Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts vs Browns post game reactions


GoColts8818

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Sad thing was only way browns had  offense this game was because of turnovers.  Without turnovers colts score 50.

 

Between the early TD run and that drive in the 4th, they had like 55 yards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Kyle said:

I completely disagree.   I think Pittman is lazy and disappears for 3/4 of every game.  We need 2 new WRs to pair with Josh Downs next year

Pittman isn't lazy. We aren't even halfway through the season and especially today it felt like we were very run heavy..  he isn't disappearing. Josh Downs is just getting more targets.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As loyal Colts fans it is natural to get down and a little negative after a loss, but personally I feel much different this year after a loss than last year. There is reason for optimism.
Although hurt, Richardson’s learning curve appears to be much shorter than anyone anticipated. The Moss trade is turning out to be an absolute steal. Downs and Brent are already in position to heavily contribute. Today we had late round draft picks lined up against an all pro DE and a #1 WR - A very tall order. 
‘last year I cannot count the number of games we entered the fourth quarter with large defecits.

 

This is a much different feel this year- for me anyway.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Play to win the game not lose it.Go for plays to keep the chains moving and put the game away .what happened to uncatchable ball mo Pi.the fan in the stands in row 1 had a better chance to catch that ball. I wish the pros pi was like college  15 yd penalty .these refs are awful . baseball too.whst has happened to these guys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, w87r said:

It's not reviewable, they just had a conversation about it.

Yeah I think one of two things happened.

 

1.  New York buzzed them and said um you sure you want to call this?  (Not likely)

2.  They were buzzed to review the fumble before the penalty was called and once the call was made it became moot.  (What I think happened)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

Did anyone else question whether the running back broke the plane with the football on forth down? The refs surely didn't waste any time on replaying to make sure. A couple of times the flags were picked up for illegal man down field that extended Cleveland drives. With all the contact between a receiver and DB on every play, why not call everyone of them and play 6 hour games instead of deciding ball games in the last two min.

I’m so happy you bring the play up, watch the bear hug the guard gave Franklin, the most obvious hold in the history of the game!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bleed blue4life said:

Play to win the game not lose it.Go for plays to keep the chains moving and put the game away .what happened to uncatchable ball mo Pi.the fan in the stands in row 1 had a better chance to catch that ball. I wish the pros pi was like college  15 yd penalty .these refs are awful . baseball too.whst has happened to these guys?

Wouldn’t have mattered if it happened in college or pros.  Since it was in the endzone the ball gets put at the one and the Browns were already within 15 yards of the endzone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Dobbinblitz said:

As loyal Colts fans it is natural to get down and a little negative after a loss, but personally I feel much different this year after a loss than last year. There is reason for optimism.
Although hurt, Richardson’s learning curve appears to be much shorter than anyone anticipated. The Moss trade is turning out to be an absolute steal. Downs and Brent are already in position to heavily contribute. Today we had late round draft picks lined up against an all pro DE and a #1 WR - A very tall order. 
‘last year I cannot count the number of games we entered the fourth quarter with large defecits.

 

This is a much different feel this year- for me anyway.

These next three games will tell me more.

Home vs Saints 

at Panthers

Frankfort vs Patriots

We need some wins to make me feel more optimistic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ImissPeyton18 said:

Did anyone else question whether the running back broke the plane with the football on forth down? The refs surely didn't waste any time on replaying to make sure. A couple of times the flags were picked up for illegal man down field that extended Cleveland drives. With all the contact between a receiver and DB on every play, why not call everyone of them and play 6 hour games instead of deciding ball games in the last two min.

It was pretty clear the ball broke the plain in the replay they showed on TV.  All scoring plays are reviewed so it got looked at.  There was no point to stop game and look at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TrueBlue4ever said:

I’m so happy you bring the play up, watch the bear hug the guard gave Franklin, the most obvious hold in the history of the game!

They got every borderline key call, it wasn't just 1 call like I said earlier. It was like 5 as a whole. I am one that thinks blaming the REFS is usually a cop out, but sorry folks - NOT TODAY! I wasn't born yesterday. homer simpson whatever GIF- hey Eddie just confronted Victor Maintland lmao , great classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Kyle said:

It's not hating to think 20 mil would be better spent elsewhere.   Just my opinion.  It seems some of you have no clue how to cordially disagree.   I love the colts, want to win, and want to be great.  You can't resign everyone.  Sometimes you have to let someone go.  When we paid Taylor, I think we will let Pittman go.  I don't think he is elite.  A revamped wr system would not be the worst thing for next year


That was me being cordial, maybe try not being so sensitive? You called him lazy, many of us disagreed and showed you proof. Just tired of people bashing him without considering his overall production and the situation he’s been put in.

 

So, you don’t think he would have more targets/receptions with a better QB and O line like most of the receivers you posted have had the benefit of having? Some of those guys have been in the league twice as long too.

 

The guy has made the best of what he’s been given, and is the consummate  team mate, I think he deserves AT LEAST 20 million.

just my opinion of course.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, GoColts8818 said:

You still can’t review that.  I think that was confusion as I think they were buzzed to review the fumble that didn’t matter after the penalty was called.

