Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Defjamz Semi-Final Mock Draft


Recommended Posts

Draft is just under 20 days away. A lot of pro days have come and gone. A more clear picture of what might happen in the draft is becoming available. Here are my predictions.

 

Round 1: Hassan Reddick, ILB Temple- I see a ILB as being the BPA at 15 whether it's Foster, Davis or Reddick. In this case I'm going with Reddick who is a matchup nightmare. He's got great size and athletic ability. Can do it all and doesn't have any injury or character concerns. Day 1 starter.

 

Round 2: Cordrea Tankersly, CB Clemson- A steal at this point. He's big, fast, and a great press corner. Day 1 starter opposite Vontae. This is the Ballard prototype for CB's.

 

Round 3: Dont'a Foreman, RB Texas- I think the idea that there's a certain RB that fits our scheme is wrong. Any talented runner will work. Foreman had incredible production at Texas and showed good speed by running a 4.40 at his pro day and looked comfortable catching the ball. Has more shiftiness than his size suggests if you watch the tape carefully. Pagano alluded to taking a young back early.

 

Round 4(121): John Johnson, FS Boston College: A very good safety in a good class. Johnson has great instincts and ball skills. Looked great at his pro-day as well. He's not a banger in the run game but he can play single high or man. Excellent closing speed despite the 4.61 40 time. Challenges Green for the starting FS spot.

 

Round 4(137): Isaac Asiata, OG Utah- While Haeg could become the full time starting guard that's no sure thing and Mewhort is in a contract year and often injured. Asiata can come in and just compete. He has a real nasty streak to his game and nice power. Adds depth to the line and potential starter in 1-2 years.

 

Round 4(144): Stevie Tu'ikolovatu, NT Utah- Took him a round early just to be certain, but Stevie is going to be 26 in June. Despite that he's a monster who was the Rose Bowl defensive MVP. He's 6'1" 331 with a strong punch. A force in the run game. He'll start over Parry if not rotate with him.

 

Round 5: JoJo Mathis, Edge Washington- A developmental pass rusher with upside. Overshadowed by his other talented teammates because of a lack of athleticism. But he's 6'2", 266, with 33" arms. Has good hand usage and can bend. I think his potential is at SAM. If Maggitt can make the roster, so can Mathis.

 

 

I left needs at CB, but I feel everything else is taken care of. You can't fix it all in one draft. This gives us playmakers early and good developmental players later. We probably get more picks by trading back but those are hard to predict .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is mostly every mock draft I come up with, so I like it! I've warmed up to Foreman a bit more after watching more tape on him. I'd still prefer Hunt, but I wouldn't be mad at Foreman being the pick at all.

 

I'm not this biggest fan of Mathis. His lack of athleticism is concerning as he has a really slow get off and looks like he's wearing cement shoes when he's rushing. My favorites as of right now for later round pass rushers are Ejuan Price (undersized, but quick and would be a great situational rusher at first) and Samson Ebukam (some info on him: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/2088431/samson-ebukam).

 

I'd still be amped if the draft went this way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Shive said:

This is mostly every mock draft I come up with, so I like it! I've warmed up to Foreman a bit more after watching more tape on him. I'd still prefer Hunt, but I wouldn't be mad at Foreman being the pick at all.

 

I'm not this biggest fan of Mathis. His lack of athleticism is concerning as he has a really slow get off and looks like he's wearing cement shoes when he's rushing. My favorites as of right now for later round pass rushers are Ejuan Price (undersized, but quick and would be a great situational rusher at first) and Samson Ebukam (some info on him: http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/2088431/samson-ebukam).

 

I'd still be amped if the draft went this way.

You could go with Hunt as well if Foreman is gone. Foreman is underrated I think. Like Fournette people say he's a 1-dimensional runner. I see more than that. 

 

I think Mathis can be coached up though. Have him drop down to 255 and he'll add some speed. In the 5th round it's a decent pick IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Draft is just under 20 days away. A lot of pro days have come and gone. A more clear picture of what might happen in the draft is becoming available. Here are my predictions.

 

Round 1: Hassan Reddick, ILB Temple- I see a ILB as being the BPA at 15 whether it's Foster, Davis or Reddick. In this case I'm going with Reddick who is a matchup nightmare. He's got great size and athletic ability. Can do it all and doesn't have any injury or character concerns. Day 1 starter.

