Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Matt Barkley or RGIII?


Recommended Posts

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000d5d82a9df15/article/matt-barkley-rg3-would-have-been-drafted-after-me?module=HP11_headline_stack

Matt Barkley believed he would have been drafted ahead of RGIII if he came out for this years draft.

My first thought when I read this was:

Matt Barkley must think highly of Andrew Luck. Matt thinks enough of himself to think he's better than RGIII, but he still thinks Luck would have been drafted #1.

I see this as a compliment to Andrew Luck.

Anyone else think so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.nfl.com/n..._headline_stack

Matt Barkley believed he would have been drafted ahead of RGIII if he came out for this years draft.

My first thought when I read this was:

Matt Barkley must think highly of Andrew Luck. Matt thinks enough of himself to think he's better than RGIII, but he still thinks Luck would have been drafted #1.

I see this as a compliment to Andrew Luck.

Anyone else think so?

Barkley thinks hes better than RG3 and I think im next to win American idol lmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see any compliment toward Luck in this....

But I don't think Barkley is right. I think he would have been top-5... I think the Browns could have taken him... but I think it's been observed by many who cover the NFL that RG3 is such a good fit in the Shannahan system, that he's just the right guy for the right team.

That's doesn't necessarily make him better. Only the right choice.

We may all think otherwise in 6 months. We'll see how Barkley does this year. He's primed for a great season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Barkley that he would have been picked before RGIII. The Redskins moved up to draft RGII, all the way up to the second spot. Instead of moving up to the second spot to draft RGIII, they would've moved to the third spot. I have watched Luck, Barkley, and RGIII and both Luck and Barkley have been asked to consistantly make harder throws. I have noticed that a very high percentage of RGIII's throws have been behind or within 3-yards of the line of scrimmage. Much more than the other two QB's. It's easy to have a high completion percentage when you are asked to throw the ball to a standing wide receiver in the backfield. RGIII has a great deep ball, but if I were to compare him to Luck or Barkley, he would finish third.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk. usc hasnt really had good qbs come out. palmer is average, leinart is a bust, sanchez is trash.

True, but those were all Pete Carroll products. Barkley is a Lane Kiffin product. Kiffin is more of an offensive coach, while Carroll's background is in the defensive secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

True, but those were all Pete Carroll products. Barkley is a Lane Kiffin product. Kiffin is more of an offensive coach, while Carroll's background is in the defensive secondary.

i guess we'll find out next year when the dolphins take him haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

"I had confidence that I was going to go high," Barkley said on The Dan Patrick Show. "It wasn't really a question of that, as to why I came back"

I didnt see the Dan Patrick Show so I dont know every word that was said, but if he did say that then I agree with him but if he DID NOT say that then the guy who wrote this article who used the above quote to draw that conclusion lost alot of if not all credibilty in my opinion. Once again if he said that then fine but using that quote as a means of saying that he did is at the very least bad journalism and possibly a flat out lie, Personally I dont see Mat saying that but he could I suppose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long term I would take Barkley as my quarterback but short term I'd easily take RGIII.

Long term i would also DEFINITELY take Barkley ahead of RGIII....there were even a couple NFL Scouts who said that they believe he will have a better career than Luck (though i'd take Luck over Barkley without any hesitation) ...

But just curious why you'd "easily" take RGIII short term? I think that RGIII is more of a project that will struggle a LOT in the short term in the NFL... I'm not knocking your opinion, just curious why you feel that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I had confidence that I was going to go high," Barkley said on The Dan Patrick Show. "It wasn't really a question of that, as to why I came back"

I didnt see the Dan Patrick Show so I dont know every word that was said, but if he did say that then I agree with him but if he DID NOT say that then the guy who wrote this article who used the above quote to draw that conclusion lost alot of if not all credibilty in my opinion. Once again if he said that then fine but using that quote as a means of saying that he did is at the very least bad journalism and possibly a flat out lie, Personally I dont see Mat saying that but he could I suppose

I'm sure Barkley is not losing that much money returning to the Trojans. Heck he may even take a pay cut when he goes to the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

If Barkley would have came out, who knows what the Skins would have done. They probably don't trade away their future for the 2nd pick. They may have traded to the 3rd spot where they still would have had a chance at either QB considering I doubt St. Louis would have drafted a QB. With that said, Im not a fan of either one of them. Barkley is undersized and don't have a strong arm, and RG3 is all hype IMO, until proven otherwise.

I don't overly excited about a QB that was projected to be a project WR before his final yr. in college. I honestly think that if Barkley would have came out, he probably would have been the 2nd QB off the board before RG3, but who knows. The Skins were enamored with RG3 and they certainly don't have a history of making the best personal decisions, but since Barkley wasn't there they were sort of forced into picking next logical choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What I’m reading on him the Pacers did get good value. Looks like he will need time to develop but he is in the right situation to do that. The pacers are stacking some quality young players that will prove to be more outstanding depth or assets if they choose to make a trade. Very exciting time for the team right now.  
    • I’m not a religious person, but since you’re an educator I think you’re doing Gods work!   In these crazy insane times we’re all living in you’re doing one of the toughest jobs on earth.  And you’re teaching perhaps the most difficult generation to deal with.     From a distance it feels like you’re being very unfair to you.  I’m hoping in time you’ll see yourself in a completely different light.    Someone highly thought of.  A leader in the community.  A protector of young minds.   I couldn’t admire a teacher more.  
    • You are too self-deprecating. You are one of the most respected and bright members here. You should never feel that you are failing. I'm sure your wife and children don't feel that way.  Indiana does not pay teachers what they deserve. But money is overrated. Having good morals and good character should be valued a lot more. JMO.
    • They make a heck of a lot more money than I do. Even those on the practice squad are making life changing money.    To be completely honest, as an educator I feel more like trash nowadays. One of those moments where I feel like I’m failing as a man, a husband, a father and a teacher. I would absolutely never consider an honest working NFL player as trash. 
    • Food for thought… Once again, you continue to be your own worst enemy.     The Colts overall TE room is loaded with young players most of whom have had very little playing time for a variety of reasons.   So if you want to say the room might not be ranked high, that’s fair.    But you don’t say that.  You call them “trash”.  Why you feel that’s appropriate is a mystery.   Whenever you try the internet tough guy approach it typically blows up on you.     No one is trash.     You ignore the last three years and the QB and HC carousel the Colts have dealt with.  All of which has impacted the Colts weapons, especially the TE’s.   Ballard has publicly talked about how promising he thinks his TE room might be.   Woods, Granson, Ogletree, Mallory and MAC.    Only MAC is questionable and that’s because the salary hasn’t matched expectations.  But the first four?   All are promising.   They’re just young and looking for opportunity.  But they are NOT trash.     There’s a difference.     
  • Members

    • OLD FAN MAN

      OLD FAN MAN 1,310

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,572

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,569

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • AwesomeAustin

      AwesomeAustin 2,488

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Yoshinator

      Yoshinator 9,474

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • iuswingman

      iuswingman 253

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • C_Lew

      C_Lew 176

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 12,731

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • tate

      tate 10

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...