Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Jeff Saturday On Nfl Network


supremecoltsfan300

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

This is good news. Irsay is not going to let Peyton go and make some other team SB contenders. I think Saturday is just making it clear to irsay, fans, and everyone that Peyton Manning is playing and any team that passes on him is crazy. no, they should not pay him 28 mil and thats fine. irsay knows he is keeping peyton for awhile so let him throw and rehab wherever is best for him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, it sounds like if they cleared him, he couldn't have contact with trainers or the bosses until the first week of April

Again, that's up to interpretation. I posted this earlier, but here's language from the CBA:

"Nothing herein shall prevent a Club from permitting an individual player to work out on his own prior to the commencement of the Club’s official offseason workout program using the Club facilities if the player wishes to do so.."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, that's up to interpretation. I posted this earlier, but here's language from the CBA:

"Nothing herein shall prevent a Club from permitting an individual player to work out on his own prior to the commencement of the Club’s official offseason workout program using the Club facilities if the player wishes to do so.."

Then what is the language that Mike Chappell is using to base his statement that Pagano and Grigson cannot have access to Manning?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then what is the language that Mike Chappell is using to base his statement that Pagano and Grigson cannot have access to Manning?

Not sure. I didn't see the original statement by Chappell (or was it Kravitz) and what they were referencing.

Here's a link to the CBA. If someone can find that specific language, please let us know.

http://nfllabor.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/collective-bargaining-agreement-2011-2020.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saturday was very good on NFLN today and indicated he is planning on playing. All the guys in the booth ended up agreeing there's no reason for Peyton to throw for the Colts until the last minute, and Saturday basically said forget about it, in regards to some sort of pro day type thing for Manning with other teams. Totally my opinion but, I think Saturday is expecting Manning to remain with the Colts, and that he (Saturday) is not a sure thing to be resigned, but wants to be because he either knows or expects Peyton to be back with the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thing that caught my attention..w.as that mayock said that he saw Castonzo more of a RT and Ijalana more of a Lt...

Saturday agreed. he said castonzo is a little more stiff, like a RT and that Ijalana can sometimes be moved to this awkward positions but that he does something athletic to regain his ground and not lose. he agreed that that might be a consideration for next year... ijalana at LT and castonzo at RT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, whatever. The majority of you guys only hear what you want to hear in regards to Manning.

He isn't coming back, hang onto whatever formalitys in the CBA or anything that allows you some shrivels of hope while you can I guess. You guys are unreal.

All I've heard is most likely he is done as a Colt from everyone outside of Colts fans. Even the team writers have said it since the national media is 'nuts' and just making stuff up. Even Chappelle said it yesterday. But go ahead and think what u want

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure and they might be the best fit but the Colts are taking Andrew Luck; to keep Manning one more year doesn't mean it's a great fit for him. They're not sitting Luck two more years. I don't get how anyone who follows the game of football thinks a team can co-exist with Luck and Manning on the same team. It simply will not happen and the Colts are taking Luck. So it's time for some to start accepting reality.

Won't be any easier for the organization to release manning or let him go elsewhere a year from now after he has thrown for 4,000 yards than it is right now. It makes zero sense to bring him back when they're taking Luck #1 overall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure and they might be the best fit but the Colts are taking Andrew Luck; to keep Manning one more year doesn't mean it's a great fit for him. They're not sitting Luck two more years. I don't get how anyone who follows the game of football thinks a team can co-exist with Luck and Manning on the same team. It simply will not happen and the Colts are taking Luck. So it's time for some to start accepting reality.

Won't be any easier for the organization to release manning or let him go elsewhere a year from now after he has thrown for 4,000 yards than it is right now. It makes zero sense to bring him back when they're taking Luck #1 overall.

You're wasting your time trying to convince some people that Manning won't be back as a Colt. It's like you said in a earlier post, these people hear what they want to hear and all logic escapes their thinking. IMO there is about only a 1% chance that Manning will be back and the only reason I give it that much is because im afraid Irsay will let emotion play a part in his thinking and that would be a huge mistake IMO. Its not that im a Manning hater like some will claim, its that I really don't think it makes even the slightest bit of sense to bring him back at this point, either for Manning or the Colts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're wasting your time trying to convince some people that Manning won't be back as a Colt.

