Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

NY Jets (+14) @ New England (9-12-13)


oldunclemark

Recommended Posts

 I dont remember a Week 2 spread that large against a team that WON the first week..

 

So disrespectful to the Jets.

 

NE's top running back out...top slot receiver out

 

top TE  out..(and the other TE is in jail)

 

14 points???  in the NFL?

 

Can I say it????   I want to say.... take the Jets.

 

But I cant say it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I think the Jets "winning" was seen as pretty lucky given the silly move by the Bucs player to hit Smith out of bounds giving the Jets a shot at the win.

 

But this spread is Waay too high. This game is dangerous for the Pats because there is zero pressure on the Jets and they generally play well in Foxborough. Interestingly though, Rex is talking about the Pats in the media. Not showing his usualy bravado but perhaps he has been humbled give the mess that was last year.

 

I see a tight low scoring game. 20-17 Pats or even 17-14. I could also see the Jets winning as well to be honest. Lots of injuries for Pats and O is not in sink and Ridley has been turning the ball over. Pats D looks good though so we'll see. Lots of drama either way, I am sure. Always is when Jets come to town.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take the Pats to cover. Their defense is indeed slowly getting better. The Jets couldn't run the ball and I don't think they will be able to against Wilfork and Minkavich (sp) and that DL. I just don't see them moving the ball consistantly and while the Pats aren't going to set records with their offense this year....they will score points with Tom at the helm. I'm thinking more a 27-9 type game...I just don't see the Pats fumbling and making enough mistakes to give the Jets enough easy points to keep it too close....and thursday night games tend to be blow outs it seems. One team prepared the other not. Unless the Jets throw something new at them the Pats will handle this game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take the Pats to cover. Their defense is indeed slowly getting better. The Jets couldn't run the ball and I don't think they will be able to against Wilfork and Minkavich (sp) and that DL. I just don't see them moving the ball consistantly and while the Pats aren't going to set records with their offense this year....they will score points with Tom at the helm. I'm thinking more a 27-9 type game...I just don't see the Pats fumbling and making enough mistakes to give the Jets enough easy points to keep it too close....and thursday night games tend to be blow outs it seems. One team prepared the other not. Unless the Jets throw something new at them the Pats will handle this game.

At first I thought 14 was a bit high but I guess you're right, the Pats D is the main factor in this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fully expect the Pats to win but I'll take Jets all day at +14 with no Amendola or Gronk.  The better over/under to guess on is the over/under on the number of times the butt fumble is replayed Thursday night.  Since the game isn't on ESPN, I'll start the bidding at 20.  On ESPN it would be closer to 200.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's nagging at my head with this one is that in recent years, when it looked like a Pats-Jets game was shaping up to be competitive, the Patriots would come out and just shellac them. And more often than not, these odds that come out may look kind of crazy but they end up being accurate. Everyone was saying the same thing about Denver-Baltimore last week and turns out the Broncos covered, and then some.

 

There are some interesting factors in this one with the Patriots' personnel issues. But for some reason, I have a feeling they're going to cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's nagging at my head with this one is that in recent years, when it looked like a Pats-Jets game was shaping up to be competitive, the Patriots would come out and just shellac them. And more often than not, these odds that come out may look kind of crazy but they end up being accurate. Everyone was saying the same thing about Denver-Baltimore last week and turns out the Broncos covered, and then some.

 

There are some interesting factors in this one with the Patriots' personnel issues. But for some reason, I have a feeling they're going to cover.

The other thing to consider is the line is based on the betting in Vegas. Not sure anyone would put money on the Jets unless the spread was double digits. I think what also makes this difficult is the fact that the Jets did not look atrocious against the Bucs which may be more reflective of the Bucs and their woes than the Jets. Still, that Jets D is pretty good. I don't like this game for some reason. I do like that it is as home as the home teams on Thursday nights have a ridiculous record.

