Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Is the Defense Pathetically Bad?


Smonroe

Recommended Posts

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

Well... 

 

The only way his style goes away is if both he and Ballard go away... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  


Pathetically bad?   No.  Not yet. 
 

But they need to be much better this coming week against Pittsburgh.  Justin Fields is better than Caleb Williams. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am no fan of Gus Bradley. I was on this forum last season openly wondering if he would survive the bye week. As you said @Smonroe, his super soft scheme just isn't going to get this team over the top against good QBs.

 

The last two games the Colts have played teams with suspect QBs, so I suspect they have been more than happy to play a grind it out, run the football, low-scoring type game. I just don't understand what has happened to Speed and Franklin. Overall the defense is better against the pass, but our LBs have disappeared vs the run.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ADnum1 said:

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.


Agreed, I said the offense is doing them no favors.  But the defense is a big problem letting their offense sustain drives.  The numbers don’t lie.

 

My biggest complaint is when they sack or a penalty forces a team into 2nd and long, the D immediately goes into a soft prevent zone, laying off the receivers.  Then it’s an easy pitch and catch, making it 3rd and manageable.  
 

It’s the old “when you have them down, keep them down” attitude we’re missing.  
 

And, yes @NewColtsFan, it’s pathetically bad when your defense is in the bottom four or five of the league.   ….but I like our guys…
 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  Pathetically bad. No.  It’s a bend and don’t break defense.  Don’t give up points.  That’s the name of the game.  Score points.  Don’t give up points.  They have done their job with a young group of players especially in the secondary.  Getting dominated week after week in time of possession will take its toll on any defense.  So I don’t consider them pathetically bad.  The real problem is the offense can’t stay on the field.  3 out of 12 third down conversions is not good enough.  Getting to 50% conversions would really help.  Unfortunately they are not currently doing their part.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams over the first three weeks:

 

14/29 - 93 yards - 0 TD - 0 INT - 2 sacks

23/37 - 174 yards - 0 TD - 2 INT - 7 sacks 

33/52 - 363 yards - 2 TD - 2 INT - 4 sacks 

 

Jones made incredible plays on those interceptions, so credit to him. But without those incredible plays, Williams numbers would be A LOT better. This secondary STINKS. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been at times. I think the defense is flawed in a lot of ways, and its ability is capped by scheme and personnel. But I think there's potential for significant improvement. The run defense made some corrections this week. The pass defense will depend heavily on the pass rush, which has been better so far this season than it was at any point last year. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense is not great but the stats are misleading. Our time of possession is absolutely atrocious. If our offense could just get more first downs and hold the ball, the defense would look like the 15th best defense and not the worst.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

No.  Pathetically bad. No.  It’s a bend and don’t break defense.  Don’t give up points.  That’s the name of the game.  Score points.  Don’t give up points.  They have done their job with a young group of players especially in the secondary.  Getting dominated week after week in time of possession will take its toll on any defense.  So I don’t consider them pathetically bad.  The real problem is the offense can’t stay on the field.  3 out of 12 third down conversions is not good enough.  Getting to 50% conversions would really help.  Unfortunately they are not currently doing their part.


Ageed, the offense needs to do their part.  Keep the D fresher, let them play with the lead.  All true.  But that’s not happening yet.

 

Numbers don’t lie.  9 times out of 21 on third down they let the Bears extend drives.  4 times out of 5 on fourth down.   
 

Thats my definition of ‘pathetic’, you can chose your own adjective.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll say that I'm happy the secondary made plays yesterday. The tip drill between Cross and Jones was very encouraging to see. There was growth shown in this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KB said:

I'll say that I'm happy the secondary made plays yesterday. The tip drill between Cross and Jones was very encouraging to see. There was growth shown in this game. 

I think Jones is going to be a good player.  He showed his playmaking ability.  I’m very encouraged as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


Ageed, the offense needs to do their part.  Keep the D fresher, let them play with the lead.  All true.  But that’s not happening yet.

 

Numbers don’t lie.  9 times out of 21 on third down they let the Bears extend drives.  4 times out of 5 on fourth down.   
 

Thats my definition of ‘pathetic’, you can chose your own adjective.  

And that’s what happens when the offense fails at their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but from what I saw in the 1st 2 games was more of a "read and react" style. The problem is, delayed reading can delay the reaction. The Dolphins tried this yrs ago with mixed results. They fired their DC.

The 3rd game looked more like an attack style which for the most was a better fit.

Feel free to call me out, now. 😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this defense will ever be better than Gus Bradley as long as he is here. He is the weakest link.

