Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

…And We’re on to Green Bay!


Archer

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

Malik Willis stinks. We will take these guys out. Book it! I took the Colts and 2.5 last week and won $100. I am taking the Colts again and I think we win this one by at least 7-10 points. 


I’m surprised they’re not trying to get a proven vet like Tanehill. They might be in a 0-3, 1-2 hole in a tough NFCN.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JediXMan said:


I’m surprised they’re not trying to get a proven vet like Tanehill. They might be in a 0-3, 1-2 hole in a tough NFCN.

 

I don't think this older version of Tannehill gives them any better chance. He's really fallen off into his mid 30s.

 

Willis is inexperienced, but he's young and athletic. That probably opens up the playbook more than a vet would. 

 

And he was just on TEN, so that might help them that one. Maybe they see anything above 1-1 in these next two as gravy.

 

IND and TEN are also out-of-conference games too. 

 

I don't think the Colts should be overlooking GB on the road at all. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, John Waylon said:

Buckner not practicing today and we’re one step closer to Taven Bryan starting…


Season 3 Ugh GIF by Sony Pictures Television

 

Might just be a rest day. But when you hear the 30 year-old All-Pro DT has a back injury and then no updates...it's a bit concerning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/10/2024 at 12:18 PM, Solid84 said:

It's definitely an issue, but to me it looks like technique and timing. A lot of them are not close misses - big overthrows and stuff like that. That's generally technique, timing or miscommunication in my opinion and all of that will get better.

 

I don't see it drastically improving until he develops consistent touch. He's got a cannon, which means he can physically make any throw, but without touch, it limits everything.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, shasta519 said:

 

Might just be a rest day. But when you hear the 30 year-old All-Pro DT has a back injury and then no updates...it's a bit concerning.


I’d be a little less concerned if it was anyone else but Bryan backing him up. Literally anyone. That guy is like Jeff Linkenbach reborn as a DT. 😱

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, John Waylon said:


I’d be a little less concerned if it was anyone else but Bryan backing him up. Literally anyone. That guy is like Jeff Linkenbach reborn as a DT. 😱

 

Great comparison lol

 

It would be a huge blow to the pass and rush defense. Nobody is as valuable as a QB, but DeFo is about as valuable as you can get on the defensive side of the ball. I think that would even things out quite a bit.

 

The last time DeFo missed a game was 2020 and TEN put up 45 pts and 240 yards on the ground. That's a long time ago and that was during Henry's prime, but Jacobs is no slouch. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, shasta519 said:

 

Great comparison lol

 

It would be a huge blow to the pass and rush defense. Nobody is as valuable as a QB, but DeFo is about as valuable as you can get on the defensive side of the ball. I think that would even things out quite a bit.

 

The last time DeFo missed a game was 2020 and TEN put up 45 pts and 240 yards on the ground. That's a long time ago and that was during Henry's prime, but Jacobs is no slouch. 


The comparison made me uncomfortable as soon as I thought of it and that’s how I knew that it fit lol. 
 

I was thinking of Buckner’s injury history with this news, and wasn’t that game he missed in 2020 also a back issue? I seem to recall him having a back issue at some point, possibly even more recent than 2020. Hopefully they aren’t connected. 😬

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bradly needs to changeup the La-Z-Boy defense (Soft with Big Cushions) with this secondary personnel. Blitz rate needs to increase. I expect a heavy run and dink and dunk perimeter passing from Willis on Sunday.

 

Last week Green Bay ran on 35% of their plays for 144 yds; while Love passed for close to 300 yds. I would expect GB to be closer to 50% in the run game.  The Colts secondary made 57% of the combined defensive tackles in week 1. An atrocious stat given the Texans ran 49% of their snaps.

 

 If the Colts are to win Smith and Partridge must re-establish gap control and setting the edge. 

Week one was some of the poorest linebacker play I have watched in quite some time. (Run Defense  PFF - Speed 45.2, Franklin 46,4). Absolute must that the linebackers shed and scrape at a much higher level.

If the Colts limit Jacobs and Offensive turnovers I think they will win/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Dobbinblitz said:

Bradly needs to changeup the La-Z-Boy defense (Soft with Big Cushions) with this secondary personnel. Blitz rate needs to increase. I expect a heavy run and dink and dunk perimeter passing from Willis on Sunday.

 

Last week Green Bay ran on 35% of their plays for 144 yds; while Love passed for close to 300 yds. I would expect GB to be closer to 50% in the run game.  The Colts secondary made 57% of the combined defensive tackles in week 1. An atrocious stat given the Texans ran 49% of their snaps.

 

 If the Colts are to win Smith and Partridge must re-establish gap control and setting the edge. 

Week one was some of the poorest linebacker play I have watched in quite some time. (Run Defense  PFF - Speed 45.2, Franklin 46,4). Absolute must that the linebackers shed and scrape at a much higher level.

If the Colts limit Jacobs and Offensive turnovers I think they will win/

 

 

I think the Pack will move the ball and score around 24 points ( with it without Love). It's up to AR and the offense to match. No turnovers by the Colts O, I think they can score 30.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

I think the Pack will move the ball and score around 24 points ( with it without Love). It's up to AR and the offense to match. No turnovers by the Colts O, I think they can score 30.

Key to the game is Richardson protecting the ball. Last week he could have had a couple more picks.from errant throws that could have/should have been intercepted. Turnovers and Colts OL play will probably decide this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dobbinblitz said:

Key to the game is Richardson protecting the ball. Last week he could have had a couple more picks.from errant throws that could have/should have been intercepted. Turnovers and Colts OL play will probably decide this one.

 

 The throws were fine, we primarily have route running issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dobbinblitz said:

Bradly needs to changeup the La-Z-Boy defense (Soft with Big Cushions) with this secondary personnel. Blitz rate needs to increase. I expect a heavy run and dink and dunk perimeter passing from Willis on Sunday.

