Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Was the Browns game or the Falcons game the bigger hurt?


chad72

Recommended Posts

Did a game where you showed up for 60 minutes but taken away from you by bad NFL officiating hurt more?

 

OR

 

Does a game where our players didn't play to their abilities and take it as seriously as we could have hurt us more down the home stretch towards the end of the season?

 

Browns game was earlier in the season while the Falcons game was much later in the season where we knew everything was in front of us and it was a lackluster effort by the OL, defense and offense overall. Granted, we didn't have Pittman for the Falcons game but we had the talent to match up with them if we played our A game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both. 

 

Falcons game we didn't look like we wanted it. Just a terrible game with the offseason on the line.

 

Browns game we had in our hand. We were the better team over 60 minutes, but turnovers and poor defense cost us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browns game because the Colts won it before the refs took it away with some very questionable calls.  The falcons game the Colts just got flat out beat.  You could say the samething about the Saints, Bengals, both Jags games, or Rams game for example.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JediXMan said:

Browns game because it was a extra conference game we could’ve had in the AFC tiebreaker scenarios.

This, and because the refs totally screwed us in that ame, especially at the end

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


You seriously think the Colts players didn’t take this game seriously?     
 

Are you serious?   
 

Im beginning to seriously wonder about you.     Dear God….   :facepalm:

 

My basis was this:

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/news/shane-steichen-gardner-minshew-colts-falcons-imploded

 

You know, it is a game, I don’t know if we approached it with the right urgency. 

 

These were Minshew's words. Why would he even suggest that or say that?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, chad72 said:

 

My basis was this:

 

https://www.si.com/nfl/colts/news/shane-steichen-gardner-minshew-colts-falcons-imploded

 

You know, it is a game, I don’t know if we approached it with the right urgency. 

 

These were Minshew's words. Why would he even suggest that or say that?


It was about the ATLANTA GAME WHERE THEY LOST 29-10.  

 

This isn’t about TONIGHTS GAME, the last game of the season, where they lost on practically the last play of the game.   Why would anyone compare the two?!?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NewColtsFan said:


It was about the ATLANTA GAME WHERE THEY LOST 29-10.  

 

This isn’t about TONIGHTS GAME, the last game of the season, where they lost on practically the last play of the game.   Why would anyone compare the two?!?   

 

Dude, wth are you talking about? I am just asking folks which of the 2 games (Browns or Falcons game, it is in the title of the thread, btw) probably hurts the most for the Colts when it was all said and done. Browns game was at the beginning of the season while the Falcons game, the standings were more crystal clear and should have had more urgency. It was the Falcons game I was referring to, for the lack or urgency.

 

I said nothing about the Texans game.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, chad72 said:

Did a game where you showed up for 60 minutes but taken away from you by bad NFL officiating hurt more?

 

OR

 

Does a game where our players didn't play to their abilities and take it as seriously as we could have hurt us more down the home stretch towards the end of the season?

 

Browns game was earlier in the season while the Falcons game was much later in the season where we knew everything was in front of us and it was a lackluster effort by the OL, defense and offense overall. Granted, we didn't have Pittman for the Falcons game but we had the talent to match up with them if we played our A game.

Falcons for sure

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Falcons and I know not one of the options but I want to include the Bengals as well. These were the games that playoff teams need to win. They showed us exactly what we were…an over achieving team. The Bengals game is where I felt this team would not make the playoffs and the Falcons game certainly confirmed it. It’s a bummer the season is over but for the first time since Luck was returning from injury, I’m excited about the future. I’m upbeat and not really concerned about what could have happened but agree it’s fun to discuss. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the Browns game goes, Steichen made plenty of his own mistakes, and repeated one last night.  As for the refs, we got an equal number of breaks in Baltimore, so that's a wash.

 

If you're a playoff team, you have to beat Atlanta.  We didn't even show up.  The Colts were bullied physically for 4 quarters.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The browns game hurt worse because they are an AFC team. And to add insult to injury, the refs were bad. So for everyone out there who don’t like to put blame on the refs for rigging games, tell me how that game didn’t hurt the colts winning the division this year? Or being in the playoffs? Because 1 game can cause you to miss the playoffs, or lose a playoff game ultimately losing your chance at a SB. Every call that is made weighs heavily on what happens with any said team in the league or in sports in general. Legalizing gambling has made this even worse. 
 

ultimately I think less rules is better for the game of football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Indianapolis-Colts-Fan said:

The browns game hurt worse because they are an AFC team. And to add insult to injury, the refs were bad. So for everyone out there who don’t like to put blame on the refs for rigging games, tell me how that game didn’t hurt the colts winning the division this year? Or being in the playoffs? Because 1 game can cause you to miss the playoffs, or lose a playoff game ultimately losing your chance at a SB. Every call that is made weighs heavily on what happens with any said team in the league or in sports in general. Legalizing gambling has made this even worse. 
 

ultimately I think less rules is better for the game of football. 

