probably take one. Three teams for sure.  Maybe 4.

 

I could see the JAGS roll with Minshew and build a team around him.  What guarantee is there that any college QB will be better than Minshew?  And they have Foles.

 

We pick at 13, and that's a long ways up to picks 2 through 4, outbidding other teams that may move up a couple of slots to be sure to get the QB they want.

 

Burrow, Herbert, and Eason are probably the top 3 QBs and will be after the combine. 

 

Is Love, Tua, or Fromm worth pick 13?  

 

I don't think Love, Tua or Fromm are worth 13.  I don't think Tua's going to pan out in the NFL, I didn't think so before he got injured either.  Love or Fromm may be worth the 44th pick, but IMO they're certainly not worthy of the 13th.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Also, I was very curious to see how the early analysts were projecting this class at the end of the 2021 season to see how widely things have changed. Found this super interesting.   On May 4, 2022 Dane Brugler put out his super early mock draft for 2023 before this recent 2022 season was played. Super interesting to see much of this has not changed a whole lot. (I also like Brugler and think his opinions are some of the better ones amongst analysts, which is why I tried to see if he had said anything)   His top 10 (posting in case people can't access the article on The Athletic):   1. CJ Stroud 2. Bryce Young 3. Will Anderson 4. Kelee Ringo 5. Will Levis 6. Jalen Carter 7. Tyler Van * 8. Jaxon Smith-Njigba 9. Bryan Bresee 10. Michael Mayer   Outside of Ringo, you could argue that the top-6 has not changed a whole heck of a lot.   Why is this important if at all? Mainly because these NFL teams scout these guys for years. They aren't just looking at them now for the first time.    Also interesting, in his post-2021 and pre-2022 future draft rankings for 2022 Brugler had the QBs ranked as the following (with their best asset listed):   1. CJ Stroud- touch and anticipation 2. Bryce Young- Poise and processing 3. Will Levis- NFL level tools 4. Tanner McKee- Ball placement 5. Anthony Richardson- Rare physical profile     Sound familiar?  All these things are stillllllll the same. Especially amongst the big 4 QBs.   So I, for one, am not going to go down the path of hating on Levis if he is the choice. He may be my 3rd option, but he has the goods and is worthy of the 1.04 if the staff thinks they can work with him and unlock his potential and make him even more consistent.      https://theathletic.com/3290071/2022/05/03/nfl-mock-draft-2023/     https://theathletic.com/3415147/2022/07/12/nfl-draft-2023-qb-scouting/
    • Making up a boogie man out of thin air i see! Analysis paralysis. Quarterback coaches exist for a reason to help out with identifying pressures and navigating the pocket. So basically we would just tank the whole season bc you feel like(not confirmed in the least bit) Stroud would have problems with pressure so we can be in position to have the #1 pick. And once in position what happens when you find out a new stat about the QB in 24 you dont like? Do we tank again? How many times you want to do that? All this bc of your unconfirmed fears and concerns? Last generational QB we had what did that get us? Not even 1 Super Bowl.   You cant hang your whole hat on that. The tanking proposal has desperation all over it, but then you chide somebody else about picking a QB due to desperation? You'd really need to do a whale of a job explaining how picking Stroud represents an act of desperation.
    • If he’s still in the team, there’s a reason.   Even if none of us knows what it is.   But I wouldn’t link Foles being on the team to the Colts NOT picking a QB in the draft.     Take a deep breath.   Have a little faith.  Get good sleep.   Better days ahead. 
    • Intentionally yes. But if you go with let's say Will Anderson if he is there and ride it out with the current Qb roster you may have a chance at getting to one next year.
    • So, I have been pretty open and transparent that for the Colts, what we will likely run, and how i think they will likely evaluate these guys, I would rank the big 4 (in terms of fit and what i would want to see): Stroud, Richardson, Levis, Young.   All that being said, the total angst for Levis is insane. I have come around to sell myself on him simply because I believe Stroud will be gone and if it comes down to Richardson and Levis I have a much easier time believing the Colts would draft Levis over Richardson.   I know that many, many analysts and fans and twitter warriors love the athleticism and the upside of Richardson. And I totally get it. But here is the thing: As much as Richardson's tools, upside and testing numbers are what is elevating him, people say what truly holds him back is the lack of experience, completion percentage/inaccuracy, etc. Here is something nobody really says:   What if the "only 13 games" thing on Richardson is actually helping him instead of hurting him?   If Richardson went back to school next year and had a terrible year (think what some people say of Levis' 2022 vs his 2021), Richardson would likely fall completely out of any first round consideration and any franchise QB talk. I would argue the fact that he doesn't have experience yet is helping his stock. People can still talk about "what he could be" since he hasn't fallen on his face yet.    This is the exact reason why I am actually OK with Levis.    Things could not have gone much worse for him last season and yet he is still absolutely considered a 1st round QB and in many circles still a top-10 pick.   I wonder where he would rank amongst prospects if he had that 2021 season this past year. If we were evaluating his 2021 and his upside shown in 2021 compared to the other 3 then i think he is seen in a much different light.    Also, Richardson may have some baseline of a floor w his rushing that is decent like the clip that @Restinpeacesweetchloe posted from Mina Kimes and RGIII backing Richardson. But here is the thing. Look at all of the criticism that was heaped on Lamar Jackson and Justin Fields and guys like them that people claimed were "RBs playing QB." And both of them were much more established throwing the ball coming out compared to Richardson.    Every year it is said to "ignore what you hear during draft season" because so much misinformation and shiftiness happens as agendas are pushed and as teams jockey to elevate guys they dont want and depress guys that they do want.    To me it is telling that Richardson's stock has catapulted sky high during the draft season when basically everyone knew he was going to test as an all-time elite combine specimen. Yet when the college season ended he was seen as a pick maybe in the teens or early 20s based on possible upside. Now everywhere has him top-5.    Levis was seen in that top-5 to top-10 range to start and is now falling.    Nothing has changed w their tape. Nothing has changed with injuries. These guys are the same guys they were months ago and yet the narrative is so different now. Just doesn't sit right with me.    It is the reason why i think we hear whispers that "teams and evaluators probably have Levis a lot higher than draft analysts, media and fans do".    At the end of the day, I am in agreement with a bunch of the fans in our forum that think "give me the guy with the greatest upside and the highest high and let's hope we help him reach that consistently". That is why most folks want Richardson (myself included). But I would be remiss to not say that Levis' considerable upside is just a tick below Richardson in my eyes.    If we end up drafting either Richardson or Levis I think both of them could have top-10 NFL QB upside if they can realize their potential. But for both of them that will be a big IF. 
  • Members

    • Dobbinblitz

      Dobbinblitz 749

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 9,905

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 17,127

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • johnmatrix1991

      johnmatrix1991 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TomDiggs

      TomDiggs 1,185

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 6,707

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Aaron86

      Aaron86 375

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 11,052

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BProland85

      BProland85 2,394

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...