Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Simplify Offense for Luck


BProland85

Recommended Posts

Our we going to simplify our offense for Luck so that he has a nice rookie year like Cam Newton and Andy Dalton did? Does anyone know if this is Arian's plan?

Personally, I think we can simplify things but at the same time we can give Luck a couple of plays to choose from at the line and pick which one he feels would work against the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're no longer running the Tom Moore/Peyton Manning offense. We're running the Bruce Arians offense. I think they'll give him a nice chunk as a base, and then build from that as the year goes on. Week 5 (first game after the bye) will be a good measuring stick to see how much leeway the coaches are willing to give him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're no longer running the Tom Moore/Peyton Manning offense. We're running the Bruce Arians offense. I think they'll give him a nice chunk as a base, and then build from that as the year goes on. Week 5 (first game after the bye) will be a good measuring stick to see how much leeway the coaches are willing to give him.

I agree Iam all for an early bye week this year.Will help rookies that are not clicking get on page with vets.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our we going to simplify our offense for Luck so that he has a nice rookie year like Cam Newton and Andy Dalton did? Does anyone know if this is Arian's plan?

Personally, I think we can simplify things but at the same time we can give Luck a couple of plays to choose from at the line and pick which one he feels would work against the defense.

I hope we spend the year challenging him, rather than simplifying things for him. He'll get so much more out of it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're no longer running the Tom Moore/Peyton Manning offense. We're running the Bruce Arians offense. I think they'll give him a nice chunk as a base, and then build from that as the year goes on. Week 5 (first game after the bye) will be a good measuring stick to see how much leeway the coaches are willing to give him.

Yes we aren't running the Tom Moore offense but let's not forget the Arians offense also grew out of the Moore offense and he had a lot to do with putting in the offense that Peyton used and christinson was kept in part because of his knowledge of the old colts offense. I am sure it will be tweaked but I am sure there will be a good chunk of it that's like the old offense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In a word...... no. You want two words? heck, no!

There is no need to simplify anything for Luck. He already has an exceptional grasp of the playbook. He just needs reps....

The problems Luck will inevitably have will not come from the playbook being too complex or too big. They'll come from getting used to the speed, size, and new approaches that the NFL game presents. That's what gets most rookies. It's to be expected.

But you don't have to simplifying anything for Andrew.

His number one skill.... his absolute strength, is what's above his shoulders. His brain is his best attribute. Give him more, not less. The more you give him, the more he likes it. Push him, and keep pushing him until he says, I've got enough.

Give him reps, time and game experience and he'll be all that you want him to be.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our we going to simplify our offense for Luck so that he has a nice rookie year like Cam Newton and Andy Dalton did? Does anyone know if this is Arian's plan?

Personally, I think we can simplify things but at the same time we can give Luck a couple of plays to choose from at the line and pick which one he feels would work against the defense.

Just another plus of drafting Luck, they don't have to simplify anything. The guy is calling 30 word plays at the line, he's fine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about andrew luck Knowing the offense I'm more worried about the offensive line knowing the audible plays at the line of scrimmage when andrew luck read the defense then changes the play. This is a whole new line I just hope they can keep up with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not worried about andrew luck Knowing the offense I'm more worried about the offensive line knowing the audible plays at the line of scrimmage when andrew luck read the defense then changes the play. This is a whole new line I just hope they can keep up with him.

I don't think you'll have to worry about the O-line.... typically on most every football team, other than the QB, it's the offensive lineman who are the smartest players on the roster. They're very, very sharp guys. By necessity, they have to be. By the time the season starts, they should be good to go.

Doesn't mean they won't have some growing pains.... all new lines do.... but knowing the plays shouldn't be a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes we aren't running the Tom Moore offense but let's not forget the Arians offense also grew out of the Moore offense and he had a lot to do with putting in the offense that Peyton used and christinson was kept in part because of his knowledge of the old colts offense. I am sure it will be tweaked but I am sure there will be a good chunk of it that's like the old offense.

Good points, but the Colts offense evolved quite a bit in the years since Arians left. It started to become an extension of Manning, more than a transferable offense. I think that's part of the reason he had a few lively conversations with Christensen on the sidelines over the past three years, because Manning and Moore were so often thinking the same thing. Then, with Clyde, there's a new idea here and there, and it's not better or worse, but different, so there's some back and forth about it.