 

If we lose and the Jets start 2-0 the media frenzy will be unbearable. It will be the classic the Jets are good and going back to the AFC champ game vs. no the Jets stink and will implode eventually.  :GoodBad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing to consider is the line is based on the betting in Vegas. Not sure anyone would put money on the Jets unless the spread was double digits. I think what also makes this difficult is the fact that the Jets did not look atrocious against the Bucs which may be more reflective of the Bucs and their woes than the Jets. Still, that Jets D is pretty good. I don't like this game for some reason. I do like that it is as home as the home teams on Thursday nights have a ridiculous record.

 

If we lose and the Jets start 2-0 the media frenzy will be unbearable. It will be the classic the Jets are good and going back to the AFC champ game vs. no the Jets stink and will implode eventually.  :GoodBad:

That second part is more likely...that said if the Pats lose....it will be a bigger in the media that the Pats have lost too many players more than anyone thinking the Jets are legit. Not even the NY media would think that. It would mean Smith would likely get the keys to the car permanantly but losing would cause more people to doubt the Pats especially after a poor game against Buffalo more than anything. We all know the Jets aren't a great team....we don't know if the Pats can be a great team...we think..we expect because of Tom and that OL but you never know with all the changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing to consider is the line is based on the betting in Vegas. Not sure anyone would put money on the Jets unless the spread was double digits. I think what also makes this difficult is the fact that the Jets did not look atrocious against the Bucs which may be more reflective of the Bucs and their woes than the Jets. Still, that Jets D is pretty good. I don't like this game for some reason. I do like that it is as home as the home teams on Thursday nights have a ridiculous record.

 

If we lose and the Jets start 2-0 the media frenzy will be unbearable. It will be the classic the Jets are good and going back to the AFC champ game vs. no the Jets stink and will implode eventually.  :GoodBad:

 

Well the Jets have won their "Week 2 Super Bowl" against the Patriots a couple of times in recent years, so...

 

;)  :thmup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fully expect the Pats to win but I'll take Jets all day at +14 with no Amendola or Gronk.  The better over/under to guess on is the over/under on the number of times the butt fumble is replayed Thursday night.  Since the game isn't on ESPN, I'll start the bidding at 20.  On ESPN it would be closer to 200.

Now I'm seeing the number drop.....Its 13 in some places..12 in others.....a lot of folks clearly feel the way you do..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i need some of your info. :)

 

would you start Kembrell Thompkins this week for FF?  (i am assuming Amendola is out)

Sure, anytime. :)

 

Both Amendola and Gronk are out. Yes, I would start Thompkins as there is no one besides him and Endelman that Brady has as his WRs. Brady targeted him a lot last week but they were not able to connect because he ran a lot of wrong routes being a rookie and all. I would expect that he may be more in sync this week. He certainly has the tools to be a pretty good receiver I think but the learning curve is the unknown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i need some of your info. :)

 

would you start Kembrell Thompkins this week for FF?  (i am assuming Amendola is out)

 

If you're desperate for a flex spot or something, toss him in there. He's probably boom or bust at this point. Brady threw 14 passes to him on Sunday and he only came up with 4 catches, so they're trying to get him the ball... 

 

If you have any other solid, more consistent options, you may want to go elsewhere. There are receivers available right now in my FF league who I'd probably pick up and start over Thompkins. I'd like to see him have one good to great game before I trust him in my lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jets should cover. I think the Jets might even have a shot in this game. All depends on Geno though. Really not enough tape yet to say if he's even an average qb. I don't think the Pats will score 28+, probably more like 24. that give the jets a chance....but their o can be pretty pathetic. the one thing the patriots for the last decade have always done is have a D that generates an absurd amount of turnovers. If the jets turn it over 2 or more times it will be a blowout. If they don't, they have a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF the Jets could hold on to the ball, and catch it...  they are kicking NE's poo poo... 

 

 

A team just cannot lose the talent NE has and just WALK away with a win against an inferior team.  

