Why are you continuing this? This is a forum. That where discussions and debates take place in case you hadn't noticed. Feel free to put me on ignore if you don't like my opinions or what I have to say.
So now your the forums protector when ever I say something you don't like? I am pretty sure who ever I speak to or make comments to are quite capable of speaking and defending themselves if they have a problem with me. And now you want to insult me by calling me a derogatory name? Having a different opinion or point of view is not attacking anyone. I have been civil to you even though you have gone out of your way to try to cause a problem. You can use your own code words to insult me but that's OK because what you have to say to me means zero.
BOTT.....Think about what you're saying...my man
If the NFL didn't allow players to smoke weed or be high at their facility, then they would have to test them to prove they were high, right?
So they would be testing. .
This isn't deep legal theory. If the NFL accepts the use of weed as a painkiller for its players
they are liable for the addictions they 'cause' and what players may then do when they are high
And if they stop testing for it, and ignore its use they are allowing it
I don't have to be Denny Crane to say that
The arguement for using or allowing the use of hallucinatory drugs never makes sense for professional athletes who use their mind and body. The lack of common sense of the arguement always suggests
to me that proponents of the argument are already deep into the product....