Either way, there are plenty of differences from what we've done on offense since 2008 and what we were doing on offense in 2000 when Arians left. Every offense has some overlap with every other offense, but I think we'll see some different things moving forward than we've seen in recent years. The fact that some of the receivers are being put in motion pre-snap is one key difference.

To be honest, if you want a simple offense, you probably want what Manning and Moore did for so many years. We've heard over and over again how simple the plays were, how there were probably 10-15 plays, with different variations and wrinkles. The playbook wasn't complex. The complexities came with Manning's audibles and adjustments at the line, where every player on offense needed to know what the call was, without a huddle, and had to be prepared for the play to change with less than 10 seconds left on the clock. If you haven't read Smart Football's article from a few weeks ago, I urge you to read it when you get a chance. http://smartfootball.com/offense/peyton-manning-and-tom-moores-indianapolis-colts-offense

The "offense" was more of an orchestration than a playbook, only the key pieces could change at the drop of a hat, and you'd better be ready for it. I don't know that we'll ever see a system like that again, even with Manning, because it wasn't installed as much as it evolved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Sup pointed out the Colts offense of recent years had progressed quite a bit from when Arians was the QB coach. I have little confidence in Christensen and felt he should have been shown the door as quickly as Coyer, Caldwell or anyone else last year.

With the few videos that popped up on here and other sites, the formation motions are something the Colts rarely did under the Moore/Manning tenure. There were times in short yardage that they would shift out, but the shifts are big part of what Arians ran in Pittsburgh, but were rarely ran here.

If I had to bet the house I would say the offense will be closer to what Pitt ran than what Moore/Manning ran over the past decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't believe blocking schemes are as complex as the actual plays. Could be wrong though.

They are the most complicated part of the play.

A 9 route is a 9 route.

Here is a page from the 03 Patriots offensive playbook.

92protections03patriots.jpg

Just pick one position and notice the various assignments based on where the players are positioned.

Lower right hand corner. "Under Tim", Then imagine a cross blitz where the Will & Mike go to opposite side A gaps...

Pass protection is the first thing the team has to get straight or it is a long day for the QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Sup pointed out the Colts offense of recent years had progressed quite a bit from when Arians was the QB coach. I have little confidence in Christensen and felt he should have been shown the door as quickly as Coyer, Caldwell or anyone else last year.

With the few videos that popped up on here and other sites, the formation motions are something the Colts rarely did under the Moore/Manning tenure. There were times in short yardage that they would shift out, but the shifts are big part of what Arians ran in Pittsburgh, but were rarely ran here.

If I had to bet the house I would say the offense will be closer to what Pitt ran than what Moore/Manning ran over the past decade.

You know this franchise much better than I do, FJC.... but I'd only add this.... if Pagano, Arians and Grigson are fine with Christensen at the QB coach position, I suspect that's a very good sign. I don't think he'd be here if he was viewed as anything else than an asset.

Just my hunch.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Sup pointed out the Colts offense of recent years had progressed quite a bit from when Arians was the QB coach. I have little confidence in Christensen and felt he should have been shown the door as quickly as Coyer, Caldwell or anyone else last year.

I don't have very much confidence in him as the coordinator, but as a position coach, I have no problem with him. Not for now. Pagano and Arians could have brought in someone they wanted, I'm sure, but chose to keep him. Their vote of confidence makes me feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have very much confidence in him as the coordinator, but as a position coach, I have no problem with him. Not for now. Pagano and Arians could have brought in someone they wanted, I'm sure, but chose to keep him. Their vote of confidence makes me feel better.

You know this franchise much better than I do, FJC.... but I'd only add this.... if Pagano, Arians and Grigson are fine with Christensen at the QB coach position, I suspect that's a very good sign. I don't think he'd be here if he was viewed as anything else than an asset.

Just my hunch.....

Last year soured me on him period. I wasn't fond of him prior to that but last year he was easily as bad as Coyer & Caldwell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last year soured me on him period. I wasn't fond of him prior to that but last year he was easily as bad as Coyer & Caldwell.

Understood.....

A question...... was Christensen the QB coach last year? Or, was he the OC? Or, was it someone else? I thought he was the OC, and if he's willing to take a step back to just being the QB coach for the same team, that's pretty rare.

Normally, if a coach takes a step back, he does it with another team....

Just asking....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Understood.....

