Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Update: Tracking Colts releases at cutdown


CR91

Recommended Posts

Just now, Superman said:

 

My point was that even if he did ask to be released, he was under contract. I don't think they'd let a player they like leave just because he asked. 

 

And I don't think that's what happened.

I just remember Nyheim Hines I was confused why they let him go and then he came on out and said that he asked to be let go that's all, y'all be trying to win so many pointless battles in this forum it's not even funny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smonroe said:

 

Baker played well in the preseason - against backup QBs and WRs.  I thought the plan for Abraham was to be Kenny's backup.  Do we even have a slot corner to back him up now?

 

But I get it, this roster isn't going to be the one we see on opening day.

 

A dedicated nickel backup is a luxury we probably can't afford. He probably would have had to show the ability to play boundary to beat out one of the other guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boss7894 said:

I just remember Nyheim Hines I was confused why they let him go and then he came on out and said that he asked to be let go that's all, y'all be trying to win so many pointless battles in this forum it's not even funny

 

I don't know why you think I'm trying to win a battle. You asked a question, I responded sincerely. If it came across as snarky, that was not my intention. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I can’t see the Colts going with only three running backs.  Nor 10 OL and DL.  I think new additions will be coming on board.

 

Same. I think I had it at 9 and 9. I know Ballard loves his linemen, but we're thin at RB. I also think six WRs is overkill, and maybe that changes if Downs is ready by Week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goodson over Hull I'm not surprised by. Goodson outplayed Hull in preseason imo. He seemed WAY more explosive.

 

Ehlinger over Bean I don't really understand. Sam is what he is at this point, theres no real upside with him given his arm strength. Personally, I feel like it be better to keep Bean, as you can still run alot of the college style plays with QB designed runs, RPOs and option plays, without him having to throw the ball down the field all that much, but still sustain drives.

 

I definitely expect us to make ATLEAST 1 CB claim and 1 Safety claim, but I don't quite understand keeping 10 OL and 10 DL, while only keeping 5 CB off the bat. Whos to say the DBs we want to claim, even make it to us, and the guys we waived, get claimed. What then? We really roll into the season with 5 CBs? Not likely of course, but seems unnecessarily reckless.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Patrick Miller said:

Well, I see they waived bean. That’s a mistake in my opinion.

Only thing I can think is Sam knows the offense and AR goes to him for help.

 

I read on this board that Flacco doesn't like to help rookie QBs

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, NorthernColt said:

Goodson over Hull I'm not surprised by. Goodson outplayed Hull in preseason imo. He seemed WAY more explosive.

 

Ehlinger over Bean I don't really understand. Sam is what he is at this point, theres no real upside with him given his arm strength. Personally, I feel like it be better to keep Bean, as you can still run alot of the college style plays with QB designed runs, RPOs and option plays, without him having to throw the ball down the field all that much, but still sustain drives.

 

I definitely expect us to make ATLEAST 1 CB claim and 1 Safety claim, but I don't quite understand keeping 10 OL and 10 DL, while only keeping 5 CB off the bat. Whos to say the DBs we want to claim, even make it to us, and the guys we waived, get claimed. What then? We really roll into the season with 5 CBs? Not likely of course, but seems unnecessarily reckless.

Of the 10 on each side of the line, there are Bryan and Pinter that could be cut to make room for the CB and S you propose, both are expendable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way on Bean, I don't think that's a season-defining decision in any way. It's QB3, and keeping the established guy for now is defensible. But I think Bean did everything he needed to do, and I see more potential in him to be a good QB2 than I see in Ehlinger. 

 

I don't think it's a big deal. There are other decisions with these cuts that I don't like, also. I think Treadwell -- who I thought was a throwaway signing on the eve of camp -- outplayed Dulin, and I don't get it with Dulin to begin with. I don't understand keeping Taven Bryan. Etc. But I don't think any of these cuts are critically important to the team's chances. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glad to see we kept both Tucker and Pinter. a bit surprised with Evan Hull cut, otherwise, as I pretty much expected.

I'm pretty sure this isn't the end of cuts, with some signings coming soon. Should get most of these bubble players back on PS.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

Same. I think I had it at 9 and 9. I know Ballard loves his linemen, but we're thin at RB. I also think six WRs is overkill, and maybe that changes if Downs is ready by Week 1.

There was a suggested trade on Bleacher Report today for each team.  The one for the Colts was trading a seventh round pick to the Panthers for running back Miles Sanders reuniting him with Steichen and becoming JT’s backup.  He has a 7m cap hit.  27 years old.  And here we are with only three.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Creekside said:

 

What is the difference between being cut and being waved ?

 

Players who are not "vested veterans" are subject to waivers. That means other teams can submit a claim for that player, and rather than becoming a free agent, the team will assume that player's contract and he will be added to their roster. Players who clear waivers become free agents.

 

Players who are "vested veterans" are not subject to waivers. They are cut/released, rather than waived, and they become free agents immediately. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Superman said:

By the way on Bean, I don't think that's a season-defining decision in any way. It's QB3, and keeping the established guy for now is defensible. But I think Bean did everything he needed to do, and I see more potential in him to be a good QB2 than I see in Ehlinger. 

 

I don't think it's a big deal. There are other decisions with these cuts that I don't like, also. I think Treadwell -- who I thought was a throwaway signing on the eve of camp -- outplayed Dulin, and I don't get it with Dulin to begin with. I don't understand keeping Taven Bryan. Etc. But I don't think any of these cuts are critically important to the team's chances. 

I’m with you on Treadwell.  I thought he played well enough to beat him out on the offensive end.  Don’t remember seeing him on ST’s though?  That could have been the difference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, twfish said:

Btw don’t forget all the roster will likely change a fair bit over the next week.

