Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Could we cut AJ in the offseason?


Recommended Posts

Those of you that understand and know the cap a little better than me lol. Is this a possibility. How much would it save us? If it saves enough it would seem worth entertaining. You'd think our starting receivers, or main 3 WR's will be TY, Moncrief, and Dorsett. Then maybe we could sign Brian Quick to a little cheap 1year deal. Quick's got a ton of talent. Just had issues with injuries and what not. He started out with a bang last year before getting injured, and now only has 1 catch this year. Just something I've been wondering about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of you that understand and know the cap a little better than me lol. Is this a possibility. How much would it save us? If it saves enough it would seem worth entertaining. You'd think our starting receivers, or main 3 WR's will be TY, Moncrief, and Dorsett. Then maybe we could sign Brian Quick to a little cheap 1year deal. Quick's got a ton of talent. Just had issues with injuries and what not. He started out with a bang last year before getting injured, and now only has 1 catch this year. Just something I've been wondering about.

all I have to say is that any wr right now would be an improvement over Aj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steel City's Link to AJ's Spotrac page says cutting Johnson will be a $2.5 Mill dead cap hit.

 

That's $2.5 mill that we can't spend on another player for one year.     Yes,  it can be done.   $2.5 Mill is not that much.

 

But the Colts may not want to do that....    probably won't know until the end of the year....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We really don't have a clear view of what AJ is capable of doing. I have seen quite a bit of tape and there seems to be quite a few times he is open, just not used. The one game he was used he caught two TDs. AJ just did not suddenly lose the ability to be a good receiver. This mind set of wanting people fired is understandable but only time right now is going to tell who is going to lose their job. The next few games will play a big part of who stays and goes. After Irsay's reaction after last weeks game I feel pretty sure a GM, some coaches and a few players are playing for their jobs. For some it might be too late, only Irsay has those answers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We really don't have a clear view of what AJ is capable of doing. I have seen quite a bit of tape and there seems to be quite a few times he is open, just not used. The one game he was used he caught two TDs. AJ just did not suddenly lose the ability to be a good receiver. This mind set of wanting people fired is understandable but only time right now is going to tell who is going to lose their job. The next few games will play a big part of who stays and goes. After Irsay's reaction after last weeks game I feel pretty sure a GM, some coaches and a few players are playing for their jobs. For some it might be too late, only Irsay has those answers.

 

^^^Agree

 

I was purely talking cap implications ... I think AJ is a wait and see where he is at at the end of the season decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steel City's Link to AJ's Spotrac page says cutting Johnson will be a $2.5 Mill dead cap hit.

That's $2.5 mill that we can't spend on another player for one year. Yes, it can be done. $2.5 Mill is not that much.

But the Colts may not want to do that.... probably won't know until the end of the year....

2.5 in dead money. But cutting him means they won't be paying him the 7.5 million. So they would have 5 million by cutting him. I'm not convinced aj is the problem though. Luck needs to throw it to him. Many times I've seen him open underneath. So let's see what the rest of brings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That 'dead money' isn't just dead money. It's guaranteed money.

 

Usually when we talk about dead money it's money that's already been paid, and it just has to be accounted for eventually. AJ's roster bonus in 2016 has not yet been paid, but will be, whether he's on the roster or not (assuming no conditions that we are unaware of). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2.5 in dead money. But cutting him means they won't be paying him the 7.5 million. So they would have 5 million by cutting him. I'm not convinced aj is the problem though. Luck needs to throw it to him. Many times I've seen him open underneath. So let's see what the rest of brings

 

I'm sort of with you here.  Luck still has a problem of shying away from short throws.  He can make them, most days anyways (didn't seem like he could make any throw Monday night) he just doesn't want to throw short for some reason.

 

Quite frankly I think this is killing us.  Honestly I think that's why our receivers have trouble getting open.  All our passing plays are long routes.  It's so utterly predictable that all you have to do is tell your DB's to never bite on any fakes of short routes and always assume that it's gonna be a long route.  

 

Occasionally now Luck will check down to his RB but that's about it.  He doesn't throw to slant routes or quick outs or any route where he could do a three step drop look and fire.  

 

The shallowest route he throws besides an occasional RB checkdown is a deep crossing route.  

 

It's almost like Luck looks at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd down as 3 shots to hit TY Hilton on a seam.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I think Dan Dakich hit the nail on the head, its not the recievers not getting open, the routes are very simple and the D can stay with them very easy.  Example, most of the routes have either straight down the field or at a slight angle. That's it, very vanilla.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All our passing plays are long routes.  It's so utterly predictable that all you have to do is tell your DB's to never bite on any fakes of short routes and always assume that it's gonna be a long route.  

 

 

Very loose use of the word "route." I'm looking at Colts receivers running 10-15 yards down field and then just turning around and looking at the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No. Probably doesn't mean anything. Nowadays those contracts are standardized and largely a formality. 
    • Found Stanley’s Pro Day Results from 03/25/2024.  Hands 9 3/8, decent wingspan of 79 ½”. Stanley ran slower at his pro-day than Kamren Kinchens did with a 4.78s 40-yard dash which was even worse than James Williams SAF Miami (FL).  Curious if he was injured or that Is his top speed.  His vertical was only 33” which was still better than Jaylon Carlies, Josh Proctor, Patrick McMorris, Demani Richardson, and James Williams.  Even his broad jump was much better than those mentioned above, except Josh Proctor (10’1”), and bested Kamren Kinchens, Kitan Oladapo, and Daijah Anthony from the Combine.  Stanley’s 3-Cone Drill and 20 Yard Shuttle were actually better than some of the cornerbacks drafted this time around.     Still went through PFF's recent 2024 UDFA tracker and still could find Stanley mentioned.  Guess teams are ignoring him with such a slow 40-yard dash time.  If he was injured might account for his speed and sub-par vertical jump. 
    • Come on now…  Lamar Jackson is a two time NFL MVP.   Justin Fields is entering his 4th season, and he wasn’t terrible with Chicago.    Anthony Richardson started 4 games for the Colts.  He’s thrown just 84 total passes.   We’re all pulling for the kid to succeed,  but he’s got a lot to prove before  anyone can credibly say AR is better than Fields or Jackson.    There are plenty of questions to be asked and the answers wont come until early next year.    We all could be having an entirely different conversation next off-season.    
    • People saying he was a run first QB never watched his college tape. I won't lead the witness, but you can make some basic assumptions as to why people believed that.   IMO, his actual football problems coming into the league were:   - bad footwork. Made him have some inconsistent, wild throws at times. - not that great at making easy, short passes. The layups, essentially.     I'd say in the short sample we saw last year, that the latter issue he dramatically improved on. For the former, there were still some erratic throws (when he missed, he really missed), but he also showed progress there a s well (his completion percentage in the NFL was 59.5 vs 53.7 in his one year starting at college. It's usually the opposite trend for most rookies)   I'm absolutely on board on AR becoming a franchise QB, the only issue he has is proving he can stay healthy. I also don't think calling out two minor injuries vs one major injury is enough to call injury prone, but he has to prove it all the same.
  • Members

    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,397

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,758

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,150

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • craigerb

      craigerb 397

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,789

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • rock8591

      rock8591 853

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...