A question...... was Christensen the QB coach last year? Or, was he the OC? Or, was it someone else? I thought he was the OC, and if he's willing to take a step back to just being the QB coach for the same team, that's pretty rare.

Normally, if a coach takes a step back, he does it with another team....

Just asking....

He was the OC from 2009-2011, prior to that he was the Wide Receiver's coach since Dungy arrived. He was the OC Dungy's last year in Tampa, and was the QB coach in Tampa for a couple of years. I guess at this point it should be noted the offensive futility was the main reason Dungy was fired in Tampa to start with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was the OC from 2009-2011, prior to that he was the Wide Receiver's coach since Dungy arrived. He was the OC Dungy's last year in Tampa, and was the QB coach in Tampa for a couple of years. I guess at this point it should be noted the offensive futility was the main reason Dungy was fired in Tampa to start with.

Was Dungy just that loyal or did he always put the blame on himself?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was the OC from 2009-2011, prior to that he was the Wide Receiver's coach since Dungy arrived. He was the OC Dungy's last year in Tampa, and was the QB coach in Tampa for a couple of years. I guess at this point it should be noted the offensive futility was the main reason Dungy was fired in Tampa to start with.

The offense was bad because Shaun King was the quarterback. But that is a good connection; Christensen has been in charge of some bad offenses over the years.

Also, while Christensen did have the title in 2009, Tom Moore was still around daily, and was calling most of the plays. Word was that Christensen was calling only the red zone plays that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Dungy just that loyal or did he always put the blame on himself?

Dungy was very loyal, to a fault, I believe. Russ Purnell and Ron Meeks got a lot more rope than other coaches would have given. I think Meeks might have been fired after 2006 if not for the turnaround in the playoffs, but still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense was bad because Shaun King was the quarterback. But that is a good connection; Christensen has been in charge of some bad offenses over the years.

Also, while Christensen did have the title in 2009, Tom Moore was still around daily, and was calling most of the plays. Word was that Christensen was calling only the red zone plays that year.

This is true. Manning has raved about him, but he also spoke well of Caldwell. I don't know if that is him with his PC hat on, or sincere thoughts.

Dungy was very loyal, to a fault, I believe. Russ Purnell and Ron Meeks got a lot more rope than other coaches would have given. I think Meeks might have been fired after 2006 if not for the turnaround in the playoffs, but still.

I agree, I guess most coaches are like that. You hired the guy for the most part, you're likely friends with them and such.

Doesn't Arians run a simple offense?

Not exactly. The shifts get old, but it's about trying to catch the defense off guard. The Moore/Manning offense was more here is our offense, we do the following, we are going to be effective because we execute, where Arians will try to trick the defense more by shifting from formation to formation to try to get a mismatch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from the Steelers 2004 playbook. Arians was the WR coach at that point.

Another example of how blocking schemes change based on fronts.

steelers0439stretchtoss.jpg

FJC,

Do they sell old NFL playbooks on Amazon.com or something? I thought all franchises tightly locked down any unauthorized access to prevent another team's competitive advantage? Just Kidding!!! I know it's not a 2012 Playbook.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FJC,

Do they sell old NFL playbooks on Amazon.com or something? I thought all franchises tightly locked down any unauthorized access to prevent another team's competitive advantage? Just Kidding!!! I know it's not a 2012 Playbook.

I wish they did.

They do try to protect them for the most part, but some make it out and can be found in various places.

I have quite a few in pdf format... They can be rather interesting to look at.

Right now on ebay there is a Steelers playbook from the Green Bay Super Bowl, prep. That would likely be more relevant than the 04 book, but I'm sure it has some similar stuff in it as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our we going to simplify our offense for Luck so that he has a nice rookie year like Cam Newton and Andy Dalton did? Does anyone know if this is Arian's plan?

Personally, I think we can simplify things but at the same time we can give Luck a couple of plays to choose from at the line and pick which one he feels would work against the defense.

Tom James of the TribStar tweeted that coach Ariens said that Luck has about 90% of the offense down already. Maybe the offense is already simplified or Luck is absolutely brilliant. It took Dallas Clark nearly 2 years to grasp Tom Moore's offense and Luck has Areiens' offense down in a month with only a few days of practice.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FJC,

Do they sell old NFL playbooks on Amazon.com or something? I thought all franchises tightly locked down any unauthorized access to prevent another team's competitive advantage? Just Kidding!!! I know it's not a 2012 Playbook.

