Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Luck vs Tannehill(Talking Arm Talent)


GoodLuck

Recommended Posts

How is this even a question? Your boy is more accurate by all means. Tannehill is never going to reach Luck's level and you should know that. Kid is an average at best QB that won some lucky games.

I'm speaking just arm. Not overall player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say Tannehill has come along way since last season.

 

The Guy has like 30 career games as a QB.

I do agree on that.  Tannehill is going to be a good QB in this league for a long time.  I think Luck and him will be the Manning vs Brady of the generation before and Aikman vs Favre/Young the generation before that and Simms vs Montana or Marino vs Elway the generation before that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is this even a question? Your boy is more accurate by all means. Tannehill is never going to reach Luck's level and you should know that. Kid is an average at best QB that won some lucky games.

 

No way at all to say at this point that Tannehill will never reach Luck's level.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually a Good thread Goodluck. Seems to me this year that Tannehill has stepped up and is actually being asked to do more for his team than luck **SO FAR**. To answer your question Luck is better at all those things as far as i can tell. Than again I don't analyze players, i'm just asked to kick field goals, kick punts, and aid in tackles...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luck, it isn't close

 

If we're strictly talking arm talent then I'd disagree.  i don't think the difference between the 2 is all that great.  The biggest gap right now is between the ears but Tannehill is closing the gap quicker than I expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ARE YOU SERIOUS?

I can't tell. Tannehill has the awareness of a drunk pothead, but he has a cannon and quick release. And threads the needle.

And turns the ball over like it's going out of style.

But I often forget that's only a big deal when Andrew does it.

Weird.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's the over/under on # of posts before "GoodTimes" gets on here and backs up "GoodLuck"?

 

And have you ever noticed that neither one of them post at the same time as the other?

 

Things that make you go hmmmmm

 

Don't forget about BadLuck. Next loss I'm sure we'll see the inevitable BadTimes show up and round out the quartet. :36dancing:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kid throws a great ball. NO in NO will do this to a lot of qbs

He had 6 turnovers coming into the game. 3 more tonight. He accounts for all the turnovers the entire team had on the season coming into this game.

But all that matters is that arm by golly.

"Uh uh unless it's Luck! If Luck has any turnovers. We should cut him because he's no good!

I miss Peyton......... :( "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're right, it's practically impossible to believe.

Never understood the mentality of people who have second accounts.

Even when it's painfully obvious everyone knows who they are. They think if they just say "Nope not me." They've somehow outsmarted everyone.

Odd people IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never understood the mentality of people who have second accounts.

Even when it's painfully obvious everyone knows who they are. They think if they just say "Nope not me." They've somehow outsmarted everyone.

Odd people IMO.

If you see a MR. Whiteblood start posting here, I promise it isn't me, I'm sure the mods will check it out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never understood the mentality of people who have second accounts.

Even when it's painfully obvious everyone knows who they are. They think if they just say "Nope not me." They've somehow outsmarted everyone.

Odd people IMO.

Dude, thisthis is my only account. You people think you're so smart. I dont have time.to make that many accounts. Why on earth would I even want to make that many accounts. Common sense is lacking with a few of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude, thisthis is my only account. You people think you're so smart. I dont have time.to make that many accounts. Why on earth would I even want to make that many accounts. Common sense is lacking with a few of you.

^It's like you read what I posted, but didn't realize your reply is what I said every second accounter does. You're not innovating this tactic lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

^It's like you read what I posted, but didn't realize your reply is what I said every second accounter does. You're not innovating this tactic lol.

Please report all the names and tell mods to ip check them. I bet some of you are creating accounts that resemble my name. Why, I dont know

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please report all the names and tell mods to ip check them. I bet some of you are creating accounts that resemble my name. Why, I dont know

lmao

BadLuck for you I don't think anyone here has the time to create multiple accounts in your honor.

Same song and dance. Same kicking and screaming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Popular Now

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ATL did not get Turner.  They eventually trade up in the second for an obscure 3T DT.    I read that The GM and HC wanted Latu, but the owner stepped in for Penix because he wanted a succession plan.  Read into that what you want.  Also, I guess since ATL seemed to want to trade up to 10 for Latu, its seems somebody wanted him pretty highly.   That's why there are also thoughts...don't get excited...that Ballard got a bit lucky with latu being there at 15.  Basically, the GMs had the 1st round pegged pretty well, then in swoops Blanc and reshuffles the playing deck for everyone.  LVR was mad too, because they wanted Penix at 13.  So if things would have gone to script....who knows who Ballard would have picked since Latu probably would not have been there.
    • It comes down to having a basic understanding of the broad buckets.  Generally, first rounders will be expected to play at a high NFL level sooner than the guy you pick in the third round, and then the guy you pick in the 5th round.  If the guy you pick in the 5th round steps up and plays well very soon, your team got the eval wrong and so did every other team.  If only one other team got it right, your wrongness that drove you to wait until round 5 made you miss your guy.     I think teams boards are different, but what team these days would not want a coverage LB that steps up right away.  All schemes can use that.  Same with a quick twitch corner with arms, a safety that can read and react, a WR that can run patterns, or always find the zone, and can catch (see Puca).  Its not like teams will reject these players because they are not perfect scheme fits.  If they think those guys can play well very soon, they go high on the boards.  Teams missed it with Puca too, unless you think his success is all because of McVay and Stafford.  IDK, seems like a stretch to me.
    • Is that how it went down? It was a curious move because they just paid Cousins a bag. But this approach worked pretty well for GB.   ATL's offense is pretty stacked and putting in a proven QB like Cousins will allow them to maximize and evaluate those pieces immediately. Meanwhile, Penix develops in the background. And they bought themselves 3 years to find out.     Plus, they did get Turner as well, who I think was their #1 target. 
    • I have to say, I do agree that a lot of GMs are on a similar level as far as skill and talent. That's how they got to where they are.    Some will be more inexperienced than others, some are more aggressive while others are passive. I think there are a lot of varying philosophies on running an NFL team compared to running a normal business.    I don't think everyone's board is the same. I'm sure there are some overlap especially at the top. But in the middle I would imagine it's far more varied. There's only so many scouts, so many days and hours, and thousands of players to evaluate. They aren't going to catch them all.    But, I will say there is always going to be some luck and chance probability involved when it comes to the draft. That's just a truth in life itself. 
    • I meant whether or not he's the pick.  Going into the draft they probably have scenarios of how to pursue the existing roster based upon if a player falls.  Example, if DeFo is near contract time, the falling of Murphy begins a thought about not resigning DeFO more strongly than what you'd think if you thought he would have been gone by pick 15.   I'm not saying specific here about the Colts and Defo.  What I'm saying is that these are the types of things that happen with all 32 teams, and Ballard can't tell you that another team is going to execute a strategic roster plan...and not snipe or will snipe based upon a player falling.  Instead of not knowing how this plays out,  Ballard telling us what other teams will do would be described as knowing how this stuff will play out.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...