Why does anybody need to convince anybody of anything? At this point I am just waiting to see what happens. I am not assuming that Manning will be with the Colts next season, but I am also not assuming that it is a foregone conclusion that he is gone. It will not be long now before a decision will have to be made and there will be no more speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thing that caught my attention..w.as that mayock said that he saw Castonzo more of a RT and Ijalana more of a Lt...

Saturday agreed. he said castonzo is a little more stiff, like a RT and that Ijalana can sometimes be moved to this awkward positions but that he does something athletic to regain his ground and not lose. he agreed that that might be a consideration for next year... ijalana at LT and castonzo at RT.

Yeah, I heard the same thing too and wondered about it. We will find out how it plays out.

Linkenbach is backup RT and LT, and hope it stays that way :).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I am in the majority in saying thank goodness for this

Meh, I don't really care. I mean, I am interested to see what ultimately happens, but people can speculate all they want until a final decision is made for all I care. I don't have to read any of it. And making a decision now is not going to make football start any sooner, so what difference does it make if I know now or a week before training camp?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, I don't really care. I mean, I am interested to see what ultimately happens, but people can speculate all they want until a final decision is made for all I care. I don't have to read any of it. And making a decision now is not going to make football start any sooner, so what difference does it make if I know now or a week before training camp?

For me its putting this behind us and building a new era around a new guy. It's exciting for me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

another thing that caught my attention..w.as that mayock said that he saw Castonzo more of a RT and Ijalana more of a Lt...

Saturday agreed. he said castonzo is a little more stiff, like a RT and that Ijalana can sometimes be moved to this awkward positions but that he does something athletic to regain his ground and not lose. he agreed that that might be a consideration for next year... ijalana at LT and castonzo at RT.

I tried to tell people on here that Castonzo was a right tackle, and have been called crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to tell people on here that Castonzo was a right tackle, and have been called crazy!

The other aspect of it is that when Castanzo first played in the Senior Bowl, the position where he shone most against the top college pass rushers was also right tackle. We will see how things go. It could also be the fact that Castanzo was thinking more than reacting being his rookie year. I would say he had an average rookie year, not bad by any means but not stellar by any means either.

Ijalana, when he took over for Castanzo at LT in the Bucs game before he got injured, looked comfortable but that is too small of a sample space.

At least we know with the revamping of the coaching house, we will get fresher looks at linemen again and hopefully, the right combo is determined by TC and they stick to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or did it come off from what he said that the Colts have just given Manning the cold shoulder. They haven't reached out to see him throw Jeff said, he even said that doesn't come off like a team looking to bring him back..

What are you talking about? No

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it was he and Eisen. Saturday's whole persona to me came off like Manning will not be back.

His persona? Did you read his aura or something? What he said is Peyton will be back for 2012 but wasn't specific since he's not writing the contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to tell people on here that Castonzo was a right tackle, and have been called crazy!

A couple of months ago when I was making the case for Kalil (assuming the healthy return of Manning), I was not shy in saying I thought that Castonzo looked more like a RT to me. I still believe this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jim harbaugh as anywhere near as good as PM I would buy into that. Yes, it was risky to pick Manning over Leaf and then dump the Captain, but lets face it...Harbaugh was decent but not NFL mvp 4 times.

I think Jim would have been way better than he was if he would have had a front line that could have kept him upright and given him a little time to throw instead of having to scramble all over the field on every play. I honestly think that we shortened his playing career by at least a couple of years because of all the punishment he took.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other aspect of it is that when Castanzo first played in the Senior Bowl, the position where he shone most against the top college pass rushers was also right tackle. We will see how things go. It could also be the fact that Castanzo was thinking more than reacting being his rookie year. I would say he had an average rookie year, not bad by any means but not stellar by any means either.

Ijalana, when he took over for Castanzo at LT in the Bucs game before he got injured, looked comfortable but that is too small of a sample space.

At least we know with the revamping of the coaching house, we will get fresher looks at linemen again and hopefully, the right combo is determined by TC and they stick to it.

I know it's not the popular idea on here, but if the Colts were able to take a competent, and quality LT, and kick Castonzo to RT and Ijalana at LG, that would mean Indy had a good o line. I like Mike Adams if he falls to round two. Or Jeff Allen or Tom Compton later in the draft and a RG after that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's not the popular idea on here, but if the Colts were able to take a competent, and quality LT, and kick Castonzo to RT and Ijalana at LG, that would mean Indy had a good o line. I like Mike Adams if he falls to round two. Or Jeff Allen or Tom Compton later in the draft and a RG after that.

