Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Is the Defense Pathetically Bad?


Smonroe

Recommended Posts

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

Well... 

 

The only way his style goes away is if both he and Ballard go away... 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  


Pathetically bad?   No.  Not yet. 
 

But they need to be much better this coming week against Pittsburgh.  Justin Fields is better than Caleb Williams. 
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am no fan of Gus Bradley. I was on this forum last season openly wondering if he would survive the bye week. As you said @Smonroe, his super soft scheme just isn't going to get this team over the top against good QBs.

 

The last two games the Colts have played teams with suspect QBs, so I suspect they have been more than happy to play a grind it out, run the football, low-scoring type game. I just don't understand what has happened to Speed and Franklin. Overall the defense is better against the pass, but our LBs have disappeared vs the run.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ADnum1 said:

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.


Agreed, I said the offense is doing them no favors.  But the defense is a big problem letting their offense sustain drives.  The numbers don’t lie.

 

My biggest complaint is when they sack or a penalty forces a team into 2nd and long, the D immediately goes into a soft prevent zone, laying off the receivers.  Then it’s an easy pitch and catch, making it 3rd and manageable.  
 

It’s the old “when you have them down, keep them down” attitude we’re missing.  
 

And, yes @NewColtsFan, it’s pathetically bad when your defense is in the bottom four or five of the league.   ….but I like our guys…
 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.  Pathetically bad. No.  It’s a bend and don’t break defense.  Don’t give up points.  That’s the name of the game.  Score points.  Don’t give up points.  They have done their job with a young group of players especially in the secondary.  Getting dominated week after week in time of possession will take its toll on any defense.  So I don’t consider them pathetically bad.  The real problem is the offense can’t stay on the field.  3 out of 12 third down conversions is not good enough.  Getting to 50% conversions would really help.  Unfortunately they are not currently doing their part.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Williams over the first three weeks:

 

14/29 - 93 yards - 0 TD - 0 INT - 2 sacks

23/37 - 174 yards - 0 TD - 2 INT - 7 sacks 

33/52 - 363 yards - 2 TD - 2 INT - 4 sacks 

 

Jones made incredible plays on those interceptions, so credit to him. But without those incredible plays, Williams numbers would be A LOT better. This secondary STINKS. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been at times. I think the defense is flawed in a lot of ways, and its ability is capped by scheme and personnel. But I think there's potential for significant improvement. The run defense made some corrections this week. The pass defense will depend heavily on the pass rush, which has been better so far this season than it was at any point last year. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The defense is not great but the stats are misleading. Our time of possession is absolutely atrocious. If our offense could just get more first downs and hold the ball, the defense would look like the 15th best defense and not the worst.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

No.  Pathetically bad. No.  It’s a bend and don’t break defense.  Don’t give up points.  That’s the name of the game.  Score points.  Don’t give up points.  They have done their job with a young group of players especially in the secondary.  Getting dominated week after week in time of possession will take its toll on any defense.  So I don’t consider them pathetically bad.  The real problem is the offense can’t stay on the field.  3 out of 12 third down conversions is not good enough.  Getting to 50% conversions would really help.  Unfortunately they are not currently doing their part.


Ageed, the offense needs to do their part.  Keep the D fresher, let them play with the lead.  All true.  But that’s not happening yet.

 

Numbers don’t lie.  9 times out of 21 on third down they let the Bears extend drives.  4 times out of 5 on fourth down.   
 

Thats my definition of ‘pathetic’, you can chose your own adjective.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KB said:

I'll say that I'm happy the secondary made plays yesterday. The tip drill between Cross and Jones was very encouraging to see. There was growth shown in this game. 

I think Jones is going to be a good player.  He showed his playmaking ability.  I’m very encouraged as well.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Smonroe said:


Ageed, the offense needs to do their part.  Keep the D fresher, let them play with the lead.  All true.  But that’s not happening yet.

 

Numbers don’t lie.  9 times out of 21 on third down they let the Bears extend drives.  4 times out of 5 on fourth down.   
 

Thats my definition of ‘pathetic’, you can chose your own adjective.  

And that’s what happens when the offense fails at their job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but from what I saw in the 1st 2 games was more of a "read and react" style. The problem is, delayed reading can delay the reaction. The Dolphins tried this yrs ago with mixed results. They fired their DC.

The 3rd game looked more like an attack style which for the most was a better fit.

