Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Many Trades

Original picks:

59:

90:

166:

203:

232:

New:

56: Rashade Hageman DT we trade our next year 2nd rounder

59: Trade for vikings 72nd and 96th picks

72: Jordan Matthews WR

90: Terrance Brooks FS

96:Trade for browns 4th's

106: Christian Jones ILB

127: Louchiez Purifoy CB

166: Khalil Fortt OLB

203: Trade for rams seventh's

226: De'Anthony Thomas RB

241: Brandon Thomas G

232: Jay Bromley DT

Final: Next year we got a 1st,3rd,4th,5th, 6th 7th. create more

Rashade Hageman, jordan Matthews, Terrance Brooks, Christian Jones, louchiez purifoy, khalil fortt, de anthony thomas, jay bromley, brandon thomas. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the trade back for more picks I hope that is what we do. Not a fan of the picks.

 

I don't care for Brooks or Pulifroy. Lamarcus Joyner is who I want he can play in the back, the slot and on the outside. Then grab another bjg CB like SJP, or Gaines. I really like Dontae Johnson to eventually take over for Toler. 

 

Don't see DeAnthony Thomas going in the 7th

 

I too don't think we are getting a WR don't know why we would draft any skill positions unless it is a guy like Archer.

 

I have a feeling one of the D Line guys will fall to us not Hageman maybe a Tuitt or Jernigan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as most think they know who or when players will be picked, signed or traded for we know very little. Grigs seems to always have something different up his sleeve. Players from Canada and the Arena league (and soccer teams?lol) are always in the mix.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not drafting any WR's so everyone get that out their head

Only recievers I would want would be Jordan Matthews or Johnathan Krause.... Only Becuase they are from Vandy and are vastly overlooked! But we really don't need one.. I think people just like to see playmaking skill players get drafted..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are talking about undervalued WR I like Brandon Coleman, Martavius Bryant and Cody Latimare. I don't see the need though. TJ Jones too

 

I am all for BPA but we aren't taking a QB P, or TE and I think WR can be put in that group BPA that has a shot to help the team. We are still a month away....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a team trade a 2nd rounder this year for a 2nd rounder next year -- especially a 2nd rounder from a contender?  Usually you see a team offer a rounder higher next year in that type of trade (Ugho: 2nd for 1st, or Hughes: 5th for 4th).  So, the first second rounder is kind of unrealistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're not drafting any WR's so everyone get that out their head

this is a very deep WR draft. Nicks and Wayne are both free agents after the season and Hilton the year after that. Brazill and Whalen are nice bench players but not stars in the waiting. Rodgers has the physical tools but has to prove he can be one and that takes more than one big game when the other team has no film on you and a big catch in a playoff game to do.

So if a WR is the best player on the board in round two when we pick which it might very well be we could very eaisly draft a WR.

I think safety is our biggest need going onto the draft but if one isn't there in round two when we pick I am not going to be shocked if we go WR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would a team trade a 2nd rounder this year for a 2nd rounder next year -- especially a 2nd rounder from a contender?  Usually you see a team offer a rounder higher next year in that type of trade (Ugho: 2nd for 1st, or Hughes: 5th for 4th).  So, the first second rounder is kind of unrealistic.

 

 

A team wouldn't do that. It's usually discounted a round. So our 2015 2nd would garner a 2014 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many Trades

Original picks:

59:

90:

166:

203:

232:

New:

56: Rashade Hageman DT we trade our next year 2nd rounder

59: Trade for vikings 72nd and 96th picks

72: Jordan Matthews WR

90: Terrance Brooks FS

96:Trade for browns 4th's

106: Christian Jones ILB

127: Louchiez Purifoy CB

166: Khalil Fortt OLB

203: Trade for rams seventh's

226: De'Anthony Thomas RB

241: Brandon Thomas G

232: Jay Bromley DT

Final: Next year we got a 1st,3rd,4th,5th, 6th 7th. create more

Rashade Hageman, jordan Matthews, Terrance Brooks, Christian Jones, louchiez purifoy, khalil fortt, de anthony thomas, jay bromley, brandon thomas. 

 

I appreciate the time and effort you took to do this.....

 

BUT....

 

I think you'll find that (A) the trades are completely unrealistic.   They're all way too favorable for the Colts.   And (B)  the players you want us to take will likely not be available when you have us selecting them.

 

So......   I don't see any of this as very realistic....   sorry for being such a buzz-kill...    but, there it is.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have no idea whether we will draft a wife receiver. Is it a huge need? No. Could we use a young and talented one and would our staff draft the BPA? Yes

 

 

Only recievers I would want would be Jordan Matthews or Johnathan Krause.... Only Becuase they are from Vandy and are vastly overlooked! But we really don't need one.. I think people just like to see playmaking skill players get drafted..