 

NE may win but they are in for scrap tonight.

its weird watching a game where the qbs have all day to throw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF the Jets could hold on to the ball, and catch it... they are kicking NE's poo poo...

A team just cannot lose the talent NE has and just WALK away with a win against an inferior team.

NE may win but they are in for scrap tonight.

the jets have a darn good oline it looks like. they have very few playmakers as well. very boring game so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this as yes, I sometimes don't adequately express my take I guess..Ha!! Happens. 🤷‍♂️ But you are correct. Cam to me as you stated was never a consistently good QB at the NFL level and that is why I was never a fan of his game. I guess it's all about how one views what an NFL QB should be or look like. I'm not a fan of Lamar either as I think he is somewhat in the mold of that type of QB. Great athlete who just happens to play QB. Outside of that Raven scheme, I'm not sold on the fact the Jackson could ever flourish. It's why over 90% of the time if Lamar is needed to bring the Ravens out of a deficit he can't do it. It's not his game, yet there are those who think Lamar is superior and he has achieved personal accomplishments. Ravens do consistently win though but it's an entire team deal as their defense is normally rock solid to compliment that run first style. We don't have that here in Indy
    • I already laid out the injuries.  You can say what you want but one was the coaches pulling him in the Rams game because they were down multiple scores with little time left, two of the others were a concussion and a shoulder injury that required surgery so that rules out toughness.  Then the Steelers game he tried to comeback and clearly wasn’t moving well and it’s reported he has injury that does cause players to miss time and there is a chance he plays Sunday which seems to be counter productive to people who want argue he’s not tough enough.  None of those involve him lacking toughness.  It’s a nonsense argument made up by fans who are tired of him being injured.     also Richardson has taken wicked hits and hopped right back up from them.  To the point people complain about the league not protecting him with roughing the passer calls.  If he had no pain tolerance he wouldn’t get up from the those hits.   yes he needs to be better at protecting himself.  Again that has nothing to do with toughness.   Also I am not comparing him to Luck if you read my post.   I am pointing out Irsay is acknowledging they are being cautious with Richardson and injuries because of what happened with Luck.  That’s not comparing the two players.
    • IMO the only reason to not play Richardson (when healthy) is if you've given up on him. Joe Flacco has a role on this team and that role is secondary or tertiary to the main goal of this team at this moment - namely developing AR and figuring out if he can be our franchise QB. The best way to do both of those is to play him and let him gain experience and playing time... And, ultimately to get enough snaps that you feel comfortable with whatever decision you come to about his long term prospects. And IMO the only reason to bench him is if you think you've gotten the answer to that primary question and it is negative.    Otherwise, we are doing the same thing we were doing the last 3 years before we drafted him and IMO that's the worst place to be as a franchise in regards with your QB... Where you not only don't have a franchise QB but you don't even have the hope of having one on the roster.   I can't believe this conversation is even being had. If he can play... He has to play.
    • The kid chose not to slide to protect himself and was in a really awkward position when he did get a good NFL wallop. It’s absolutely brainless to do that after getting knocked out of games and the season.   Maybe he needs to sit on the bench for another season. Let him play  play play, what, for another game or two until the next stupid injury?  He still has a lot to learn and it looks like to me we are rushing an inexperienced kid into something he isn't quite prepared for.   AR seems humble, maybe a bit more humility regarding a possible Superman complex would serve him and the Colts very well long term.  What AR IS in years 4 and beyond is what Wise Colts fans should be concerned about. And yes, like me, many here are getting old enough we Want It Now! It's an unreasonable expectation for a kid that can't throw an out that isn't a mile high, and hasn't the sense of when and how to protect himself. 
    • I don’t listen to games anymore because I don’t work on Sundays anymore. But man sometimes listening to the game is better than watching it. Kinda miss Matt Taylor getting all pumped..  I-N-D-Y lol 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...