Jump to content
Indianapolis Colts
Indianapolis Colts Fan Forum

Colts have 4th pick (Official Discussion Thread)


danlhart87

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 16.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
15 minutes ago, richard pallo said:

I think if you were in Ballard’s or Irsay’s shoe’s right now you wouldn’t be waiting until 2024.

I think diehard fans would understand the big picture if I were trading down, acquiring extra 2024 1sts, and still landing a very talented player at a position of need with someone like Christian Gonzalez at corner later in round 1. Again this is only what I would do as owner since I can’t be fired. And only if Stroud doesn’t declare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BProland85 said:

I think diehard fans would understand the big picture if I were trading down, acquiring extra 2024 1sts, and still landing a very talented player at a position of need with someone like Christian Gonzalez at corner later in round 1. Again this is only what I would do as owner since I can’t be fired. And only if Stroud doesn’t declare. 

No I don’t think fans will. That’s how bad it was this year. It’s why I don’t want Richardson. He needs to sit and I can’t stand another retread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Moosejawcolt said:

I called nonsense. If he waits next year, he has no idea where he will go. His draft stock  could plummet and he  loses millions.  My  guess is that his stock is not as high as he thinks and he is graded as a late 1st round pick if that.

If Stroud declares he will go top 10 possibly even top 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, danlhart87 said:

He's 4th on QBs I want in this draft. It would be terrible if he stayed because the price to trade up for Levis or Young would increase and Bears would want 3 1s etc.

Trading up for ANY of these 3-4 QBs is beyond stupid. Sorry. But it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

No I don’t think fans will. That’s how bad it was this year. It’s why I don’t want Richardson. He needs to sit and I can’t stand another retread.

Sometimes things just don’t work out. I don’t know how old you are or how long you’ve been a fan, but let me tell you being Colts fan as a kid in the 90s was so bad people would practically point and laugh in Bengals and Bears territory. 
 

We can’t really go into next season with high expectations. In fact, I wouldn’t be shocked if our record ends up being the same or worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

Sometimes things just don’t work out. I don’t know how old you are or how long you’ve been a fan, but let me tell you being Colts fan as a kid in the 90s was so bad people would practically point and laugh in Bengals and Bears territory. 
 

We can’t really go into next season with high expectations. In fact, I wouldn’t be shocked if our record ends up being the same or worse. 

If saturday is the coach I expect worse and depending on who our qb is I expect worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

This is a very good point. That would Levis or Richardson.

 

 

I wouldn’t count on that. Someone could move up to one and Levis and young  both gone by 4.

Richardson might be the best pure athlete in the draft. He's basically a bigger, stronger version of Lamar, but without the accuracy. Some scouting types attribute his poor accuracy to mechanics. If that's true then it's the type of thing that can be corrected through coaching, so he could wind up being quite the steal. Or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

Sometimes things just don’t work out. I don’t know how old you are or how long you’ve been a fan, but let me tell you being Colts fan as a kid in the 90s was so bad people would practically point and laugh in Bengals and Bears territory. 
 

We can’t really go into next season with high expectations. In fact, I wouldn’t be shocked if our record ends up being the same or worse. 

I don’t care what the record is if it’s a rookie starting. I am fine with that. I can’t stand to sit and watch a retread again. Richardson will not be ready to start. The other three I feel could start without getting overwhelmed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I don’t care what the record is if it’s a rookie starting. I am fine with that. I can’t stand to sit and watch a retread again. Richardson will not be ready to start. The other three I feel could start without getting overwhelmed. 

Richardson could start but he would have to rely on legs til his passing improved

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I don’t care what the record is if it’s a rookie starting. I am fine with that. I can’t stand to sit and watch a retread again. Richardson will not be ready to start. The other three I feel could start without getting overwhelmed. 

If you don't care about the record why cant Richardson start?     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I feel he would be overwhelmed unlike the other 3.

Who cares?    You said you dont care about the record.   You do realize all these QB's are going to srtuggle in a HUGE way. SO you better prepare for 2-3 yrs of bad records and missing the playoffs.     

 

None of these QB's are Andrew Luck. Or Burrow or Lawrence or Mahomes. etc     They may turn out to be a Daniel Jones in a few years.  

