Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Rehash of the wildcard game


theanarchist

Recommended Posts

I don't know why. Maybe its that fact that we may have lost a winnable game to the eventual super bow champs? But I feel the need to post about this game and give credit where credit is due. I think there is a feeling around us Colts fans of satisfaction that we just made it that far and were happy to be in the playoffs. But as I look back on that game now I have a different perspective:

 

1) We had a number of chances to put ourselve in position to win that game. We drove into the redzone a number of times and came up empty. Credit the Ravens for stiffening when they had to.

 

2) Andrew Luck played one heck of a game in my opinion. I said it that day also. He was under constant pressure on almost every drop back. Yet he threaded the needle into a lot of tight spaces and made throws that only the true top qb's in the NFL were going to make.

 

3) The defense played well enough to win the game. Yes, I said it. They did have some breakdowns at a couple of critical times but they played solid against what now looks like the hottest team in football. There's no denying that in today's NFL the team with the hot hand at this time of year ususally wins the Super Bowl regardless of their regular season record. How many times have we seen the #1 and #2 seeds falter in recent history in the NFL. Plenty. So, to do the job they did against the Ravens I think was a solid effort.

 

The point I want to make I guess is that yes it was great to make into the playoffs. But we were closer than a lot of people give us credit for, including us fans.

 

Also, I'd like to make an observation about the defense this year. I read a lot of posts about the defense not being improved from the old regime. The thing I thought was better about our defense this year was that we appeared to be making more stops on 3rd down. In  years past our defense was really bad at making stops on 3rd down. I may be wrong but it sure appeared to me that our defense was much better in that regard this year.

 

Cant wait for next season!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Initially after the game I was mad about loosing, but if I reconsider the game now, calmed, I must say, we played well, still a lot of mistakes killed us...I'm thinking of dropped passes, missed FG, blown coverage on Baldin (I don1t want to put all blame on Vaughn, but his performance contributed largely to our loss, he gave up a lot of yards and 1 TD).

 

Fixing O-line is a must and we need some depth.

 

I expect new offensive philosophy will be based on shorter, effective passive, but I hope we won't trash long-pass play calls when short of time (2min> drives), and running plays will also support Luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know why. Maybe its that fact that we may have lost a winnable game to the eventual super bow champs? But I feel the need to post about this game and give credit where credit is due. I think there is a feeling around us Colts fans of satisfaction that we just made it that far and were happy to be in the playoffs. But as I look back on that game now I have a different perspective:

 

1) We had a number of chances to put ourselve in position to win that game. We drove into the redzone a number of times and came up empty. Credit the Ravens for stiffening when they had to.

 

2) Andrew Luck played one heck of a game in my opinion. I said it that day also. He was under constant pressure on almost every drop back. Yet he threaded the needle into a lot of tight spaces and made throws that only the true top qb's in the NFL were going to make.

 

3) The defense played well enough to win the game. Yes, I said it. They did have some breakdowns at a couple of critical times but they played solid against what now looks like the hottest team in football. There's no denying that in today's NFL the team with the hot hand at this time of year ususally wins the Super Bowl regardless of their regular season record. How many times have we seen the #1 and #2 seeds falter in recent history in the NFL. Plenty. So, to do the job they did against the Ravens I think was a solid effort.

 

 

Cant wait for next season!

 

I agree with you on points 1&2 completely and to some extent number 3. I was impressed with the job the D did on Ray Rice, but the failure to try and offset the constant deep ball threat proved our downfall. Tough I know when you have Vaughan as a corner I know. Did make me feel better somewhat when they did the exact same thing to the Broncos! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know we had that game. I was just mad at how people were blaming Butler for getting scored on by Boldin as a reason we loss. You can't expect for your 3rd String CB to come off the Bench and play well against a WR who Vaughn let get Hot. If we benched Vaughn at half or even the 1st snap of the game, I think a few plays would've been different imo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone chose to play Vaughn ahead of Butler and Satelle ahead of Shipley.

Ballard killed us with terrible pass blocking 2-3 times.

3-4 tough catches that were not made.

Very typical of the regular season games.

But so many big Clutch plays all season long.

Indeed, and 100% Amazing, our Newborn Colts made the Playoffs.

Have to feel really good about the Reestablishment of the High Character & Winning Team Effort of our Franchise.

And i do agree that Reggie, Dwight, Mathis' Leadership was Instrumental to a focused & winning positive TEAM environment.

We will reap the rewards of their presence for many years to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of my concerns have been addressed.

O line has to give Luck more than 1 second to throw the ball. They have to get better at pickin up the blitz. Our running backs also have to learn to pick up the blitz too.

We are not getting any push up the middle from out nose tackle, which makes it much more difficult for our outside pass rushers.

We still need a better CB to play opposite of David.