Refs can be incompetent and not mean they are rigging games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Indianapolis-Colts-Fan said:

ultimately I think less rules is better for the game of football. 


That’s an unrealistic statement to make. We will have every DB pulling every pass catcher down if they could get away with it and every defender like Kazee and Kareem Jackson spearing people and get away with it.

 

I do think the head ref needs to talk to the coaches and fellow refs to let them all know what areas they will focus on and be consistent with it throughout the game. I wonder to what extent it happens game after game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poor coaching cost us in both those games and not the Refs. So sick of people blaming the Refs for the Browns game. If we don’t give up that 3rd down we’re off the field. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, NewColtsFan said:


It was about the ATLANTA GAME WHERE THEY LOST 29-10.  

 

This isn’t about TONIGHTS GAME, the last game of the season, where they lost on practically the last play of the game.   Why would anyone compare the two?!?   

 

I understand that fans cope with losses differently. Some vent, some remain optimistic, some say they don't want to follow the team, some come to a forum to exchange thoughts, etc. This is a time to let folks cope how they can. Losing is disappointing, escpecially when the playoffs seemed minutes away.

 

I recommend letting people vent and share their tthoughts 

 

This message is for everyone, myself included.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If people want to * and moan about Steichen the Falcons game was a much better case for it, since in that game the players just didn't look prepared to play and win that game. That's more on Steichen than designing a great play and 2 players not being able to execute it the simplest of passes. 

 

So yeah... the Falcons game was one we should regret much more than this one vs the Texans. This one was a good game between two teams on the rise and one of them executed better and had better talent at QB. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Colts part in the podcast is from 9:50 til about 13:40, so it is a short listen. He said LT is a big question. Struggled at that position since Castanzo left. Raimann has not really panned out. Need the position to be solidified. Like the Oline man from Pitt and there is a belief that he can play LT. It could mean nothing but teams do draft for next years free agent market. I believe Raimann is up for a contract and could give the Colts some flexibility if Raimann wants huge money and/or if they don't really think he is he answer moving forward and Conclaves shows something. Let be honest,  Cosell could be totally opposite of what the Colts think of Raimann as a LT.  
    • Agree in that he may have used the incorrect words in trying to get his point across.   I would have to listen to it again but I believe he did say that the Colts have basically not found their starting LT.
    • Not unless they feel that one of the Oline men they drafted could develop into a LT. They used a 3rd a 4th on Oline this year and that is what they used on Raimann when they drafted. I am not saying Raimann is trash. Like I said, a lot of people on this forum and the media are high on him and Cosell is not.  He could be some where in the middle in how the Colts feel about them. If that is true, then  I would tend to believe that he has not cemented himself as the franchise LT moving forward.
    • If he said something like 'Raimann isn't a franchise LT, but he's serviceable,' I probably wouldn't bat an eye. If he said 'they could probably improve at LT because I'm not sure Raimann will hold up,' my ears would perk up a little, but that's still a defensible opinion. Saying he has not panned out is a different story. I interpret that as meaning he thinks Raimann has played poorly, which is objectively not true.   Like you said, we can disagree on a draft prospect, and only time will tell. If someone has doubts about how someone on the team will perform in the future, that's fair. But saying Raimann has not panned out is based on what we've already seen, and in this case, I think Cosell is just wrong.    Maybe I'm taking his comment too literally. I listened to the interview, it was just one line in a broader discussion, and maybe if he was going to clarify he'd state his position differently. 
    • We would have to pick pretty high to move on from Rainmann. That would mean a bad season and that isn’t happening.  I doubt they would pay a LT in FA. That’s too much money.
  • Members

    • Superman

      Superman 21,032

      Moderators
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • DynaMike

      DynaMike 162

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • NewColtsFan

      NewColtsFan 21,461

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • G8R

      G8R 54

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Snakeman

      Snakeman 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • TheNewGuy

      TheNewGuy 53

      New Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • John Hammonds

      John Hammonds 5,033

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Solid84

      Solid84 6,881

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • chad72

      chad72 18,384

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...