 

And there will be a vet QB and they could start the season as the starter

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ChuggaBeer said:

Who cares?    You said you dont care about the record.   You do realize all these QB's are going to srtuggle in a HUGE way. SO you better prepare for 2-3 yrs of bad records and missing the playoffs.     

 

None of these QB's are Andrew Luck. Or Burrow or Lawrence or Mahomes. etc     They may turn out to be a Daniel Jones in a few years.  

 

And there will be a vet QB and they could start the season as the starter

 

We’re going to have to get some high caliber talent to surround the QB if we want to be competitive right away. That requires aggression during the off-season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ChuggaBeer said:

Who cares?    You said you dont care about the record.   You do realize all these QB's are going to srtuggle in a HUGE way. SO you better prepare for 2-3 yrs of bad records and missing the playoffs.     

 

None of these QB's are Andrew Luck. Or Burrow or Lawrence or Mahomes. etc     They may turn out to be a Daniel Jones in a few years.  

 

And there will be a vet QB and they could start the season as the starter

 

I wasn’t talking just about the record. I was talking about it killing his career with how little he had played. Young and stroud have played in enough games and big games I don’t  worry  their confidence if they lose.  Levis is 24. He isn’t going to have his confidence Killed going through rookie struggles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RollerColt said:

We’re going to have to get some high caliber talent to surround the QB if we want to be competitive right away. That requires aggression during the off-season.

It will all depend on who the HC is.  IMO that is the most important aspect.   Indy already has difficulty attracting big time FA's and will have even more with a rookie QB until they prove themselves.    Which means we are most likely going to  struggle for a few yrs and many on here (and you know who you are) will * and panic constantly while this happens.   

 

I'm fine with some down yrs to develop a QB.    Not sure some on here will be that patient 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RollerColt said:

We’re going to have to get some high caliber talent to surround the QB if we want to be competitive right away. That requires aggression during the off-season.

I don’t even care about that. I assume we will have rookie struggles. I just don’t think Richardson I had played enough to handle that well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I feel he would be overwhelmed unlike the other 3.

It's my understanding that he has an extremely good hard-working ethic and when it comes to making a bad play, he has that 'good' kind of amnesia about it and doesn't let it get to him.

 

However, I have yet to hear anything in depth about how good or quick he is at processing information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

I don’t even care about that. I assume we will have rookie struggles. I just don’t think Richardson I had played enough to handle that well.

Who is to say Richardson hasnt already been working to fix mechanics already like the reports of Levis working with the guy who helped Allen and many others fix their mechanics. Fact is with the right oc we could win with richardson right away because him and taylor in the back field would cause extra focus on the run which would open up the pass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Pelt said:

It's my understanding that he has an extremely good hard-working ethic and when it comes to making a bad play, he has that 'good' kind of amnesia about it and doesn't let it get to him.

 

However, I have yet to hear anything in depth about how good or quick he is at processing information.

I think his interviews and background information on him is going to be very important. I just assume he is going to test well athletically.  I like what I see on take if that can be developed. I would just like someone a little farther along so we don’t have to watch a vet again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stephen said:

Who is to say Richardson hasnt already been working to fix mechanics already like the reports of Levis working with the guy who helped Allen and many others fix their mechanics. Fact is with the right oc we could win with richardson right away because him and taylor in the back field would cause extra focus on the run which would open up the pass

For me it’s just how little he has played. Not really if he is working on things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

Excuse my naivety which stems from not being super familiar with college football rules. But if Stroud has another year of eligibility, why has every single person ( not just on this forum) been saying he is coming out and will be a top 5 pick. You know what they say about assuming something..............

Stroud would be smart to come out now. If he goes back he may be the third or fourth qb taken as next year draft is stacked

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stephen said:

Who is to say Richardson hasnt already been working to fix mechanics already like the reports of Levis working with the guy who helped Allen and many others fix their mechanics. Fact is with the right oc we could win with richardson right away because him and taylor in the back field would cause extra focus on the run which would open up the pass

how about we don't draft a QB who can't throw the ball.

 

that sounds like a plan to me.

 

QB job - throw ball

 

I'd like a QB with throwing mechanics that don't need to be overhauled. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, masterlock said:

Richardson might be the best pure athlete in the draft. He's basically a bigger, stronger version of Lamar, but without the accuracy. Some scouting types attribute his poor accuracy to mechanics. If that's true then it's the type of thing that can be corrected through coaching, so he could wind up being quite the steal. Or not.