 

 

why? I could see them drafting a wr in the late rounds if he is the BPA

 

 

this is a very deep WR draft. Nicks and Wayne are both free agents after the season and Hilton the year after that. Brazill and Whalen are nice bench players but not stars in the waiting. Rodgers has the physical tools but has to prove he can be one and that takes more than one big game when the other team has no film on you and a big catch in a playoff game to do.

So if a WR is the best player on the board in round two when we pick which it might very well be we could very eaisly draft a WR.

I think safety is our biggest need going onto the draft but if one isn't there in round two when we pick I am not going to be shocked if we go WR.

 

You all make valid points but I just don't see us taking a WR unless it's a undrafted one at the end that we bring in to workout or have a competition in camp. If I'm wrong, then I'll admit it after the draft if we do in fact draft a WR 

 

I just feel like if we draft one, the forum will go wrong. Cause us taking a WR in the 2nd or 3rd means he'll probably be on the 53 which means Brazill, Whalen, or Rogers will be cut or traded from the 53 which will lead to a forum explosion cause we all know how much people love Whalen, Rogers, & Brazill

 

But my personal opinion is that Nicks sealed the thought of us drafting a WR despite his injuries. I think the signing made it clear we're not drafting one. But like I said if I'm wrong, I'll admit it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No way we give up a 2nd next year to move up 3 spots in the 2nd round next year. I see us as BPA in the 2nd, so no need to trade a draft pick. If we trade down fine, but I want to have all our draft picks next year plus one or two comps. I think Buchannon will be there in the 2nd when we pick, and that is who I want. A good FS who plays the ball, played in a good BCS conference, and can tackle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You all make valid points but I just don't see us taking a WR unless it's a undrafted one at the end that we bring in to workout or have a competition in camp. If I'm wrong, then I'll admit it after the draft if we do in fact draft a WR 

 

I just feel like if we draft one, the forum will go wrong. Cause us taking a WR in the 2nd or 3rd means he'll probably be on the 53 which means Brazill, Whalen, or Rogers will be cut or traded from the 53 which will lead to a forum explosion cause we all know how much people love Whalen, Rogers, & Brazill

 

But my personal opinion is that Nicks sealed the thought of us drafting a WR despite his injuries. I think the signing made it clear we're not drafting one. But like I said if I'm wrong, I'll admit it

 

TK....

 

I agree the forum will not be happy with one of Whalen, Brazil or Rogers being cut.   

 

That said,  I hope you're not suggesting that Grigson will make his decision based on what the Forum here will or won't do?   Grigson shouldn't care what the fans think or want.   He should only care what his scouts and coaches think and want -- period.

 

I'm just trying to make sure I understand your meaning.............?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2nd

***Gabe Jackson or Marcus Martin- Feel that each one of them could be able to start.

***Daniel McCullers- A Big guy that is good against the run. I am very intrigued by his size and upside. Going higher than he should because of his size.

 

3rd

***Antone Exum- A man corner who also played S at VaTech

***Cyril Richardson- Need to get some competition and depth at the position possible even with an OL before.

     

 

5th

***Jonathan Dowling- Tall FS with good cover skills.

***Brandon Thomas- Don't think that he will slide anymore than this even after his ACL injury.2nd round talent.

 

6th

***Ronald Powell- Has pass rush ability could learn under Mathis.

***Aaron Colvin-Injury has caused him to fall because he torn his ACL at the Senior Bowl

     

 

7th-Nic Jacobs- Big TE went to LSU transferred a small school

 

Undrafted-  Ben Gardner- Stanford connection

-Tavita Woodard Hawaii OLB- nice size and good measurables. 

 

****What if haha Clinton Dix or Darqueze Dennard slip into the 20's do the Colts have the fire power to trade up and get one of them.****

Dennard it a man to man corner that fits the scheme

Clinton Dix has the abilities to play FS that we need

post-22770-0-56143200-1397465535_thumb.p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TK....

I agree the forum will not be happy with one of Whalen, Brazil or Rogers being cut.

That said, I hope you're not suggesting that Grigson will make his decision based on what the Forum here will or won't do? Grigson shouldn't care what the fans think or want. He should only care what his scouts and coaches think and want -- period.

I'm just trying to make sure I understand your meaning.............?

I know he doesn't care (at times) what fans want. Sometimes he does though, I mean he did cut David Reed & Samson Satele after all haha

It's just it'll be a headache getting on the forum if indeed one of our current WR's are traded or cut due to us drafting a WR. I'll probably stay off the forum for awhile if that comes to pass

But anyway, my original point was that I don't believe we'll take a WR unless it's after the draft when we just bring a guy or guy's in like we did with Whalen. If I'm wrong, I'll admit it though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...