Feel free to call me out, now. 😂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this defense will ever be better than Gus Bradley as long as he is here. He is the weakest link.

 

Looking past two weeks of terrible run defense, we're still terrible on 3rd and long. Like it's almost a given we give that away at this point. Then how about going prevent defense with a full quarter remaining on the clock?! OR, playing 5 yards off their receivers when they are on the 5 yard line?!

 

There are so many issues with Bradley's playcalling. He REALLY needs to go after this season.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ADnum1 said:

Your first sentence is correct.

 

The defense has been decent not great.  Giving up 16 points a game for 2 games straight is pretty good.  The last TD in the bears game was pretty much in garbage time.

 

The defense is not the problem with this team giving up only 16 points a game.  

 

The offense is the problem in that drives cannot be sustained with the passing game.  Without JT this team would be 0-3 because he is the only spark on offense right now.

 

TOP is critical as well as the defense is being tired out.

The defense has been bad. Green Bay ran at will and was totally fine with this approach and it worked. I have no doubt that if Willis was forced to throw, he would have put up very good numbers. No one is testing the secondary as they are running the ball. Chicago probably has the worse offensive line and/or running game in the NFL. Stopping the run as they did, is not a reason to celebrate. The Colts D will do serviceable when they play teams that are one dimensional. As i have stated over the years. Every time they play a balanced team, they look like trash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Indyfan4life said:

Williams over the first three weeks:

 

14/29 - 93 yards - 0 TD - 0 INT - 2 sacks

23/37 - 174 yards - 0 TD - 2 INT - 7 sacks 

33/52 - 363 yards - 2 TD - 2 INT - 4 sacks 

 

Jones made incredible plays on those interceptions, so credit to him. But without those incredible plays, Williams numbers would be A LOT better. This secondary STINKS. 

 

 

What an INT by Jones a beauty... staying inbound and tipping it to himself wow... Hopefully he stays hot. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moosejawcolt said:

The defense has been bad. Green Bay ran at will and was totally fine with this approach and it worked. I have no doubt that if Willis was forced to throw, he would have put up very good numbers. No one is testing the secondary as they are running the ball. Chicago probably has the worse offensive line and/or running game in the NFL. Stopping the run as they did, is not a reason to celebrate. The Colts D will do serviceable when they play teams that are one dimensional. As i have stated over the years. Every time they play a balanced team, they look like trash.


Huh?   
 

“No one is testing the secondary, they are running ball.”    

 

That was true the first two weeks, but Williams just threw over 50 passes and the Bears ran about just 20 times.    Did you miss that?   
 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without getting into the long version of it. 

 

They absolutely have to find a freaking way to stop some 3rd downs. It's scary how bad they are at it. 

 

Whether it's 3rd and 2 or 15 it's not a problem for opposing teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This defense needs a true #1 corner, play making LB and a DE that wreaks havoc. We may have the DE but that’s about it.  Beyond Buckner, just a bunch of average to good players.  This personnel can work in a great scheme but I don’t think this one is it. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dingus McGirt said:

If i read the box score correctly - Chicago ran 84 plays to the Colts running 54.  Jeez-Louise.


My count had it as 90 to 56 plays run. The possession is the first thing we need to fix. Fortunately for us, if Shane cleans up the playcalling, we just so happen to have the RB we need to start strategically tilting this balance. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Smonroe said:

Okay, right off the bat, I Know Points is the most important thing.   And I know the Offense is doing them no favors.  Bears had 10 more minutes of possession.  

 

But giving up 9 of 21 third downs and 4 out of 5 4th downs is totally on the D.  Super soft coverage when it’s a long 2nd down always allows them to make third down manageable.

 

I’m not one calling for Gus to be fired, but I am so over his style.  I’ll add blame to Ballard for not giving Gus the players to change his style.   But d… man, press the receivers!  Don’t let them get off the line so easily.  
 

This style will (barely) work against inexperienced QBs.  Not against the good ones.  We’ve been saying this for years, even when Flus was here.  When are they going to wake up and admit it’s an archaic defense?   Okay, rant over.  

To be fair offense can’t sustain drives and turn the ball over a lot 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think the run defense will continue to be as bad as it has been. However, I do think the pass D is worse than it has appeared so far. First two games the run defense was so bad that it covered up for the Pass D a lot. I don’t t think the Colts are actually able to stop the pass if they want to. I think they rely purely on the pass rush to get there. 
 