Luck has to learn to put a little more touch on his short throws. I know the receivers have to learn to handle balls thrown a little too hard, it seemed to me that on a few short throws, Andrew threw the balls so hard that the receivers don't have quite enough time to react. That very well maybe that the pressure was forcing him to get rid of the ball faster than he wanted to, but I think he could stand to practice a little softer touch with short throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I watched that game, I just settled into the realization that the Ravens were a better team than the Colts. Since then, I've been a little encouraged by the fact that the Ravens were also better than the Broncos & Patriots. There is no glory in losing to the best, but there may be some hope in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ravens were the team a lot of us wanted to play..and we held them to 24 points...

I have to admit I'm still not of the mind that 'well, we overachieved anyway,

We gained 400 yards and Joe Flacco completed 12 passes..all day...

..There wasn 't that much difference in the 2 teams...

.....I think it was an opportunity missed....

I juts hope we return to the playoffs sometime soon...You never know...

NYGs..world champs one year...on the outside looking in the next

Baltimore clearly isnt the best team in the AFC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good analysis OP.

 

We have been constantly killed by the deep pass. I remember seeing at least one 30+ pass in almost every game.

 

In the old regime, I don't remember getting killed by the deep ball that often, but you take the good with the bad.

 

Especially with a defense that was suited to play in a cover 2 rather than an attacking 3-4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Boldin was the difference in that game.   Flacco throws the ball up for grabs and Boldin goes up to get it.   Take away a couple Boldin catches and it's a very different game.  I don't really blame Vaughn or Butler for some of those.. just a great effort by Boldin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As disappointed as I was with the loss, had we won.....the Pats probably are in the SB right now. We would have lost @ Denver most likely (or would we have played NE? doesnt matter, we would have lost that one too) setting up the Pats/Broncos game. I think the Pats win that one, especially after seeing how Baltimore exposed their D. Baltimore was the right team to play NE, and their D stopped the Pats cold. They were a tough matchup bc of their physical D and resurgent passing game. They got hot, and looking back I feel better about the game. It was a gravy year just making the playoffs. But let's be honest. We weren't going to the SB. And the last thing I wanted to see was Tommy in another one. I am damn proud of what the Colts accomplished this season, no doubt. But if anything we played an indirect role in preventing NE from another SB shot, and I am cool with that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm good with picking up the option. I kind of agree a little with Ballard that there is more upside to Paye on passing downs. He is a good athlete and he has improved each season. Important that he says healthy, he was quite a raw prospect coming out of college and was then injured alot in his first 2 seasons in the NFL. So I can see why Ballard would like him around for another 2 years to see how much they can improve him. He's also an excellent run defender, which is important to note, especially in that LDE role.
    • Doug….   I’ve just read your latest two posts.   And as has been the recent trend, I don’t understand your logic.   So I’ve got a long post to respond to your long post.    So let me ask you an important question:     Have you noticed in the last month or so that I am responding to your posts very slowly?   I’m taking 8, 10, even 12 hours to respond.    I’m doing it deliberately.  I don’t want us to be going back and forth and back and forth while we’re both awake.  I’m trying to slow the pace of communication so things don’t get heated.  So I’m not trying to pick a fight,  I’m trying to AVOID a fight.   As to your two posts….   I think your memory is playing tricks with you.  Ballard said “let’s take the wide receiver” this draft for Mitchell.  His quote in 2022 after the Colts had no pick in the first round was this…. “Tomorrow,  wide receiver, tight end, tackle, and safety or corner.”   What did Ballard do?   He took those 4 positions in that order.  But not until he had traded DOWN from 35 to 53 for Pierce.   That was Reich’s personal pick.  Ballard was confident the players would be there and they were.   Not possible if everyone has same info as you assert.    Do you remember the 2019 draft when Ballard took Rock, Benagu, Campbell, and Okereke on Day 2,  that was the first year of the popular video series and the most memorable sound was Frank going around the war room high fiving everyone yelling “Four for Four!  Four for Four!”   Those were the guys Frank wanted, those were the guys Ballard got him.   Not possible if every team sees things the same.    The story of the 21 draft was the Colts picking 21.  And Ballard telling the scouts he had a good feeling that Paye, who the Colts ranked 10th on their board, would fall to the Colts.   And he did.   Ballard thought Dayo would fall to pick 54, and he said he likely would’ve taken Dayo at 21 if Paye had been taken.  Ballard was right again.   And again, not possible if everyone sees things the same.    Historically speaking…. In 2012, Seattle had Russell Wilson ranked THIRD on their board.  