Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Conversations are moderated for civility. We ask that you please stay on topic. For more info, see our Community Guidelines ×
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

2023 Week#4, Rams @ Colts, Sunday, October 1st, 1:00PM EDT

NFLfan

By NFLfan
in Colts Game Day

 Share

Rams @ Colts  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Who wins?

  2. 2. How many sacks will the Colts have?

  3. 3. How many receiving yards will Puka Nacua have for the Rams?

    • Less than 50
      2
    • 50 to 100
      11
    • More than 100
      3
    • Who's Puka Nacua??
      2

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 10/01/2023 at 05:10 PM

Recommended Posts

NFLfan Ring of Honor

NFLfan

Posted
Posted

After a notable win at Baltimore last Sunday, your AFC South-leading Indianapolis Colts (2-1) return home to play the LA Rams (1-2) today.

 

 

Anthony Richardson is expected back at QB, but he will have two of his best offensive linemen out in this game. Ryan Kelly and Bernhard Raimann are out with concussions.  In addition, Nelson is questionable, as is DeForest Buckner who has not practiced this week with a back and groin injuries.

 

The Rams have not ruled anyone out but listed the following as Questionable:

Alaric Jackson, OL

Ben Skowronek, WR

Tyler Higbee, TE

John Johnson III, Safety

 

Detailed Injury Report for Colts and Rams

 

What are your thoughts on this game? Should the Colts have given Richardson another day to rest with the team facing Aaron Donald with two key Colts offensive linemen out? What has you excited or concerned about this game?

 

There is a good chance the Colts will be 3-1 after this game. Cheer your team on to win. Enjoy the game.  Good luck! :colts:

 

Note: This was supposed to post on 10/1/23. It posted early. Enjoy.

  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

CardiacColts
CardiacColts

I respectfully have to disagree with this perspective. These are invaluable reps for Richardson. Let him take his lumps. Let him learn. And let him develop.

stitches
stitches

Whatever the final score, this is invaluable experience for RIchardson. I can't understand the people who wanted Minshew in. What's the point? Are we winning the SB with Minshew? This is so pointless.

2006Coltsbestever
2006Coltsbestever

I really don't see how anyone can be bashing the team after this loss when most were saying it was over at halftime. We were down 23-0 and AR played like a Boss in the 4th Qtr. We lost to a good team

2006Coltsbestever Ring of Honor

2006Coltsbestever

Posted
Posted

I went:

 

1. Colts

2. More than 4

3. 50 to 100, I will say around 70.

 

Colts win 24-19. I really hope we win this game because at that point, the media people who predicted we would win 2 or 3 games will look really bad. There were a lot of them including our Bob Kravitz who predicted we would win 3. A win gives us 3 already! Greg Doyle even questioned if we were going to try win games because we looked so bad on paper. There are 3 posters in here that have constantly bashed this team badly where they stand out and have made fun of them, and I haven't seen them all week, I wonder why?

 

By the way I predicted we would win 8 on this site, I had us going 8-8-1 = .500, so I wasn't one of the one's that thought we would suck. So if I want to talk trash I have a right too. We are even winning without Taylor which is hilarious. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
2006Coltsbestever Ring of Honor

2006Coltsbestever

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I went:

 

1. Colts

2. More than 4

3. 50 to 100, I will say around 70.

 

Colts win 24-19. I really hope we win this game because at that point, the media people who predicted we would win 2 or 3 games will look really bad. There were a lot of them including our Bob Kravitz who predicted we would win 3. A win gives us 3 already! Greg Doyle even questioned if we were going to try win games because we looked so bad on paper. There are 3 posters in here that have constantly bashed this team badly where they stand out and have made fun of them, and I haven't seen them all week, I wonder why?

 

By the way I predicted we would win 8 on this site, I had us going 8-8-1 = .500, so I wasn't one of the one's that thought we would suck. So if I want to talk trash I have a right too. We are even winning without Taylor which is hilarious. 

I meant to vote 3 to 4, oh well happy homer simpson GIF.I voted more than 4. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardiacColts Practice Squad

CardiacColts

Posted
Posted

I’m looking forward to a pretty competitive game. I’m curious to see how Shane is going to use the tight ends to assist in pass blocking situations. Rookie LT vs AD definitely has me a bit nervous. 
 

I’m definitely one of the people who was overly optimistic going into this season. But at the end of the day, I just want to see Richardson finish a full football game injury free…

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NFLfan Ring of Honor

NFLfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I wrote a bonus question but those who responded to the first three questions were not able to respond to the bonus question. So, I removed it.

 

This was the question:

 

Considering the injuries to the OL, having rookie and veteran QBs, the Colts leading the division, and other factors, who would you have preferred to start this game at QB?

 

A) Richardson

B) Minshew

C) Someone else...It is a long season. We need to protect our top two QBs 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
shakedownstreet Hall of Famer

shakedownstreet

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

I wrote a bonus question but those who responded to the first three questions were not able to respond to the bonus question. So, I removed it.

