Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Could we cut AJ in the offseason?


Recommended Posts

Those of you that understand and know the cap a little better than me lol. Is this a possibility. How much would it save us? If it saves enough it would seem worth entertaining. You'd think our starting receivers, or main 3 WR's will be TY, Moncrief, and Dorsett. Then maybe we could sign Brian Quick to a little cheap 1year deal. Quick's got a ton of talent. Just had issues with injuries and what not. He started out with a bang last year before getting injured, and now only has 1 catch this year. Just something I've been wondering about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of you that understand and know the cap a little better than me lol. Is this a possibility. How much would it save us? If it saves enough it would seem worth entertaining. You'd think our starting receivers, or main 3 WR's will be TY, Moncrief, and Dorsett. Then maybe we could sign Brian Quick to a little cheap 1year deal. Quick's got a ton of talent. Just had issues with injuries and what not. He started out with a bang last year before getting injured, and now only has 1 catch this year. Just something I've been wondering about.

all I have to say is that any wr right now would be an improvement over Aj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steel City's Link to AJ's Spotrac page says cutting Johnson will be a $2.5 Mill dead cap hit.

 

That's $2.5 mill that we can't spend on another player for one year.     Yes,  it can be done.   $2.5 Mill is not that much.

 

But the Colts may not want to do that....    probably won't know until the end of the year....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We really don't have a clear view of what AJ is capable of doing. I have seen quite a bit of tape and there seems to be quite a few times he is open, just not used. The one game he was used he caught two TDs. AJ just did not suddenly lose the ability to be a good receiver. This mind set of wanting people fired is understandable but only time right now is going to tell who is going to lose their job. The next few games will play a big part of who stays and goes. After Irsay's reaction after last weeks game I feel pretty sure a GM, some coaches and a few players are playing for their jobs. For some it might be too late, only Irsay has those answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We really don't have a clear view of what AJ is capable of doing. I have seen quite a bit of tape and there seems to be quite a few times he is open, just not used. The one game he was used he caught two TDs. AJ just did not suddenly lose the ability to be a good receiver. This mind set of wanting people fired is understandable but only time right now is going to tell who is going to lose their job. The next few games will play a big part of who stays and goes. After Irsay's reaction after last weeks game I feel pretty sure a GM, some coaches and a few players are playing for their jobs. For some it might be too late, only Irsay has those answers.

 

^^^Agree

 

I was purely talking cap implications ... I think AJ is a wait and see where he is at at the end of the season decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steel City's Link to AJ's Spotrac page says cutting Johnson will be a $2.5 Mill dead cap hit.

That's $2.5 mill that we can't spend on another player for one year. Yes, it can be done. $2.5 Mill is not that much.

But the Colts may not want to do that.... probably won't know until the end of the year....

2.5 in dead money. But cutting him means they won't be paying him the 7.5 million. So they would have 5 million by cutting him. I'm not convinced aj is the problem though. Luck needs to throw it to him. Many times I've seen him open underneath. So let's see what the rest of brings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 'dead money' isn't just dead money. It's guaranteed money.

 

Usually when we talk about dead money it's money that's already been paid, and it just has to be accounted for eventually. AJ's roster bonus in 2016 has not yet been paid, but will be, whether he's on the roster or not (assuming no conditions that we are unaware of). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2.5 in dead money. But cutting him means they won't be paying him the 7.5 million. So they would have 5 million by cutting him. I'm not convinced aj is the problem though. Luck needs to throw it to him. Many times I've seen him open underneath. So let's see what the rest of brings

 

I'm sort of with you here.  Luck still has a problem of shying away from short throws.  He can make them, most days anyways (didn't seem like he could make any throw Monday night) he just doesn't want to throw short for some reason.

 

Quite frankly I think this is killing us.  Honestly I think that's why our receivers have trouble getting open.  All our passing plays are long routes.  It's so utterly predictable that all you have to do is tell your DB's to never bite on any fakes of short routes and always assume that it's gonna be a long route.  

 

Occasionally now Luck will check down to his RB but that's about it.  He doesn't throw to slant routes or quick outs or any route where he could do a three step drop look and fire.  

 

The shallowest route he throws besides an occasional RB checkdown is a deep crossing route.  

 

It's almost like Luck looks at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd down as 3 shots to hit TY Hilton on a seam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think Dan Dakich hit the nail on the head, its not the recievers not getting open, the routes are very simple and the D can stay with them very easy.  Example, most of the routes have either straight down the field or at a slight angle. That's it, very vanilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All our passing plays are long routes.  It's so utterly predictable that all you have to do is tell your DB's to never bite on any fakes of short routes and always assume that it's gonna be a long route.  

 

 

Very loose use of the word "route." I'm looking at Colts receivers running 10-15 yards down field and then just turning around and looking at the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm all for doubling down and going EDGE in the 1st again. Just got to make sure we get the right one. Depending on where we draft, I'm okay with trading up a couple of picks to snatch the better pass rusher of the bunch. Since there will be a good amount of rushers, I hear, let's go get the better one. I can also see the draft being the opposite as this years. Most teams will go defense now in this draft, and very good offensive players fall. I think we are perfect on offense, that's why I'm okay with trading up to get the guy we need on defense.
    • IMHO , its all about perspective   If you treat Pierce as WR1, you will be disappointed   If you treat Pierce as a solid contributor, you will be pleased   - The man can block, maybe the best blocking WR on this team - The man has speed - The man can rotate in with our other WRs   I do believe that AD Mitchell will take over as a starting outside WR   The reality is, 17 games is a LONG season,    Pittman and AD Mitchell will be "fresher" for the end of the game as they are rotated in and out   The odds say that there will be injuries, and we could see Pierce be a starter on either side   I for one, WANT to keep Pierce thru his rookie deal (We will see after that)      
    • Zach Moss is no RB1.  If he showed signs he was the Bills wouldn’t have traded him for Hines who also is no RB1.  Moss is a RB 2.  A good one too.  Fortunately for him a season playing behind the Colts OL worked out favorably for him. Moss became available because we have an RB1 and the Bengals jumped at the chance to fill a hole in their lineup and Moss can do that like he did for the Colts when Taylor wasn’t available.  He is not a back teams have to worry about like they have to do for Taylor.  Every team needs an RB1.  He was the Bills RB1 for a short time and shipped off to the Colts for Hines.  And they drafted him.  He certainly belongs on a NFL roster.  I wish he stayed to back up Taylor.  But money and opportunity always talks as it should.  I worry about our RB position if something happens to Taylor for a long period.  I think we should be looking for a proven player who would be that true backup you can rely on behind Taylor.  Right now that backup position is a position that concerns me.   The other being starting FS.
  • Members

    • coltsleafs

      coltsleafs 106

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Knuckles79

      Knuckles79 244

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Introspect

      Introspect 346

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,506

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ChuggaBeer

      ChuggaBeer 1,793

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Kc77

      Kc77 11

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tweezy32

      tweezy32 846

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,915

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • w87r

      w87r 14,481

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IndyD4U

      IndyD4U 1,450

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...