Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Recommended Posts

Games are won and lost at the line of scrimmage.

So, I'm in favor of an OL, or a DE/OLB. Someone who will have an impact on virtually every play they're on the field.

Some positions have less of an impact if their not as directly involved in the play.

If we're building a monster, we need to build with the foundation first. A lineman. We can even trade down and still pick up a quality lineman, plus a pick(s)

That's my preference....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have tons of needs..

Both D-Line and O-line could clearly need better talent. I have high expectations for Chapman as our future NT.

OLB - Freeney is a question mark, so OLB is an area that needs attention.

ILB - A top prospect like Te'o would be a great addition, and improve our defense a great deal. But he's probably the only ILB I would spend a first round pick on as it's not the position we're worst at.

CB - Our CB's have not been as bad as everyone expected, but could still be improved a lot.

WR's - Wayne is still great, but not getting any younger. Collie is probably done. Avery, Hilton, Brazil have done okay, but a top WR prospect is always interesting.

Safety - Could use an upgrade, however I don't think a first round pick would be the smartest move. In my opinion we would be better of picking at another defensive position (OLB, ILB, DT)

RB's - Brown and Ballard have been doing okay. Nothing spectacular, but probably not an area where we will spend a first round pick.

QB - Set for years to come

TE - We should be set for a long time with Fleener/Allen

Overall, I hope we go for D-line/OLB pass rusher first, but I'm with the "Drafting for needs is a bad strategy" crowd. Draft the most talented player available, with slight reservations of course. It wouldn't make sense drafting a QB, when we have Luck, but if the most talented player available is a CB or an ILB, you get him. Elite talent is just the way to go in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should sign a more established LT and move Constanzo over to RT..Constanzo is not Grigson's guy anyway so I don't know how committed he'll be to the Constanzo at LT project..

AC will stay at lt if ain,t broke dont fix it they say he the best lineman we have , if we want and rt in drasft we could get luke joeckel or ricky wagner and then we could have too bookend tackles or we get warmack and jones who both could well be top 5 in the postion for years to come..

as for team needs

1.RT through free agency someone like vollmer or clady or if through draft joeckel and wagner

2.RG Warmack,Jones thomas

3.Safties FA kenny phillps would be awesome

4.OLB Jarvis jones closes thing to von miller absolute beast

5.Wr find a number 1 for the future Justin hunter would be great

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AC will stay at lt if ain,t broke dont fix it they say he the best lineman we have , if we want and rt in drasft we could get luke joeckel or ricky wagner and then we could have too bookend tackles or we get warmack and jones who both could well be top 5 in the postion for years to come..

as for team needs

1.RT through free agency someone like vollmer or clady or if through draft joeckel and wagner

2.RG Warmack,Jones thomas

3.Safties FA kenny phillps would be awesome

4.OLB Jarvis jones closes thing to von miller absolute beast

5.Wr find a number 1 for the future Justin hunter would be great

Would love to have Justin Hunter but he will go in the first and we need help on D more than a WR. Hunters teammate Patterson might be able to be had in the third and I believe will be a great WR in the NFL.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would love to have Justin Hunter but he will go in the first and we need help on D more than a WR. Hunters teammate Patterson might be able to be had in the third and I believe will be a great WR in the NFL.

What about Hunter's old teammate, Da'Rick Rogers? The off-field issues might put some people off. Top talent though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about Hunter's old teammate, Da'Rick Rogers? The off-field issues might put some people off. Top talent though.

Yea Rogers really stepped up last year when Hunter got hurt. He has not got in any trouble this year after he transfered schools. I have heard he is 2-3 round area but like you said some teams might not take a shot because of all the trouble he got in at Tennessee. If Bray didnt regress this year like it has seemed Hunter and Patterson would have nasty numbers. Also remember Hunter is just back from the knee injury last year so him quickness and agility is not all the way back. Man if the Vols only had a decent defense this year.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if we get Chapman this year and he is successful I would like to see us get another big body on the line. Redding can't be trusted he has been to prone to injury. After how we have been gashed in the run game we still need help on the line which has been the case for years. Ideally I would like us to trade back and collect a few picks and draft a guard at the end of round one and hopefully pick up a 2nd rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if we get Chapman this year and he is successful I would like to see us get another big body on the line. Redding can't be trusted he has been to prone to injury. After how we have been gashed in the run game we still need help on the line which has been the case for years. Ideally I would like us to trade back and collect a few picks and draft a guard at the end of round one and hopefully pick up a 2nd rounder.