There is a difference between reviewing something and challenging it. Challenging is what you’re referring to, meaning the team throws a red flag which doesn’t apply here obviously, which is why I didn’t use the word challenge and instead used reviewed as that can be initiated from a couple of different parties. NY, upstairs booth, other officials…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems that refs have gotten the memo that scoring is down and they were bad all over the league today.

 

I will say this last week against jags looks like it will be the outliar. Looks like team is fighting. I know I said last week what if things fall apart and would Ballard be safe. As long as they play hard like this his job will be ok.

 

Colts still don’t have a consistent pass rush. Despite turnovers colts defense still needs to be better when there is a short field.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Have panthers in there too. We have the hard part of the schedule out of the way I think. Carr has not looked good but if Brent’s don’t play he might eat us up.

Carr usually plays his Super Bowls against us! I’m not too optimistic!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, csmopar said:

It was a booth ordered review. Even the broadcasters thought it was odd

Illegal contact is not reviewable. Think everyone knows that.(except these refs apparently)

 

 

I did just watch it back and the ref did start to go to the sidelines to look at it, then stopped and announced it stood.

 

 

My guess, is that the league told him in his ear that the play wasn't reviewable.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

Yeah I think one of two things happened.

 

1.  New York buzzed them and said um you sure you want to call this?  (Not likely)

2.  They were buzzed to review the fumble before the penalty was called and once the call was made it became moot.  (What I think happened)

I think the league told them it wasn't reviewable so he stopped going off the field.

 

 

I do agree they were probably initially going to review if it was a fumble or incomplete pass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Have panthers in there too. We have the hard part of the schedule out of the way I think. Carr has not looked good but if Brent’s don’t play he might eat us up.

Panthers have next two games in a row at home

Oct 29  Houston

Nov 5   Colts

Should they be 0-7 when we come to town, that could be trouble. Bound to win a home game sooner or later.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

Should have Bern opi or no call. Then we recover and win. It’s one of the worst calls I have seen.

Yup. You absolutely do not call that for several reasons:

 

1. The receiver was wide open anyways so he wasn’t even obstructed

2. Ball wouldn’t have went to the receiver regardless because the QB was hit for a strip sack

3. The receiver actually initiated the contact and the DB reacted as it is stated in the rules

4. You can’t call that in that situation. The game is on the line, you can’t call an iffy call like that. Early in the 1st quarter it’s whatever, but not with seconds left in the 4th quarter when the defense makes a game changing play. They didn’t call it on the last play of the Bills and Giants game last week and it was more obvious. Why call this?

5. The alleged contact had absolutely no affect on the play at all. Not in any capacity.

6. The rule book says the defender is allowed to use his arms to defend against contact.

 

 

It’s inexcusable 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I wonder if there will be settlements to the people that have ordered the NFL package for many years   Im in it for 20 years.......  
    • Don’t worry. This is pretty common for the 2024 Reds. They always win the first game of the series in convincing fashion, and then the bats get cold for the rest of the other 2-3 games. 
    • I gotta say you make arguments that you’d never accept from your students because they’re so superficial.      So saying Ballard has been mediocre to bad is tissue paper thin.  Why hasn’t Irsay fired this mediocre to bad GM?  Because he signed off on what Ballard did each year in real time, not after the fact.   Irsay knows Ballard has an eye for talent.  And as Ballard freely admitted in January, the Colts haven’t had more success because he failed to get the QB right.  These aren’t excuses, but it IS badly needed context — which you’d realize if you weren’t always looking for new ways to hate on CB.      As to what you and Moose “supposedly said”  there’s a simple way to verify.  Go to the Day 2 draft thread of Friday April 26.  It was between 3a and 4 my time when I saw it.  I believe it was recent.  Just add 2-3 hours depending on your time zone and you can see your conversation with Moose.   What was so astonishing, what makes me “prattle on” as you put it is how you two ever thought you were right?!?   Given your career choice you jumped to conclusions I’d like to think you’d never accept from your students.   Why you thought Ballard didn’t know more?  Why you thought you two knew better?   Ballard not only knows more, he knows dramatically more.  As I said in another post, he shared the tip of the iceberg.  He doesn’t share the part of the iceberg that you can’t see.  The 90 percent.  The absence of curiosity is stunning given your occupation.    Now, at the bottom of your post you brought up a new line of attack on me and I have no idea what you’re talking about?   I’m not an optimist?   Since when?  Based on what?   In my 12 years here, only 1-2 posters have ever made that claim.   So what are you talking about?     Finally….   You can stop calling me Sir.  It’s normally said with respect.  You don’t respect me at all.   I’ve extended olive branches publicly and privately, and both have been rejected.  Your choice.  So calling me sir is intended as an insult.   It’s old and boring.   Move on.   I don’t know why you “enjoy engaging with me”.   You take a beating.  But if that’s what you’re in to, be my guest.    Sorry this went so long….       
    • He loves you, you just don't know it (sarcasm) 
    • Cubs actually won one - beat the Giants finally.
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...