 

 Lamar with his accuracy. 

  I would love a trade back that got us Richardson. Two trade backs would be even better.  :applause:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Restinpeacesweetchloe said:

No I don’t think fans will. That’s how bad it was this year. It’s why I don’t want Richardson. He needs to sit and I can’t stand another retread.

All of these QBs this year will likely need 2-4 years to round into any type of shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, throwing BBZ said:

 

 Lamar with his accuracy. 

  I would love a trade back that got us Richardson. Two trade backs would be even better.  :applause:

I would love that too. But the Raiders are just a few spots behind us. As are the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, New Zealands #1 Colts Fan said:

Excuse my naivety which stems from not being super familiar with college football rules. But if Stroud has another year of eligibility, why has every single person ( not just on this forum) been saying he is coming out and will be a top 5 pick. You know what they say about assuming something..............

It would be a shock if he doesnt declare. When your going to most likely be a top five pick it would not be very smart. Then add the QB class next year.

 

I feel he would of announced it already if he was coming back. So hopefully that means he is coming off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stephen said:

Stroud would be smart to come out now. If he goes back he may be the third or fourth qb taken as next year draft is stacked

Which is why I think we trade back, Grab our LT of the future in round one.  Grab the best remaining QB in round 2. If it works out, great if it doesn’t, high draft pick in 2024 in a QB stacked draft

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Thread of the Week

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re right. You have every right to have your opinion.    Odds are stacked in favor of failure more than success in the NFL. Sustained winning is hard. Avoiding injuries is hard nowadays for QBs… More than likely due to the odds the Colts will be continuing to search for a QB in the future.    It is what it is. 
    • I’m sorry you feel this way. I’ve struggled with it in the past. I’ve made a post a few weeks back but it bears repeating:   I used to get irrationally angry watching Colts games. It was bad. It was violent. Looking back, it was embarrassing.   What finally changed for me was seeing the look of fear in my little children’s eyes staring up at me with tears. It… washed away my cares for the Colts. That probably sounds bad, but I no longer care as much about what happens with the team. It was one my entire persona. It was as if my own personal happiness stemmed from the team’s success.    All I can tell you is that at some point you’ll learn to separate the Colts from your personal identify.    There are other things truly more worthy of your worries and stress than a football team. I promise you.    Be well and cherish life. I recently lost a great friend in NC due to the horrible flooding. Life is too short to waste it away fretting over the Colts. 
    • I had to start a thread on this that some people may feel is stupid, but it's something that Colts fans go through every year more than most teams it seems. How can you, as a Colts fan, watch week after week, without letting it bother you that so many top players seem to be out every week for us? I couldn't even care to watch last year knowing AR was out most of the year and that Minshew was our QB, yet he wouldn't either be on the team or the starter when AR returned. We had the same issues with Luck a lot, AR is injury prone early in his career, and Taylor is missing time too.    I just can't have fun knowing Taylor is out this week. It hurts as a Colts fan, it hurts as a fantasy player who owns him, it just lowers any level of interest I have when he is the one that is holding this offense together. How is AR supposed to develop when his RB is out like this? All the players that are out seem to be important players like Moore, Paye, Taylor, Ekubam and Brents for the year, and of course whenever we try to run it with AR, he gets hurt.   I just don't see how Colts fans can continuously stay interested when we seem to get the worst injuries to the most important players. Please help me with this. Maybe you guys have a viewpoint that can help me. I'm just so over the injuries that seem to happen to our top players every year, and we don't have a chance to compete or develop anyone. Ruins my fan experience.   Thanks.
    • Just reading through the comment there is a lot of bickering.    Honestly any completely unbiased opinion/viewpoint with an understanding of football would say the sample size is not near big enough to make any fair determination of what AR is. However what we have seen thus far health and play on the field is not good, not good at all. By all metrics the only QB worse is Bryce Young.   There solved it
    • Well, I'm probably not paying attention to the game Sunday with Taylor out. Besides a small start last week from Richardson, Taylor generally has to carry AR in these games in order to sustain drives. Don't see it happening with Goodson/Sermon. Not only that, it's not even fun in bestballs I have Taylor in where he's out because I can't score points with Taylor. It makes us worse in reality, and it makes my teams much worse.   Lose/Lose. 
  • Members

×
×
  • Create New...