The Rams traded down from 6 to 14 and picked up a 2nd. I think we're going to win too many games to get such a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Rams traded down from 6 to 14 and picked up a 2nd. I think we're going to win too many games to get such a deal.

You make a very good point, one I've been trying to make here since I joined....

Even more to the point, once the draft started, this was the only trade where a team traded down and picked up a #2.

And if we're picking in the middle of the 1st round, the chances of a team wanting to trade up being willing to part with a #2 for a player who might be the 14th best, or 16th best are very remote.... a real long shot.

It's not even clear we can get a #3. Some first round picks involved a 4. These days are easy to make on internet message boards. They're much harder to do in the Real World.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool story. Lets look at the 2011 draft where New England traded their 28th pick to New Orleans for their 2nd rounder that year and a first rounder in 2012.

I think that was because New Orleans traded up from the bottom of the 2nd round. And the Patriots' had a late first rounder. Say we're picking 15th/16th (for argument's sake), it's unlikely anybody will be moving up from the 2nd round for that pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Love the addition of Latu. I wanted him and/or the corner who is blazing fast and a man corner (cannot remember his name). I never thought Ballard would pick either because of the injury history for Latu and the other not a zone corner. In reality, the D could be a lot better this year than last. However it may not be reflected in the stats because they play some very good qb's this year. Last year, the D faced horrible qb play and what is alarming is that they actually put up stats near the bottom.  That being said, I cannot see the D being worse than last year if that is comforting, lol?? 
    • We’ll see if it remains average this year.  I think it’s possible, but unlikely.   Put another way,  if the Colts defense is average in 2024 I will be very, Very, VERY disappointed. 
    • I agree with you that he is not trying to build an average defense. It is just a plain fact that after 8 yeas of drafting and free agency, he has managed to do it.
    • Kind of an extreme example, but Jim Irsay specifically praising Bryce Young last year could qualify. In general though, if a team is trying to throw off the scent by floating positive information about other players, that seems harmless. It's different if a team is trashing a player to try to get him to drop into their range, and I don't think that's something that actually happens. If it did, I think that would be highly inappropriate, and I think a good reporter would look back and recognize that their source was using them, and think twice about trusting that source again.     So I think this is way more common than what McGinn did. And I don't think people ignore it, unless it's something they don't want to hear. Most sports reports include some version of 'I've been told...' without naming or directly quoting a source. A lot of those are just fact-based, black/white reports, but that often happens with more opinion-based or viewpoint-based reporting as well.     I don't know if anyone necessarily likes those reports, but I do think we consume them, and are generally influenced by them. Yeah, the substantiated/analytical stuff is way more valuable than a report discussion a potential character issue, but if it has a legitimate foundation -- AD Mitchell does have diabetes, it can be difficult for someone with that condition to control their mood and energy levels -- then I think it should be considered. Ultimately, I know the quality of information I have access to is nowhere near what the teams are getting, so I don't worry too much about it.      Yeah, I fully agree. Ballard faced the media when the Okereke story came out, and it was obvious the team had done their homework. He was firm when asked about Ogletree coming back. The Colts are thorough. Doesn't mean nothing can go wrong once they draft the guy, but I'm confident they've checked all their boxes.    And definitely, I think Ballard 100% meant everything he said, and I have no problem with him saying it. But, I think there's a difference between McGinn's report, and the narrative that came later. I think the report was based on anonymous insights, and the narrative was based on sensational headlines. And I'd say Ballard's comments apply more to the narrative than to the report.
  • Members

    • coltsfeva

      coltsfeva 1,794

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • IinD

      IinD 4,523

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • stitches

      stitches 19,979

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,890

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Hoose

      Hoose 1,983

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Dickerson29

      Dickerson29 0

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,675

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CoachLite

      CoachLite 1,213

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheEdgeis1

      TheEdgeis1 90

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Crush22

      Crush22 488

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...