 

This was the question:

 

Considering the injuries to the OL, having rookie and veteran QBs, the Colts leading the division, and other factors, who would you have preferred to start this game at QB?

 

A) Richardson

B) Minshew

C) Someone else...It is a long season. We need to protect our top two QBs 

 

 

yer nutz man. AR is our starter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
VikingsFanInChennai Ring of Honor

VikingsFanInChennai

Posted
Posted
On 9/30/2023 at 8:29 PM, 2006Coltsbestever said:

I went:

 

1. Colts

2. More than 4

3. 50 to 100, I will say around 70.

 

Colts win 24-19. I really hope we win this game because at that point, the media people who predicted we would win 2 or 3 games will look really bad. There were a lot of them including our Bob Kravitz who predicted we would win 3. A win gives us 3 already! Greg Doyle even questioned if we were going to try win games because we looked so bad on paper. There are 3 posters in here that have constantly bashed this team badly where they stand out and have made fun of them, and I haven't seen them all week, I wonder why?

 

By the way I predicted we would win 8 on this site, I had us going 8-8-1 = .500, so I wasn't one of the one's that thought we would suck. So if I want to talk trash I have a right too. We are even winning without Taylor which is hilarious. 

Nacua gets 15+ targets every week so more than 100 yards... easy.

 

But Colts win and gets huge sacks

Link to comment
Share on other sites
GoColts8818 Ring of Honor

GoColts8818

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, NFLfan said:

I wrote a bonus question but those who responded to the first three questions were not able to respond to the bonus question. So, I removed it.

 

This was the question:

 

Considering the injuries to the OL, having rookie and veteran QBs, the Colts leading the division, and other factors, who would you have preferred to start this game at QB?

 

A) Richardson

B) Minshew

C) Someone else...It is a long season. We need to protect our top two QBs 

 

If you ever have to seriously consider not starting your starter if healthy and available you don’t have a starter.

 

Yes I know people are banged up but Richardson is the starter and starters play in the NFL regardless of injuries around them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
NFLfan Ring of Honor

NFLfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, GoColts8818 said:

If you ever have to seriously consider not starting your starter if healthy and available you don’t have a starter.

 

Yes I know people are banged up but Richardson is the starter and starters play in the NFL regardless of injuries around them.

 

I'm just wondering what the fan base is thinking. At the beginning of the year, some here said that the team should start Minshew and let this be a redshirt year for Richardson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
NFLfan Ring of Honor

NFLfan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, smittywerb said:


 

I like this.  Hopefully this means him and Pittman have been getting some chemistry going.  Let’s see some deep balls today

Missed last week, here today.  #ForTheShoe

 

Be sure to vote. You and others have 6 minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • KB
      Potential/Average/Concern

      By KB · Posted

      Im on the kther side of the state, but I reside over in Sumner/ Lake Tapps area. This state, and the Pacific North West in general, is very beautiful. A good view of Mt Ranier can make most bad days good.   Its $600K minimum for a decent starter home around here. Anything less needs major work, or it is in a not desirable area. The not desirable area ones are still $500K.
    • gspdx
      Potential/Average/Concern

      By gspdx · Posted

      Well,  Washington is actually a pretty awesome state.  It really has it all.  I know people have issues with politics,  but if you are into hiking,  hunting,  camping,  fishing, skiing (water and snow) and many other outdoor activities,  this place has it all.  Plus in two hours I can be in NW Montana.  And I chose Spokane to live because homes are more expensive in the parts of Montana where my wife would live (gotta have an airport).
    • lester
      Potential/Average/Concern

      By lester · Posted

      Spokane is a really, really nice city. Its in the wrong state.
    • gspdx
      Potential/Average/Concern

      By gspdx · Posted

      I live in Spokane Washington,  25 miles from the Idaho border. 
    • 2006Coltsbestever
      Potential/Average/Concern

      By 2006Coltsbestever · Posted

      In Indiana you can get a real nice 3 bedroom, 2 full bathrooms/showers/nice Kitchen/big living room house for 200,000 in a decent neighborhood. Where do you live NY or Cali , in one of the those states I guess it would be about 600,000 to afford anything like I talked about. I could never live in either of those states. If someone in NY moved here, they would be rich. 

  • Members

    • IndyEV

      IndyEV 97

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ColtStrong2013

      ColtStrong2013 3,573

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • ponyboy

      ponyboy 127

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • KB

      KB 1,152

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • krunk

      krunk 8,442

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Cujo54

      Cujo54 0

      Rookie
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • CR91

      CR91 12,890

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • MikeCurtis

      MikeCurtis 4,690

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • Shepman

      Shepman 402

      Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
    • shasta519

      shasta519 5,330

      Senior Member
      Joined:
      Last active:
×
×
  • Create New...