But they waited to draft him at pick 75 because they thought at 5’10” and 5/8ths,  RW would still be there.  And he was.   That wouldn’t be possible if everyone had mostly similar rankings as you believe.  As for Reimann:  picked 77.  You talk about his value as a left tackle.  Yet he lasted to pick 77.   Any other team could’ve taken him before the Colts did.   They didn’t.  Yet you think it has nothing to do with his age.  I don’t understand the logic you use to reject the age argument.   I don’t see an alternative view that makes sense.    All of these are examples of teams seeing the same thing differently.  They value things differently.  When asked recently, Steichen said he valued quickness in a wide receiver.  For other teams they might value speed, or precision route running.   Every team has its own identity based on what they value.    GMs are different.  Head coaches are different.  Scouts are different.   They are NOT working with the same information.  Every team has their own Big Board and the differences are big, not small.  32 teams, 32 very very different looking boards.     I’m 67.  I have literally studied the draft for more than 50 years.   The draft has always been a passion of mine, even before I became a TV sports producer at age 23.   I’m not making this up.     This post could be longer, but I think it’s gone long enough.  There was much to talk about.   Thanks for reading.               
    • Next year imagine the Colts will be looking at 2 QBs.  My top dual threat/mobile pocket passers are Jalen Milroe, Grayson McCall, and KJ Jefferson.   For offensive lineman got to love LT Kelvin Banks Jr who managed to hold his own versus Will Anderson a few years ago and LG Donovan Jackson.  Jackson has generated all-conference honors the past two seasons; Nelson's contract expires at the end of 2026 where he will be 30 years old.   So far for running backs I like Treveyon Henderson, DJ Giddens, and Kyle Monangai.  Each back knows how to secure the rock.  Last I checked both Dalvin Cook and Damien Harris are still free agents that would improve our roster.   Not sure if we need a top talented wide receiver early but am interested in Tre Harris and Ricky White.  While De'Corian Clark been compared to Alec Pierce and made Bruce Feldman's Freak list.  Still need to see where his high school numbers would have ranked compared to this year's draft class.     Plenty of defensive lineman to like in the next draft and probably one of the best groups coming out.   Edge Princely Umanmielen - one I feel is a fit for the Colts Edge Jack Sawyer is another stud that I want to pair with Latu and Paye Edge James Pearce Jr. DT 3-tech Tyleik Williams Edge/DL Mykel Willaims - as a freshman led all FBS true freshman edge defenders LDT Kenneth Grant NT/DT Walter Nolan Edge Dani Dennis-Sutton Edge Landon Jackson Edge Patrick Payton Edge Tyler Baron DL Shermar Turner - been one of the more disruptive DTs in the SEC.  Has a quick first step and body control to shoot the gaps. NT/DT Tonka Hemingway Edge Jasheen Davis NT/DT Alfred Collins. Linebackers got an interesting group of prospects to keep an eye on from the following: WLB Jack Kiser WLB Danny Stutsman LB Dasan McCullough MLB/OLB Jay Higgins LB/Edge Collin Oliver LB Eugene Asante SLB/Edge Khordae Sydnor LB Keaten Wade LB/Edge Steve Linton WLB Eric Gentry Read where some say this is a very weak safety class but got a few that seem to have potential.  This draft class I noticed more excel in press/man more than zone but still very capable of playing both.  Some of the defensive backs I like so far are: LCB Will Johnson CB Benjamin Morrison CB Ricardo Hallman SS Kevin Winston Jr - Blackmon signed a 1-year deal but only a 2% missed tackle rate and ranked 2nd among all safeties in 2023. SS Xavier Nwankpa - 4.39s-forty speed reminds me of Nick Cross FS Rod Moore - excellent 4.40s-forty speed FS Hunter Wohler - slower 4.52s-forty speed, if can improve his speed might be better than Rod Moore CB Tacario Davis CB Maxwell Hairston FS Jahdae Barron CB Jacobee Bryant CB Jordan Hancock CB Denver Harris SS Keon Sabb CB Malik Spencer CB Aydan White CB Tommi Hill - In 2023 had an outstanding QB rating when targeted of 38.6.  With another solid year Hill could move up the draft boards. Still on the lookout of those players not listed on the primary draft boards that the Colts always seem to find hidden gems to draft.
    • This is the list of Retired Colts Numbers. Peyton Manning — No. 18 Johnny Unitas — No. 19 Buddy Young — No. 22 Lenny Moore — No. 24 Art Donovan — No. 70 Jim Parker — No. 77 Raymond Berry — No. 82 Gino Marchetti — No. 89
    • a lot of the recent super bowl winners had game changing tight ends bowers would have been a nice addition but i like who we got, imo an a plus draft  
  • Members

    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 16

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • sellmyhousefast

      sellmyhousefast 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Virtuoso80

      Virtuoso80 435

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Behle

      Behle 102

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nadine

      Nadine 8,136

      Administrators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheBlueAndWhite

      TheBlueAndWhite 154

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,389

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • SOMDColtsfan

      SOMDColtsfan 418

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CardiacColts

      CardiacColts 342

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,387

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...