I do think you need to give Castanzo a second year to see if he makes that second year jump of playing faster. Next, with more defensive needs to fill, IMO, and knowing our first pick will most likely be a QB, there is not much luxury of picks that would make it worthwhile to not give it one more year with the 2 O-line picks of last year to see how things shape out.

OTs that drop are projects anyway. Sebastian Vollmer was picked by the Pats in round 2 and he plays RT more than LT. Tarik Glenn played RT or OG (one of those) his first year before playing LT. Castanzo has been thrown into the fire, much like Ugoh. Maybe Castanzo's progress curve will be the opposite of Ugoh. Ugoh looked better in year 1 and regressed. Maybe it is the other way with Castanzo, still have to give him that second year for the new coaches to figure him and the rest of the O-line out, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think you need to give Castanzo a second year to see if he makes that second year jump of playing faster. Next, with more defensive needs to fill, IMO, and knowing our first pick will most likely be a QB, there is not much luxury of picks that would make it worthwhile to not give it one more year with the 2 O-line picks of last year to see how things shape out.

OTs that drop are projects anyway. Sebastian Vollmer was picked by the Pats in round 2 and he plays RT more than LT. Tarik Glenn played RT or OG (one of those) his first year before playing LT. Castanzo has been thrown into the fire, much like Ugoh. Maybe Castanzo's progress curve will be the opposite of Ugoh. Ugoh looked better in year 1 and regressed. Maybe it is the other way with Castanzo, still have to give him that second year for the new coaches to figure him and the rest of the O-line out, IMO.

Castonzo should play to his strengths, I have preferred him to play RT. Ijalana can play either LT or LG. I like Jeff Allen or Tom Compton as a mid round LT pick, they have serious talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NFLN is reporting that the Colts will not get to see Peyton throw due to CBA rules. Would it be a violation for someone not employed by the Colts to see him throw and offer an opinion to the Colts, say Dungy?

Using the 3rd party example, If Irsay/Grigson wanted an opinion of Manning's throwing they would likely contact Duke's head coach who has seen Manning workout and knows a little more about the position than Dungy.

With that said, I don't believe it matters how well Manning throws the ball at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Castonzo should play to his strengths, I have preferred him to play RT. Ijalana can play either LT or LG. I like Jeff Allen or Tom Compton as a mid round LT pick, they have serious talent.
I'm sure if he is a better RT than LT, that's where he would have played......well unless our coaches last season really were so bad to have missed such an obvious skill-set....
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Funny how people see the same thing differently.   You think the Colts OL is average.   Average?!?    To me, that’s jaw dropping.     You could make an easy argument that listing QB as you do is nothing more than Fan Boy cheer leading.  Richardson played less than 200 snaps.  In essence, he’s still a rookie.     But I can’t get over listing the OL as average.  Hey, it’s your post.  You set it up with Potential, Average and Concern.   And by doing so I think you’ve painted yourself into a corner.   The Colts offensive line is AVERAGE?!?   Shaking my head doesn’t begin to cover it.   
    • if tyson had hit you probability is you would not have woke up, lol
    • People shouldn't get too excited yet. The case could be thrown out later. In the meantime, the NFL will appeal this, which is going to take a long time. It might change how the NFL charges streaming services, but it could be years (or maybe never) that anyone sees payout from this case. 
    • TE atleast have players that have produced. Can't say the same thing about the LBers. Franklin and Speed are the only LBers on the team I trust to play significant snaps 
    • I agree with most of this. I would switch TE and LB. The TE's are trash until proven otherwise IMO. No one is a no1 TE on any team that we have. It's all a bunch of what ifs that have potential. Like throwing darts at a dartboard.    The LBers are actually average IMO. Franklin and Speed are pretty solid, and there is potential for good depth. I'd rather us be in a position where we have potential for good depth than a situation at TE where there's 4 guys who might be good enough to be a no1 on the team.
  • Members

    • PeterBowman

      PeterBowman 1,764

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shadow_Creek

      Shadow_Creek 1,151

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 4,675

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • gspdx

      gspdx 1,658

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • colts89

      colts89 1,051

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • jvan1973

      jvan1973 11,082

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,869

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,473

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,563

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...