 

Looking past two weeks of terrible run defense, we're still terrible on 3rd and long. Like it's almost a given we give that away at this point. Then how about going prevent defense with a full quarter remaining on the clock?! OR, playing 5 yards off their receivers when they are on the 5 yard line?!

 

There are so many issues with Bradley's playcalling. He REALLY needs to go after this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ADnum1 said:

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.

The defense has been bad. Green Bay ran at will and was totally fine with this approach and it worked. I have no doubt that if Willis was forced to throw, he would have put up very good numbers. No one is testing the secondary as they are running the ball. Chicago probably has the worse offensive line and/or running game in the NFL. Stopping the run as they did, is not a reason to celebrate. The Colts D will do serviceable when they play teams that are one dimensional. As i have stated over the years. Every time they play a balanced team, they look like trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He basically did sit last year. He was on the sidelines for 3/4ths of the season. 
    • Josh Allen's first 7 games:   @Ravens: Passing: 6/15 - 74 yards - 0/0 TD/Int - 3 Sacks - Rushing: 4 attempts for 26 yards - 0/0 TD/FUM  Chargers: Passing: 18/33 - 245 yards - 1/2 TD/Int - 5 Sacks - Rushing: 8 attempts for 32 yards - 0/0 TD/FUM  @Vikings: Passing: 15/22 - 196 yards - 1/0 TD/Int - 3 Sacks - Rushing: 10 attempts for 39 yards - 2/3 TD/FUM  @Packers: Passing: 16/33 - 151 yards - 0/2 TD/Int - 7 Sacks - Rushing: 5 attempts for 19 yards - 0/1 TD/FUM  Titans: Passing: 10/19 - 82 yards - 0/1 TD/Int - 1 Sacks - Rushing: 4 attempts for 19 yards - 1/0 TD/FUM  @Texans: Passing: 10/17 - 84 yards - 0/0 TD/Int - 2 Sacks - Rushing: 4 attempts for 20 yards - 0/0 TD/FUM  Jaguars: Passing: 8/19 - 160 yards - 1/0 TD/Int - 0 Sacks - Rushing: 13 attempts for 99 yards - 1/1 TD/FUM    Total: Passing: 83/158 (52.5%) - 992 yards (6.28 YPA) - 3/5 TD/Int - 21 Sacks - Rushing: 48 attempts for 254 yards (5.29 YPC) - 4/5 TD/Fum     AR's first 7 games:   Jaguars: Passing: 24/37 - 223 yards - 1/1 TD/Int - 4 Sacks - Rushing: 10 attempts for 40 yards - 1/0 TD/FUM  @Texans: Passing: 6/10 - 56 yards - 0/0 TD/Int - 0 Sacks - Rushing: 3 attempts for 35 yards - 2/0 TD/FUM  Rams: Passing: 11/25 - 200 yards - 2/0 TD/Int - 2 Sacks - Rushing: 10 attempts for 56 yards - 1/2 TD/FUM  Titans: Passing: 9/12 - 98 yards - 0/0 TD/Int - 1 Sacks - Rushing: 2 attempts for 5 yards - 0/1 TD/FUM  Texans: Passing: 9/19 - 212 yards - 2/1 TD/Int - 2 Sacks - Rushing: 6 attempts for 56 yards - 1/0 TD/FUM  @Packers: Passing: 17/34 - 204 yards - 1/3 TD/Int - 1 Sacks - Rushing: 4 attempts for 37 yards - 0/2 TD/FUM  Bears: Passing: 10/20 - 167 yards - 0/2 TD/Int - 1 Sacks - Rushing: 8 attempts for 24 yards - 0/0 TD/FUM    Total: Passing: 86/157 (54.8%) - 1,160 yards (7.39 YPA) - 6/7 TD/Int - 11 Sacks - Rushing: 43 attempts for 253 yards (5.88 YPC)- 5/5 TD/Fum   Not trying to make AR out to be Allen. I just want to point out that Allen had to go through EXACTLY the same thing AR is going through right now and if the Bills had given up they'd have lost out on a franchise QB.
    • I agree and like you I was here to watch Curtis Painter and Scott Tolizen try to play QB so that’s saying something.
    • I feel like the key factors to a Colts win would end up being: 1. Stifling/limiting the Steelers in the red zone 2. AR limiting turnovers 3. AR having a good game through the air   sadly none of those give me a ton of confidence at the moment, but we are at home, and a win like this past week could give us confidence. But for predictions. I’m going to say 27-17 Steelers. Steelers have 1 defensive TD and another comes from a short field coming off of a turnover. T_T
    • That would help too.  The bears went to theirs 10 times yesterday.  Manning leaned on Dilger and Pollard to start his career.  Same with Luck with Flenner and Allen.  The old saying a tightend is a young QB’s best friend is true.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...