What you saw from Jones is the high of Bradley’s D. When everything goes according to plan, CBs are supposed to read the QB and make breaks on the ball for either PBUs or INTs. The problem is that rarely happens. The big issue is how horrible they are at defending 3rd down and how many in opputune big plays they give up. They allowed a 100+ yard receiver and 97 yard TE against the Bears.  Thats not going to cut it.

 

We are 27th in The league for opponent 3rd down conversion at 50%. Awful

 

31st In the league for rush yards allowed per game. Awful

 

21st in the league for passing yards per game allowed. Bad

 

24th for passing TDs allowed. Bad

 

31st in the league for yards a game with 398!!! Awful

 

To answer the original question, it is awfully bad. Near the bottom for every major defensive category. Some blame goes to the offense but that wasn’t the issue in the Houston game, so it a moot point.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the defense bad? Yes, is the offense helping them out by sustaining drives No, bad scheme, moderate talent, missing key players  operating in a state of fatigue leads to the Colts having a top 32 defense...The perfect formula to create the sucking sound you hear from the west side.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ColtStrong2013 said:

We are 5th worst in 3rd down conversion rate on defense at 50%. The worst news is that the Steelers are #1 at 22%. That doesn’t bode well for us next Sunday. 

We absolutley suck on 3rd downs... but how are the steelers 1st and all they do is kick FGs?

18 vs Falcons

13 vs Denver

20 vs Chargers (was better) 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

We absolutley suck on 3rd downs... but how are the steelers 1st and all they do is kick FGs?

18 vs Falcons

13 vs Denver

20 vs Chargers (was better) 


That is the bane of the defense.  I rewatched the game yesterday and came away thinking the D wasn’t as bad as I thought - except it kept allowing them to sustain drives.  They sustained 13 of 21 drives on third or fourth down.  Thats demoralizing.  
 

Yes, I agree, the offense is putting them out there too much.  I don’t expect that to change much against the Steelers.   Gus has to let the DBs start playing more aggressive.  Way too soft zones and big cushions for the receivers is playing not to lose.  Not playing to win.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Chrisaaron1023 said:

We absolutley suck on 3rd downs... but how are the steelers 1st and all they do is kick FGs?

18 vs Falcons

13 vs Denver

20 vs Chargers (was better) 


I guess more methodical drives to fieldgoal range and less big play/touchdown finishing drives. I hope we can hold them to fieldgoals, because if we can’t get them off the field then we are going to have another very lopsided time of possession game. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I wouldn't say pathetically bad but they are marginal at best. This is what you get when you have a passive dc running a soft scheme that's being carried out by avg players on a whole with the exception of maybe Buckner and Moore. The main problem with this defense under Gus is their inability to get off the field regardless of what the offense is doing.

 

No lead is safe. How about the 31 pt cushion against the Vikings that led to the greatest comeback in NFL history! That game alone should've sent Gus packing but unfortunately we're now in year 3 asking this question while also coming off back to back seasons of being ranked 28th in points allowed league wise. Get a big sack and guess what? Give up 3rd and long on the very next play to keep a drive going. Easy pickings in the passing game have been the norm except now teams are running with success so pick your poison. Yeah they stopped the Bears rushing attack Sunday but they were dead last coming in so take that with a grain of salt. 

 

@richard pallo pointed out in a post on another topic on how the team averaged nearly 30 pts a game last season (teens now) on offense with Minshew at qb but guess what they still missed the playoffs and finished only 1 game above .500 while having the luxury of nearly a last place schedule. A lot of that had to do with the defense being unable to close out games and by making key stops. The Colts set a team sack record last year and that probably kept Gus his job but look who they feasted on!! A bunch of bad offenses littered with bad qb play. Bottom line food term wise is that Ballard is serving chewy cube steak without gravy trying to convince you that you're eating a tender porterhouse served with excellent sides! The cube steak is ok but I prefer a meal... Oh well in Ballard we trust!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bluephantom87 said:

@richard pallo pointed out in a post on another topic on how the team averaged nearly 30 pts a game last season (teens now) on offense with Minshew at qb but guess what they still missed the playoffs and finished only 1 game above .500 while having the luxury of nearly a last place schedule.

No offense to Pallo, I don't know where he got that number from but it's simply not true. It's way off. We scored 396 points last season in 17 games. That's 23.3 points per game - nowhere near 30.