 

Round 2: Cordrea Tankersly, CB Clemson- A steal at this point. He's big, fast, and a great press corner. Day 1 starter opposite Vontae. This is the Ballard prototype for CB's.

 

Round 3: Dont'a Foreman, RB Texas- I think the idea that there's a certain RB that fits our scheme is wrong. Any talented runner will work. Foreman had incredible production at Texas and showed good speed by running a 4.40 at his pro day and looked comfortable catching the ball. Has more shiftiness than his size suggests if you watch the tape carefully. Pagano alluded to taking a young back early.

 

Round 4(121): John Johnson, FS Boston College: A very good safety in a good class. Johnson has great instincts and ball skills. Looked great at his pro-day as well. He's not a banger in the run game but he can play single high or man. Excellent closing speed despite the 4.61 40 time. Challenges Green for the starting FS spot.

 

Round 4(137): Isaac Asiata, OG Utah- While Haeg could become the full time starting guard that's no sure thing and Mewhort is in a contract year and often injured. Asiata can come in and just compete. He has a real nasty streak to his game and nice power. Adds depth to the line and potential starter in 1-2 years.

 

Round 4(144): Stevie Tu'ikolovatu, NT Utah- Took him a round early just to be certain, but Stevie is going to be 26 in June. Despite that he's a monster who was the Rose Bowl defensive MVP. He's 6'1" 331 with a strong punch. A force in the run game. He'll start over Parry if not rotate with him.

 

Round 5: JoJo Mathis, Edge Washington- A developmental pass rusher with upside. Overshadowed by his other talented teammates because of a lack of athleticism. But he's 6'2", 266, with 33" arms. Has good hand usage and can bend. I think his potential is at SAM. If Maggitt can make the roster, so can Mathis.

 

 

I left needs at CB, but I feel everything else is taken care of. You can't fix it all in one draft. This gives us playmakers early and good developmental players later. We probably get more picks by trading back but those are hard to predict .

I love that whole Utah O-line. Asiata and Bolles were great. JJ Dielman had top 100 hype before he got injured and was moved inside. Now I'm hearing Asiata's stock is on the rise. He might not be available in the 4th. Greg Cosell seems to love him. He said he reminds him of Gabe Jackson who was one of the best guards in the league last year.

 

I love your mock draft for the most part. I'm not the biggest Foreman fan and I'd rather have about 3-4 other backs at that position, but oh well, you can't have it all. The USC NT is intriguing, I haven't watched too much of him. I need to go over the NT prospects this weekend in order to be able to talk more intelligently about them.

 

Mathis will be a steal if he falls to the 5th too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you reached on a good number of players and I'd rather get a pass rusher earlier than round 5. If we don't get a Charles Harris or Takk McKinley type player early, I want Derek Rivers in the 3rd.

 

I'd be okay with Reddick in the 1st if Ballard couldn't trade down though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

I think you reached on a good number of players and I'd rather get a pass rusher earlier than round 5. If we don't get a Charles Harris or Takk McKinley type player early, I want Derek Rivers in the 3rd.

 

I'd be okay with Reddick in the 1st if Ballard couldn't trade down though.

The good pass rushers were gone by 15, and there's no reason to reach for need. Plus I'm not a big fan of small school pass rushers unless it's a guy who everyone is high on like Khalil Mack. We'll have a shot at true pass rushers next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Love Joe Mathis and Stevie late.

Joe is an underrated pass rusher and Stevie is a big man who does his job and plugs the DL.

Reddick is one of my draft crushes so I'm all for him

Cordrea has been one of my favorite CBs since a few months ago aswell

Not as familiar with Asiata or Johnson.

Foreman I'd only take if the RBs I like more were taken, although he is good

Nice mock

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OffensivelyPC said:

"Any talented runner will work."

 

I disagree. Otherwise guys like Trent Richardson wouldnt be the busts they are.

Trent Richardson wasn't talented though. His line at Alabama was. Foreman is more talented. No one on that Texas OL is getting drafted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

Trent Richardson wasn't talented though. His line at Alabama was. Foreman is more talented. No one on that Texas OL is getting drafted.