Exactly.  Ballard and his crew are going through all the cuts and waiver wires.  I expect a few changes over the next week 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Superman said:

 

Players who are not "vested veterans" are subject to waivers. That means other teams can submit a claim for that player, and rather than becoming a free agent, the team will assume that player's contract and he will be added to their roster. Players who clear waivers become free agents.

 

Players who are "vested veterans" are not subject to waivers. They are cut/released, rather than waived, and they become free agents immediately. 

 

Thanks. I thought something like that, but some posters are using the term "cut" for some who were "waved". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MB-ColtsFan said:

I’m with you on Treadwell.  I thought he played well enough to beat him out on the offensive end.  Don’t remember seeing him on ST’s though?  That could have been the difference?

 

I definitely don't know anything about who played STs this preseason, or how they did. That could easily be the difference. But honestly, I think it was Dulin vs Treadwell, and this staff loves Dulin, so that was to be expected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Creekside said:

 

Thanks. I thought something like that, but some posters are using the term "cut" for some who were "waved". 

 

In most cases there's no practical difference from a fan standpoint. But yeah, it can get confusing. That's why the teams specify when they make the moves.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Superman said:

 

I definitely don't know anything about who played STs this preseason, or how they did. That could easily be the difference. But honestly, I think it was Dulin vs Treadwell, and this staff loves Dulin, so that was to be expected. 

Some club will reach out to Treadwell and offer him a spot for sure. Hoping Hull sneaks through,some teams may have concerns over his injury, Goodson has played very well and he played very well last season also, I expect a solid year from him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't get why everyone is so surprised the colts chose Sam over Bean. I understand the "upside" argument as Bean is fresh meat around the league and his ceiling is unknown and could be better than Sam....but by all accounts by the limited snaps Bean played and not knowing the full playbook as well as Sam does is why they chose to stick with consistency. *shrugs*. I never felt Sam would be cut unless one of those two rookies showed something absolutely off the charts in both the practice field, the game field, and meetings..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Happy2BeHere said:

I really don't get why everyone is so surprised the colts chose Sam over Bean. I understand the "upside" argument as Bean is fresh meat around the league and his ceiling is unknown and could be better than Sam....but by all accounts by the limited snaps Bean played and not knowing the full playbook as well as Sam does is why they chose to stick with consistency. *shrugs*. I never felt Sam would be cut unless one of those two rookies showed something absolutely off the charts in both the practice field, the game field, and meetings..

 

None of us knows what happened on the practice field or in meetings. But during games, Bean was very good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, CR91 said:

Only surprise to me are Baker and Bryan making the team, but I expect post cut moves


Season 7 Please GIF by The Office
 

Hopefully Baker doesn’t play any meaningful snaps besides special teams.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Solid84 said:

Honestly, sometimes it feels like guys have to come in here and play like super stars just to beat out the back-ups' back-ups.

I don’t know of many that have been cut down that went on to become superstars with other teams, but there may be a couple.  We all know Ballard likes his guys - for better or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree to  point, it depends upon what the demands are.  But Mannings should have the clout to influence, maybe not control, Arch's destiny (if he's going to be that good, we don't know that yet).  And in a way, I'm not sure the NFL FO would get in the way a lot as to not see one of its potential stars....in terms of play and name legacy...get ruined by a bad organization and out of the NFL in a short time.   I think the chances of your prognostication happening are decent.  It will be interesting.
    • I think the  Peyton would not  want him going to Indy. You would have the never ending comparisons and I believe that was part of Eli not wanting to play for the Chargers. I could be wrong but I believe they wanted him in the NFC. The bigger point is also that if it came to be that  the Colts had the pick when Manning was available. That would also be an indication that the Colts would be a dumpster fire and they would probably want no part of it.  Based on wins, losses, lack of play off success, FO office drama. I bet the Colts has lost some of it's value. Sure it is still worth billions but no doubt the shine is no longer there
    • No, and this is not news.  For a while, folks have been leaning on the Buckner trade as being a great (use of) pick.  But Buck was known as a very good NFL player already, which is not the same thing as using picks on college players you think should be good.  The college evaluation/valuation process has not been good.  That's pretty evident, IMO.
    • Easiest way to fix the Colts defense is to fire Gus Bradley. First it was Michael Lombardi (who I generally don't agree with) who said that Gus defense is simple and now even JJ Watt has said that he runs a defense that doesn't make adjustments for the opponent and defensives that that don't do that generally fail in the NFL. It's interesting to see two weeks in and more and more people are coming out and saying that " Bradley's system is ineffective."   It won't help us much this year but I do believe that Bradley's system is holding back the talent on the defense and him having favorites puts blinders on improving positions (Facyson).
    • When  it is his draft year, he will most likely be the number 1 pick if he continues to excel. There is not doubt in my mind that if the team that is picking is a complete dumpster fire. The Mannings will pull another Eli. They will have a lot of control and the team that is drafting him will have to give into the Manning's recommendations. Thats the way it should be. I always said Bryce Young would be a bust due to his body makeup. That being said, he is getting no help in Carolina and it basically looks like his career is over after only 2 years. This will not happen to Manning. I bet if  Manning's draft year next  was in 2025 and Carolina had the pick.  The Mannings would probably have a list of demands before even entertaining the thought of Manning going there and that is the way it should be. 
  • Members

    • Zoltan

      Zoltan 3,299

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • 1959Colts

      1959Colts 3,900

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Superman

      Superman 22,014

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Moosejawcolt

      Moosejawcolt 5,322

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • indyagent17

      indyagent17 1,966

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • JediXMan

      JediXMan 4,991

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • richard pallo

      richard pallo 9,409

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • RollerColt

      RollerColt 13,614

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Jason_

      Jason_ 2,331

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Colt.45

      Colt.45 2,486

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...