I wish they did.

They do try to protect them for the most part, but some make it out and can be found in various places.

I have quite a few in pdf format... They can be rather interesting to look at.

Right now on ebay there is a Steelers playbook from the Green Bay Super Bowl, prep. That would likely be more relevant than the 04 book, but I'm sure it has some similar stuff in it as well.

Granted, no NFL team can stop all copies of the playbook from leaving their facility, but more squads like Denver put all their playbook schemes on ipads now with a digital access key that can be periodically changed & erased permanently if necessary. Although, no metadata can be completely eliminated in scope either. At least digital copies cut down on ebay & Amazon sales I guess.

Assignments in gap control are nice to look at though. I agree 100%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Granted, no NFL team can stop all copies of the playbook from leaving their facility, but more squads like Denver put all their playbook schemes on ipads now with a digital access key that can be periodically changed & erased permanently if necessary. Although, no metadata can be completely eliminated in scope either. At least digital copies cut down on ebay & Amazon sales I guess.

Assignments in gap control are nice to look at though. I agree 100%.

Most of the stuff is traded back and fourth from people that have an interest in them.

The Ipads will cut down on some of it. Time will tell how much it eliminates it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our we going to simplify our offense for Luck so that he has a nice rookie year like Cam Newton and Andy Dalton did? Does anyone know if this is Arian's plan?

Personally, I think we can simplify things but at the same time we can give Luck a couple of plays to choose from at the line and pick which one he feels would work against the defense.

I dont think the offense will be simplified, more so I think Luck will be protected. What I mean by protected is the runnning game. I dont think Coach Pagano at least in year one will have game plans drawn up for Luck to thrown the Ball 30 + times like an Aaron Rogers or Drew Brees. I think 20 times a game and alot of runs to protect Luck and a young Offensive line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember how mad Rothlesburger was when Arians was shown the door in Pittsburgh?

That has to be a good sign for us.

I can't wait to see shouting matches on the side lines with Big Ben and Todd Haley. Fun Times.

I sure do Lollygager. Big Ben's body language spoke volumes about his displeasure over losing Arians as his OC without even saying a word. I hope having Arians in the INDY corner twice now is an exceptional omen for us too. Yup, there is destined to be some friction between Todd Haley & Big Ben. Pull up a chair, grab some popcorn, & enjoy the fireworks.

In fairness to Todd Haley though, he holds everybody accountable from rookies to seasoned veterans. That's the way it should be too. He demands improvement & attention to detail at all times on the field & I really like that i.e. a Championship mentality. Haley was a vital cog in the machine that took the Cardinals to the SB & nearly won the game as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dungy was very loyal, to a fault, I believe. Russ Purnell and Ron Meeks got a lot more rope than other coaches would have given. I think Meeks might have been fired after 2006 if not for the turnaround in the playoffs, but still.