 

That said, the defense gave up 415 in 17 games. That's 24.4 points per game, which is probably still too much for most offenses to overcome.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After rewatching the game, I put it on Gus (duh).  Almost every time we had them behind the sticks on 2nd down, they went to a soft zone.  Letting them make up enough yards to make 3rd down manageable.  
 

They do a good job of putting pressure on the QB, and they did a very good job against the run.

 

But they have no killer instinct.  I bet the players really don’t like that soft D.  It just keeps them on the field and wears them down.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bluephantom87 said:

 

I wouldn't say pathetically bad but they are marginal at best. This is what you get when you have a passive dc running a soft scheme that's being carried out by avg players on a whole with the exception of maybe Buckner and Moore. The main problem with this defense under Gus is their inability to get off the field regardless of what the offense is doing.

 

No lead is safe. How about the 31 pt cushion against the Vikings that led to the greatest comeback in NFL history! That game alone should've sent Gus packing but unfortunately we're now in year 3 asking this question while also coming off back to back seasons of being ranked 28th in points allowed league wise. Get a big sack and guess what? Give up 3rd and long on the very next play to keep a drive going. Easy pickings in the passing game have been the norm except now teams are running with success so pick your poison. Yeah they stopped the Bears rushing attack Sunday but they were dead last coming in so take that with a grain of salt. 

 

@richard pallo pointed out in a post on another topic on how the team averaged nearly 30 pts a game last season (teens now) on offense with Minshew at qb but guess what they still missed the playoffs and finished only 1 game above .500 while having the luxury of nearly a last place schedule. A lot of that had to do with the defense being unable to close out games and by making key stops. The Colts set a team sack record last year and that probably kept Gus his job but look who they feasted on!! A bunch of bad offenses littered with bad qb play. Bottom line food term wise is that Ballard is serving chewy cube steak without gravy trying to convince you that you're eating a tender porterhouse served with excellent sides! The cube steak is ok but I prefer a meal... Oh well in Ballard we trust!

 

  Gus reminds me of coaches that are really good at designing screen games while others (historically us) seem lousy at it.

 Gus coaches a simple D. While top D's are on the line with 7-8 guys making the QB and his line think, Gus shows them the same look that we got beat playing the week before, and the week(s) before that. It's simple, lazy, a loser.

 Ballard's type D. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Solid84 said:

No offense to Pallo, I don't know where he got that number from but it's simply not true. It's way off. We scored 396 points last season in 17 games. That's 23.3 points per game - nowhere near 30.

 

That said, the defense gave up 415 in 17 games. That's 24.4 points per game, which is probably still too much for most offenses to overcome.

 

You are correct....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Probably twice I can remember but never missed a game.
    • I would honestly trade pittman and draft someone that is A a better player more dynamic weapon and B cheaper.
    • Gus will get fired and nothing else will change.   After the Colts finish with a top 15 pick its going to be the same thing.   Ballard will say “Look, we didn’t get it done. I will hold myself accountable and I didn’t give us enough to do go win games. Look We had some tough injuries. Things just didn’t go our way. I still believe in these young guys.”   Ballard mentioned in his earlier years that he will spend to get the team over the top. Once he believed the Colts were close to a championship he would be willing to risk more to get some guys to put it all together. Problem is, we haven’t even been close because of his poor decisions and stubbornness.    Okay rant over.    
    • Guys I will take the blame for all the injuries. I don’t know what I did to get cursed but all of my sports teams this year are made of glass. I’m a huge braves fan and we lost our star outfielder Ronald Acuna for the year and our star pitcher Spencer strider for the year.  That’s not all, our all star level players Ozzie albies ,Austin Riley , and Roy winner Michael Harris, lost over 50 games each with injury.   Oh and our best pitcher and this years most likely cy young winner got injured and couldn’t pitch in the playoffs.    I feel like I’ve seen so many injuries this year on my favorite teams that I’m some how causing it , like medusas gaze lol.    No but seriously I think this could be a blessing in disguise. Pittman wasn’t exactly lighting the world on fire and I think our young guys could use the experience of stepping up into a higher role in the offense. We will see how it goes. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,977

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • fanoftheteam

      fanoftheteam 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crunked

      Crunked 327

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dunk

      Dunk 1,499

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jbaron04

      jbaron04 820

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Nevbot

      Nevbot 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • newb767

      newb767 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jz0204945

      Jz0204945 43

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,970

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 636

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...