Thats revisionist history. The dude was selected 3rd overall. Pretty much everyone had him as a higher 1st round pick or at bare minimum top 1 or 2 RB in the class. He was talented. He just didnt pan out because he never was able to read at NFL speeds.  He may not be "talented" now, but that doesnt help when you evaluate guys today to be on your team the next 4 years. The bottom line is, GMs miss on guys with talent, and just because they dont pan out doesnt mean they somehow lost their talent. That being the case, not just any RB will do. Were case in point, been trying to turn a day 3 RB into a starter pretty much since Edgerrin James left, and it hasnt worked. Im not saying invest a 1st, but its almost science that the sooner you take a back, the better your chances he will be good enough to be your lead guy. Foreman may be it, I dont think so, but i may be wrong. I just disagreed with the philosophy that any RB will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OffensivelyPC said:

Thats revisionist history. The dude was selected 3rd overall. Pretty much everyone had him as a higher 1st round pick or at bare minimum top 1 or 2 RB in the class. He was talented. He just didnt pan out because he never was able to read at NFL speeds.  He may not be "talented" now, but that doesnt help when you evaluate guys today to be on your team the next 4 years. The bottom line is, GMs miss on guys with talent, and just because they dont pan out doesnt mean they somehow lost their talent. That being the case, not just any RB will do. Were case in point, been trying to turn a day 3 RB into a starter pretty much since Edgerrin James left, and it hasnt worked.

There were people like Jim Brown who weren't high on Richardson. And let's not forget he went #3 overall because the BROWNS took him that high. The same team that drafted Brandon Weeden and Johnny Manziel.

 

And I didn't say any RB will do, I said any "talented" RB will do. We don't need a specific type of RB, just a talented one. We need a David Johnson, Jordan Howard, Melvin Gordon, Demarco Murray, etc...We just need a good rusher who can help set up the pass game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Defjamz26 said:

There were people like Jim Brown who weren't high on Richardson. And let's not forget he went #3 overall because the BROWNS took him that high. The same team that drafted Brandon Weeden and Johnny Manziel.

 

And I didn't say any RB will do, I said any "talented" RB will do. We don't need a specific type of RB, just a talented one. We need a David Johnson, Jordan Howard, Melvin Gordon, Demarco Murray, etc...We just need a good rusher who can help set up the pass game.

Fair enough. I know our margin of disagreement is more technical than anything, but at the end of the day, we both just want a dependable guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way Mathis falls to the 5th. Tankersly is drastically overrated. Always grabbing and tugging, doesn't change directions smoothly and stiff in the hips, 29.5" vertical will have him getting mossed regularly, and not a great fit for our man coverage scheme. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best draft I have seen in awhile. My only two questions are on Asiata being there in the 4th given the dearth of lineman, and I think there will be a better option at CB than Tankersly at point. I have seen a lot who have him in the beginning of the 3rd. Still I like it overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Tmoney said:

No way Mathis falls to the 5th. Tankersly is drastically overrated. Always grabbing and tugging, doesn't change directions smoothly and stiff in the hips, 29.5" vertical will have him getting mossed regularly, and not a great fit for our man coverage scheme. 

https://www.profootballfocus.com/draft-pff-scouting-report-cordrea-tankersley-cb-clemson/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/8/2017 at 5:20 PM, Defjamz26 said:

Trent Richardson wasn't talented though. His line at Alabama was. Foreman is more talented. No one on that Texas OL is getting drafted.

Whaaaat? Connor Williams is a stud. He caught my attention in the few Texas games I saw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to get Joe Mixon if he falls to the 3rd! I know what many people think about him and i don't stand for what he did either, BUT like they say, everyone deserves a second chance. He is VERY talented and it's said he could go somewhere in the 2nd or 3rd round! Depends on what team is willing to take on his past character issue! But with the right plan for him i believe he is a steal in the 3rd!!  On another note Chris Ballard was asked about him and he himself basically said he hasn't looked into him much! So i guess that's pretty much saying Colts not drafting him! Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
  • Members

    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,768

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • dw49

      dw49 1,355

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • crazycolt1

      crazycolt1 10,264

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tfunky14

      tfunky14 171

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ruf

      ruf 274

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,260

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fourstar40

      Fourstar40 20

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtsWarrior24

      ColtsWarrior24 2

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DZS13

      DZS13 13

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...