with that said I would have taken Meeks over Coyer at least with the cover-2 defense in place.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m getting ready also I switched from 12 ounce beers to 16 ounces Lol 
    • Biggest takeaway from episode 3 -- the reason they left in the middle of the night was that the city of Baltimore was about to vote to force the Colts to stay through Eminent Domain.
    • Let us not forget that there are also other ways of acquiring Pro Bowl and All Pro players besides drafting them.   2018 - Pro Bowl TE Eric Ebron (free agent 2018) 2020 - All Pro DT DeForest Buckner (trade 2020); All Pro ST George Odom (UDFA 2018) 2021 - Pro Bowl DB Kenny Moore (free agent 2017); 2nd team All Pro ST Ashton Dulin (UDFA 2019) 2023 - Pro Bowl DT DeForest Buckner (again); Pro Bowl QB replacement Gardner Minshew (trade 2023)
    • Don’t know if it really says a lot about anything? I mean he’s neck and neck with Veach who’s won 3 Super Bowls in 7 seasons. Also, I’m not sure Veach should be credited with Mahomes - it was Dorsey who drafted him.    I do think a lack of star power has been a trademark of the Ballard era though. 
    • I ran across this analysis on Reddit showing Ballard having the second-lowest rate per year of drafting Pro Bowl players among NFL GMs with a tenure of at least five years. I was kind of surprised by it, but it fits the narrative of him putting together a solid team, but one that's mostly lacking in superstars. I hope this improves with the results of our promising 2023 and 2024 drafts.      The GMs Chris Ballard, Colts (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Quenton Nelson, Shaq Leonard, Jonathan Taylor (3) All-Pros per season: 0.4   Eric DeCosta, Ravens (5 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Justin Madubuike, Patrick Queen, Devin Duvernay, Kyle Hamilton (4) All-Pros per season: 0.8   Jon Robinson, Former Titans (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Jack Conklin, Derrick Henry, Kevin Byard, Jeffery Simmons, AJ Brown (5) All-Pros per season: 0.7   Brian Gutenkunst, Packers (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Jaire Alexander (1) All-Pros per season: 0.1   Brett Veach, Chiefs (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Patrick Mahomes (thank you u/darcys_beard), Mecole Hardman, Creed Humphrey, Trent McDuffie (3) All-Pros per season: 0.4   Brandon Beane, Bills (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Tre White, Matt Milano, Josh Allen, Wyatt Teller, Taron Johnson (5) All-Pros per season: 0.7   Jon Lynch, 49ers (7 seasons) All-Pros drafted: George Kittle, Fred Warner, Nick Bosa, Deebo Samuel, Brandon Aiyuk, Talanoa Hufanga (6) All-Pros per season: 0.9   Chris Grier, Dolphins (8 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Xavien Howard, Jakeem Grant, Minkah Fitzpatrick, Jason Sanders (4) All-Pros per season: 0.5   Jason Licht, Buccaneers (10 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Mike Evans, Chris Godwin, Devin White, Tristan Wirfs, Antoine Winfield Jr (5) All-Pros per season: 0.5   Les Snead, Rams (12 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Janoris Jenkins, Greg Zuerlein, Alec Ogletree, Aaron Donald, Todd Gurley, Pharoh Cooper, Cooper Kupp, Kyren Williams, Puka Nacua (9) All-Pros per season: 0.8   Howie Roseman, Eagles (14 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Brandon Graham, Jason Kelce, Fletcher Cox, Lane Johnson, Jordan Poyer, Carson Wentz, Jalen Hurts (7) All-Pros per season: 0.5   John Schneider, Seahawks (14 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Earl Thomas, Kam Chancellor, Richard Sherman, Bobby Wagner, Russell Wilson, Tyler Lockett, Michael Dickson, DK Metcalf (8) All-Pros per season: 0.6   Stephen Jones, Cowboys de facto (14 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Sean Lee, Dez Bryant, Tyron Smith, DeMarco Murray, Travis Frederick, Zack Martin, DeMarcus Lawrence, Byron Jones, Ezekiel Elliott, Dak Prescott, Leighton Vander Esch, Cee Dee Lamb, Trevon Diggs, Micah Parsons, DaRon Bland, Tyler Smith (16) All-Pros per season: 1.1   Kevin Colbert, Former Steelers (22 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Antwaan Randle-El, Troy Polamalu, Lawrence Timmons, LaMarr Woodley, Maurkice Pouncey, Antonio Brown, Cam Heyward, David DeCastro, Le'Veon Bell, TJ Watt, Diontae Johnson (11) All-Pros per season: 0.5   Mickey Loomis, Saints (22 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Jamaal Brown, Reggie Bush, Jahri Evans, Carl Nicks, Malcolm Jenkins, Thomas Morstead, Jimmy Graham, Cam Jordan, Terron Armstead, Michael Thomas, Alvin Kamara, Ryan Ramczyk, Trey Hendrickson (13) All-Pros per season: 0.6   Bill Belichick, Former Patriots (24 seasons) All-Pros drafted: Tom Brady, Richard Seymour, Asante Samuel, Dan Koppen, Vince Wilfork, Logan Mankins, Stephen Gostkowski, Matt Light, Jerod Mayo, Matthew Slater, Sebastian Vollmer, Devin McCourty, Rob Gronkowski, Marcus Cannon, Chandler Jones, Dont'a Hightower, Jamie Collins, Nate Ebner, Joe Thuney, Jake Bailey, Marcus Jones (21) All-Pros per season: 0.9
  • Members

    • Indeee

      Indeee 1,857

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,059

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moe

      Moe 611

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 21,127

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,909

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Waylon

      John Waylon 5,286

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Restinpeacesweetchloe

      Restinpeacesweetchloe 42,857

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • il vecchio

      il vecchio 134

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • BeanDiasucci

      BeanDiasucci 755

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 59

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...