 

Last week Green Bay ran on 35% of their plays for 144 yds; while Love passed for close to 300 yds. I would expect GB to be closer to 50% in the run game.  The Colts secondary made 57% of the combined defensive tackles in week 1. An atrocious stat given the Texans ran 49% of their snaps.

 

 If the Colts are to win Smith and Partridge must re-establish gap control and setting the edge. 

Week one was some of the poorest linebacker play I have watched in quite some time. (Run Defense  PFF - Speed 45.2, Franklin 46,4). Absolute must that the linebackers shed and scrape at a much higher level.

If the Colts limit Jacobs and Offensive turnovers I think they will win/

 

 

 

 Does anyone here believe Gus runs our game plan by his HC?

Franklin said there was a plan to defend pass first.

 What a surprise that when Grover took snaps we were decent against the run but got absolutely gashed when he was out.

 And it would be no surprise our LB's had low grades after playing back with no adjustments.

  Tomorrow we will make their QB/QB's beat us with the pass.

 We will focus at stopping the run then getting after them on passing downs. It's Gus so lol.

Colts 20-16.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, throwing BBZ said:

 

 The throws were fine, we primarily have route running issues. 

Yeah, there were certainly those issues- turf slips etc. Bad news -the Colts only ran 45 offensive plays. Good News - Richardson threw  21% of his passes over 20 yards which led the NFL.
 The threat and the ability to throw downfield should go long ways in helping Taylor and the ground game.  Really looking forward to watching this offense grow and evolve with this personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, cdgacoltsfan said:

I think the Pack will move the ball and score around 24 points ( with it without Love). It's up to AR and the offense to match. No turnovers by the Colts O, I think they can score 30.

If Willis plays the Packers score less than 17, unless the Colts turn the ball over a few times

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/9/2024 at 4:21 PM, Two_pound said:

The defense couldn't off the field when Dungy was coach either, thus only 1 super bowl win with the greatest qb to ever play the game. It's not just a "Ballard-Bradley thing". This is the same defense I've watched since Bert Jones was the qb. Our three playoff games with Bert Jones at qb we gave up 28, 42, and 37 points so all I can say is s.o.s.

 

On 9/9/2024 at 4:21 PM, Two_pound said:

The defense couldn't off the field when Dungy was coach either, thus only 1 super bowl win with the greatest qb to ever play the game. It's not just a "Ballard-Bradley thing". This is the same defense I've watched since Bert Jones was the qb. Our three playoff games with Bert Jones at qb we gave up 28, 42, and 37 points so all I can say is s.o.s.

you are right. I believe the only time the Colts have had a reliable defense was during the Harbaugh era. Siracusa was a wall.

The 2006 Super Bowl run was anchored by Sanders working up on the line. If the Bears had a better QB indy might not have won that one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

 

you are right. I believe the only time the Colts have had a reliable defense was during the Harbaugh era. Siracusa was a wall.

The 2006 Super Bowl run was anchored by Sanders working up on the line. If the Bears had a better QB indy might not have won that one.

Uh.  I loves Goose as much as any colts fan.   He was not a difference maker.   He was a fine player and a great character.   Wonderful man in the community,   but he wasn't a "wall"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well, I thought Stroud was clearly superior to AR as a pro prospect (I'm not a modern-day mobility snob), so I see no desperation in trading up to 1 to get the best QB on your board when you do, desperately, need to hit on a QB after 5 years.    I didn't advocate for it then, so I'm not blaming Ballard but I can see if others want to make that argument though.   I'm not going to die on a hill over the word desperation pick to describe AR.  I'll describe it as expanding tolerances for what you level of college competence you expect a player to come into the NFL with...and you expand them now because you failed at finding a QB for the past 5 years.   And this stuff about high ceiling is a bit of a false reason.  Kids walking the streets right now have higher ceilings....if a team took the time to teach them everything and take the risk he never reaches his ceiling.  The difference is that the guys picked in the top 5 should come out of college equipped with a certain mastery level of skills and plenty of experience, or its not much different than taking a great athlete and begin by teaching him the basics of how to throw a ball.
    • Chicago doesn't look that good to me in terms of what they can do on offense. I don't think they have what Green Bay or Houston has at RB. It's mostly just Caleb and a messed up OL. I think if there's any opportunity to get things right it will be against this opponent. I think we can and should beat this team as long as AR doesn't turn the ball over.
    • I'm not overreacting, I simply said that I hate losing, we've been a losing team for way too long, now.   I've also said that I don't like having a long term project at QB, while all of our other impact players are on far different career timelines.   And yes, I've been open since BEFORE we drafted Richardson, that I do not think he will become a quality starter in the NFL.    As for shaking my fist at Irsay's mansion, that's just silly talk (overreacting on your part lol). I'm not mad, but if we keep losing every year, eventually myself and a lot of others will simply lose interest in the team...and if enough people lose interest, the team will end up relocated (almost happened before Manning, so it's not crazy to think it can happen)
    • I think him refusing to make certain moves has zero to do with him not wanting to do what people are asking. It has to do with what Ballard feels about the roster.
    • One thing I can absolutely guarantee will never happen again in this lifetime is the Colts going with a vet as a long term solution.    We did that from 2019-2022 and it failed. Irsay will not be standing for that. 
  • Members

    • Dingus McGirt

      Dingus McGirt 3,896

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,299

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Fluke_33

      Fluke_33 5,098

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tweezy32

      tweezy32 879

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,726

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Defjamz26

      Defjamz26 4,800

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NFLfan

      NFLfan 17,892

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • coltsblue1844

      coltsblue1844 421

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Bluesmith

      Bluesmith 113

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,295

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...